UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-020

Friday, October 29, 2004

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0074/NA.  U.S. v. Mack A. HARRIS.  CCA 200301923.

No. 05-0075/AF.  U.S. v. Jose F. GARCIA.  CCA S30099.

No. 05-0076/AF.  U.S. v. Pernell R. HILL.  CCA 35477.

No. 05-0077/AF.  U.S. v. Keith E. POPE.  CCA 34921.

No. 05-0078/AF.  U.S. v. Eric W. SAXON.  CCA 35069.

No. 05-0079/AF.  U.S. v. Marquis A. ALDERMAN.  CCA 35927.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 04-0723/NA.  U.S. v. Aaron A. OESTMANN.  CCA 200301443.  Appellant's motion to attach survey of Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals decisions in cases where unreasonable post-trial delay was asserted is granted.

 

No. 04-0792/AR.  U.S. v. James M. JOSEPH III.  CCA 20031093.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to November 26, 2004.

 

No. 05-0013/AR.  U.S. v. Louis S. LOPEZ.  CCA 20010994.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to December 5, 2004.

 

No. 05-0015/AR.  U.S. v. Michael A. SHIFFLETT.  CCA 20000881.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to December 8, 2004.

 


 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-019

Thursday, October 28, 2004

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0073/AR.  U.S. v. Joshua L. KRELL.  CCA 20020266.

 

 


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-018

Wednesday, October 27, 2004

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0069/MC.  U.S. v. Thomas A. HORTON.  CCA 200401142.

No. 05-0070/NA.  U.S. v. Randall N. MITCHELL.  CCA 200101673.

No. 05-0071/NA.  U.S. v. John C. HOLLNAGEL.  CCA 200301562.

No. 05-0072/MC.  U.S. v. Christopher E. PARKER.  CCA 200102191.

 

 


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-017

Tuesday, October 26, 2004

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 04-0340/MC.  U.S. v. Michael D. BAIER.  CCA 02-0476.

No. 04-8025/MC.  U.S. v. Wade L. WALKER.  CCA 9501607.

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 04-0336/AF.  U.S. v. Bradley K. RHODES.  CCA 34697.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

I. IN LIGHT OF CRAWFORD v. WASHINGTON, 124 S.Ct. 1354 (2004), WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED BY FINDING THAT THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE OF THE SIXTH AMENDMENT WAS NOT IMPLICATED WHERE AN ALLEGED ACCOMPLICE'S TESTIMONIAL STATEMENT TO INVESTIGATORS WAS USED AS SUBSTANTIVE EVIDENCE OF APPELLANT'S GUILT AFTER THE ACCOMPLICE COULD NOT REMEMBER THE EVENTS THAT WERE REPORTED IN HIS WRITTEN STATEMENT.

 

II. WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED WHEN IT FOUND THAT AN ALLEGED ACCOMPLICE'S WRITTEN STATEMENT TO INVESTIGATORS UNDER MIL.R.EVID. 804(b)(3) WAS TRULY SELF-INCULPATORY WHERE THE ACCOMPLICE REALIZED IN ADVANCE THAT OTHER CO-ACTORS HAD ALREADY GIVEN STATEMENTS TO INVESTIGATORS AND HIS WRITTEN STATEMENT INDICATED HIS DESIRE TO CURRY FAVOR WITH AUTHORITIES.

 

III. WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY ADMITTING EVIDENCE OF UNCHARGED MISCONDUCT UNDER MIL.R.EVID. 404(b) AND 403 WHERE THE ONLY EVIDENCE OF AN ALLEGED OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE WAS THE CHANCE TIMING OF THE WITNESS WITH THE TRIAL DEFENSE COUNSEL TO MAKE AN AFFIDAVIT RECANTING SIGNIFICANT TESTIMONY.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 04-0569/AF.  U.S. v. Richard S. SOVINE.  CCA S30135.

No. 04-0593/MC.  U.S. v. Zachariah R. DELACRUZ.  CCA 200101482.

No. 04-0597/AR.  U.S. v. Robert C. SPARKS.  CCA 20020822.

No. 04-0654/AR.  U.S. v. Cody B. HOPPE.  CCA 20021162.

No. 04-0655/AF.  U.S. v. Suzanne R. ANGELES.  CCA S30265.

No. 04-0681/AF.  U.S. v. Vincent C. T. FINONA.  CCA 35233.

No. 04-0705/AF.  U.S. v. Jonathan P. GILLIAM.  CCA 35770.

No. 04-0706/AF.  U.S. v. Reina L. LUSHINE.  CCA S30471.

No. 04-0725/AR.  U.S. v. Jason C. LEE.  CCA 20040080.

