UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-163

Thursday, May 31, 2007

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 07-0406/MC.  U.S. v. Travis S. JAMES.  CCA 200501533.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0604/AR.  U.S. v. Micah E. MITCHELL.  CCA 20060493.

No. 07-0605/AR.  U.S. v. Michael L. MUNOZ.  CCA 20060772.

No. 07-0606/AR.  U.S. v. Michael A. CONNARD.  CCA 20060946.

No. 07-0607/AR.  U.S. v. Jubal GOMEZ.  CCA 20060211.

No. 07-0608/AR.  U.S. v. Phoung H. QUACH.  CCA 20060982.

No. 07-0609/AR.  U.S. v. Richard P. CHARTIER.  CCA 20060876.

No. 07-0610/NA.  U.S. v. Alvin L. CLEMENS.  CCA 200501576.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 06-0758/AF.  U.S. v. Matthew S. CARR.  CCA 35772.


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-162

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 06-0934/NA.  U.S. v. Walter S. STEVENSON.  CCA 200301272.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

WHETHER NCIS AND VA HOSPITAL PERSONNEL VIOLATED THE FOURTH AMENDMENT BY SEIZING APPELLANT'S BLOOD AND SEARCHING IT FOR DNA EVIDENCE WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE OR A SEARCH WARRANT ISSUED ON PROBABLE CAUSE?

 

IF THIS COURT SUPPRESSES THE EVIDENCE FROM THE WARRANTLESS SEARCH AND SEIZURE, DID THE LOWER COURT ERR BY FAILING TO ADDRESS OR SUPPRESS BLOOD AND DNA EVIDENCE GAINED BY A SEARCH WARRANT ISSUED ON TAINTED EVIDENCE AND MATERIAL MISREPRESENTATIONS?

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW - OTHER SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 07-0176/AR.  U.S. v. Keith D. BULLOCK.  CCA 20021240.

Appellee’s motion to dismiss Appellant’s petition for grant of review granted.        

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0603/AR.  U.S. v. Francis M. SCHWENNING.  CCA 20060400.

 

PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED

 

No. 07-0152/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher E. VIEIRA.  CCA 35727.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 07-0182/AR.  U.S. v. Reginald T. GRIFFIN.  CCA 20031044.  Appellant's motion to file additional matters pursuant to U.S. v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), granted.

 

No. 07-0514/AR.  U.S. v. Darrell R. LEMONS.  CCA 20050695.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 28, 2007.

 

No. 07-0516/AR.  U.S. v. Andrew M. HUMISTON.  CCA 20030713.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 28, 2007.


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-161

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 07-0188/AF.  U.S. v. John H. CUSTIS.  CCA S30875.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE COMMITTED PREJUDICIAL ERROR BY DENYING THE DEFENSE'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS AND HOLDING THAT CERTAIN STATEMENTS MADE BY THE APPELLANT TO HIS WIFE DID NOT FALL WITHIN THE PRIVILEGE FOR CONFIDENTIAL MARITAL COMMUNICATIONS.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0585/AR.  U.S. v. Jonathan L. HENSLEY.  CCA 20070022.

No. 07-0586/AR.  U.S. v. Michael R. CHAMBERS.  CCA 20060606.

No. 07-0587/AR.  U.S. v. David P. WARREN.  CCA 20041280.

No. 07-0588/AR.  U.S. v. Nicholas D. MIKEL.  CCA 20060318.

No. 07-0589/AF.  U.S. v. Anthony CAMACHO.  CCA 36473.

No. 07-0590/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher M. DEBBAS.  CCA S31052.

No. 07-0591/AF.  U.S. v. John J. FRELLO, Jr.  CCA 36351.

No. 07-0592/AF.  U.S. v. Frank D. GOZUKIZIL.  CCA S31010.

No. 07-0593/AF.  U.S. v. Rashone L. JOHNSON.  CCA 36433.

No. 07-0594/AF.  U.S. v. James L. MILLER.  CCA 36252.

No. 07-0595/AF.  U.S. v. Justin D. MILLER.  CCA S30659.

No. 07-0596/AF.  U.S. v. Austin Q. RINEHART.  CCA 36548.

No. 07-0597/AF.  U.S. v. Manuela DEL CARMEN SCOTT.  CCA 36514.

No. 07-0598/NA.  U.S. v. Manuel A. MATOSPACHECO.  CCA 200101562.

No. 07-0599/NA.  U.S. v. Travis D. GREENE.  CCA 200401272.

No. 07-0600/NA.  U.S. v. Hawan T. CAMPBELL.  CCA 200400093.

No. 07-0601/MC.  U.S. v. Jason M. RYAN.  CCA 200401577.

