UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-139

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

 

APPEALS-SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 08-0738/NA.  U.S. v. Dennis A. THOMAS.  CCA 200700858.  On further consideration of the granted issue, 67 M.J. 187 (C.A.A.F. 2008), and the briefs submitted by the parties, we note that the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed a finding of guilty of communicating indecent language under the sole specification of Additional Charge III.  We also note that the staff judge advocate’s recommendation and the court-martial promulgating order erroneously listed the offense as an attempted communication of indecent language, and the convening authority approved the sentence as adjudged without addressing the findings.

Under Article 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 866(c) (2000), the Court of Criminal Appeals may act only with respect to the findings as approved by the convening authority.  Under these circumstances, we conclude that, in affirming a finding of guilty of communicating indecent language, the Court of Criminal Appeals exceeded its authority.  See United States v. Diaz, 40 M.J. 335 (C.A.A.F. 1994).

Accordingly, it is ordered that the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed as to Additional Charge III and its sole specification and as to sentence.  The finding of guilty of communicating indecent language under Additional Charge III is set aside and a finding of guilty of attempted communication of indecent language is hereby affirmed under Article 80, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 880 (2000).  The remaining findings are affirmed.  The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy for remand to the Court of Criminal Appeals for reassessment of the sentence in light of the amended findings.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0048/NA.  U.S. v. Bryan K. LEDBETTER.  CCA 200500009.

No. 09-0131/AF.  U.S. v. Rhonda C. MCDANIEL.  CCA 36906.

No. 09-0208/AF.  U.S. v. Brandon N. WILLIAMS.  CCA 37014.

No. 09-0256/MC.  U.S. v. James D. POMEROY.  CCA 200700923.

No. 09-0282/AF.  U.S. v. Garry E. KING.  CCA 37134.

No. 09-0297/AR.  U.S. v. Terry A. CORBIN, Jr.  CCA 20080373.

No. 09-0321/AR.  U.S. v. Sean R. COVELL.  CCA 20080183.

No. 09-0329/AF.  U.S. v. Kenny L. GIBSON.  CCA S31436.

No. 09-0333/AF.  U.S. v. Nicholas J. DAVIES.  CCA 37187.

No. 09-0335/AR.  U.S. v. Shane M. CHARTIER.  CCA 20080757.

No. 09-0341/AR.  U.S. v. Jose A. FARFAN.  CCA 20070467.

No. 09-0344/AF.  U.S. v. Derrell J. COAKLEY.  CCA S31485.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0506/AR.  U.S. v. Jessie GARZA, Jr.  CCA 20081055.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 08-0746/MC.  U.S. v. Joseph P. SCHWEITZER.  CCA 200000755.  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for leave to file a C.A.A.F. R. 24 (b) and (c) non-compliant brief, it is ordered that said motion is hereby denied, and that Appellant will file a brief in compliance with the Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, on or before April 7, 2009.*

____________________


*  Chief Judge Andrew S. Effron, Judge James E. Baker, and Judge Margaret A. Ryan have recused themselves from this case and did not participate in this order.  Senior Judge Robinson O. Everett, Senior Judge Walter T. Cox III, and Senior Judge H. F. “Sparky” Gierke have been called upon by Acting Chief Judge Charles E. “Chip” Erdmann and consented to participate in this case pursuant to Article 142(e)(1)(A)(iii), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 942(e)(1)(A)(iii) (2000).



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-138

Monday, March 30, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 08-0720/AF.  U.S. v. Mohamed M. MOHAMED.  CCA 36421.*

No. 09-0500/CG.  U.S. v. Christopher E. HUPP.  CCA 1284.

No. 09-0501/AF.  U.S. v. Andrew COLLINS.  CCA S31505.

No. 09-0502/AF.  U.S. v. Kristy K. BARRETT.  CCA S31464.

No. 09-0503/AR.  U.S. v. David J. LEWIS.  CCA 20080487.

No. 09-0504/MC.  U.S. v. Robert J. FLORES.  CCA 200800742.

No. 09-0505/MC.  U.S. v. Denise M. BERKLEY.  CCA 200800649.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0262/AF.  U.S. v. David J. E. FLATT.  CCA S31440.  Appellee's motion to file a 10-day letter out of time in reply to Appellant’s supplement is denied.

 

No. 09-8018/NA.  Michael C. DIPAOLA, Petitioner v. United States, Respondent.  CCA 200602442.