No. 04-0740/AF.  U.S. v. Anna E. BELLAMY.  CCA S30549.

No. 04-0742/MC.  U.S. v. Brandon L. HANSON.  CCA 200300269.

No. 04-0747/NA.  U.S. v. Paul F. CASTANEDA.  CCA 200301089.

No. 04-0748/MC.  U.S. v. Luis M. CASTRO.  CCA 200300379.

No. 04-0767/AR.  U.S. v. Cleveland WILCOX.  CCA 20040273.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0067/AR.  U.S. v. Mike E. JENERETTE.  CCA 20020821.

No. 05-0068/NA.  U.S. v. Walter D. DISNEY.  CCA 200100932.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 02-0060/MC.  U.S. v. Anthony L. JONES.  CCA 200100066.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file reply brief granted to October 29, 2004.

 

No. 03-0590/AR.  U.S. v. Kirk E. HALL.  CCA 20021342.  On consideration of Appellant's petition for grant of review and the matters personally asserted by Appellant under United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), (see Appendix B to the Supplement to the Petition for Grant of Review), we conclude that it is necessary to obtain briefs of counsel and any available supporting documents relating to the issue raised in paragraph 6 of Appellant's submission and on related potential questions of ineffective assistance of trial defense counsel.  See generally United States v. Smith, 34 M.J. 158 (C.M.A. 1991)(interlocutory order). Accordingly, it is ordered that, within 60 days of the date of this order, appellate defense counsel will file a brief with this Court that will include the following:

 

1.  A discussion of the various forms of restitution identified by Appellant in Appendix B, paragraph 6, and the attachment thereto, including but not limited to:  how much was taken and from whom; when the larcenies occurred; the maximum punishment or potential range of maximum punishment; relevant provisions of the pretrial agreement; how much was repaid and to whom; when the repayments were made; and other pertinent information from the record of trial.

 

2.  An analysis of the impact of such matters on:

 

     a.  Whether there is good cause to review the legal sufficiency of the advice regarding restitution in the staff judge advocate's post-trial recommendation; and

 

     b.  Whether there is good cause to review an issue of ineffective assistance of counsel both at trial and post-trial relative to the restitution purportedly made both before and after trial;

 

        That appellate defense counsel additionally will provide this Court with an affidavit from Appellant and such other documents as may be pertinent to the issue of Appellant's restitution.  Copies of the brief and all documents will be served on counsel for the United States; and

 

        That the Government will file an answer brief within 30 days of the filing of Appellant's brief and supporting documents.

 

No. 04-0698/MC.  U.S. v. Javier A. MORENO.  CCA 200100715.  Appellee's motion to extend time to file an answer to the supplement to petition for grant of review granted to November 19, 2004.

 

No. 04-0723/NA.  U.S. v. Aaron A. OESTMANN.  CCA 200301443.  Appellee's motion to correct pleadings granted.

 

No. 04-0749/MC.  U.S. v. Keenan J. LAWRENCE.  CCA 200400338.  In light of United States v. Brunson, 59 M.J. 41 (C.A.A.F. 2003), Appellant's motion for leave to file supplement to petition for grant of review out of time is granted.

 

No. 04-0750/NA.  U.S. v. Christian R. CASTILLO.  CCA 200400091.  In light of United States v. Brunson, 59 M.J. 41 (C.A.A.F. 2003), Appellant's motion for leave to file supplement to petition for grant of review out of time is granted.

 

No. 04-0754/MC.  U.S. v. Jorge J. ADRIAZOLA.  CCA 200301990.

Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review out of time granted up to and including November 15, 2004.

 

 


 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-016

Monday, October 25, 2004

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 03-0595/AR.  U.S. v. Marc R. REEVES.  CCA 20010497.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, and in light of United States v. O’Connor, 58 M.J. 450 (C.A.A.F. 2003), said petition is granted on the following issue raised by appellate defense counsel:

 

     WHETHER THE ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN UPHOLDING APPELLANT'S CONVICTION UNDER THE CHILD PORNOGRAPHY PREVENTION ACT, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 2251, ET SEQ., DESPITE THE SUPREME COURT'S PRONOUNCEMENT THAT THE CPPA DEFINITION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ASHCROFT V. FREE SPEECH COALITION, 535 U.S. 234 (2002), AND THIS COURT'S DECISION THAT ASHCROFT V. FREE SPEECH COALITION REQUIRES PROOF THAT ACTUAL MINORS WERE USED IN PRODUCING THE PORNOGRAPHIC IMAGES.  SEE UNITED STATES V. O'CONNOR, 58 M.J. 450 (C.A.A.F. 2003).