No. 07-0602/NA.  U.S. v. Angela R. MITCHELL.  CCA 200600998.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 06-0298/AR.  U.S. v. Daryle C. FAIR.  CCA 20030622.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 21, 2007.

 

No. 07-0079/AR.  U.S. v. Rickie E. PARRISH.  CCA 20020916.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file a brief granted, but only up to and including June 13, 2007, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 07-0096/AR.  U.S. v. Robert J. MEDINA.  CCA 20040327.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 25, 2007.

 

No. 07-0384/MC.  U.S. v. Anthony T. HALL.  CCA 200600805.  Appellee's motion to file an answer to the supplement to the petition for grant of review out of time granted.

 

No. 07-0485/AR.  U.S. v. George V. HENRY.  CCA 20050303.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 22, 2007.

 

No. 07-0496/NA.  U.S. v. Justin W. DEANS.  CCA 200400791.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 25, 2007.

 

No. 07-0497/AR.  U.S. v. Christian A. RAMIREZ.  CCA 20040647.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 22, 2007.

 

No. 07-0498/AR.  U.S. v. Jason D. HOCKMAN.  CCA 20030562.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 22, 2007.

 

No. 07-0510/NA.  U.S. v. Shaun J. GORSKEY.  CCA 200301580.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 28, 2007.

 

No. 07-0522/MC.  U.S. v. James R. AUSTIN.  CCA 200500132.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to July 2, 2007.

 

No. 07-0523/NA.  U.S. v. Richard K. CORDLE.  CCA 200600570.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to July 2, 2007.


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-160

Friday, May 25, 2007

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 07-0298/AR.  U.S. v. Brian A. LLOYD.  CCA 20040248.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 06-0532/NA.  U.S. v. Hector A. COLEMAN.  CCA 200101009.*

No. 07-0578/AF.  U.S. v. Richard E. WILSON.  CCA S31050.

No. 07-0579/AF.  U.S. v. James P. KELLY.  CCA S31177.

No. 07-0580/AF.  U.S. v. Alexis ORTIZ.  CCA S31104.

No. 07-0581/AF.  U.S. v. Jeffery L. LINK.  CCA 36833.

No. 07-0582/AR.  U.S. v. James B. WILLIAMS.  CCA 20060327.

No. 07-0583/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher J. MYERS.  CCA 20060619.

No. 07-0584/AR.  U.S. v. Reginald C. MURPHY.  CCA 20031225.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 06-0714/AF.  U.S. v. Heidi F. ADCOCK.  CCA 36018.

No. 06-0860/AF.  U.S. v. Jason A. RADER.  CCA 36133.

No. 06-0911/AF.  U.S. v. James E. BARE Jr.  CCA 35863.

__________________________

 

* Second petition filed in this case.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-159

Thursday, May 24, 2007

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 07-0316/NA.  U.S. v. Dennis R. TOY.  CCA 200001418.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER MIL.R.EVID. 317(a) INCORPORATES STATE STATUTES WHEN DETERMINING AN UNLAWFUL INTERCEPTION OF AN ORAL OR WIRE COMMUNICATION.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 06-0837/AF.  U.S. v. Joseph E. WILSON, Jr.  CCA 35602.

No. 07-0291/AR.  U.S. v. Kyle J. VALCOURT.  CCA 20030451.

No. 07-0410/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher S. CORBOY.  CCA 36694.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0576/AR.  U.S. v. David P. BUSH.  CCA 20041111.

No. 07-0577/AR.  U.S. v. Jason J. MATTERSON.  CCA 20060546.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 04-8020/MC.  Kenneth G. Parker, Petitioner v. U.S., Respondent.  CCA 9501500.  Respondent's motion to lift stay granted.


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-158

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 07-0286/AR.  U.S. v. Anthony BROWN.  CCA 20020983.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY INSTRUCTING THE COURT MEMBERS THAT THEY COULD CONVICT APPELLANT OF INDECENT ASSAULT, THE LESSER-INCLUDED OFFENSE OF RAPE, WITHOUT VOTING ON EACH OF THREE SEPARATE FACTUAL SCENARIOS, WHICH EFFECTIVELY CONSTITUTED DUPLICITOUS PLEADING.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 07-0016/MC.  U.S. v. Shawn G. HEZEKIAH.  CCA 200501262.

No. 07-0110/AF.  U.S. v. Daniel C. ESTEY.  CCA S30706.

No. 07-0255/AR.  U.S. v. Dedric T. ROGERS.  CCA 20050099.

No. 07-0258/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher D. COX.  CCA 20060548.

No. 07-0413/AR.  U.S. v. Erick M. AYALA-PATINO.  CCA 20051322.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0574/AR.  U.S. v. Thomas C. COBB.  CCA 20031142.