Respondent's motion to extend time to file a response to Court's order granted, up to and including April 6, 2009.

 

No. 09-8020/AF.  Ronald J. WEBB, Jr., Appellant v. Major General Stephen L. Hogg, USAFWC/CC, General Court-Martial Convening Authority, Nellis AFB, NV, and Colonel Howard D. Belote, 99ABW/CC, Special Court-Martial Convening Authority, Nellis AFB, NV, and Colonel David S. Castro, HQ AF/JATW, Military Judge, Appellees. On consideration of Appellant’s motion to stay proceedings, it is ordered that said motion is hereby granted pending further order of the Court regarding the writ-appeal petition.

____________________

 

*  Second petition filed in this case.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-137

Friday, March 27, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0196/AR.  U.S. v. Jeffrey R. HOUSE.  CCA 20080258.

No. 09-0368/AF.  U.S. v. Yuski HONG.  CCA S31483.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0488/AR.  U.S. v. Justin W. GREEN.  CCA 20080388.

No. 09-0489/AF.  U.S. v. Danial A. BEADLE.  CCA 37225.

No. 09-0490/AF.  U.S. v. Anesha C. JENNINGS.  CCA S31447.

No. 09-0491/AF.  U.S. v. Brandon A. BROWN.  CCA S31514.

No. 09-0492/AF.  U.S. v. Robert L. CAMNETAR.  CCA 36448.

No. 09-0493/AF.  U.S. v. Joshua P. CLELAN.  CCA 37150.

No. 09-0494/AF.  U.S. v. Michael L. ENNIS.  CCA S31415.

No. 09-0495/AR.  U.S. v. Charlette D. JOHNSON.  CCA 20060575.

No. 09-0496/AR.  U.S. v. David L. FRANK, Jr.  CCA 20080316.

No. 09-0497/AR.  U.S. v. Maurice DOAN, II.  CCA 20080606.

No. 09-0498/AR.  U.S. v. Michael J. ANDERSEN.  CCA 20071006.

No. 09-0499/AR.  U.S. v. Daniel J. YOUNG.  CCA 20080738.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 08-0746/MC.  U.S. v. Joseph P. SCHWEITZER.  CCA 200000755.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file a joint appendix granted, but only up to and including April 6, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.*

 

No. 08-0770/MC.  U.S. v. Richard J. ASHBY.  CCA 200000250.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file a brief and joint appendix granted, but only up to and including April 6, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.*

 

No. 09-0415/AR.  U.S. v. Michael A. RODRIGUEZ.  CCA 20080515.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including April 10, 2009. 

 

No. 09-0416/AR.  U.S. v. Shane A. WILLIAMS.  CCA 20080471.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including April 10, 2009. 

 

No. 09-0417/AR.  U.S. v. Bryan E. HUFF.  CCA 20080671.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including April 10, 2009. 

 

No. 09-0418/AR.  U.S. v. Charles E. MCANGUS.  CCA 20070054.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including April 10, 2009. 

 

No. 09-0419/AR.  U.S. v. Orry R. JONES.  CCA 20080397.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including April 10, 2009. 

 

No. 09-0420/AR.  U.S. v. Gary D. FIELDS.  CCA 20080168.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including April 10, 2009. 

 

No. 09-0421/AR.  U.S. v. Jason L. HINSON.  CCA 20071140.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including April 10, 2009. 

 

No. 09-0422/AR.  U.S. v. Justin R. HARDIN.  CCA 20080812.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including April 10, 2009. 

____________________________

 
* Chief Judge Andrew S. Effron, Judge James E. Baker, and Judge Margaret A. Ryan have recused themselves from this case and did not participate in this order.  Senior Judge Robinson O. Everett, Senior Judge Walter T. Cox III, and Senior Judge H. F. “Sparky” Gierke have been called upon by Acting Chief Judge Charles E. “Chip” Erdmann and consented to participate in this case pursuant to Article 142(e)(1)(A)(iii), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 942(e)(1)(A)(iii) (2000).




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-136

Thursday, March 26, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0202/AF.  U.S. v. Tyler A. HARDEN.  CCA 37243.

No. 09-0222/AR.  U.S. v. Carlton D. JONES.  CCA 20080146.

No. 09-0254/AF.  U.S. v. Gregory E. EVANS.  CCA S31408.

No. 09-0260/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher M. URICH.  CCA 36823.

No. 09-0312/AR.  U.S. v. Kenneth M. KRATMAN.  CCA 2008542.