 

And the following issues specified by the Court:

 

I. WHETHER 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2), WHICH IN PART PROSCRIBES KNOWING RECEIPT OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY THAT HAS TRAVELED IN "FOREIGN COMMERCE," HAS EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION.

 

II. WHETHER 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5), WHICH PROSCRIBES KNOWING POSSESSION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY "ON ANY LAND OR BUILDING OWNED BY, LEASED TO, OR OTHERWISE USED BY OR UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT," HAS EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION.

 

III. WHETHER 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a), WHICH IN PART PROSCRIBES USING A MINOR TO ENGAGE IN SEXUALLY EXPLICIT CONDUCT FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRODUCING A VISUAL DEPICTION OF THAT CONDUCT USING MATERIAL THAT HAS TRAVELED IN "FOREIGN COMMERCE," HAS EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION.

 

IV. WHETHER 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2) IS BEING APPLIED DOMESTICALLY OR EXTRATERRITORIALLY WHEN APPLIED TO THE ACT OF DOWNLOADING AND RECEIVING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY AT A COMPUTER LOCATED IN GERMANY WHEN THAT MATERIAL WAS "SENT FROM THE U.S. THROUGH THE INTERNET."

 

V. WHAT EFFECT, IF ANY, IS THERE ON APPELLANT'S GUILTY PLEA TO RECEIVING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2), FROM APPELLANT'S ADMISSION DURING THE PROVIDENCE INQUIRY THAT THE IMAGES "WERE SENT FROM THE U.S. THROUGH THE INTERNET TO ME."

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 02-0955/AR.  U.S. v. Raphelito G. WELLINGTON.  CCA 9900782.*/

No. 05-0059/AR.  U.S. v. Ryan P. WARZYNSKI.  CCA 20030361.

No. 05-0060/AR.  U.S. v. Sebastian L. BELCHER.  CCA 20030189.

No. 05-0061/AR.  U.S. v. Ryan S. McLEOD.  CCA 20031046.

No. 05-0062/AR.  U.S. v. Antonio D. BARBER.  CCA 20000413.

No. 05-0063/AR.  U.S. v. Jason L. DOUGLASS.  CCA 20020382.

No. 05-0064/AF.  U.S. v. William N. ROGERS.  CCA 35256.

No. 05-0065/AF.  U.S. v. David A. HARRIS.  CCA 35264.

No. 05-0066/NA.  U.S. v. Nicholas J. GENEST.  CCA 200201749.

 

 

__________

 

*/  Second petition filed in this case.

 

 


 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-015

Friday, October 22, 2004

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 03-0072/AF.  U.S. v. Joshua P. LOVETT.  CCA 33947.*/

No. 05-0055/AF.  U.S. v. Allen N. PRICE.  CCA S30517.

No. 05-0056/AF.  U.S. v. Brendan L. DODSON.  CCA S30499.

No. 05-0057/AF.  U.S. v. Ryan R. BELL.  CCA S30548.

No. 05-0058/NA.  U.S. v. Peter T. COSBY.  CCA 9901704.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 02-0623/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher P. MARTINELLI.  CCA 20000311.  On consideration of the briefs filed and the oral arguments made by the parties, it is ordered that Appellant will file a supplemental brief on or before November 22, 2004, addressing the following issues specified by the Court:

 

I.              WHETHER 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252A(a)(1)-(3) APPLY TO AN INDIVIDUAL WHO SENDS, RECEIVES, AND REPRODUCES ELECTRONIC FILES CONTAINING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY AT AN INTERNET CAFÉ LOCATED OFF POST IN GERMANY.

 

II.         WHETHER 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252A(a)(1)-(3) ARE BEING APPLIED DOMESTICALLY OR EXTRATERRITORIALLY WHEN E-MAILS CONTAINING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY ARE SENT THROUGH E-MAIL OR INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER SERVERS LOCATED IN THE UNITED STATES.

 

Appellee shall file an answer to the supplemental brief within thirty days thereafter.

__________

 

*/  Second petition filed in this case.

 

 


 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-014

Thursday, October 21, 2004

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 04-0524/AR.  U.S. v. John M. ARNOLD.  CCA 20010713.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE PLAINLY ERRED BY ADMITTING APPELLANT'S CONFESSION BASED ON TESTIMONY DERIVED EXCLUSIVELY FROM THE CONFESSION ITSELF, WHICH FAILED TO SATISFY THE INDEPENDENCE REQUIREMENT OF THE CORROBORATION RULE.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 04-0614/AR.  U.S. v. Darrell K. HAYNES.  CCA 20010580.