No. 07-0575/MC.  U.S. v. Christopher A. GREATTING.  CCA 200401945.


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-157

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0568/AR.  U.S. v. Gideon N. DANESHRAD.  CCA 20050457.

No. 07-0569/AR.  U.S. v. Travis W. MILLS.  CCA 20060631.

No. 07-0570/AR.  U.S. v. Jeffrey WRIGHT, Jr.  CCA 20060468.

No. 07-0571/NA.  U.S. v. Robert M. SHAW.  CCA 200600728.

No. 07-0572/AR.  U.S. v. Jeanne L. KELLOM.  CCA 20060655.

No. 07-0573/AR.  U.S. v. Jeremy L. MANN.  CCA 20050493.


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-156

Monday, May 21, 2007

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 07-0066/MC.  U.S. v. Matthew R. ROBINSON.  CCA 200401097.

No. 07-0178/AR.  U.S. v. James L. MCCRAY.  CCA 20030102.

No. 07-0250/AF.  U.S. v. Mindy A. WALSH.  CCA 36330.

No. 07-0256/NA.  U.S. v. Paul P. KROKUS, Jr.  CCA 200401325.

No. 07-0287/AR.  U.S. v. Nicholas M. BOJACK V.  CCA 20051444.

No. 07-0374/AF.  U.S. v. Aaron L. NOLLER.  CCA 36539.

No. 07-0381/AR.  U.S. v. James J. WARREN.  CCA 20050809.

No. 07-0411/AF.  U.S. v. David C. ROPER.  CCA S31129.

No. 07-0414/AR.  U.S. v. Anthony V. WHIPPLE.  CCA 20040884.

No. 07-0417/AR.  U.S. v. John J. SMITH.  CCA 20060405.

No. 07-0429/AR.  U.S. v. Laverne C. EWERS III.  CCA 20060697.

No. 07-0441/AR.  U.S. v. Jason E. BOPP.  CCA 20060136.

No. 07-0472/AR.  U.S. v. Jason S. PFIEFFER.  CCA 20060622.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 04-0313/AF.  U.S. v. George E. ROLLINS.  CCA 34515.*

No. 07-0558/AR.  U.S. v. Ronald REED.  CCA 20051461.

No. 07-0559/AR.  U.S. v. Keith E. PARKINSON.  CCA 20050792.

No. 07-0560/AR.  U.S. v. Mark A. WILLIAMS.  CCA 20061201.

No. 07-0561/AR.  U.S. v. Robert C. BECKHART.  CCA 20060295.

No. 07-0562/AR.  U.S. v. Charley L. HOOSER.  CCA 20050073.

No. 07-0563/AF.  U.S. v. Jason G. CAMPBELL.  CCA S31031.

No. 07-0564/AF.  U.S. v. Joseph M. BUSH.  CCA S31200.

No. 07-0565/AF.  U.S. v. Jason J. HOBBS.  CCA S31130.

No. 07-0566/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher B. SKINNER.  CCA 36692.

No. 07-0567/MC.  U.S. v. Alex A. KING.  CCA 200500797.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 07-8016/AR.  Lloyd DANIELS III, Petitioner v. United States, Respondent.  Notice is hereby given that a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus was filed under Rule 27(a) on April 23, 2007, and placed on the docket this 21st day of May, 2007.  On consideration thereof, under Rule 4 of this Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, we note that Rule 4(b)(1) provides that “[a]bsent good cause, no such petition shall be filed unless relief has been sought in the appropriate Court of Criminal Appeals.”  Petitioner has not first sought relief at the lower court and has made no showing of good cause.  Accordingly, it is ordered that said petition is hereby denied.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

No. 06-0898/AR.  United States, Appellee v. Lloyd C. DANIELS III, Appellant.  On consideration of Appellant’s motion for enlargement of time to file a petition for reconsideration out of time, it is ordered that said motion is hereby granted, and that said petition for reconsideration is hereby denied.  

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 07-0379/NA.  U.S. v. David A. CZACHOROWSKI.  CCA 200400735.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including June 5, 2007, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 07-0394/AF.  U.S. v. Shaun E.L. CHADWICK.  CCA S31128.  Appellant's motion to submit documents denied.

 

No. 07-0401/NA.  U.S. v. Russell B. MULLINS.  CCA 200200988.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including May 29, 2007, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 07-0471/AR.  U.S. v. Albert T. GOINS, Jr.  CCA 20040523.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 18, 2007.

 

No. 07-0473/NA.  U.S. v. Brain S. WARD.  CCA 200600722.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 18, 2007.

 

No. 07-0474/NA.  U.S. v. Timothy E. DURBIN.  CCA 200500304.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 18, 2007.

