UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-077

Friday, January 30, 2004

 
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 04-0268/AR.  U.S. v. Richard P. LEGG.  CCA 20030375.

No. 04-0269/MC.  U.S. v. Oscar MALDONADO.  CCA 200301351.

No. 04-0270/MC.  U.S. v. John A. SEAGRAVE.  CCA 200301214.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 04-0169/AF.  U.S. v. Gregory L. PARKER.  CCA 34430.  Appellant's motion to submit documents granted.




 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-076

Thursday, January 29, 2004


ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 03-0613/MC.  U.S. v. Jimmie L. GETER.  CCA 9901433.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

I.   WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION IN DENYING APPELLANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS PERSONAL E-MAIL MESSAGES THAT WERE DOWNLOADED FROM A GOVERNMENT SERVER AND HAD BEEN SENT TO ONE INTENDED RECIPIENT.

 

II.  WHETHER SPECIFICATION 1 OF CHARGE II FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE BECAUSE THE AGREEMENT OF TWO PERSONS IS NECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE SUBSTANTIVE CRIME OF DISTRIBUTION OF MARIJUANA AND THERE IS NO INGREDIENT IN THE CONSPIRACY TO DISTRIBUTE WHICH IS NOT PRESENT IN THE COMPLETED CRIME.

 

III. WHETHER THE LOWER COURT'S VERBATIM REPLICATION OF SUBSTANTIAL PORTIONS OF THE GOVERNMENT'S ANSWER BRIEF AS THAT COURT'S OPINION CONSTITUTES AN ABUSE OF DISCRETION, NEGATES ANY APPEARANCE OF JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY AND SUBSTANTIALLY UNDERMINES THE INTEGRITY OF THE OPINION.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 04-0041/AR.  U.S. v. Jesse R. CRISOSTO.  CCA 20020974.

No. 04-0059/MC.  U.S. v. Jacob A. GARCIA.  CCA 200101606.

No. 04-0099/MC.  U.S. v. Salvatore A. FALZONE.  CCA 200300701.

No. 04-0118/AF.  U.S. v. Shane A. CURRY.  CCA S30206.

No. 04-0138/AF.  U.S. v. Darnell E. THOMPSON.  CCA 35580.

No. 04-0154/AF.  U.S. v. Brandon T. ROGERS.  CCA S30288.

No. 04-0155/AF.  U.S. v. Renne RODRIGUEZ.  CCA S30225.

No. 04-0159/NA.  U.S. v. Nicholas K. IZZI.  CCA 200200674.

No. 04-0166/AR.  U.S. v. William F. WHITE II.  CCA 20021304.

No. 04-0167/AR.  U.S. v. Joseph G. BELL.  CCA 20030457.

No. 04-0171/CG.  U.S. v. Robbie L. RIGGS.  CCA 1186.

No. 04-0172/AR.  U.S. v. Spencer D. STEELE.  CCA 20030509.

No. 04-0181/AR.  U.S. v. George FLORES, Jr.  CCA 20030422.

No. 04-0186/AF.  U.S. v. Jason M. MAYNARD.  CCA S30388.

No. 04-0197/MC.  U.S. v. Jermaine T. HARRINGTON.  CCA 200301300.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 04-0218/MC.  U.S. v. Paul A. RICHARDSON.  CCA 200101917. Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to February 27, 2004.

 

No. 04-0230/AR.  U.S. v. Steven R. SMITH.  CCA 9102660.  Appellant's motion for enlargement of time to file a response granted up to and including February 13, 2004.



 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-075

Tuesday, January 27, 2004

 
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 04-0267/AR.  U.S. v. Michael P. RUGGIA.  CCA 20021067.

 


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-074

Monday, January 26, 2004

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 04-0266/AR.  U.S. v. Rashan G. BROOKS.  CCA 20030254.

No. 04-6001/AF.  U.S. v. Matthew T. FENWRICK.  CCA 2003-06.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 04-0143/AR.  U.S. v. Kiyon H. HARVEY.  CCA 20030268.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including February 10, 2004; and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 04-0148/AR.  U.S. v. David L. DURDIN.  CCA 20030525.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including February 10, 2004; and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 04-0212/AR.  U.S. v. Dennis S. MURPHY.  CCA 20010654.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to February 23, 2004.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-073

Friday, January 23, 2004

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 04-0066/MC.  U.S. v. Wesley R. RUNIONS.  CCA 200102075.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE COMMITTED PLAIN ERROR BY ADMITTING RECORDS OF TWO PRIOR NONJUDICIAL PUNISHMENTS DURING PRESENTENCING WITHOUT EVIDENCE OF COMPLIANCE WITH UNITED STATES v. BOOKER.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 04-0003/AR.  U.S. v. Jason T. DOERFLINGER.  CCA 20020824.

No. 04-0006/AF.  U.S. v. Erick R. FABIAN.  CCA 34903.

No. 04-0008/AF.  U.S. v. David B. MOYER.  CCA 35103.

No. 04-0024/MC.  U.S. v. Michael D. OLSON.  CCA 200102063.

No. 04-0079/AF.  U.S. v. Jacob D. MCAFEE.  CCA S30097.

No. 04-0131/AR.  U.S. v. Farrah L. DOZIER.  CCA 20010629.

No. 04-0132/AR.  U.S. v. Troy S. QUALE.  CCA 20021118.