No. 04-0664/AR.  U.S. v. Antonio D. KIRBY.  CCA 20020626.

No. 04-0691/AR.  U.S. v. Calvin B. DONOVAN.  CCA 20020669.

No. 04-0692/AR.  U.S. v. Lenard A. BROOKS.  CCA 20031150.

No. 04-0693/AR.  U.S. v. John D. MORRIS.  CCA 20021266.

No. 04-0696/AR.  U.S. v. Billie H. SLUCK.  CCA 20010693.

No. 04-0714/AR.  U.S. v. Anthony C. CRAWFORD.  CCA 20030060.

No. 04-0716/AR.  U.S. v. Benjamin L. LEHMAN.  CCA 20021421.

No. 04-0736/AR.  U.S. v. James M. BLAIR.  CCA 20030349.

No. 04-0759/AR.  U.S. v. Larry S. JONES.  CCA 20030358.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0052/NA.  U.S. v. Jorge E. AGUIRRE.  CCA 200400479.

No. 05-0053/MC.  U.S. v. Joshua A. GILLIAM.  CCA 200400392.

No. 05-0054/MC.  U.S. v. Erick G. GOMEZ.  CCA 200302052.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 05-8005/AR.  Ricardo GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. United States, Respondent.  Notice is hereby given that a “Writ-Appeal Petition of the Decision of the U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals Denying Petitioner’s Motion for New Action,” which this Court construes as a petition for extraordinary relief under Rule 27(a) of this Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, was filed on September 23, 2004, and placed on the docket this date.  On consideration thereof, it is ordered that said petition is hereby denied without prejudice to Petitioner’s right to raise the issue contained in the petition during the course of normal appellate review.  [See also MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET – FILINGS this date.]

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 05-8005/AR.  Ricardo GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. United States, Respondent.  [See also MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET – FILINGS this date.].

 

PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED

 

No. 03-0152/NA.  U.S. v. Thomas W. DOWTY.  CCA 9901701.  Appellant’s petition for reconsideration of this Court’s decision (60 M.J. 163 (C.A.A.F. 2004)), denied.

 


 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-013

Wednesday, October 20, 2004

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 03-0655/MC.  U.S. v. Keith W. STROTHER.  CCA 200000050.

No. 04-0145/AF.  U.S. v. Andrea L. REEVES.  CCA 34730.

No. 04-0217/AF.  U.S. v. Richard ISRAEL, Jr.  CCA 34877.

No. 04-0240/AR.  U.S. v. Bartholomew M. BERRY.  CCA 20000960.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 04-0623/AF.  U.S. v. Matthew L. DAVIS.  CCA 35548.

No. 04-0635/MC.  U.S. v. Gary M. JOHNSON.  CCA 200301875.

No. 04-0656/AF.  U.S. v. Francesco P. MARRAPODI-BOVE.  CCA S30437.

No. 04-0658/MC.  U.S. v. John O. CARRINGTON.  CCA 200400199.

No. 04-0674/AF.  U.S. v. Nathan A. SHERRILL.  CCA S30444.

No. 04-0687/AF.  U.S. v. Timothy V. DENIO.  CCA S30440.

No. 04-0704/AF.  U.S. v. Justin N. ALLEN.  CCA S30580.

No. 04-0743/NA.  U.S. v. Clevon R. MAYE.  CCA 200302035.

No. 04-0744/MC.  U.S. v. Jorge L. CANDANOZA.  CCA 200400280.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0049/AR.  U.S. v. Vito A. LANGLEY.  CCA 20031332.

No. 05-0050/AF.  U.S. v. John N. ANTHONY.  CCA 35867.

No. 05-0051/AF.  U.S. v. Jeremy M. GEHLHAUSEN.  CCA 35280.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 05-8003/AR.  Donald Moore PRESTON, Petitioner, v. United States, Respondent.  Petition for extraordinary relief denied.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 04-0524/AR.  U.S. v. John M. ARNOLD.  CCA 20010713.  Appellant's motion to attach denied.

 

No. 04-0591/NA.  U.S. v. E' Randal K. WILLIS.  CCA 200200842.  Appellant's motion for leave to file supplement to petition for grant of review out of time granted.

 

No. 04-0660/AR.  U.S. v. Marsha R. PURCELL.  CCA 20031007.  Appellant's motion for leave to file and motion to withdraw assignment of error brief, and motion for leave to file substitute supplement to petition for grant of review are granted; Appellee's motion for leave to file answer to supplement to petition for grant of review granted.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 04-0708/NA.  U.S. v. Shawanna L. MOORE.  CCA 200201537.  In light of United States v. Brunson, 59 M.J. 41 (C.A.A.F. 2003), Appellant's motion for leave to file supplement to petition for grant of review out of time is granted.

