UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
05-225
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 05-0374/AF.
WHETHER
THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED WHEN HE ADMITTED EVIDENCE THAT APPELLANT
ENGAGED IN
SEXUAL ACTS WITH ANOTHER FEMALE UNDER THE AGE OF 16 WHERE (A) THE
ALLEGED ACTS
OCCURRED SUBSEQUENT TO THE CHARGED ACTS, AND (B) THE EVIDENCE ADMITTED
WAS OF
SUCH AN UNFAIRLY PREJUDICIAL NATURE AS TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE MEMBERS
ARRIVING AT
A VERDICT ON AN IMPROPER BASIS.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
No. 05-0521/MC.
I.
WHETHER THE ORDER
DIRECTING APPELLANT TO RECEIVE ANTHRAX VACCINE ABSORBED ON
II. WHETHER
APPELLANT'S DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO TIMELY REVIEW OF HIS APPEAL HAS BEEN
DENIED.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No.
05-0289/AF.
No.
05-0418/AF.
No.
05-0439/AR.
No.
05-0540/AF.
No.
05-0547/AF.
No.
05-0560/AR.
No.
05-0603/AR.
No.
05-0638/AR.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
05-0718/AR.
No.
05-0719/NA.
No.
05-0720/AR.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No.
05-0521/MC.
MANDATES ISSUED
No.
04-0524/AR.
No.
04-0677/AR.
No.
05-6002/NA.
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
05-224
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 05-0300/NA.
WHETHER,
IN LIGHT OF CRAWFORD v. WASHINGTON, 541 U.S. 36 (2004),
APPELLANT WAS
DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO CONFRONT THE WITNESSES AGAINST HIM
WHERE
THE GOVERNMENT'S CASE CONSISTED SOLELY OF APPELLANT'S POSITIVE
URINALYSIS.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
No. 05-0462/AF.
I.
WHETHER
APPELLANT'S GUILTY PLEA TO BEING ABSENT FROM HIS PLACE OF DUTY AT WHICH
HE WAS
REQUIRED TO BE AND TO HIS ABSENCE BEING TERMINATED BY APPREHENSION WAS
PROVIDENT.
II.
WHETHER THE AIR
FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS IMPROPERLY INCREASED APPELLANT'S
SENTENCE BY
APPROVING A TWO-THIRDS FORFEITURE OF PAY AT THE E-4 RATE RATHER THAN AT
THE E-1
RATE.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No.
05-0269/NA.
No.
05-0282/AF.
No.
05-0324/AF.
No.
05-0364/AR.
No.
05-0419/AF.
No.
05-0497/AF.
No.
05-0498/AF.
No.
05-0527/AF.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
05-0717/MC.
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
05-223
CERTIFICATES FOR REVIEW FILED
No. 05-5003/AF.
WHETHER THE
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No.
05-0351/AF.
No.
05-0373/AF.
No.
05-0387/AF.
No.
05-0406/NA.
No.
05-0411/AR.
No.
05-0428/AF.
No.
05-0461/AF.
No.
05-0518/AF.
No.
05-0525/AR.
No.
05-0583/NA.
No.
05-0587/AR.
No.
05-0608/AF.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
05-0711/AR.
No.
05-0712/AF.
also
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS this date.]
No.
05-0713/AF.
No.
05-0714/AF.
No.
05-0715/AF.
No.
05-0716/NA.
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
Misc.
No. 05-8037/AF.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No.
03-0620/AR.
No.
05-0382/NA.
No.
05-0565/AR.
No.
05-0679/AF.
No.
05-0712/AF.
UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
05-222
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
04-0310/AF.
No.
05-0700/AR.
No.
05-0701/AF.
No.
05-0702/AF.
No.
05-0703/AF.
No.
05-0704/AF.
No.
05-0705/AF.
No.
05-0706/AF.
No.
05-0707/MC.
No.
05-0708/MC.
No.
05-0709/NA.
No.
05-0710/NA.
_______________
*/
Second petition
filed in this case.