No. 04-0136/AR.  U.S. v. Jecixca CARVAJAL.  CCA 20020676.

No. 04-0141/AR.  U.S. v. Donald C. ELZY Jr.  CCA 20020700.

No. 04-0149/AR.  U.S. v. Kristy L. FARNSWORTH.  CCA 20010738.

No. 04-0151/AR.  U.S. v. Amanda L. SHELLBERG.  CCA 20021161.

No. 04-0152/AF.  U.S. v. Chadd C. COLLIER.  CCA S30358.

No. 04-0161/AR.  U.S. v. Tresa R. CAROLINA.  CCA 20020585.

No. 04-0164/AR.  U.S. v. Scottie B. ROBINSON.  CCA 20030171.

No. 04-0180/AR.  U.S. v. Orlando D. EDIE.  CCA 20030473.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 04-0257/AF.  U.S. v. Scott M. ELLERBROEK.  CCA S30318.

No. 04-0258/AF.  U.S. v. Chivonn N. ANDERSON.  CCA 35514.

No. 04-0259/AF.  U.S. v. Kiel G. RUSO.  CCA S30377.

No. 04-0260/AF.  U.S. v. Mason A. STAPLEY.  CCA 35097.

No. 04-0261/AF.  U.S. v. Michael C. BUTLER.  CCA 35472.

No. 04-0262/AF.  U.S. v. Anthony A. DEHOFF.  CCA S30186.

No. 04-0263/AF.  U.S. v. James D. MALONEY.  CCA S30150.

No. 04-0264/AR.  U.S. v. Michael B. HAYS.  CCA 20001100.

No. 04-0265/AR.  U.S. v. Kimberly D. LOUDEN.  CCA 20011108.

No. 04-5002/AF.  U.S. v. Mario L. CARTER.  CCA 35027.*/

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 04-8008/NA.  United States, Appellee, v. Rodrigo P. GONZALES, Appellant.  CCA 200302053.  Writ-appeal petition denied without prejudice to Appellant's right to raise the issue during the course of normal appellate review.

 

Misc. No. 04-8010/NA.  United States, Appellee, v. Jahmal R. CLARK, Appellant.  CCA 200300254.  Writ-appeal petition denied without prejudice to Appellant's right to raise the issue during the course of normal appellate review.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 04-8011/AR.  United States, Appellee, v. Armand ANDREOZZI, Appellant.  CCA 20030440.  Writ-appeal petition for review of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals decision on application for extraordinary relief was filed under Rule 27(b) on January 20, 2004, and placed on the docket this date.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 04-0198/AR.  U.S. v. Dawn M. YOUNGBLOOD.  CCA 20030012. Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review out of time granted to February 17, 2004.

 

No. 04-0208/AR.  U.S. v. Keith L. WILLIAMS, Jr.  CCA 20020327.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to February 23, 2004.

 

__________

 

*/  Cross-petition filed in same case.

 



 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-072

Thursday, January 22, 2004

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 03-0151/MC.  U.S. v. Fernando GARCIA.  CCA 9901513.

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 03-0515/NA.  U.S. v. Thomas J. SCHNABLE.  CCA 9900852.  Review granted on the following issue specified by the Court:

 

WHETHER THE LOWER COURT'S VERBATIM REPLICATION OF SUBSTANTIAL PORTIONS OF THE GOVERNMENT'S ANSWER BRIEF AS THAT COURT'S OPINION CONSTITUTES AN ABUSE OF DISCRETION, NEGATES ANY APPEARANCE OF JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY AND SUBSTANTIALLY UNDERMINES THE INTEGRITY OF THE OPINION.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 02-0937/AR.  U.S. v. Wayne M. PARKER.  CCA 9600945.





UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-071

Wednesday, January 21, 2004

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 02-0100/AF.  U.S. v. Raymond B. HARRISON.  CCA 34172.  On consideration of Appellant’s motion for leave to file petition for reconsideration out of time and petition for reconsideration out of time and in light of this Court's decision in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450 (C.A.A.F. 2003), it is ordered that Appellant's motion for leave to file petition for reconsideration out of time and petition for reconsideration out of time are granted; that the order of the Court dated February 26, 2002, is hereby vacated; and that review is granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE STATUTORY LANGUAGE OF 18 U.S.C. 2252A IS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY OVERBROAD ON ITS FACE AND AS APPLIED TO APPELLANT.

 
That the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed and the findings of guilty and the sentence are set aside.  The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for further action consistent with this Court's decision in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450 (C.A.A.F. 2003).  A rehearing may be ordered.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION and INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS this date.]

 

CRAWFORD, Chief Judge (dissenting):  I dissent for the reasons set forth in Sections A and B of my separate opinion in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450, 455-457 (C.A.A.F. 2003) (Crawford, C.J., dissenting).

 

No. 02-0257/AF.  U.S. v. James E. STOOPS.  CCA 34491.  On consideration of Appellant's petition for reconsideration of the order denying review and in light of this Court's decision in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450 (C.A.A.F. 2003), it is ordered that Appellant's petition for reconsideration of the order denying review is granted; that the order of the Court dated April 12, 2002, is hereby vacated; and that review is granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER APPELLANT'S GUILTY PLEA MUST BE SET ASIDE BECAUSE HIS PLEA WAS EXPRESSLY CONTINGENT ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE DEFINITION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY CONTAINED IN 18 U.S.C. 2256(8) WOULD BE UPHELD.