 

No. 07-0475/NA.  U.S. v. Anthony V. WILSON.  CCA 200300734.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 18, 2007.

 

 

No. 07-0480/AR.  U.S. v. James H. WILLIAMS.  CCA 20040760.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 18, 2007.

 

No. 07-0481/AR.  U.S. v. Francis J. DELGROSSO.  CCA 20050891.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 18, 2007.

 

No. 07-0482/MC.  U.S. v. Matthew K. TRAVIS.  CCA 200600519.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 19, 2007.

 

No. 07-6004/AR.  U.S. v. Eric LOPEZ de VICTORIA.  CCA 20061248.  Appellant's motion to stay proceedings denied.

 

No. 07-0476/NA.  U.S. v. Audley G. EVANS, II.  CCA 200600806.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 18, 2007.

______________________

 

* Second petition filed in this case.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-155

Friday, May 18, 2007

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 07-0184/AR.  U.S. v. Mark K. CONNOLLY.  CCA 20050810.

No. 07-0190/AF.  U.S. v. ROBERT L. DIXIE, Jr.  CCA S30917.

No. 07-0223/NA.  U.S. v. Fonzay O. KNIGHT.  CCA 200500541.

No. 07-0333/AF.  U.S. v. Ryan E. MCCLAIN.  CCA 36429.

No. 07-0334/AF.  U.S. v. Donald W. JEWELL.  CCA 36624.

No. 07-0336/AF.  U.S. v. Mathieu Y. ST. LAURENT.  CCA S30955.

No. 07-0373/AR.  U.S. v. Armin J. CRUZ.  CCA 20040973.

No. 07-0400/AR.  U.S. v. Polanski B. MORGAN.  CCA 20051442.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0557/AR.  U.S. v. Israel J. HERNANDEZ.  CCA 20041051.


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-154

Thursday, May 17, 2007

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0556/AR.  U.S. v. Bradley S. CRUM.  CCA 20060746.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 06-0695/AF.  U.S. v. Kevin E. PAXTON.  CCA 36092.


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-153

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0554/AR.  U.S. v. Alex L. PITTS.  CCA 20051471.

No. 07-0555/AR.  U.S. v. Daniel ORTIZ.  CCA 20040672.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-152

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0551/AR.  U.S. v. Charles R. DAVIS.  CCA 20060320.

No. 07-0552/NA.  U.S. v. Vincent M. ALCORN.  CCA 200301610.

No. 07-0553/NA.  U.S. v. Christopher A. BOLSINS.  CCA 200602408.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 07-0296/AR.  U.S. v. Omar B. SEYMOUR.  CCA 20030692.  Appellant's motion to correct errata granted.

 

No. 07-0451/AR.  U.S. v. Eric J. COLVIN.  CCA 20050853.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 11, 2007.

 

No. 07-0477/AR.  U.S. v. Nicholas A. MCCARTY.  CCA 20060387.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 14, 2007.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 06-0403/MC.  U.S. v. Damien B. SHAW.  CCA 200300312.

No. 06-0439/AF.  U.S. v. Jess M. DAVIS.  CCA 35932.

No. 06-0610/AR.  U.S. v. James A. WISE.  CCA 20031310.

No. 06-0675/MC.  U.S. v. Rodolfo FLORES.  CCA 200400701.

No. 06-0793/AF.  U.S. v. Jeffrey D. BEATTY.  CCA 35523.


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-151

Monday, May 14, 2007

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0543/AR.  U.S. v. Steven J. MELVIN.  CCA 20060208.

No. 07-0544/AR.  U.S. v. Kevin L. McILWAIN.  CCA 20040095.

No. 07-0545/AR.  U.S. v. Leslie A. HARALSON, Jr.  CCA 20060733.

No. 07-0546/AF.  U.S. v. Nathaniel J. LEAL.  CCA 36627.

No. 07-0547/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher L. MCAFEE.  CCA 36340.

No. 07-0548/AF.  U.S. v. Garrett N. ZORN.  CCA S31169.

No. 07-0549/MC.  U.S. v. Herbert VELEZ, Jr.  CCA 200600399.

No. 07-0550/MC.  U.S. v. Lateasha MOORE.  CCA 200501142.

 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-150

Friday, May 11, 2007

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0540/AF.  U.S. v. Alan W. HEIFNER.  CCA 36576.

No. 07-0541/CG.  U.S. v. Brian J. LIND.  CCA 1228.

No. 07-0542/AR.  U.S. v. Steven A. PARKER.  CCA 20041031.