 

No. 04-0718/AF.  U.S. v. Mark R. HUSCHAK.  CCA 35382.  Appellant's motion to submit document granted.

 

No. 04-0800/AF.  U.S. v. James MORENO Jr.  CCA S30552.  Appellant's motion to submit petition for grant of review out of time granted.

 


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-012

Tuesday, October 19, 2004

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 04-0293/AR.  U.S. v. James W. GRANDY, II.  CCA 20000258.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby granted and the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 04-0293/AR.  U.S. v. James W. GRANDY, II.  CCA 20000258. [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 04-0242/AF.  U.S. v. Anthony E. CUTINO.  CCA S30239.

No. 04-0386/AR.  U.S. v. Eric L. GASPER.  CCA 20010801.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0047/MC.  U.S. v. Thomas M. HANEY.  CCA 9900878.

No. 05-0048/MC.  U.S. v. Julius E. LETT.  CCA 9901826.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 04-0711/MC.  U.S. v. Joshua A. WHITE.  CCA 200202259.  Appellant's motion to withdraw the petition for grant of review denied.  Had this motion been granted, Appellant’s conviction would be rendered final under Article 76, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 876 (2000).  Such a result would be inconsistent with the reasons to withdraw provided in the motion.

 

     It is further ordered that Appellant will file a supplement to the petition for grant of review on or before November 19, 2004.

 

No. 04-0778/AR.  U.S. v. Patrick S. MCDERMOTT, Jr.  CCA 20020837.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to November 18, 2004.

 

 


 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-011

Monday, October 18, 2004

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0038/NA.  U.S. v. Scott A. PULVER.  CCA 84 0203.

No. 05-0039/AR.  U.S. v. Steven D. CORDOVA.  CCA 20021420.

No. 05-0040/AR.  U.S. v. John W. RZUCEK.  CCA 20020307.

No. 05-0041/AF.  U.S. v. Terrance A. BETHEA.  CCA 35381. [See also

  INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS this date.]

No. 05-0042/MC.  U.S. v. Jose L. SOLA.  CCA 200400675.

No. 05-0043/MC.  U.S. v. Anthony A. SANVILLE.  CCA 200400008.

No. 05-0044/AF.  U.S. v. Deandrea J. KING, Jr.  CCA 35653.

No. 05-0045/AF.  U.S. v. James M. McCORMICK.  CCA S30511.

No. 05-0046/AF.  U.S. v. Timothy J. RYAN.  CCA 35710.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 05-0041/AF.  U.S. v. Terrance A. BETHEA.  CCA 35381.  Notice is hereby given that a petition for grant of review was offered for filing under Rule 20 together with Appellant’s supplement to petition for grant of review and motion to file the same out of time this date.  Appellee shall file an answer to Appellant’s motion on or before the 25th day of October, 2004.  Further action on the petition shall be held in abeyance pending the Court’s final action on the motion.  [See also PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED this date.]

 

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-010

Friday, October 15, 2004

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 04-0313/AF.  U.S. v. George E. ROLLINS.  CCA 34515.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

I. WHETHER THE CONVENING AUTHORITY ERRED BY ALTERING THE INCEPTION DATE OF TWO SPECIFICATIONS IN ORDER TO DEFEAT A STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS CLAIM.

 

II. WHETHER THE CONVENING AUTHORITY ERRED BY ATTEMPTING TO REASSESS THE SENTENCE AFTER SETTING ASIDE THREE FINDINGS OF GUILTY.

 

III. WHETHER APPELLANT'S CONVICTION FOR INDECENT ACTS WITH JG MUST BE SET ASIDE WHERE APPELLANT'S ACTIONS WERE NOT DONE WITH THE "PARTICIPATION" OF JG AND WHERE APPELLANT'S ACTIONS ARE PROTECTED BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT.

 

No. 04-0429/AF.  U.S. v. Jeffrey R. DILLON.  CCA 34933.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS HAS MISAPPLIED THIS COURT'S HOLDING IN UNITED STATES v. STRINGFELLOW, 32 M.J. 335 (C.M.A. 1991), IN CASES WHERE AN ACCUSED IS CHARGED WITH KNOWING INGESTION OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE AND IS SEPARATELY CHARGED WITH THE SIMULTANEOUS, BUT UNKNOWING, INGESTION OF ANOTHER CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE.