 

That the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed and the finding of guilty and the sentence are set aside.  The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for further action consistent with this Court's decision in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450 (C.A.A.F. 2003).  A rehearing may be ordered.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION this date.]

 

CRAWFORD, Chief Judge (dissenting):  I dissent for the reasons set forth in Section B of my separate opinion in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450, 456 (C.A.A.F. 2003) (Crawford, C.J., dissenting).

 

No. 02-0304/AR.  U.S. v. Jason L. MATHEWS.  CCA 20000136.  On consideration of Appellant's petition for grant of review and in light of this Court’s decision in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450 (C.A.A.F. 2003), it is ordered that the petition is granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER APPELLANT'S PLEA OF GUILTY TO POSSESSION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY UNDER THE CHILD PORNOGRAPHY PREVENTION ACT MAY STAND WHEN THE MILITARY JUDGE'S DEFINITION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY INCLUDED COMPUTER-GENERATED IMAGES, A DEFINITION THAT THE SUPREME COURT FOUND UNCONSTITUTIONAL.  ASHCROFT v. FREE SPEECH COALITION, 535 U.S. 234 (2002).

 

     That the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed and the finding of guilty and the sentence are set aside.  The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for further action consistent with this Court's decision in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450 (C.A.A.F. 2003).  A rehearing may be ordered.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

CRAWFORD, Chief Judge (dissenting):  I dissent for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450, 455 (C.A.A.F. 2003) (Crawford, C.J., dissenting).

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 02-0304/AR.  U.S. v. Jason L. MATHEWS.  CCA 20000136.  [See also APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

No. 03-0620/AR.  U.S. v. William T. LUNDY.  CCA 2000069.  Review granted on the following issue raised by appellate defense counsel:

 

I.   WHETHER THE ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS, HAVING FOUND THAT THE CONVENING AUTHORITY DID NOT OR COULD NOT WAIVE FORFEITURES AT THE E-6 RATE AS PROVIDED IN THE PRETRIAL AGREEMENT, ERRED WHEN IT HELD THAT BECAUSE HIS FAMILY RECEIVED PAYMENTS UNDER THE TRANSITIONAL COMPENSATION PROGRAM, 10 U.S.C. 1059, HIS PLEAS WERE NOT IMPROVIDENT.

 

And the following issue specified by the Court:

 

II.  WHETHER TRIAL DEFENSE COUNSEL PROVIDED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL BY FAILING TO ADVISE APPELLANT OF THE LEGAL CONSTRAINTS ON THE POWER OF THE CONVENING AUTHORITY TO WAIVE FORFEITURES AT THE E-6 RATE AS PROVIDED IN THE PRETRIAL AGREEMENT.

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION

 

No. 02-0100/AF.  U.S. v. Raymond B. HARRISON.  CCA 34172.  [See also APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS and INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS this date.]

 

No. 02-0257/AF.  U.S. v. James E. STOOPS.  CCA 34491.  [See also APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 04-0089/NA.  U.S. v. Mark S. SARASUA.  CCA 200100723.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 04-0255/NA.  U.S. v. Russell E. HARRIS.  CCA 99-1587.

No. 04-0256/MC.  U.S. v. Juan D. PASTOR.  CCA 200200142.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 02-0100/AF.  U.S. v. Raymond B. HARRISON.  CCA 34172.  [See also APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS and ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION this date.]

 


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-070

Tuesday, January 20, 2004


 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 02-0617/AR.  U.S. v. Martin C. DUNCAN.  CCA 20010182.  On consideration of the issue granted review by this Court on December 31, 2002, and in light of this Court's decision in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450 (C.A.A.F. 2003), it is ordered that the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed and the findings of guilty and the sentence are set aside.  The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for further action consistent with this Court's decision in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450 (C.A.A.F. 2003).  A rehearing may be ordered.

 

CRAWFORD, Chief Judge (dissenting):  I dissent for the reasons set forth in Sections A and B of my separate opinion in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450, 455-457 (C.A.A.F. 2003) (Crawford, C.J., dissenting).

 

No. 03-0071/AF.  U.S. v. Joseph W. LEE.  CCA S29894.  On consideration of the issue granted review by this Court on January 24, 2003, and in light of this Court's decision in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450 (C.A.A.F. 2003), it is ordered that the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed and the finding of guilty and the sentence are set aside.  The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for further action consistent with this Court's decision in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450 (C.A.A.F. 2003).  A rehearing may be ordered.

 

CRAWFORD, Chief Judge (dissenting):  I dissent for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v. Thompson, 57 M.J. 319 (C.A.A.F. 2002) (Crawford, C.J., dissenting), and Section A of my separate opinion in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450, 455 (C.A.A.F. 2003) (Crawford, C.J., dissenting).

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 03-0389/NA.  U.S. v. Alvin N. CUENTO.  CCA 200100281.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

I.   WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY FAILING TO ORDER A DUBAY HEARING TO ASSIST IT IN DETERMINING WHETHER THE PETITION FOR A NEW TRIAL SHOULD BE GRANTED AND A NEW TRIAL ORDERED WHERE THE TRIAL WAS A SWEARING CONTEST BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND THE COMPLAINING WITNESS RECANTED HER ALLEGATIONS ON FOUR OCCASIONS AFTER APPELLANT WAS TRIED.