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-149

Thursday, May 10, 2007

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 07-0236/MC.  U.S. v. Craig H. EMBRY.  CCA 200600572. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted, and the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]   

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 07-0236/MC.  U.S. v. Craig H. EMBRY.  CCA 200600572.[See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 07-0122/AR.  U.S. v. Michael R. LEVITT.  CCA 20041050.

No. 07-0331/AR.  U.S. v. Reggie L. PERRY.  CCA 20051250.

No. 07-0393/AR.  U.S. v. Clifton C. SHEGOG, Jr.  CCA 20051351.

No. 07-0404/AR.  U.S. v. Luis A. RAMOS.  CCA 20060209.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0539/MC.  U.S. v. William C. RICHARDSON.  CCA 200602445.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 03-0151/MC.  U.S. v. Fernando GARCIA.  CCA 9901513.  Appellant's motion to correct errata granted.

 

No. 07-0354/AR.  U.S. v. Edgar D. JONES.  CCA 20010856.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including June 8, 2007, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 07-0420/CG.  U.S. v. Christopher M. UPHAM.  CCA 1268.  Appellant's motion for leave to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review out of time granted.

 

No. 07-0440/AR.  U.S. v. Timothy S. SMALLWOOD.  CCA 20060307.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 7, 2007.

 

No. 07-0446/AR.  U.S. v. Edward S. VOYCE, Jr.  CCA 20040084.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 7, 2007.

 

No. 07-0452/MC.  U.S. v. Mark A. HURST.  CCA 200401383.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 13, 2007.

 

No. 07-0454/AR.  U.S. v. Dann R. LINTEAU.  CCA 20010926.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 8, 2007.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-148

Wednesday, May 9, 2007

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 03-0382/AR.  U.S. v. Scott R. BALDWIN.  CCA 20020708.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted, and the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.[See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

No. 06-0621/AR.  U.S. v. William H. MASCHEK.  CCA 20030064.  On further consideration of the granted issues, 64 M.J. 309 (C.A.A.F. 2006), the briefs of the parties, and in light of this Court’s decisions in United States v. Terry, 64 M.J. 295 (C.A.A.F. 2007), United States v. Briggs, 64 M.J. 285 (C.A.A.F. 2007), and United States v. Clay, 64 M.J. 274 (C.A.A.F. 2007), it is ordered that the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.

 

No. 06-0683/NA.  U.S. v. George S. JOHNS.  CCA 200301518.  On further consideration of the granted issue, 64 M.J. 310 (C.A.A.F. 2006), the briefs of the parties, and in light of this Court’s decisions in United States v. Terry, 64 M.J. 295 (C.A.A.F. 2007), United States v. Briggs, 64 M.J. 285 (C.A.A.F. 2007), and United States v. Clay, 64 M.J. 274 (C.A.A.F. 2007), it is ordered that the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 03-0382/AR.  U.S. v. Scott R. BALDWIN.  CCA 20020708.[See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 07-0164/AF.  U.S. v. Scott M. BAKER.  CCA 36279.

No. 07-0234/NA.  U.S. v. Roniel G. CERVANTES.  CCA 200400242.

No. 07-0254/AR.  U.S. v. Marcus A. HAMPTON III.  CCA 20030725.

No. 07-0257/NA.  U.S. v. Michael P. TETLEK.  CCA 20050094.

No. 07-0276/AF.  U.S. v. Edwin J. BUDD III.  CCA S31070.

No. 07-0421/AF.  U.S. v. Kendell D. HAFFORD.  CCA 36557.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0536/AR.  U.S. v. Robert J. GRAVES.  CCA 20050846.

No. 07-0537/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher T. WRIGHT.  CCA 20040706.

No. 07-0538/NA.  U.S. v. Bonnie J. ARCHIBALD.  CCA 200500147.


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-147

Tuesday, May 08, 2007

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0535/AR.  U.S. v. Kengatta R. HOLT.  CCA 20041286.

No. 07-6004/AR.  U.S. v. Eric LOPEZ DE VICTORIA.  CCA 20061248.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 07-0347/AR.  U.S. v. Richmond D. SLATE.  CCA 20021227.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including May 23, 2007, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-146

Monday, May 07, 2007

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 07-0294/AR.  U.S. v. Michael P. VARGAS.  CCA 20040454.

No. 07-0365/AR.  U.S. v. Cynthia L. WILLIAMS.  CCA 20060783.

No. 07-0376/AF.  U.S. v. James T. COMFORT.  CCA S31132.

No. 07-0389/AR.  U.S. v. Cory B. DAVIDSON.  CCA 20060094.

No. 07-0396/AF.  U.S. v. David L. CASTRO.  CCA 36778.

No. 07-0398/AF.  U.S. v. Amanda D. SWABB.  CCA S31041.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0530/AR.  U.S. v. Andrew J. MacCAFFREY.  CCA 20050793.