No. 09-0348/AF.  U.S. v. Ethan J. HAYES.  CCA 37216.

No. 09-0369/AF.  U.S. v. Erik C. PETERSEN.  CCA S31522.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0485/AR.  U.S. v. Trevor G. WALSH.  CCA 20080536.

No. 09-0486/AR.  U.S. v. Chester A. ORDENANA.  CCA 20080143.

No. 09-0487/AR.  U.S. v. Jonszshell D. AGNEWSIMMONS.  CCA 20080710.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 09-8020/AF.  Ronald J. WEBB, Jr., v. Major General Stephen L. Hogg, USAFWC/CC, General Court-Martial Convening Authority, Nellis AFB, NV, and Colonel Howard D. Belote, 99ABW/CC, Special Court-Martial Convening Authority, Nellis AFB, NV, and Colonel David S. Castro, HW AF/JATW, Military Judge, Appellees.  CCA 2009-01.  Notice is hereby given that a writ-appeal petition for review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals on application for extraordinary relief was filed under Rule 27(b) on this date.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-135

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0483/AR.  U.S. v. Michael B. WEBB, Jr.  CCA 20080799.

No. 09-0484/AR.  U.S. v. Brian JACKSON.  CCA 20080185.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0432/AR.  U.S. v. Charles A. GRANER, Jr.  CCA 20050054.  Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including May 4, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 09-8019/AR.  Joshua A. DIXON, Appellant v. F.L. Hagenbeck, Lieutenant General, U.S. Army Convening Authority, and Andrew J. Glass, Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army, Military Judge, and The United States, Appellees.  CCA 20090001.  Appellant's motion to file supplement to joint appendix granted.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-134

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 08-0621/AF.  U.S. v. Jessica L. MALLORY.  CCA S31245.  On consideration of Appellant’s Petition for Grant of Review, it appears that said petition is untimely.  See United States v. Rodriguez, 67 M.J. 110 (C.A.A.F. 2009).  Accordingly, it is ordered that Appellant show cause on or before April 3, 2009, why the Petition for Grant of Review should not be dismissed.  Appellee may file a reply no later than five days after the filing of Appellant’s answer to this order.

 

No. 08-0736/AR.  U.S. v. Jose M. GALDAMEZ-RAMIREZ.  CCA  20070916.  On consideration of Appellant’s Petition for Grant of Review, it appears that said petition is untimely.  See United States v. Rodriguez, 67 M.J. 110 (C.A.A.F. 2009).  Accordingly, it is ordered that Appellant show cause on or before April 3, 2009, why the Petition for Grant of Review should not be dismissed.  Appellee may file a reply no later than five days after the filing of Appellant’s answer to this order.

 

No. 08-0740/AR.  U.S. v. John L. TANNER.  CCA 20070453.  On consideration of Appellant’s Petition for Grant of Review, we note that the hand-written date on the Petition for Grant of Review suggests that the petition may have been timely filed despite the fact that it was received by the Court after the sixty-day filing period under Article 67(b)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. 867(b)(2) (2000).  However, the Court has no properly submitted facts upon which to determine whether the Petition for Grant of Review was timely filed by mail under C.A.A.F. R. 19(a)(3).  Accordingly, it is ordered that Appellant show cause on or before April 13, 2009, why Petition for Grant of Review should not be dismissed.  Appellee may file an answer to Appellant’s response within ten days of Appellant filing a response to the order to show cause.

 

No. 08-0769/AR.  U.S. v. Benjamin A. VISH.  CCA 20071196.  On consideration of Appellant’s Petition for Grant of Review, we note that the hand-written date on the Petition for Grant of Review suggests that the petition may have been timely filed despite the fact that it was received by the Court after the sixty-day filing period under Article 67(b)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. 867(b)(2) (2000).  However, the Court has no properly submitted facts upon which to determine whether the Petition for Grant of Review was timely filed by mail under C.A.A.F. R. 19(a)(3).  Accordingly, it is ordered that Appellant show cause on or before April 13, 2009, why Petition for Grant of Review should not be dismissed.  Appellee may file an answer to Appellant’s response within ten days of Appellant filing a response to the order to show cause.