   

II.  WHETHER APPELLANT'S CONFESSION WAS INVOLUNTARY WHEN THE GOVERNMENT OBTAINED THE CONFESSION AFTER INFORMING APPELLANT THAT HE WOULD NOT BE REUNITED WITH HIS CHILDREN UNLESS HE ADMITTED THAT HE HAD SEXUALLY MOLESTED HIS DAUGHTER, AND WHERE APPELLANT CONFESSED WITHIN DAYS OF A GOVERNMENT IMPOSED DEADLINE FOR ADMITTING HIS GUILT AFTER MAINTAINING HIS INNOCENCE FOR EIGHTEEN MONTHS.

 

III. WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION WHEN IT REFUSED TO CONDUCT A PLAIN ERROR ANALYSIS AND FOUND THAT ANY POTENTIAL ERROR WAS HARMLESS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT WHERE THE GOVERNMENT VIOLATED APPELLANT'S SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO CONSULT WITH COUNSEL BY ELICITING TESTIMONY THAT APPELLANT RECANTED HIS ADMISSION ONLY AFTER CONSULTING WITH AN ATTORNEY AND BY ARGUING TO THE MEMBERS THAT APPELLANT'S RECANTATION WAS FALSE BECAUSE IT WAS MOTIVATED BY APPELLANT'S CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 04-0254/CG.  U.S. v. David D. RENDON.  CCA 1168.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 04-8003/NA.  United States, Appellee, v. Justin M. LEWIS, Appellant.  CCA 200200089.  Writ-appeal petition denied without prejudice to Appellant's right to raise the issue during the course of normal appellate review.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 04-0206/AR.  U.S. v. Anthony R. RUDD, Sr.  CCA 20000886.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to February 20, 2004.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-069

Friday, January 16, 2004

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 03-0246/AR.  U.S. v. Bobby D. SEAY II.  CCA 9900779.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

I.   WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION IN NOT SUPPRESSING APPELLANT'S PRETRIAL STATEMENTS TO ARMY INVESTIGATORS.

 

II.  IF APPELLANT'S PRETRIAL STATEMENTS SHOULD HAVE BEEN SUPPRESSED (ISSUE I), WHETHER THE REMAINING EVIDENCE IS LEGALLY SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT FINDINGS OF GUILTY TO ALL CHARGES AND SPECIFICATIONS.

 

III. WHETHER PORTIONS OF APPELLANT'S STATEMENTS TO ARMY INVESTIGATORS WERE UNCORROBORATED, AND, IF SO, WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRONEOUSLY PERMITTED THE PANEL MEMBERS TO CONSIDER THE PERTINENT PORTIONS OF APPELLANT'S STATEMENTS REGARDING THE CHARGE OF LARCENY.

 

IV.  WHETHER THE EVIDENCE IS LEGALLY SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT A FINDING OF GUILTY TO THE CHARGE THAT APPELLANT STOLE PFC [C]'S WALLET.

 

V.   WHETHER THE EVIDENCE IS LEGALLY SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT A FINDING TO THE CHARGE THAT APPELLANT KIDNAPPED PFC [C].

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 01-0738/AF.  U.S. v. Amanda L. GILBREATH.  CCA 34091.*/

No. 04-0238/AF.  U.S. v. John C. HARRIS.  CCA 34918.  [See

        also PETITIONS FOR NEW TRIAL - FILINGS this date.]

No. 04-0253/AR.  U.S. v. William R. RICKARD.  CCA 20030368.

 

PETITIONS FOR NEW TRIAL - FILINGS

 

No. 04-0238/AF.  U.S. v. John C. HARRIS.  CCA 34918.  [See also PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED this date.]

__________

 

*/  Second petition filed in this case.




 

 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 068

Thursday, January 15, 2004


PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 04-0252/AR.  U.S. v. Michael E. BODKINS.  CCA 20010107.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 04-8010/NA.  United States, Appellee, v. Jahmal R. CLARK, Appellant.  CCA 200300254.  Writ-appeal petition for review of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals decision on application for extraordinary relief was filed under Rule 27(b).

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 04-0185/AF.  U.S. v. Trevor L. NELSON.  CCA 35083.  Motion filed by Major Andrea M. Gormel for leave to withdraw as counsel for Appellant granted.

 

No. 04-0191/AR.  U.S. v. Mark G. SARAZINE.  CCA 20020321.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to January 28, 2004.



 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-067

Wednesday, January 14, 2004

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 03-0369/AR.  U.S. v. Patrick L. SIMMONS.  CCA 20000153.

No. 03-0522/MC.  U.S. v. Matthew S. KAHMANN.  CCA 200200355.

No. 03-0557/MC.  U.S. v. Michael D. STRAND.  CCA 200000275.

No. 03-8007/AR.  Dwight J. LOVING v. U.S.  CCA 8901123.

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 03-0651/MC.  U.S. v. Wesley B. NEGRON.  CCA 200100844.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

I. WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN AFFIRMING THE APPELLANT'S PLEA OF GUILTY TO DEPOSITING OBSCENE MATTERS IN THE MAIL WHERE THE RECORD DISCLOSES A SUBSTANTIAL BASIS FOR QUESTIONING THAT PLEA.

