UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

Monday, September 30, 2024

 

Petition for Grant of Review Filed

 

No. 24-0237/NA. U.S. v. Eddie A. Tyson. CCA 202300083.

 

Miscellaneous Docket - Filing

 

No. 24-0238/AF. In re Jeg E.R. Libed, Petitioner. CCA S32719. Notice is given that a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of writ of mandamus was filed under Rule 27(a) on this date.

 

Order Granting Petition for Review

 

No. 24-0208/AF. U.S. v. Michael A. Valentin-Andino. CCA 40185. On consideration of Appellant's petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, and in light of Appellant's allegations that the Court of Criminal Appeals provided meaningless relief for unreasonable post-trial delay, it is ordered that said petition is granted on the following issues:

 

I. WHETHER "APPROPRIATE RELIEF" FOR EXCESSIVE POST-TRIAL DELAY UNDER ARTICLE 66(d)(2), UCMJ, ALSO REQUIRES "MEANINGFUL RELIEF".

 

II. WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT ERRED BY FAILING TO AWARD "MEANINGFUL RELIEF" DESPITE FINDING THAT RELIEF WAS WARRANTED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 66(d)(2), UCMJ, AND UNITED STATES v. TARDIF, 57 M.J. 219 (C.A.A.F. 2002), FOR UNREASONABLE POST-TRIAL DELAY.

 

On or before October 30, 2024, Appellant will file a brief, Appellee will file an answer brief no later than 30 days after the filing of Appellant's brief, and Appellant may file a reply brief no later than 10 days after the filing of Appellee's answer brief.

 

Notice

 

Pursuant to Rule 45 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure, United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, the following persons are, this 30th day of September, 2024, hereby appointed as members of the Rules Advisory Committee, effective October 1, 2024, for a term expiring on September 30, 2027:

 

             Mr. Dwight H. Sullivan, Esq.

             Mr. Thomas E. Booth, Esq.

             Mr. Seth D. Berlin, Esq.

 

The following members, whose terms expire on the dates indicated below, remain on the Rules Advisory Committee:

 

To expire on September 30, 2025:

             Prof. Alan B. Morrison (Chair)

             Ms. Michelle Lindo McCluer, Esq.

             Ms. Carol K. Joyce, Esq.

 

To expire on September 30, 2026:

 

             Mr. William A. DeCicco, Esq.

             Ms. Rebecca S. Snyder, Esq.

             Mr. Solomon L. Wisenberg, Esq.

 

The Clerk of the Court is an ex officio member of the Committee and serves as its Reporter.

 

The Court expresses its deep appreciation to John P. Taitt for his distinguished service as a member of the Rules Advisory Committee.

 

Rules Changes

 

Upon careful consideration of certain proposed changes to the Rules of Practice and Procedure, United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, which were presented to and reviewed by the Rules Advisory Committee of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, and thereafter published in the Federal Register for comment, it is ordered that the new Rules of Practice and Procedure are effective October 1, 2024, and are promulgated as provided by the Court's official website.

 

Mandate Issued

 

No. 23-0107/AR. U.S. v. Ladonies P. Strong. CCA 20200391.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

Friday, September 27, 2024

 

Petitions for Grant of Review Denied

 

No. 24-0177/AR. U.S. v. Timothy N. Sharrock. CCA 20230374.

No. 24-0178/AR. U.S. v. Jeron K. Edgerton. CCA 20230371.

 

Order Granting Petition for Review

 

No. 24-0196/NA. U.S. v. Edmond A. Maebane III. CCA 202200228. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is granted on the following issue:

 

DOES AN ACCUSED HAVE A SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO PRESENT EVIDENCE OF A RECORDED THIRD PARTY'S CONFESSION TO THE CRIME FOR WHICH THE ACCUSED IS ON TRIAL?

 

Appellant will file a brief on or before October 28, 2024, Appellee will file an answer brief no later than 30 days after the filing of Appellant's brief, and Appellant may file a reply brief no later than 10 days after the filing of Appellee's answer brief.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

Thursday, September 26, 2024

 

Interlocutory Orders

 

No. 24-0234/AF. U.S. v. James L. Taylor, Jr. CCA 40371. Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review is granted to October 16, 2024.

 

No. 24-0236/MC. U.S. v. Shaun J. Hernandez. CCA 202300060. Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review is granted to October 16, 2024.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

Wednesday, September 25, 2024

 

Petitions for Grant of Review Filed

 

No. 24-0235/AF. U.S. v. Kris A. Hollenback. CCA 40481.

No. 24-0236/MC. U.S. v. Shaun J. Hernandez. CCA 202300060.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

Tuesday, September 24, 2024

 

Petition for Grant of Review Filed

 

No. 24-0234/AF. U.S. v. James L. Taylor, Jr. CCA 40371.