No. 07-0531/AR.  U.S. v. Sarith EM.  CCA 20060181.

No. 07-0532/CG.  U.S. v. William E. GONZALEZ.  CCA 1241.

No. 07-0533/AF.  U.S. v. Michael D. SAUCEDA.  CCA 36729.

No. 07-0534/NA.  U.S. v. William J. O’BRIEN.  CCA 200601395.


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-145

Friday, May 04, 2007

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0527/MC.  U.S. v. Joey M. GALLAGHER.  CCA 200400151.

No. 07-0528/AF.  U.S. v. Jacob M. CONNOR.  CCA S31158.

No. 07-0529/AF.  U.S. v. Jesse E. MILLER.  CCA S31229.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 07-8015/NA.  Trent D. THOMAS, Appellant v. U.S., Appellee. CCA 200700261. Notice is hereby given that a writ-appeal petition for review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals on application for extraordinary relief, was filed under Rule 27(b) on May 3, 2007, and placed on the docket this date.


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-144

Thursday, May 03, 2007

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 07-0263/AF.  U.S. v. John R. LARSON.  CCA 35934.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issues: 

 

WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN HOLDING THAT APPELLANT HAD NO REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY IN HIS GOVERNMENT COMPUTER DESPITE THIS COURT'S RULING IN UNITED STATES v. LONG, 64 M.J. 57 (C.A.A.F. 2006).

 

WHETHER THE APPELLANT WAS DENIED THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL GUARANTEED BY THE SIXTH AMENDMENT AND ARTICLE 27, UCMJ, WHEN HIS CIVILIAN DEFENSE COUNSEL, IN HIS OPENING STATEMENT, DURING FINDINGS, AND AGAIN IN CLOSING ARGUMENT, CONCEDED THE APPELLANT'S GUILT TO VARIOUS CHARGES AND SPECIFICATIONS.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 07-0191/AF.  U.S. v. Joseph M. GENTRY.  CCA 36116.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0524/AR.  U.S. v. Lamanous T. BONNER.  CCA 20040196.

No. 07-0525/AR.  U.S. v. Jeremiah S. HARTSHORN.  CCA 20050144.

No. 07-0526/NA.  U.S. v. Myrl F. PACKER.  CCA 200600231.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 07-8014/AF.  Prince S.J. WEBBER, Petitioner v. United States, Respondent.  CCA 2006-7.  Notice is hereby given that a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of habeas corpus was filed under Rule 27(a) on April 17, 2007, and placed on the docket this 3rd day of May, 2007.  On consideration thereof, it is ordered that said petition is hereby denied.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 07-8014/AF.  U.S. Respondent v. Prince S.J. WEBBER Petitioner.  CCA 2006-7.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 06-0870/AR. U.S. v. Alexander N. WILSON. CCA 20040227.  On further consideration of the previously filed briefs and oral argument held on April 30, 2007, it is ordered that Appellant and Appellee shall brief the following issue:

 

IS THE DEFENSE OF MISTAKE OF FACT AS TO AGE AVAILABLE WITH RESPECT TO A CHARGE OF SODOMY WITH A CHILD UNDER THE AGE OF 16, ARTICLE 125, 10 U.S.C. § 825?

 

It is also ordered that all government and defense appellate divisions are invited to file amicus curiae briefs under Rule 26; that Appellant’s brief shall be filed no later than June 4, 2007; that Appellee’s brief shall be filed no later than 30 days after the filing of Appellant’s brief; that Appellant’s reply brief, if any, shall be filed no later that 10 days after the filing of Appellee’s brief; that any briefs from amici curiae shall be filed no later than 10 days after the filing of Appellee’s brief; and that requests for enlargements of time will not be granted in the absence of extraordinary circumstances.

 

No. 07-0295/MC.  U.S. v. Jesika I. JENKINS.  CCA 200600989.  Appellant's motion to attach documents denied.

 

No. 07-0365/AR.  U.S. v. Cynthia L. WILLIAMS.  CCA 20060783.  Appellant's motion to file matters pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), granted.

 

No. 07-0415/AR.  U.S. v. Derrick Q. WHITE, Jr.  CCA 20060641.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 1, 2007.

 

No. 07-0416/AR.  U.S. v. Omar CISNEROS.  CCA 20040846.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 1, 2007.

 

No. 07-0419/AR.  U.S. v. Jonathan E. HARWOOD.  CCA 20050559.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to May 31, 2007.

 

No. 07-0428/AR.  U.S. v. Stephen A. BLAZOFSKY.  CCA 20060126.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to May 31, 2007.

 

No. 07-0431/AR.  U.S. v. Bradley J. PAVLIK.  CCA 20040825.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to May 31, 2007.