 

No. 09-0017/AR.  U.S. v. Ira B. DAVIS. CCA 20061148.  On consideration of Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss Appellant’s Petition for Grant of Review for Lack of Jurisdiction and Appellant’s response thereto, we note that Appellant has appended his own declaration in support of his response to the motion to dismiss, but that declaration has not been properly submitted to the Court for attachment to the appellate record.  We also note that the date on Appellant’s Petition for Grant of Review suggests that the petition may have been timely filed despite the fact that it was received by the Court after the sixty-day filing period under Article 67(b)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. 867(b)(2) (2000).  However, the Court has no properly submitted facts upon which to determine whether the Petition for Grant of Review was timely filed by mail under C.A.A.F. R. 19(a)(3).  Accordingly, it is ordered that Appellant show cause on or before April 13, 2009, why the Petition for Grant of Review should not be dismissed.  Appellee may file an answer to Appellant’s response within ten days of Appellant filing a response to the order to show cause.

 

No. 09-00307/NA.  U.S. v. Josh R. RITTENHOUSE.  CCA 20050411.  On consideration of Appellant’s Petition for Grant of Review, it appears that said petition is untimely.  See United States v. Rodriguez, 67 M.J. 110 (C.A.A.F. 2009).  Accordingly, it is ordered that Appellant show cause on or before April 3, 2009, why the Petition for Grant of Review should not be dismissed.  Appellee may file a reply no later than five days after the filing of Appellant’s answer to this order.

 

No. 09-0032/NA.  U.S. v. Matthew W. MAZZA.  CCA 200400095.  Appellant's motion for leave to file brief and joint appendix out of time granted.

 

No. 09-0119/MC.  U.S. v. Marco A. BUSH.  CCA 200700137.  Appellant's motion for leave to file brief and joint appendix out of time granted.

 

No. 09-0121/AR.  U.S. v. Valerie L. EMERSON.  CCA 20080123.  On consideration of Appellant’s Petition for Grant of Review, it appears that said petition is untimely.  See United States v. Rodriguez, 67 M.J. 110 (C.A.A.F. 2009).  Accordingly, it is ordered that Appellant show cause on or before April 3, 2009, why the Petition for Grant of Review should not be dismissed.  Appellee may file a reply no later than five days after the filing of Appellant’s answer to this order.

 

No. 09-0236/AR.  U.S. v. Vincent QUESADA IV.  CCA 20060940.  On consideration of Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss Appellant’s Petition for Grant of Review for Lack of Jurisdiction, we note that the hand-written date on the Petition for Grant of Review suggests that the Petition may have been timely filed despite the fact that it was received by the Court after the sixty-day filing period under Article 67(b)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. 867(b)(2) (2000).  We also note that the date on the Petition for Grant of Review appears that it may have been altered.  However, the Court has no properly submitted facts upon which to determine whether the Petition for Grant of Review was timely filed by mail under C.A.A.F. R. 19(a)(3).  Accordingly, it is ordered that Appellant show cause on or before April 13, 2009, why the Petition for Grant of Review should not be dismissed.  Appellee may file an answer to Appellant’s response within ten days of Appellant filing a response to the order to show cause.

 

No. 09-0371/AR.  U.S. v. Dana L. DUNN.  CCA 2060370. On consideration of Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss Appellant’s Petition for Grant of Review for Lack of Jurisdiction, we note that the hand-written date on the Petition for Grant of Review suggests that the Petition may have been timely filed despite the fact that it was received by the Court after the sixty-day filing period under Article 67(b)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. 867(b)(2) (2000).  We also note that the date on the Petition for Grant of Review appears that it may have been altered.  However, the Court has no properly submitted facts upon which to determine whether the Petition for Grant of Review was timely filed by mail under C.A.A.F. R. 19(a)(3).  Accordingly, it is ordered that Appellant show cause on or before April 13, 2009, why the Petition for Grant of Review should not be dismissed.  Appellee may file an answer to Appellant’s response within ten days of Appellant filing a response to the order to show cause.

 

No. 09-0405/AR.  U.S. v. Joseph B. ALBA II.  CCA 20080549.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including April 7, 2009.

 

No. 09-0406/AR.  U.S. v. Michaella B. ADKINS.  CCA 20080599. Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including April 7, 2009.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-133

Monday, March 23, 2009

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0371/AR.  U.S. v. Dana L. DUNN.  CCA 20060370.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including April 2, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-132

Friday, March 20, 2009

 

NOTICE OF FILING

 

No. 09-5002/NA.  United States, Appellant v. Willie A. BRADLEY, Appellee.  CCA 200501089.