 

Petitions for Grant of Review Denied

 

No. 24-0155/AR. U.S. v. Dalton C. Clark. CCA 20220541.

No. 24-0171/AR. U.S. v. Sean M. Garrad. CCA 20220352.

 

Order Granting Petition for Review

 

No. 24-0004/SF. U.S. v. Devin W. Johnson. CCA 40257. On further consideration of the granted issues, 84 M.J. 343 (C.A.A.F. 2024), and in view of United States v. Williams, __ M.J. __ (C.A.A.F. Sept. 5, 2024), it is ordered that the grant of review of issues in the Court's order of March 29, 2024, is vacated, and said petition is granted on the following issues:

 

I.  WHETHER THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES HAS JURISDICTION AND AUTHORITY TO DIRECT THE MODIFICATION OF THE 18 U.S.C. § 922 PROHIBITION NOTED ON THE STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE'S INDORSEMENT TO THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. 

 

II.  WHETHER REVIEW BY THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES OF THE 18 U.S.C. § 922 PROHIBITION NOTED ON THE STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE'S INDORSEMENT TO THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WOULD SATISFY THE COURT'S PRUDENTIAL CASE OR CONTROVERSY DOCTRINES.  SEE B.M. v. UNITED STATES, 84 M.J. 314, 317 (C.A.A.F. 2024) (DETAILING THIS COURT'S PRUDENTIAL CASE AND CONTROVERSY DOCTRINES).

 

III.  AS APPLIED TO APPELLANT, WHETHER 18 U.S.C. § 922 IS CONSTITUTIONAL IN LIGHT OF RECENT PRECEDENT FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. 

 

On or before October 24, 2024, Appellant will file a brief on Issues I and II only, Appellee will file an answer brief no later than 30 days after the filing of Appellant's brief, and Appellant may file a reply brief no later than 10 days after the filing of Appellee's answer brief. 

 

Interlocutory Orders

 

No. 24-0124 & 24-0125/NA. United States, Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. Jeremy W. Harborth, Appellant/Cross-Appellee. CCA 202200157. On consideration of Appellee/Cross-Appellant's second motion to extend time to file a reply brief, it is ordered that the motion is granted to October 3, 2024, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extensions of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 24-0179/AR. U.S. v. David J. Rudometkin. CCA 20180058. Appellant's motion to examine sealed material is granted.

 

No. 24-0206/AF. U.S. v. Dennis A. George, Jr. CCA 40397. Appellant's motion to extend time to file a brief and the joint appendix is granted to October 8, 2024. 

 

No. 24-0226/CG. U.S. v. Eliud I. Lopez. CCA 1487. Appellant's second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review is granted to October 16, 2024.

 

No. 24-0230/AR. U.S. v. Brett M. Hansen. CCA 20220162. Appellant's motion to submit matters pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), is granted.

 

No. 24-0233/MC. U.S. v. Jaden T. Rohlfs. CCA 202300019. Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review is granted to October 15, 2024.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

Monday, September 23, 2024

 

Petition for Reconsideration

 

No. 23-0207/AF. U.S. v. Samuel H. Smith. CCA 40202. 

 

Mandates Issued

 

No. 23-0239/NA. U.S. v. Rodney D. Harvey. CCA 202200040.

No. 24-0015/AR. U.S. v. Jaheemee J. Williams. CCA 20230048.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

Friday, September 20, 2024

 

Petition for Grant of Review Filed

 

No. 24-0233/MC. U.S. v. Jaden T. Rohlfs. CCA 202300019.

 

Order Granting Petition for Review

 

No. 24-0134/CG. U.S. v. Andrew J. Shafran. CCA 1480. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is granted on the following issue:

 

DOES THE SPECIFICATION OF CHARGE II, ALLEGING A VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 134, UCMJ (PROVIDING SEVERAL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES TO A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF 21), FAIL TO STATE AN OFFENSE BECAUSE IT FAILS TO ALLEGE WORDS OF CRIMINALITY?

 

Appellant will file a brief on or before October 21, 2024, Appellee will file an answer brief no later than 30 days after the filing of Appellant's brief, and Appellant may file a reply brief no later than 10 days after the filing of Appellee's answer brief.

 

Interlocutory Orders

 

No. 24-0216/AR. U.S. v. Brett D. Crawford. CCA 20230107. Appellant's second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review is granted to October 8, 2024.

 

No. 24-0218/AR. U.S. v. Anthony J. Longres. CCA 20220473. Appellant's motion to withdraw the petition for grant of review is granted, and the petition for grant of review is withdrawn.