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
05-221
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 05-0127/MC.
I.
WHETHER THE LOWER
COURT ERRED BY HOLDING THAT IT WAS HARMLESS ERROR FOR THE MILITARY
JUDGE TO
HAVE RULED THAT IF APPELLANT WERE TO PUT INTO EVIDENCE HIS CHARACTER OF
PEACEFULNESS THEN THE GOVERNMENT WOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO PUT INTO
EVIDENCE THE
PORNOGRAPHIC PICTURES FOR IMPEACHMENT PURPOSES.
And
the following issues specified by the Court:
II.
WHETHER THE UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF
CRIMINAL
APPEALS ERRED IN DETERMINING THAT APPELLANT WAS NOT DENIED HIS DUE
PROCESS
RIGHT TO SPEEDY POST-TRIAL AND APPELLATE REVIEW OF HIS COURT-MARTIAL
CONVICTION
IN LIGHT OF THE 644-DAY PERIOD FROM TRIAL TO CONVENING AUTHORITY’S
ACTION, THE
146-DAY PERIOD FROM THAT ACTION TO DOCKETING THE RECORD AT THE COURT OF
CRIMINAL APPEALS, AND THE 1440-DAY PERIOD DURING WHICH THE CASE WAS
PENDING AT
THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS.
III. WHETHER THE
DELAY IN THE POST-TRIAL AND APPELLATE
REVIEW OF APPELLANT'S COURT-MARTIAL CONVICTION IS SO EXCESSIVE AS TO
GIVE RISE
TO A PRESUMPTION OF PREJUDICE, AND IF SO, WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF THAT
PREJUDICE? See UNITED STATES
v. JONES, 61 M.J. 80 (C.A.A.F. 2005).
IV.
WHETHER THE UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF
CRIMINAL
APPEALS ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY DENYING RELIEF UNDER ARTICLE 66(c),
UNIFORM
CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c) (2000), BY HOLDING THAT
SUCH
SENTENCE APPROPRIATENESS RELIEF "SHOULD ONLY BE GRANTED UNDER THE MOST
EXTRAORDINARY OF CIRCUMSTANCES," AND BY CONCLUDING "THERE IS NOTHING
SO EXTRAORDINARY ABOUT THIS CASE THAT MERITS THE EXERCISE OF OUR
ARTICLE 66(c)
POWERS."
Briefs
will be filed under Rule 25.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No.
05-0532/AR.
No.
05-0586/AR.
No.
05-0588/AR.
No.
05-0596/AR.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW - OTHER SUMMARY
DISPOSITIONS
No.
05-0585/AF.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
05-0699/AR.
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
Misc.
No. 05-8036/NA.
Darian C. JORDAN, Petitioner, v. The
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No.
05-0127/MC.
No.
05-0269/NA.
No.
05-0567/MC.
No.
05-0621/AR.
No.
05-0627/MC.
No.
05-0628/MC.
No.
05-0629/AR.
No.
05-0630/AR.
No.
05-0631/AR.
No.
05-0635/MC.
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
05-220
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 05-0262/AR.
WHETHER THE ARMY
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN
REASSESSING APPELLANT'S SENTENCE TO TWO YEARS CONFINEMENT AND A
BAD-CONDUCT
DISCHARGE FOR A SINGLE SPECIFICATION OF A FALSE OFFICIAL STATEMENT TO
AN
INVESTIGATOR.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
05-0693/NA.
No.
05-0694/NA.
No.
05-0695/AR.
No.
05-0696/NA.
No.
05-0697/MC.
No.
05-0698/MC.
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
Misc.
No. 05-8038/NA.
Daniel W. BARTOLO, Petitioner, v. Robin G. RUNNE, Commanding
Officer
Transient Personnel Unit, Puget Sound, Aundrea TAPLIN, Appointed
Article 32
Officer, Submarine Group 9, Hanger Naval Base, Silverdale, Washington,
and the
United States, Respondents. On
consideration of the request for a stay of Article 32 proceedings and
the
petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of
prohibition, it is
ordered that the request for a stay of proceedings is hereby denied;
and that
said petition for extraordinary relief is denied without prejudice to
Petitioner’s right to raise the same issues before the military judge
or in the
ordinary course of appellate review if Petitioner is convicted.