 

No. 04-0555/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher D. DEISHER.  CCA 35143.  Review granted on the following issue specified by the Court:

 

WHETHER PLAIN ERROR OCCURRED UNDER UNITED STATES v. NEW, 55 M.J. 95 (C.A.A.F. 2001), WHEN THE MILITARY JUDGE, CONTRARY TO THE DEFENSE REQUEST, SUBMITTED THE QUESTION OF THE LAWFULNESS OF THE DISOBEYED ORDER TO THE MEMBERS.

 

No. 04-0563/AF.  U.S. v. Wayne G. AUGSPURGER.  CCA S30222.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER, IN LIGHT OF UNITED STATES v. WALTERS, 58 M.J. 391 (C.A.A.F. 2003), THE AIR FORCE COURT ERRED IN AFFIRMING APPELLANT'S CONVICTION FOR WRONGFULLY USING MARIJUANA WHERE THE MEMBERS DID NOT SPECIFY THE INSTANCE OF USE THAT FORMED THE BASIS OF THEIR FINDING.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 03-0394/AF.  U.S. v. Hector R. GONZALEZ, Jr.  CCA 34691.*/

No. 05-0034/AR.  U.S. v. Jose R. ROSA-GOMEZ.  CCA 20000165.

No. 05-0035/AF.  U.S. v. Mark GIBSON.  CCA 35150.

No. 05-0036/AF.  U.S. v. Arthur B. HEATH.  CCA 35201.

No. 05-0037/AR.  U.S. v. Eric J. PETERSON.  CCA 20020897.

 

____________

 

*/  Second petition filed in this case.

 

 


 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-009

Thursday, October 14, 2004

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 04-0120/AR.  U.S. v. George R. LITTERAL.  CCA 20011191.  On consideration of the granted issue, 59 M.J. 344 (C.A.A.F. 2004), and in light of this Court’s decision in United States v. Felder, 59 M.J. 444 (C.A.A.F. 2004), it is ordered that the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0031/MC.  U.S. v. Brian K. CATCHINGS.  CCA 85 2172.

No. 05-0032/NA.  U.S. v. Joseph E. SNYDER.  CCA 200300729.

No. 05-0033/MC.  U.S. v. Michael T. SIRK.  CCA 200301084.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 05-8001/AR.  United States, Appellee, v. Ivan L. FREDERICK, Appellant.  CCA 20040937.  Writ-appeal petition is denied without prejudice to Appellant’s right to raise the matter asserted in the petition during the course of normal appellate review.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 05-8004/AR.  United States, Appellee, v. Edward GOODWIN, Appellant.  CCA 20040826.  Writ-appeal petition for review of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals decision on application for extraordinary relief was filed under Rule 27(b) on September 20, 2004, and placed on the docket this date.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 03-0403/NA.  U.S. v. Robert F. BRINTON.  CCA 200001971.  Motion filed by Karen L. Hecker, Esquire, to withdraw as appellate defense counsel granted.

 

No. 03-0678/AR.  U.S. v. John H. STEBBINS.  CCA 20000497.  Motion filed by Karen L. Hecker, Esquire, to withdraw as appellate defense counsel granted.

 

No. 04-0513/MC.  U.S. v. Wayne D. MCKENZIE.  CCA 200101937.  Motion filed by Karen L. Hecker, Esquire, to withdraw as appellate defense counsel granted.

 

No. 04-0765/AR.  U.S. v. John P. DAUM.  CCA 20010683.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to November 17, 2004.

 

 


 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-008

Wednesday, October 13, 2004

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 04-0042/AR.  U.S. v. Shapour MEGHDADI.  CCA 20000029.

No. 04-0208/AR.  U.S. v. Keith L. WILLIAMS, Jr.  CCA 20020327.

No. 04-0216/AF.  U.S. v. Carl L. KEY.  CCA 34965.

No. 04-0382/AF.  U.S. v. Patrick A. MIZGALA.  CCA 34822.

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 04-0494/AF.  U.S. v. Stephen J. DODGE.  CCA 34870.  On consideration of Appellant’s petition for grant of review, and in light of this Court’s decision in United States v. O’Connor, 58 M.J. 450 (C.A.A.F. 2003), said petition is granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER APPELLANT’S GUILTY PLEA TO POSSESSING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY UJNDER 18 U.S.C. § 2252A MUST BE SET ASIDE BECAUSE IT WAS BASED ON A DEFINITION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY THAT HAS BEEN PARTIALLY INVALIDATED BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.