 

II. WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN HOLDING THAT THE APPELLANT'S PLEA OF GUILTY TO DEPOSITING OBSCENE MATTERS IN THE MAIL WOULD SUSTAIN A CONVICTION FOR SERVICE DISCREDITING CONDUCT UNDER ARTICLE 134(2), UCMJ.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 03-0206/AR.  U.S. v. Charles W. STONE.  CCA 9900401.

No. 03-0660/MC.  U.S. v. Eric J. SUBJECT.  CCA 200100426.

No. 04-0128/AR.  U.S. v. Adrian A. WALCOTT.  CCA 20030593.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 04-0250/AR.  U.S. v. Jonathan G. SCALO.  CCA 20020624.

No. 04-0251/AR.  U.S. v. Jason W. GARMAN.  CCA 20020199.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-066

Tuesday, January 13, 2004

 
APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 04-0015/MC.  U.S. v. Joseph W. RUSSELL.  CCA 200300651.  On consideration of Appellant's petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is granted and the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed as to findings and only so much of the sentence as provides for a bad-conduct discharge and confinement for 90 days.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 04-0015/MC.  U.S. v. Joseph W. RUSSELL.  CCA 200300651.  [See also APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 03-0690/MC.  U.S. v. Brian L. JOHNSON.  CCA 200202074.

No. 04-0002/NA.  U.S. v. Ryan J. WILSON.  CCA 200200954.

No. 04-0062/MC.  U.S. v. Charles W. NEWMAN.  CCA 200201731.

No. 04-0064/MC.  U.S. v. Andrew G. MORTENSON.  CCA 200201635.

No. 04-0065/MC.  U.S. v. Jose R. AGUILAR.  CCA 200300958.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 04-0249/AR.  U.S. v. William A. PHILLIPS, Jr.  CCA 20020659.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 04-8007/AF.  Charles S. STEWART, Petitioner, v. United States, Respondent.  CCA 35471.  Petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus denied without prejudice to Petitioner's right to raise the issue during the course of normal appellate review.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 02-0457/AR.  U.S. v. Brian P. ADAMS.  CCA 20000431.  Appellee's motion to correct errata and to attach government appellate exhibit 6 granted and Appellant's motion to attach defense appellate exhibits and to substitute defense appellate exhibit J granted.

 

No. 02-0623/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher P. MARTINELLI.  CCA 20000311.  Appellant's motion to correct errata granted.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 03-0151/MC.  U.S. v. Fernando GARCIA.  CCA 9901513.  Motion filed by Professor Fredric I. Lederer seeking permission to appear as Amicus Curiae, for law student participants to present oral argument, and to use Courtroom 21 technology granted, except that the request to present oral argument via Courtroom 21 Video Teleconferencing is denied, and the request to make oral argument for fifteen minutes is denied.  Amicus will be allotted ten minutes to submit oral argument.

 

No. 04-0130/AR.  U.S. v. Roger E. MEDFORD.  CCA 20030769.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including January 27, 2004; and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 04-0182/AR.  U.S. v. Paul R. INMAN, III.  CCA 20021071.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to February 12, 2004.

 

No. 04-0185/AF.  U.S. v. Trevor L. NELSON.  CCA 35083.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to January 22, 2004.

 

No. 04-0189/AR.  U.S. v. Lee E. MOON.  CCA 20020175.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to January 20, 2004.

 


 

 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-065

Monday, January 12, 2004

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 04-0244/AR.  U.S. v. William F. HENDERSON.  CCA 20021142.

No. 04-0245/AR.  U.S. v. James R. HAMP.  CCA 20000306.

No. 04-0246/AR.  U.S. v. Andrew J. KISALA.  CCA 20000930.

No. 04-0247/AR.  U.S. v. Kenyon L. MANLEY.  CCA 20030079.

No. 04-0248/AR.  U.S. v. Kyle D. SORENSEN.  CCA 20030623.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 04-8009/NA.  United States, Appellee, v. Norbert Basil MacLEAN, III, Appellant.  CCA 9202821.  Writ-appeal petition for review of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals decision on application for extraordinary relief was filed under Rule 27(b).



 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-064

Friday, January 09, 2004


 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 01-0827/AR.  U.S. v. Chad D. BENNER.  CCA 9801777.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is granted and the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 01-0827/AR.  U.S. v. Chad D. BENNER.  CCA 9801777.  [See also APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

No. 04-0090/MC.  U.S. v. Eric W. SELL.  CCA 200200458.  Review granted on the following issue specified by the Court:

 

WHETHER THE LOWER COURT'S VERBATIM REPLICATION OF SUBSTANTIAL PORTIONS OF THE GOVERNMENT'S ANSWER BRIEF AS THAT COURT'S OPINION CONSTITUTES AN ABUSE OF DISCRETION, NEGATES ANY APPEARANCE OF JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY AND SUBSTANTIALLY UNDERMINES THE INTEGRITY OF THE OPINION.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 03-0658/MC.  U.S. v. Jeffrey M. ARNOLD.  CCA 200300446.

No. 04-0049/MC.  U.S. v. Marcus K. LACY.  CCA 200100309.

No. 04-0055/NA.  U.S. v. Martin MONITA III.  CCA 200201674.

No. 04-0093/NA.  U.S. v. Randy T. MIZZELL.  CCA 200201847.