Notice is hereby given that a motion for enlargement of time to file a certificate for review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals was filed by Appellant under Rule 30 on this date.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0481/AR.  U.S. v. Jason E. PADEN.  CCA 20070556.

No. 09-0482/AF.  U.S. v. Andrew F. FOX.  CCA 37119.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-131

Thursday, March 19, 2009

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 08-0808/AR.  U.S. v. Derand M. DAVIS.  CCA 20070808.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER TRIAL DEFENSE COUNSEL PROVIDED, TO THE SUBSTANTIAL PREJUDICE OF APPELLANT, INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL IN THE POST-TRIAL PHASE WHEN HE, WITHOUT CONSULTING WITH APPELLANT, SUBMITTED MATTERS TO THE CONVENING AUTHORITY BUT FAILED TO SUBMIT APPELLANT'S PERSONAL STATEMENT.

 

The decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is set aside.  The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for remand to that court to obtain an affidavit from trial defense counsel that responds to Appellant’s allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel.  Under Article 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 866(c) (2000), the Court of Criminal Appeals shall review the granted issue in light of the affidavit and any other relevant matters.  See United States v. Ginn, 47 M.J. 236 (C.A.A.F. 1997).  Thereafter, Article 67, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 867 (2000), shall apply.

 

No. 09-0043/AR.  U.S. v. Neil S. LUBASKY.  CCA 20020924.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

WHETHER APPELLANT COMMITTED LARCENIES OF M.S.'S PROPERTY BY ENGAGING IN THE UNAUTHORIZED USE OF HER CREDIT, DEBIT, AND ATM CARDS.

 

WHETHER A VARIANCE AS TO OWNERSHIP IN LARCENY CASES IS FATAL IF THERE IS LEGALLY SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE THAT APPELLANT STILL COMMITTED A LARCENY OF PROPERTY.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0478/AR.  U.S. v. James L. NIELSEN.  CCA 20080149.

No. 09-0479/AR.  U.S. v. Jeremiah K. JOHNSON.  CCA 20070961.

No. 09-0480/AR.  U.S. v. Enrique O. HINTON.  CCA 20080451.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 09-8019/AR.  Joshua A. DIXON, Appellant, v. F.L. Hagenbeck, Lieutenant General, U.S. Army Convening Authority, and Andrew J. Glass, Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army, Military Judge, and The United States, Appellees.  CCA 20090001.

Notice is hereby given that a writ-appeal petition for review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals on application for extraordinary relief was filed under Rule 27(b) on this date.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0370/AR.  U.S. v. Janis M. GALL-MARTIN.  CCA 20051415.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including April 3, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 09-0390/CG.  U.S. v. Patrick P. CHEN.  CCA 1282.  Appellant's motion to file corrected page granted.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-130

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 08-0771/CG.  U.S. v. Lloyd E. VICKREY, Jr.  CCA 1274.

No. 09-0011/AR.  U.S. v. David L. CLEMENTS II.  CCA 20070541.

No. 09-0100/AR.  U.S. v. Marc B. WILLIAMS.  CCA 20070667.

No. 09-0226/AR.  U.S. v. Ernest SMALLS, Jr.  CCA 20071002.

No. 09-0307/AR.  U.S. v. Daniel L. BONAPARTE.  CCA 20080387.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0475/AF.  U.S. v. Nicholas A. CHIASSON.  CCA 37312.

No. 09-0476/AF.  U.S. v. Jeconiah A. YEHUDAH.  CCA 37244.

No. 09-0477/AR.  U.S. v. William P. BAKER Jr.  CCA 20080430.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 08-0072/AF.  U.S. v. Edward S. MACOMBER.  CCA 36693.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-129

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 08-0594/MC.  U.S. v. Darrel A. WESTON.  CCA 200600985.

No. 08-0805/MC.  U.S. v. Manasses A. PAIGE.  CCA 200600587.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0038/AF.  U.S. v. Justin N. LEDBETTER.  CCA 36727.

No. 09-0206/AF.  U.S. v. Steven M. MCINTYRE.  CCA S31286.

No. 09-0243/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher M. CARELAS.  CCA  2008441.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0471/AR.  U.S. v. Cody R. SMITH.  CCA 20080957.

No. 09-0472/AR.  U.S. v. Edgar L. OLIVA, Jr.  CCA 20080774.

No. 09-0473/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher L. MCNEILL.  CCA 20070709.