 

No. 07-0433/AR.  U.S. v. Monte A. TOUSSAINT.  CCA 20051364.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 1, 2007.

 

No. 07-0435/AR.  U.S. v. William ALFONSO-ZEA.  CCA 20040405.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 4, 2007.

 

No. 07-0438/AR.  U.S. v. Dat Vu T. HA.  CCA 20050543.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 1, 2007.

 

No. 07-0439/AR.  U.S. v. Tiia A. BOWMAN.  CCA 20060592.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 1, 2007.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-143

Wednesday, May 02, 2007

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 07-0118/AR.  U.S. v. Floyd T. LATTA, Jr.  CCA 20041175.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue specified by the Court:

 

WHETHER THE UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN AFFIRMING APPELLANT’S CONVICTION UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(A) OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY PREVENTION ACT WHERE THAT ACT LACKS EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION.

 

The decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed, except for the words and figures, “ in violation of Title 18, United States Code Section 2252A(a)(5)(A)” in the Specification of Charge II.  See United States v. Martinelli, 62 M.J. 52 (C.A.A.F. 2005).  The finding of guilty as to those words and figures is set aside and that portion of the Specification is dismissed.   

 

No. 06-0918/MC.  U.S. v. Raymon F. THOMAS, Jr.  CCA 200401149.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, it is noted that that court set aside Specifications 1 and 2 of Charge I (violation of a lawful regulation), Specifications 1 and 2 of Charge II (maltreatment by sexual harassment), Specifications 1 and 2 of Charge IV (adultery), and the Specification of the Additional Charge (fraternization).  The court then stated that the remaining approved findings of guilty were affirmed.  In fact, Charge II and all five of its specifications had been withdrawn by the Government as part of the plea agreement and dismissed.  Moreover, Specification 1 of Charge I and Specification 1 of Charge IV were merged into Specification 2 of Charge III (conduct unbecoming an officer).  Likewise, Specification 2 of Charge I and the Additional Charge and its Specification were merged into Specification 1 of Charge III (conduct unbecoming an officer).  Despite the court’s broad statement that the remaining findings of guilty were affirmed, it then suggested that “[t]he affirmed charges and specifications reflect two separate instances of conduct unbecoming an officer to include a specific quid pro quo offer by the Appellant of time off from work in return for sex from a subordinate female Marine.”  In fact, four specifications of a single charge of conduct unbecoming an officer remained.  Under Article 67(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 867(c) (2000), this Court can only act with respect to findings as affirmed by a court of criminal appeals.  Accordingly, because of the ambiguity as to the affirmed findings, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted.  The decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is set aside, and the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy for remand to the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals for clarification as to the affirmed findings.

 

Thereafter, Article 67, UCMJ, shall apply.  This is without prejudice to Appellant’s right to resubmit any assignments of error in a subsequent petition for grant of review to this Court.

 

No. 07-0086/NA.  U.S. v. Theodore THOMPSON.  CCA 200401732.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, we note that the lower court identified the four-prong test for evaluating an alleged post-trial delay, due process violation.  See United States v. Moreno, 63 M.J. 129, 135 (C.A.A.F. 2005)(citing Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530 (1972)).  In applying the prejudice prong of that test, the Court of Criminal Appeals stated that “[a]bsent a showing of prejudice, there can be no due process violation.”  To the contrary, we have held that “where there is no finding of Barker prejudice, we will find a due process violation only when, in balancing the other three factors, the delay is so egregious that tolerating it would adversely affect the public's perception of the fairness and integrity of the military justice system.”  United States v. Toohey, 63 M.J. 353, 362 (C.A.A.F. 2006).  Consequently, the Court of Criminal Appeals erred as a matter of law in applying the due process test for reviewing post-trial delay.  Appellant is entitled to a new review pursuant to Article 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 866(c) (2000).  Accordingly, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN HOLDING THAT, “ABSENT A SHOWING OF PREJUDICE, THERE CAN BE NO DUE PROCESS VIOLATION,” FOR UNREASONABLE POST-TRIAL DELAY IN FORWARDING A RECORD OF TRIAL FOR APPELLATE REVIEW.

 

                The decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is set aside.  The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy for remand to the Court of Criminal Appeals for consideration in light of Toohey.  Thereafter, Article 67, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 867 (2000), will apply.