No. 04-0095/MC.  U.S. v. Brian M. WYLIE.  CCA 200301229.

No. 04-0105/NA.  U.S. v. Luke J. SHANAHAN.  CCA 200201839.

No. 04-0106/MC.  U.S. v. Michael K. SMOTHERS.  CCA 200200635.

No. 04-0110/AF.  U.S. v. Noah W. ROBBINS.  CCA S30280.

No. 04-0114/AF.  U.S. v. Richard S. KUHN.  CCA S30297.

No. 04-0134/MC.  U.S. v. Mark S. PICKETT.  CCA 200200048.

No. 04-0135/AR.  U.S. v. Lazaro J. GONZALEZ.  CCA 20020104.

No. 04-0147/AR.  U.S. v. Aaron D. MOORE.  CCA 20021305.

No. 04-0156/AF.  U.S. v. Scott A. ROSE.  CCA 34873.

No. 04-0158/AF.  U.S. v. Jason P. SMITH.  CCA S30143.

No. 04-0173/AR.  U.S. v. Marcus F. CLARK.  CCA 20030477.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 04-0241/AF.  U.S. v. Gregory S. MOSES.  CCA S30336.

No. 04-0242/AF.  U.S. v. Anthony E. CUTINO.  CCA S30239.

No. 04-0243/AF.  U.S. v. Mark A. PRICE.  CCA 34869.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 04-0197/MC.  U.S. v. Jermaine T. HARRINGTION.  CCA 200301300.

Appellant's motion to attach granted.

 

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-063

Thursday, January 08, 2004

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 01-0664/AR.  U.S. v. Dennis P. COLLINS.  CCA 9900937.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

I.   WHETHER THE SANITY BOARD ORDERED BY THIS COURT HAS GENERATED NEW EVIDENCE NOT DISCOVERABLE BY DUE DILIGENCE AT THE TIME OF TRIAL, AND, IF SO, WHETHER THE NEW EVIDENCE, WHEN VIEWED IN THE LIGHT OF ALL OTHER PERTINENT EVIDENCE, WOULD HAVE PRODUCED A SUBSTANTIALLY MORE FAVORABLE RESULT FOR APPELLANT.  See R.C.M. 1210(f).

 

II.  WHETHER, IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO ISSUE I, AND IN LIGHT OF THE APPELLATE SANITY BOARD'S FINDING THAT APPELLANT WAS NOT COMPETENT TO STAND TRIAL, APPELLANT WAS SUBSTANTIALLY PREJUDICED WHEN THE MILITARY JUDGE FAILED TO ORDER SUA SPONTE A SECOND SANITY BOARD. 
See R.C.M. 909(d).

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 03-0639/AF.  U.S. v. Brandon J. JACOBIAN.  CCA 35178.

No. 04-0013/AF.  U.S. v. Blake A. BRITNER.  CCA 35464.

No. 04-0023/MC.  U.S. v. Nathaniel J. LOFTIS.  CCA 200300006.

No. 04-0071/NA.  U.S. v. Odells W. SIMS.  CCA 200201986.

No. 04-0073/AF.  U.S. v. Matthew D. BRIDGES.  CCA 35088.

No. 04-0091/NA.  U.S. v. Antonio M. SMITH.  CCA 200300718.

No. 04-0094/NA.  U.S. v. John M. LENHART.  CCA 200300175.

No. 04-0103/AR.  U.S. v. Kedric C. WEST.  CCA 20010894.

No. 04-0104/AR.  U.S. v. Anthony L. JONES.  CCA 20010510.

No. 04-0115/AF.  U.S. v. Ian M. GRIFFIN-BALES.  CCA 35189.

No. 04-0117/AF.  U.S. v. Michael S. DRIGGERS.  CCA 35084.

No. 04-0127/AR.  U.S. v. Jayson BARTOLOMEY.  CCA 20030322.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 04-0239/MC.  U.S. v. Mark J. SZCZEPANIK.  CCA 200200215.

No. 04-0240/AR.  U.S. v. Bartholomew M. BERRY.  CCA 20000960.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 03-0614/NA.  U.S. v. Joshua S. DANIELS.  CCA 200001604.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file final brief granted, but only up to and including January 30, 2004; and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 04-0177/NA.  U.S. v. John M. LYDY.  CCA 200200005.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to February 6, 2004.

 

No. 04-0179/NA.  U.S. v. Harold R. FINBERG.  CCA 200000076.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to February 6, 2004.

 


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-062

Wednesday, January 07, 2004

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 03-0692/AF.  U.S. v. Gary W. TAYLOR Jr.  CCA 34852.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

I.   WHETHER THE STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE (SJA) WAS DISQUALIFIED FROM DRAFTING THE SJA RECOMMENDATION WHERE A MEMBER OF HIS LEGAL OFFICE PENNED AN ARTICLE IN THE BASE NEWSPAPER COMPLAINING THAT "JUSTICE WAS NOT SERVED" IN APPELLANT'S CASE.

 

II.  WHETHER THE CONVENING AUTHORITY WAS DISQUALIFIED FROM TAKING ACTION UNDER ARTICLE 60, UCMJ.

 

No. 04-0067/MC.  U.S. v. Timothy T. RYAN.  CCA 9900374.  Review granted on the following issue specified by the Court:

 

WHETHER THE LOWER COURT'S VERBATIM REPLICATION OF SUBSTANTIAL PORTIONS OF THE GOVERNMENT'S ANSWER BRIEF [OF NOVEMBER 1, 1999] AS THAT COURT'S OPINION CONSTITUTES AN ABUSE OF DISCRETION, NEGATES ANY APPEARANCE OF JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY AND SUBSTANTIALLY UNDERMINES THE INTEGRITY OF THE OPINION.