No. 09-0474/AR.  U.S. v. Patrick T. STEWART.  CCA 20070710.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 09-8018/NA.  Michael C. DIPAOLA, Petitioner v. United States, Respondent.  CCA 200602442.  Notice is hereby given that a petition for extraordinary relief was filed under Rule 27(a) on February 26, 2009, and placed on the docket this 17th day of March, 2009.  On consideration thereof, it is ordered that Respondent will file an answer to said petition on or before March 27, 2009, why the requested relief should not be granted.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0388/AR.  U.S. v. Daysha C. SMITH.  CCA 20071291.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including March 30, 2009.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-128

Monday, March 16, 2009

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 09-0185/AR.  U.S. v. Makisha I. MORTON.  CCA 20060458.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER, AFTER FINDING THE EVIDENCE FACTUALLY INSUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT A FINDING OF GUILTY TO THE ADDITIONAL CHARGE AND ITS SPECIFICATION (FORGERY), THE ARMY COURT ERRED IN FINDING APPELLANT GUILTY OF A LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE ON A THEORY NOT PRESENTED TO THE TRIER OF FACT.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0454/AR.  U.S. v. John D. WATRIN.  CCA 20080607.

No. 09-0455/AF.  U.S. v. John R. WILLIAMS.  CCA S31513.

No. 09-0456/AF.  U.S. v. Joseph K. WALKER Jr.  CCA S31491.

No. 09-0457/AF.  U.S. v. Logan W. WALDRIP.  CCA S31534.

No. 09-0458/AF.  U.S. v. James W. SUTTON.  CCA 37155.

No. 09-0459/AF.  U.S. v. George K. SPARKS.  CCA S31503.

No. 09-0460/AF.  U.S. v. Matthew M. REBSTOCK.  CCA S31488.

No. 09-0461/AF.  U.S. v. Latrice D. PAYNE.  CCA S31556.

No. 09-0462/AF.  U.S. v. Robert B. ONEILL III.  CCA S31582.

No. 09-0463/AF.  U.S. v. William A. MARTIN.  CCA S31461.

No. 09-0464/AF.  U.S. v. Joshua N. HELMAN.  CCA S31489.

No. 09-0465/AF.  U.S. v. Marciano A. ESPINOZA.  CCA 36944.

No. 09-0466/AF.  U.S. v. Adam D. DOUGLAS.  CCA S31059.

No. 09-0467/AF.  U.S. v. Thomas G. CARTER Jr.  CCA 37229.

No. 09-0468/AF.  U.S. v. Jose A. BORUNDA.  CCA S31425.

No. 09-0469/AR.  U.S. v. Tanika S. SPRUELL.  CCA 20080864.

No. 09-0470/NA.  U.S. v. Sheila P. DANIELS.  CCA 200800499.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0343/AR.  U.S. v. Rolando A. MAITLAND.  CCA 20080347.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including March 27, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-127

Friday, March 13, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0452/MC.  U.S. v. Jerry ANDERSON, Jr.  CCA 200800180.

No. 09-0453/MC.  U.S. v. Jack R. BROWN.  CCA 200800648.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0243/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher M. CARELAS.  CCA 20080441.  Appellee's motion to file a 10-day letter out of time in reply to Appellant’s supplement is denied.

 

No. 09-0300/AR.  U.S. v. John F. GRIMES.  CCA 20060361.  Appellant's motion to correct errata granted.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-126

Thursday, March 12, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0067/AR.  U.S. v. Broderick D. HARDEMAN.  CCA 20071277.

No. 09-0234/AR.  U.S. v. Robert J. WEISS.  CCA 20080442.

No. 09-0314/AR.  U.S. v. Marcus M. ROLLINS.  CCA 20060980.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 08-0158/AR.  U.S. v. Mark R. CONLIFFE.  CCA 20040721.*

No. 09-0450/MC.  U.S. v. Dwayne F. BAILEY.  CCA 200800692.

No. 09-0451/AR.  U.S. v. Fleming A. VALERIO.  CCA 20071037.

___________________

 

*  Second petition filed in this case.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-125

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 08-0719/CG.  U.S. v. Webster M. SMITH.  CCA 1275.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE VIOLATED APPELLANT'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO CONFRONT HIS ACCUSERS BY LIMITING HIS CROSS-EXAMINATION OF [SR], THE GOVERNMENT'S ONLY WITNESS, ON THREE OF THE FIVE CHARGES.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0096/AR.  U.S. v. Earl R. POLAN.  CCA 20080024.