MANDATES ISSUED
No.
03-0647/AR & 04-5001/AR.
No.
04-0429/AF.
No.
04-0721/AF.
No.
05-0044/AF.
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
05-219
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
03-0369/AR.
No.
05-0690/AR.
No.
05-0691/AR.
No.
05-0692/MC.
____________
*/
Second petition
filed in this case.
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
05-218
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
05-0688/MC.
No.
05-0689/AR.
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS
Misc.
No. 05-8038/NA.
Daniel W. BARTOLO, Petitioner, v. Robin G. RUNNE, Commanding
Officer
Transient Personnel Unit Puget Sound, Aundrea TAPLIN, Appointed Article
32
Officer, Submarine Group 9, Hanger Naval Base, Silverdale, Washington,
and the United
States, Respondents. Petition for
extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of prohibition and request
for a
stay of Article 32 proceedings were filed under Rule 27(a).
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
05-217
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
05-0685/NA.
No.
05-0686/MC.
No.
05-0687/MC.
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS
Misc.
No. 05-8037/AF.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No.
03-0072/AF.
No.
05-0614/MC.
No.
05-0618/NA.
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
05-216
APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
No. 05-0233/NA.
WHETHER APPELLANT
WAS DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO
EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL DURING SENTENCING AND THE CLEMENCY
PROCESS.
The decision of the United States
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is set aside.
The record of trial is returned to the Judge
Advocate General of the Navy for remand to that court to obtain an
affidavit from
the trial defense counsel responding to Appellant’s allegation of
ineffective
assistance of counsel. In the course of
conducting its new review under Article 66(c), Uniform Code of Military
Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c) (2000), the Court of Criminal Appeals shall
review
the trial defense counsel’s affidavit and any other relevant matters. See
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 05-0233/NA.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No.
05-0254/AF.
No.
05-0476/AR.
No.
05-0507/AR.
No.
05-0568/AF.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
05-0679/AF.
No.
05-0680/MC.
No.
05-0681/MC.
No.
05-0682/MC.
No.
05-0683/MC.
No.
05-0684/MC.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No.
05-0266/MC.
No.
05-0563/MC.
No.
05-0606/NA.
No.
05-0611/MC.
No.
05-0613/AR.
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
05-215
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No.
05-0530/AR.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
05-0677/AR.
No.
05-0678/MC.
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS
Misc.
No. 05-8036/NA.
Darian C. JORDAN, Petitioner, v. The Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals,
Respondent. CCA
200201228. Notice is hereby given
that a petition for
extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus was filed
under Rule
27(a).
_______________
*/ It
is directed that the promulgating order be
corrected to reflect a guilty plea and guilty finding to Charge II,
vice a not
guilty plea and finding.
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
05-214
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 05-0274/MC.
I. THE
II. THE
III. THE
Briefs
will be filed under Rule 25.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
05-0672/AR.
No.
05-0673/AR.
No.
05-0674/AR.
No.
05-0675/AR.
No.
05-0676/MC.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No.
05-0478/NA.
No.
05-0274/MC.
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
05-213
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 05-0013/AR.
I.
WHETHER THE ARMY
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN UPHOLDING APPELLANT'S CONVICTIONS
FOR
POSSESSING AND DISTRIBUTING PORNOGRAPHY UNDER CLAUSE 3 OF ARTICLE 134,
UNIFORM
CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE, AS 18 U.S.C. § 2252A HAS NO EXTRATERRITORIAL
APPLICATION.
II. WHETHER APPELLANT'S
GUILTY PLEAS TO OFFENSES UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 2252A MUST BE SET ASIDE
BECAUSE THE
DEFINITIONS USED TO SUPPORT THE CONVICTIONS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND
OVERBROAD.