 

No. 04-0069/MC.  U.S. v. David Y. OWENS.  CCA 200200427.  Review granted on the following issues specified by the Court:

 

I.   WHETHER THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS, IN RELYING ON UNITED STATES v. ROJAS, 15 M.J. 902 (N.M.C.M.R. 1983) AND UNITED STATES v. USRY, 9 M.J. 701 (N.M.C.M.R. 1980), APPLIED THE CORRECT LEGAL STANDARD IN REVIEWING APPELLANT'S SENTENCE APPROPRIATENESS ARGUMENT.

 

II.  WHETHER THE LOWER COURT'S VERBATIM REPLICATION OF SUBSTANTIAL PORTIONS OF THE GOVERNMENT'S ANSWER BRIEF AS THAT COURT'S OPINION CONSTITUTES AN ABUSE OF DISCRETION, NEGATES ANY APPEARANCE OF JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY AND SUBSTANTIALLY UNDERMINES THE INTEGRITY OF THE OPINION.

 

No. 04-0140/AR.  U.S. v. Steven E. ASBURY.  CCA 20030367.  Review granted on the following issue specified by the Court:

 

WHETHER APPELLANT'S CONVICTION FOR VIOLATING ARTICLE 125 BY ENGAGING IN CONSENSUAL SODOMY MUST BE SET ASIDE IN LIGHT OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT'S HOLDING IN LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 123 S. CT. 2472 (2003).

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 04-0235/MC.  U.S. v. Aaron W. WALTERS.  CCA 200301402.

No. 04-0236/AF.  U.S. v. Donald S. CORNELL.  CCA 34932.

No. 04-0237/AF.  U.S. v. Timothy C. DAVENPORT.  CCA 35244.

No. 04-0238/AF.  U.S. v. John C. HARRIS.  CCA 34918.

No. 04-5003/MC.  U.S. v. Esteven E. RODRIGUEZ.  CCA 200200740.

 


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-061

Tuesday, January 06, 2004

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 04-0233/AR.  U.S. v. Tracy V. RYLEE.  CCA 20000852.

No. 04-0234/AR.  U.S. v. Robert A. MATA, Jr.  CCA 20020121.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 03-0479/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher L. TOMPKINS.  CCA 20010473.  Appellant's motion for reconsideration of this Court's order dated August 27, 2003, denied.

 

No. 04-5003/MC.  U.S. v. Esteven E. RODRIGUEZ.  CCA 200200740.  Appellant's motion to attach granted.

 



 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-060

Monday, January 05, 2004


 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 02-5001/CG.  United States, Appellant, v. Marlon D. HUTCHISON, Appellee.  CCA 1090.  The prior history of this case before our Court is set forth at 57 M.J. 231 (C.A.A.F. 2002).  Following a general court-martial, the convening authority approved the sentence adjudged at trial -- a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 28 months, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade.  During its initial review, the Court of Criminal Appeals approved only that part of the sentence extending to confinement pursuant to its statutory responsibility to review the sentence under Article 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).  55 M.J. 574 (C.G. Ct. Crim. App. 2001), aff'd en banc, 56 M.J. 684.  The General Counsel of the Department of Transportation certified the case to our Court for review of issues related to the lower court's action on the sentence.

 

     Article 66(c) provides that a Court of Criminal Appeals "may affirm only such findings of guilty and the sentence or such part or amount of the sentence, as it finds correct in law and fact and determines, on the basis of the entire record, should be approved."  In our review, we observed that the lower court's opinion raised the possibility that the court had viewed state court proceedings in a separate, but related case against Appellee as inappropriate.  We further noted that the lower court's opinion raised the possibility that the court had "sought to lessen the punishment from those [state court] proceedings," as opposed to confining itself to its statutory responsibility of "considering whether the military sentence is inappropriate" in light of all the circumstances in the record, including the state court conviction.  We emphasized that the legal issue in the case was not what sentence we would have approved, but whether the lower court abused its discretion in modifying the sentence.  In that context, we "remand[ed] the case to the court below for a de novo review of [Appellee's] military sentence under Article 66(c)."  57 M.J. at 234.

 

     On remand, the judges of the court below in various opinions speculated as to whether our Court had ordered that court to "clarif[y]" its initial opinion, 58 M.J. 744, 745 (C.G. Ct. Crim. App. 2003)(en banc); whether it was necessary, as a predicate to conducting the de novo review of Appellee's sentence that we had ordered, that the court on remand determine it had committed legal error during its initial review of the sentence, 58 M.J. at 746; and whether a remand for a de novo review requires a determination by our Court that there was a legal error in the case.  In the end, however, the court below conducted the required de novo review, and reinstated the full sentence approved by the convening authority, including a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 28 months, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade.  58 M.J. at 746-47.

 

     Appellee now has requested that this Court review the following issues:

 

I.  whether THIS COURT HAS THE AUTHORITY TO REVIEW A SERVICE COURT'S GRANT OF RELIEF PURSUANT TO ITS SENTENCE APPROPRIATENESS AUTHORITY.