 

     The decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals as to Specification 1 of the Additional Charge and the sentence is reversed, but is affirmed in all other respects.  The finding of guilty of Specification 1 of the Additional Charge and the sentence are set aside.  The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for remand to the Court of Criminal Appeals.  That court may either dismiss Specification 1 of the Additional Charge and reassess the sentence based on the affirmed guilty findings or order a rehearing.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

CRAWFORD, Chief Judge (dissenting):  As to the reversal concerning Specification 1 of the Additional Charge, I dissent for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v. O’Connor, 58 M.J. 450, 455 (C.A.A.F. 2003) (Crawford, C.J., dissenting).

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 04-0494/AF.  U.S. v. Stephen J. DODGE.  CCA 34870.  [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 04-0438/AF.  U.S. v. Charles N. SOLLMANN.  CCA 35041.

No. 04-0538/AF.  U.S. v. Edward A. BARKLEY II.  CCA S30142.

No. 04-0557/AF.  U.S. v. Samuel D. MIRACLE.  CCA 35002.

No. 04-0594/AF.  U.S. v. Robert L. FRENCH.  CCA S30183.

No. 04-0610/AF.  U.S. v. Wayne E. DANIELS.  CCA 35642.

No. 04-0640/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher K. WARE.  CCA S30453.

No. 04-0641/AF.  U.S. v. Juan J. JARVIS.  CCA S30226.

No. 04-0675/AF.  U.S. v. Sean M. MOHONEY.  CCA 35330.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0028/AR.  U.S. v. Carl M. EVANS.  CCA 20040238.

No. 05-0029/AR.  U.S. v. William E. PITRE, III.  CCA 20010258.

No. 05-0030/AR.  U.S. v. Gabriel C. DURAN.  CCA 20011052.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 04-0685/AR.  U.S. v. Adam R. COOK.  CCA 20010400.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted up to and including November 15, 2004; and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 04-0758/AR.  U.S. v. Ricky G. THOMAS.  CCA 20040388.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to November 1, 2004.

 

 


 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-007

Tuesday, October 12, 2004

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 03-0638/CG.  U.S. v. William E. DATZ.  CCA 001-69-01.

No. 04-0252/AR.  U.S. v. Michael E. BODKINS.  CCA 20010107.

No. 04-5004/AR.  U.S. v. Charles E. SINGLETON.  CCA 20010376.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 04-0500/AR.  U.S. v. Kristina L. COSSICH.  CCA 20020856.

No. 04-0600/AR.  U.S. v. Jason E. RUDIN.  CCA 20031287.

No. 04-0649/NA.  U.S. v. Damon D. MUNGIN.  CCA 200301154.

No. 04-0653/AR.  U.S. v. Larry K. HAGUE, Jr.  CCA 20021413.

No. 04-0657/NA.  U.S. v. David L. ROBERTS.  CCA 200301353.

No. 04-0678/AR.  U.S. v. Ronnie C. CARPENTER.  CCA 20020894.

No. 04-0679/AR.  U.S. v. Darlene N. MARTINEZ.  CCA 20040071.

No. 04-0680/AR.  U.S. v. Michael E. NISSEL.  CCA 20030630.

No. 04-0684/AR.  U.S. v. Miles E. ABRAHAM.  CCA 20031282.

No. 04-0688/NA.  U.S. v. Rafael L. CENTENERA.  CCA 200400183.

No. 04-0694/NA.  U.S. v. John J. STEPHENS.  CCA 200301649.

No. 04-0697/AR.  U.S. v. Jose M. BONILLA RAMIREZ.  CCA 20040155.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0024/AR.  U.S. v. Michael T. BILLADEAU.  CCA 20020876.

No. 05-0025/AR.  U.S. v. Fernando JAUREGUI.  CCA 20030289.

No. 05-0026/AR.  U.S. v. Eric L. BARNETT.  CCA 20031259.

No. 05-0027/NA.  U.S. v. Ferland D. ANTWINE.  CCA 200300327.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 04-0042/AR.  U.S. v. Shapour MEGHDADI.  CCA 20000029.  Appellee's motion to correct errata granted.

 

No. 04-0741/MC.  U.S. v. Clayton J. McALEES.  CCA 200301664.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to November 12, 2004.

 

No. 04-0756/MC.  U.S. v. David E. FISCHER.  CCA 200200303.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to November 12, 2004.

 


 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-006

Friday, October 08, 2004

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0015/AR.  U.S. v. Michael A. SHIFFLETT.  CCA 20000881.

No. 05-0016/AF.  U.S. v. Reggie L. BERRY.  CCA 35168.

No. 05-0017/AF.  U.S. v. Jacqueline V. CHESTER.  CCA 35853.

No. 05-0018/AF.  U.S. v. Nicholas S. HACKLER.  CCA S30586.

No. 05-0019/AF.  U.S. v. Brian C. HILLS.  CCA 35732.