No
briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
No. 05-0263/MC.
WHETHER A DUTY TO
INTERVENE ARISES FOR PURPOSES OF AIDER AND
ABETTOR LIABILITY WHEN A
Briefs
will be filed under Rule 25.
No. 05-0310/AF.
WHETHER
APPELLANT'S GUILTY PLEA TO SEVERAL ELECTRONIC
"CHECK CARD" TRANSACTIONS UNDER THE SPECIFICATION OF THE SECOND
ADDITIONAL CHARGE WAS IMPROVIDENT.
Briefs
will be filed under Rule 25.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No.
05-0006/AR.
No.
05-0390/AR.
No.
05-0542/AF.
No.
05-0555/AF.
No.
05-0556/AF.
No.
05-0571/AR.
No.
05-0572/AR.
No.
05-0581/AR.
No.
05-0589/AR.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
05-0670/AF.
No.
05-0671/AF.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No.
05-0561/AR.
No.
05-0605/NA.
No.
05-0607/AR.
No.
05-0609/MC.
____________
1/ It is directed that the promulgating order
dated September 9, 2004 be corrected by deleting the words, “which
decision was
made final by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
by order
dated 14 November 2001 (ACM #34974).”
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
05-212
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 04-0799/NA.
I. WHETHER
APPELLANT
RECEIVED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF APPELLATE COUNSEL IN VIOLATION OF
THE SIXTH
AMENDMENT TO THE
II. WHETHER
APPELLANT'S PLEA WAS
INVOLUNTARY AND THEREFORE FAILED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF R.C.M.
910(d).
III. WHETHER
APPELLANT RECEIVED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF
DEFENSE COUNSEL IN VIOLATION OF THE SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE
Briefs
will be filed under Rule 25.
No. 05-0320/AR.
WHETHER
A CONVICTED SERVICEMAN'S CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY RIGHT TO A TIMELY
APPEAL
WAS VIOLATED BY EXCESSIVE AND INORDINATE POST-TRIAL DELAY WHERE THE
LOWER COURT
DID NOT DECIDE HIS CASE UNTIL FOUR YEARS AFTER HIS TRIAL.
No
briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
No. 99-0911/MC.
WHETHER
APPELLANT'S POST-TRIAL CONFINEMENT AT
No
briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
05-0667/CG.
No.
05-0668/AR.
No.
05-0669/NA.
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
Misc.
No. 05-8035/AR.
Michael L. BAKER, Petitioner, v.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No.
05-0195/AF.
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
05-211
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 05-0341/NA.
WHETHER THE LOWER
APPELLATE COURT ERRED IN CONCLUDING THAT
DEFENSE COUNSEL'S ERRONEOUS REQUEST TO SUSPEND FORFEITURES AND THE
STAFF JUDGE
ADVOCATE'S ERRONEOUS ADVICE RECOMMENDING SUCH ACTION DID NOT PREJUDICE
APPELLANT WHEN HE WAS NOT ENTITLED TO PAY.
Briefs
will be filed under Rule 25.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No.
05-0367/MC.
No.
05-0376/AF.
No.
05-0415/AR.
No.
05-0431/MC.
No.
05-0441/AR.
No.
05-0443/AF.
No.
05-0468/NA.
No.
05-0479/AF.
No.
05-0539/AR.
No.
05-0546/AF.
No.
05-0574/AR.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
05-0663/AR.
No.
05-0664/NA.
No.
05-0665/MC.
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
05-210
APPEALS - SUMMARY
DISPOSITIONS
No. 04-0778/AR.
No. 05-0148/AF.
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 05-0363/NA.
WHETHER THE
MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN NOT DISMISSING THE
CHARGE AND SPECIFICATION BECAUSE THE APPELLANT RELIED TO HIS DETRIMENT
ON A
PRETRIAL AGREEMENT.
Briefs
will be filed under Rule 25.
No. 05-0447/AF.