 

ii.  WHETHER THIS COURT HAS THE AUTHORITY TO VACATE A LOWER COURT'S DECISION ABSENT ANY FINDING OF LEGAL ERROR.

 

III.  WHETHER THIS COURT HAS THE AUTHORITY TO ORDER A SERVICE COURT TO CONDUCT A DE NOVO REVIEW OF SENTENCE APPROPRIATENESS ABSENT ANY FINDING OF LEGAL ERROR.

 

     These issues misapprehend our earlier decision.  Although we used the word "clarification" at the outset of our earlier decision, 57 M.J. at 232, the opinion expressly states:  "The issue before our Court is not whether we would have reached the same result [as the court below], but whether the Court of Criminal Appeals abused its discretion in doing so."  Our remand for a de novo review reflected our conclusion that the Court of Criminal Appeals committed an error of law by abusing its discretion in its initial review of this case.  The authority of our Court to review the sentence appropriateness decisions of the Courts of Criminal Appeals for abuse of discretion is well-established, as is our authority to order a de novo review when the lower court has erred as a matter of law.  See, e.g., United States v. Tardif, 57 M.J. 219, 223-24 (C.A.A.F. 2002); United States v. Brock, 46 M.J. 11, 13 (C.A.A.F. 1997); United States v. Dukes, 5 M.J. 71, 73-74 (C.M.A. 1978).  Upon remand, the court conducted an appropriate de novo review in accordance with our remand, which was based upon our determination that there had been an error of law.

 

     Accordingly, it is ordered that the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals on remand is affirmed.1/  [See also INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 04-0011/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher D. HAMMONDS.  CCA 20000736.

No. 04-0026/CG.  U.S. v. Jordan D. ISAAC.  CCA 1179.

No. 04-0036/AF.  U.S. v. Adam M. DISIERE.  CCA S30270.

No. 04-0048/MC.  U.S. v. Daniel A. DEERY.  CCA 200300676.

No. 04-0050/NA.  U.S. v. Jacob E. ZAMORA.  CCA 200101149.

No. 04-0060/NA.  U.S. v. Shannon W. BENNETT.  CCA 01-1473.

No. 04-0070/MC.  U.S. v. Dax H. O. NESS.  CCA 200301107.

No. 04-0074/AF.  U.S. v. Hubert C. COLEMAN.  CCA S30213.

No. 04-0076/AF.  U.S. v. Alan E. GORHAM.  CCA S30211.

No. 04-0077/AF.  U.S. v. Steven J. HERGOTT Jr.  CCA S30228.

No. 04-0083/AR.  U.S. v. Samuel A. STERNER.  CCA 20010358.

No. 04-0111/AF.  U.S. v. Jerrell L. ROGERS.  CCA S30061.

No. 04-0122/AR.  U.S. v. Benjamin J. NORTHCUTT.  CCA 20030295.

No. 04-0150/AR.  U.S. v. Julian B. RICHIE.  CCA 20021320.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 04-0228/AF.  U.S. v. Kenneth J. BETTS.  CCA 35288.

No. 04-0229/AR.  U.S. v. Tanner B. VOLKING.  CCA 20030628.

No. 04-0230/AR.  U.S. v. Steven R. SMITH.  CCA 9102660.

No. 04-0231/AR.  U.S. v. Michael B. GARVIN.  CCA 20030250.

No. 04-0232/MC.  U.S. v. Monica Y. ESCOBAR.  CCA 200101984.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 04-8008/NA.  United States, Appellee, v. Rodrigo P. GONZALES, Appellant.  CCA 200302053.  Writ-appeal petition for review of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals decision on application for extraordinary relief was filed under Rule 27(b) on December 24, 2003 and placed on the docket this date.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 02-5001/CG.  U.S. v. Marlon D. HUTCHISON.  CCA 1090.  [See also APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

__________

 

1/  Appellee's pending motion to file a reply to the Government's answer to Appellee's supplement to his petition is granted.

 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-059

Friday, January 02, 2004

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 03-0561/AR.  U.S. v. William A. BYRD.  CCA 9901101.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file final brief granted, but only up to and including January 16, 2004; and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 03-0578/NA.  U.S. v. Jeffrey B. MAZER.  CCA 200001655.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file final brief granted, but only up to and including January 20, 2004; and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case..

 

No. 04-0113/AF.  U.S. v. Rodriguez L. MEDINA.  CCA 34783.  Appellant's motion to submit document granted.

 

No. 04-0119/AF.  U.S. v. Anthony W. WARNER.  CCA 34716.  Appellant's motion to submit documents granted.

 

No. 04-0165/AR.  U.S. v. James A. MCQUOID.  CCA 20030074.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 30, 2004.

 

No. 04-0176/AR.  U.S. v. Roger O. MILES.  CCA 20010148.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to January 21, 2004.

 

No. 04-0178/AR.  U.S. v. Jacques SAINTAUDE, Jr.  CCA 9801647.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to February 6, 2004.

 

No. 04-5001/AR.  U.S. v. Ray T. LEAK.  CCA 20000356.  Appellee's motion for extension of time to file an answer granted, but only up to and including January 16, 2004; and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 


 Home Page |  Opinions & Digest  |  Daily Journal  |  Scheduled Hearings  |  Search Site