No. 05-0020/AF.  U.S. v. Brandt P. MELERINE.  CCA 35764.

No. 05-0021/AF.  U.S. v. Rachel K. MONJURE.  CCA S30561.

No. 05-0022/AF.  U.S. v. Terry E. NORTHINGTON.  CCA 35667.

No. 05-0023/AF.  U.S. v. Alan M. SKLENCHAR.  CCA 35793.

 

 


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-005

Thursday, October 07, 2004

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 04-0081/AF.  U.S. v. Mathew P. SCHEURER.  CCA 34866. */

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 05-8003/AR.  Donald Moore PRESTON, Petitioner, v. United States, Respondent.  Petition for extraordinary relief was filed under Rule 27(a) on September 28, 2004, and placed on the docket this date.

 

_____________

 

*/  Hearing held at the Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, as part of the Court’s “Project Outreach” Program.

 

 


 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-004

Wednesday, October 06, 2004

 


HEARINGS

 

No. 03-0647/AR.  U.S. v. Ray T. LEAK.  CCA 20000356.*/

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0012/AR.  U.S. v. David S. SWEETING.  CCA 20020720.

No. 05-0013/AR.  U.S. v. Louis S. LOPEZ.  CCA 20010994.

No. 05-0014/MC.  U.S. v. Michael G. SHRUM, II.  CCA 200300224.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 05-8001/AR.  United States, Appellee, v. Ivan L. FREDERICK, Appellant.  CCA 20040937.  Writ-appeal petition for review of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals decision on application for extraordinary relief was filed under Rule 27(b) on September 30, 2004, and placed on the docket this date.

 

Misc. No. 05-8002/AR.  William J. KREUTZER, Jr., Petitioner, v. United States, Respondent.  CCA 20040953.  Petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus was filed under Rule 27(a) on September 29, 2004, and placed on the docket this date.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 04-0348/AR.  U.S. v. Justin L. BROOKS.  CCA 20000901.  Appellee's motion to extend time to file answer to the final brief granted, but only up to and including October 20, 2004; and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 04-0662/MC.  U.S. v. Michael J. YUNGEN.  CCA 200301752.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including October 25, 2004; and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 04-0729/AR.  U.S. v. Pedro S. RAMIREZ.  CCA 20021445.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to November 3, 2004.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

 

No. 04-0734/NA.  U.S. v. Thomas J. SMITH.  CCA 200201003.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to November 3, 2004.

 

_____________

 

*/  Hearing held at the Vermont Law School, South Royalton, Vermont, as part of the Court’s “Project Outreach” Program.

 


 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-003

Tuesday, October 05, 2004

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 03-0694/AR.  U.S. v. Darrell L. SHELTON.  CCA 9900816.*/

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0011/AR.  U.S. v. Jermaine R. LOWE.  CCA 20030568.

 

_____________

 

*/  Hearing held at the Franklin Pierce Law Center, Concord, New Hampshire, as part of the Court’s “Project Outreach” Program.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-002

Monday, October 04, 2004

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0004/AR.  U.S. v. Kimberly E. DOBSON.  CCA 20000098.

No. 05-0005/AR.  U.S. v. Joshua R. TODD.  CCA 20040472.

No. 05-0006/AR.  U.S. v. Ruben MALDONADO.  CCA 20010048.

No. 05-0007/AR.  U.S. v. Derrick L. MIVENS.  CCA 20021314.

No. 05-0008/AR.  U.S. v. Diego M. TOROMARCA.  CCA 20040471.

No. 05-0009/NA.  U.S. v. Suzanne M. SCLAFINI.  CCA 200201800.

No. 05-0010/MC.  U.S. v. Amy L. HOLDERMAN.  CCA 200301880.

 

 


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-001

Friday, October 01, 2004

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0001/NA.  U.S. v. Garrick O. STEWART.  CCA 200400312.

No. 05-0002/MC.  U.S. v. Jonathan S. CAMPBELL.  CCA 200400559.

No. 05-0003/AF.  U.S. v. Justin T. WEST.  CCA S30256.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

In the Matter of the 2004 Term of Court, it is ordered that the following cases heard during the 2004 Term of Court, are hereby carried over from the 2004 Term of Court to the 2005 Term of Court:

 

     United States v. Martinelli, No. 02-0623/AR

     Loving v. United States, No. 03-8007/AR

 

No. 04-5005/NA.  United States, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Todd R. FORBES, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.  CCA 9901454.  Cross-Appellant's motion to extend time to file final brief granted up to and including November 15, 2004; and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 


Home Page |  Opinions & Digest  |  Daily Journal  |  Scheduled Hearings  |  Search Site