No. 09-0213/AR.  U.S. v. Todd R. MARCHESANO.  CCA 20060388.

No. 09-0286/AF.  U.S. v. Chance W. SLAUGHTER.  CCA S31419.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 09-8014/NA.  Gary R. JACKSON, Appellant v. Colleen Glaser-Allen, Commander, Judge Advocate General’s Corps, U.S. Navy Military Judge, and Robert R. Rabuse, Captain, U.S. Navy Commanding Officer, U.S. Naval Support Activity, Naples, Italy, and The United States, Appellees.  CCA 200900100.  On consideration of the writ-appeal petition and Appellant’s motion for a stay of proceedings, said petition is hereby denied, and said motion is hereby denied as moot.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 07-0900/MC.  U.S. v. Carlos J. RODRIGUEZ.  CCA 9900997.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-124

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0041/NA.  U.S. v. Brandon J. KING.  CCA 200700342.

No. 09-0092/AF.  U.S. v. Nicole M. LOZANO.  CCA S31370.

No. 09-0103/AF.  U.S. v. Andrew L. BARKER.  CCA 37104.

No. 09-0109/AF.  U.S. v. Kevin J. MITCHELL.  CCA S31338.

No. 09-0122/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher D. COKLEY.  CCA S31430.

No. 09-0182/AF.  U.S. v. Cory M. MCGEE.  CCA S31256.

No. 09-0207/AF.  U.S. v. Micheal F. SEPPALA.  CCA S31267.

No. 09-0240/AF.  U.S. v. Wiley T. DE MAINTENON-PARKHURST.  CCA S31544.

No. 09-0241/AR.  U.S. v. Mariano GUTIERREZ, III.  CCA 20080685.

No. 09-0285/AF.  U.S. v. Steven M. LEES.  CCA S31363.

No. 09-0332/AF.  U.S. v. Adam J. MONTGOMERY.  CCA S31451.

No. 09-0367/AF.  U.S. v. Alexis ARTIS.  CCA S31480.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0448/AR.  U.S. v. Robert L. MCMILLIAN, Jr.  CCA  20071073.

No. 09-0449/AR.  U.S. v. Jeremy S. TERRY.  CCA 20080470.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 09-8016/NA.  United States v. Wayne TATUM.  Notice is hereby given that a writ-appeal petition under Rule 27(b) for review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals on application for extraordinary relief was filed by mail on December 15, 2008, and placed on the docket this 10th day of March, 2009.  On consideration thereof, said petition is hereby denied.

 

Misc. No. 09-8017/AF.  In re Andrew P. WITT.  Notice is hereby given that a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus was filed under Rule 27(a) on February 23, 2009, and placed on the docket this 10th day of March, 2009.  On consideration thereof, said petition is hereby denied.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 08-0808/AR.  U.S. v. Derand M. DAVIS.  CCA 20070808.  Appellant's motion to attach granted.

 

No. 09-0096/AR.  U.S. v. Earl R. POLAN.  CCA 20080024.  Appellee's motion to file a 10-day letter out of time in reply to Appellant’s supplement is denied.

 

No. 09-5001/MC.  U.S., Appellant v. Matthew T. BURK, Appellee.  CCA 200800146.  On consideration of Appellant’s motion for an enlargement of time to file a certificate for review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said motion is hereby granted, but only up to and including March 30, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-123

Monday, March 9, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0445/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher D. DREW.  CCA 37067.

No. 09-0446/NA.  U.S. v. Daniel J. CUTLER.  CCA 200800658.

No. 09-0447/AR.  U.S. v. Louis P. ROMERO.  CCA 20080584.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-122

Friday, March 6, 2009

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 07-0856/AR.  U.S. v. Dustin A. OWENS.  CCA 20070264.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby granted, and, the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 07-0856/AR.  U.S. v. Dustin A. OWENS.  CCA 20070264.  [See also APPEALS-SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0101/MC.  U.S. v. Joseph HENRY.  CCA 200800028.

No. 09-0115/AR.  U.S. v. Zerrin L. THERIOT.  CCA 20071417.

No. 09-0128/AR.  U.S. v. Anthony R. LUCERO.  CCA 20080325.

No. 09-0200/AF.  U.S. v. Simone M. DAWSON.  CCA 37203.

No. 09-0229/AR.  U.S. v. Antonio ROBLES-CHIRU.  CCA 20080460.