WHETHER A UNITED
STATES SENATOR'S PARTICIPATION ON A PANEL
OF THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS VIOLATES THE SEPARATION OF
POWERS
DOCTRINE.
No
briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No.
05-0261/AR.
No.
05-0275/NA.
No.
05-0277/NA.
No.
05-0329/AR.
No.
05-0384/AR.
No.
05-0437/AR.
No.
05-0544/AF.
No.
05-0553/MC.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
05-0661/AR.
No.
05-0662/NA.
PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED
No.
04-0711/MC.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No.
04-0121/AR.
No.
05-0341/NA.
No.
05-0595/AR.
No.
05-0597/AR.
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
05-209
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
05-0657/AR.
No.
05-0658/AR.
No.
05-0659/AR.
No.
05-0660/MC.
No.
05-5002/MC.
____________
*/
Cross-petition
filed in same case.
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
05-208
HEARINGS
No.
05-0004/AR.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
05-0656/AF.
MANDATES ISSUED
No.
02-0060/MC.
____________
*/ Hearing held at the Ceremonial Courtroom,
Dirksen Federal Building, Chicago, IL, as part of the Court’s “Project
Outreach” Program.
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
05-207
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 05-0159/AR.
WHETHER
THE SPECIFICATION OF CHARGE V CREATED BY THE GOVERNMENT UNDER ARTICLE
134,
UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE (WRONGFULLY ADVOCATING ANTI-GOVERNMENT
AND
DISLOYAL STATEMENTS, AND ENCOURAGING PARTICIPATION IN EXTREMIST
ORGANIZATIONS
WHILE IDENTIFYING HIMSELF AS A U.S. ARMY PARATROOPER, AND ADVISING
INDIVIDUALS
ON RACIST VIEWS), IS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY OVERBROAD AS APPLIED TO
APPELLANT.
Briefs
will be filed under Rule 25.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No.
05-0174/MC.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
05-0653/AR.
No.
05-0654/MC.
No.
05-0655/NA.
PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED
No.
02-0060/MC.
CRAWFORD,
Judge (concurring in part and dissenting in part):
I agree with the majority and grant
Appellee’s motion for leave to file petition for reconsideration out of
time. I would also grant Appellee’s
petition for reconsideration. See my
dissent in United States v. Jones, 61 M.J. 80, 86 (C.A.A.F.
2005)
(Crawford, J., dissenting).
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No.
03-0086/AR.
No.
05-0591/MC.
No.
05-0592/NA.
Appellant's
motion for extension of time to file supplement to petition for grant
of review
granted to
No.
05-0601/MC.
No.
05-0647/NA.
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
05-206
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No.
05-0140/NA.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
05-0651/AR.
No.
05-0652/AR.
MANDATES ISSUED
No.
04-0563/AF.
No.
04-0611/AF.
____________
*/
It is directed that
the
promulgating order be corrected to reflect that the sentence was
adjudged on
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
05-205
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 05-0381/AF.
WHETHER
FORFEITURES WERE IMPROPERLY IMPOSED ON THE APPELLANT'S PAY AND
ALLOWANCES AFTER
HE WAS RELEASED FROM CONFINEMENT AND RETURNED TO DUTY STATUS ON
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No.
05-0366/MC.
No.
05-0389/AR.
No.
05-0456/AR.
No.
05-0499/AF.
No.
05-0514/AF.
No.
05-0536/AR.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
02-0937/AR.
No.
05-0647/NA.
No.
05-0648/AR.
No.
05-0649/AR.
No.
05-0650/MC.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No.
05-0565/AR.
No.
05-0573/AR.
No.
05-0582/AR.
No.
05-0584/MC.
____________
*/
Second petition
filed in this case.
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
05-204
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No.
05-0457/AR.
No.
05-0466/AF.
No.
05-0473/AR.
No.
05-0477/AR.
No.
05-0487/AF.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
05-0641/AR.
No.
05-0642/AR.
No.
05-0643/AF.
No.
05-0644/AF.
No.
05-0645/AF.
No.
05-0646/MC.