 

No. 06-0926/AR. U.S. v. Emily N. HAMILTON. CCA 20050738.  On further consideration of the granted issue, 64 M.J. 391 (C.A.A.F. 2007), and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that the military judge erred when he found Appellant guilty of Specification 5 of Charge III by distributing valium and excepting the words “on divers occasions” and substituting the words “on one occasion” without specifying which occasion was the basis for the guilty finding.  United States v. Scheurer, 62 M.J. 100 (C.A.A.F. 2005).  Accordingly, it is ordered that the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is set aside as to the guilty finding of Specification 5 of Charge III.  Specification 5 of Charge III is dismissed.  The decision of that court as to the remaining charges is affirmed.  The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for remand to the Army Court of Criminal Appeals.  That court may reassess the sentence based on the affirmed guilty findings or order a rehearing on the sentence. 

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 07-0118/AR. U.S. v. Floyd T. LATTA, Jr. CCA 20041175. [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

No. 06-0918/MC.  U.S. v. Raymon F. THOMAS, Jr.  CCA 200401149. [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

No. 07-0053/NA.  U.S. v. Robert D. FELLS.  CCA 200500668.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER, IN LIGHT OF THIS COURT'S DECISION IN UNITED STATES v. ZACHARY, 63 M.J. 438 (C.A.A.F. 2006), THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN AFFIRMING APPELLANT'S GUILTY PLEAS TO CONSENSUAL SODOMY WITH A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF 16 AND INDECENT ACTS WITH A CHILD WHEN THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRONEOUSLY INFORMED APPELLANT THAT A MISTAKE OF FACT DEFENSE AS TO AGE CATEGORICALLY DID NOT APPLY TO THE SODOMY CHARGE, AND THAT BASED ON THIS COURT'S DECISION IN UNITED STATES v. STRODE, 43 M.J. 29 (C.A.A.F. 1995), THE DEFENSE DID NOT APPLY TO THE INDECENT ACTS CHARGE.

 

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.


No. 07-0086/NA.  U.S. v. Theodore THOMPSON.  CCA 200401732. [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 07-0222/MC.  U.S. v. Colin J. TIERNEY.  CCA 200501620.

No. 07-0372/AR.  U.S. v. Lamar WILLIAMS, Jr.  CCA 20051492.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0519/AR.  U.S. v. Luis A. AGUILAR.  CCA 20021439.

No. 07-0520/AR.  U.S. v. David R. KELLY.  CCA 20061004.

No. 07-0521/AR.  U.S. v. Justen  A. WALKER.  CCA 20060226.

No. 07-0522/MC.  U.S. v. James R. AUSTIN.  CCA 200500132.

No. 07-0523/NA.  U.S. v. Richard K. CORDLE.  CCA 200600570.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-142

Tuesday, May 01, 2007

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 07-0093/AR.  U.S. v. James H. FOERSTER.  CCA 20040236.

No. 07-0084/MC.  U.S. v. Deric B. HOLLINGS.  CCA 200500497.

No. 05-0139/MC.  U.S. v. Gerald R. PFLUEGER III.  CCA 200400213.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 07-0103/AR.  U.S. v. Fredrick W. LOPEZ, V.  CCA 20040620.*

No. 07-0127/AF.  U.S. v. Quincy C. TARVER.  CCA 36368.**

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0517/MC.  U.S. v. Nathan M. RENDON.  CCA 200602188.

No. 07-0518/MC.  U.S. v. Matthew J. SPEIGHTS.  CCA 200600386.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 07-0221/MC.  U.S. v. Joseph M. REYOSO.  CCA 200401465.  On consideration of Appellee’s motion to dismiss Appellant’s petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, we note that Appellant filed his petition on January 17, 2007.  On that same day, we issued a Docketing Notice directing Appellant to file a supplement to his petition by February 16, 2007.  Both the petition and Docketing Notice were served on Appellee.  Appellant filed his supplement, as required, on February 16 and served it on Appellee.  On February 26, 2007, Appellee entered a general opposition to Appellant’s request for a grant of review, relying on the decision of the Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals.  Appellee subsequently moved to dismiss the petition as untimely on March 29, 2007, more than two months after Appellee received notice of the petition and more than one month after Appellant filed his supplement.  Under these circumstances, we decline to grant the motion to dismiss the petition.  Accordingly, it is ordered that Appellee’s motion to dismiss the petition is denied.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 06-0319/MC.  U.S. v. Jason L. TAYLOR.  CCA 200202366.

_____________________________

 

* This Court notes that the convening authority approved, for a period of six months beginning July 9, 2004, Appellant’s request for a waiver of automatic forfeitures pursuant to Article 58b, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 858b (2000), but the convening authority’s action, dated October 24, 2004, does not include the approved waiver of forfeitures.

 

** It is directed that the promulgating order be corrected to reflect February 5, 2004, as the inception date in Charge I, Specification 2.


Home Page |  Opinions & Digest  |  Daily Journal  |  Scheduled Hearings  |  Search Site