No. 09-0230/AF.  U.S. v. Garrett E. MCCORMICK.  CCA S31475.

No. 09-0266/AR.  U.S. v. Darshea M. MENDERS.  CCA 20080421.

No. 09-0272/AF.  U.S. v. Gilbert GERSON-MARTINEZ.  CCA 36927.

No. 09-0275/AF.  U.S. v. Eric J. HOPKINS.  CCA S31443.

No. 09-0283/AF.  U.S. v. Dustin R. KOEHN.  CCA S31021.

No. 09-0292/AF.  U.S. v. Isaac K. ADAMS.  CCA S31456.

No. 09-0294/AF.  U.S. v. Brandon M. DONOVAN.  CCA S31330.

No. 09-0306/AR.  U.S. v. Jheridiah M. ANDERSON.  CCA 20080279.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0441/AF.  U.S. v. Joshua C. BLAZIER.  CCA 36988.

No. 09-0442/AF.  U.S. v. Phillip M. JAMESON.  CCA S31438.

No. 09-0443/AF.  U.S. v. Willie J. COFFIE, Jr.  CCA S31495.

No. 09-0444/AF.  U.S. v. Billy L. CURTIS.  CCA 37072.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-121

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0440/AR.  U.S. v. James R. BURMEISTER.  CCA 20080691.

 

PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED

 

No. 07-0900/MC.  United States, Appellee v. Carlos J. RODRIGUEZ, Appellant.  CCA 9900997.  On consideration of Appellant's petition for reconsideration of this Court’s decision, 67 M.J. 110 (C.A.A.F. 2009); Appellant’s motion to attach document of January 9, 2009; Appellee’s motion to strike Appellant’s petition for reconsideration; and Appellant’s motion to attach document of January 26, 2009, said petition for reconsideration is hereby denied, and Appellant’s motions to attach and Appellee’s motion to strike are denied as moot.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0370/AR.  U.S. v. Janis M. GALL-MARTIN.  CCA 20051415.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including March 19, 2009.

 

No. 09-0374/AR.  U.S. v. Mark S. BRADY.  CCA 20070888.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including March 24, 2009.

 

No. 09-5001/MC.  U.S. v. Matthew T. BURK.  CCA 200800146. Notice is hereby given that a motion for enlargement of time to file a certificate for review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals was filed by the United States under Rule 30 on this date.   




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-120

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0431/AR.  U.S. v. Celedonio CORTEZ, III.  CCA 20080847.

No. 09-0432/AR.  U.S. v. Charles A. GRANER, Jr.  CCA 20050054.

No. 09-0433/AR.  U.S. v. James A. HAWKINS.  CCA 20080660.

No. 09-0434/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher J. FRIEND.  CCA 20080437.

No. 09-0435/AR.  U.S. v. Matthew L. SCOTT.  CCA 20080610.

No. 09-0436/AR.  U.S. v. Charles L. LANIER.  CCA 20080296.

No. 09-0437/AR.  U.S. v. Jess E. HOGFOSS.  CCA 20080452.

No. 09-0438/AR.  U.S. v. Richard L. RAMOS.  CCA 20080124.

No. 09-0439/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher P. REMSBURG.  CCA 20070161.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 09-8014/NA.  Gary R. JACKSON, Appellant v. Colleen Glaser-Allen, Commander, Judge Advocate General’s Corps, U.S. Navy, Military Judge and Robert R. Rabuse, Captain, U.S. Navy, Commanding Officer, U.S. Naval Support Activity, Naples, Italy, and the United States, Appellees.  CCA 200900100.

Notice is hereby given that a writ-appeal petition for review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals on application for extraordinary relief was filed under Rule 27(b) this date.

 

Misc. No. 09-8015/AR.  United States, Appellant v. Gregory A. GROSS, Appellee.  CCA 20081049.  Notice is hereby given that a writ-appeal petition for review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals on application for extraordinary relief was filed under Rule 27(b) this date.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0365/AR.  U.S. v. Samuel J. BELL III.  CCA 20060302.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including March 17, 2009.

 

No. 09-0371/AR.  U.S. v. Dana L. DUNN.  CCA 20060370.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including March 20, 2009.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-119

Monday, March 2, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0430/AF.  U.S. v. Willie L. MAY.  CCA 37192.

 



Home Page |  Opinions & Digest  |  Daily Journal  |  Scheduled Hearings  |  Search Site