 

Petition for Reconsideration Denied

 

No. 23-0107/AR. U.S. v. Ladonies P. Strong. CCA 20200391. Appellant's petition for reconsideration of the decision issued by the Court, __ MJ. __ (C.A.A.F. 2024), is denied.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

Thursday, September 19, 2024

 

Order Granting Petition for Review

 

No. 24-0104/AF. U.S. v. Bryce T. Roan. CCA 22033. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is granted on the following issues:

 

I.  WHETHER THE LOWER COURT'S ERRONEOUS RESOLUTION OF A QUESTION OF LAW -- FINDING THAT WITHHELD EVIDENCE WAS IMMATERIAL AND THERE WAS NO PREJUDICE TO APPELLANT -- VIOLATED BRADY v. MARYLAND, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).

 

II. WHETHER THE LOWER COURT'S ERRONEOUS RESOLUTION OF A QUESTION OF LAW -- FINDING THAT THE GOVERNMENT DID NOT VIOLATE APPELLANT'S RIGHTS UNDER RULE FOR COURTS-MARTIAL 701(A)(6) -- VIOLATED BINDING PRECEDENT SET BY THIS COURT.

 

Appellant will file a brief on or before October 21, 2024, Appellee will file an answer brief no later than 30 days after the filing of Appellant's brief, and Appellant may file a reply brief no later than 10 days after the filing of Appellee's answer brief.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

Wednesday, September 18, 2024

 

Petition for Grant of Review Filed

 

No. 24-0232/AR. U.S. v. Jorge L. Espinal. CCA 20220152.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

Tuesday, September 17, 2024

 

Petition for Grant of Review Denied

 

No. 24-0215/AF. U.S. v. Branden C. Haynes. CCA 40306.

 

Appeals — Summary Dispositions

 

No. 23-0139/NA. U.S. v. Thomas H. Martin. CCA 202100089. On further consideration of the granted issues, 83 M.J. 434 (C.A.A.F. 2023), and in view of United States v. Wheeler, __ M.J. __ (C.A.A.F. Aug. 22, 2024), it is ordered that the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.  

 

No. 23-0147/NA. U.S. v. David M. Diaz. CCA 202100090. On further consideration of the granted issues, 83 M.J. 431 (C.A.A.F. 2023), and in view of United States v. Wheeler, __ M.J. __ (C.A.A.F. Aug. 22, 2024), it is ordered that the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.

 

Interlocutory Order

 

No. 24-0220/AR. U.S. v. Laavon D. Owens. CCA 20220280. Appellant's second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review is granted to October 7, 2024.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

Monday, September 16, 2024

 

Petition for Grant of Review Filed

 

No. 24-0231/AR. U.S. v. Lakeeva K. Swint. CCA 20230037.

 

Mandate Issued

 

No. 23-0188/AR. U.S. v. Tryvon M. Jones. CCA 20210503.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

Friday, September 13, 2024

 

Petition for Grant of Review Filed

 

No. 24-0230/AR. U.S. v. Brett M. Hansen. CCA 20220162.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

Thursday, September 12, 2024

 

Petition for Grant of Review Filed

 

No. 24-0229/AF. U.S. v. Carson C. Conway. CCA 40372.

 

Order Granting Petition for Review

 

No. 24-0189/AF. U.S. v. Logan A. McLeod. CCA 40374. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is granted on the following issues:

 

I. WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES HAS STATUTORY AUTHORITY TO DECIDE WHETHER A CONVICTION IS FACTUALLY SUFFICIENT.

 

II. WHETHER APPELLANT'S CONVICTION FOR ATTEMPTED MURDER OF "SARAH" AND ATTEMPTED CONSPIRACIES TO RAPE AND KIDNAP AB ARE FACTUALLY AND LEGALLY SUFFICIENT.

 

III. WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRONEOUSLY INTERPRETED AND APPLIED THE AMENDED FACTUAL SUFFICIENCY STANDARD UNDER ARTICLE 66(d)(1)(B), UCMJ.

 

No briefs will be filed under C.A.A.F. R. 25




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

Wednesday, September 11, 2024

 

Petitions for Grant of Review Denied

 

No. 24-0149/AR. U.S. v. Justin M. Scott. CCA 20220450.

No. 24-0211/MC. U.S. v. Christian J. Elizondo. CCA 202300239.

 

Orders Granting Petition for Review

 

No. 24-0147/AR. U.S. v. Ryan C. Thomas. CCA 20210662. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY DENYING APPELLANT'S BATSON CHALLENGE.

 

Appellant will file a brief on or before October 11, 2024, Appellee will file an answer brief no later than 30 days after the filing of Appellant's brief, and Appellant may file a reply brief no later than 10 days after the filing of Appellee's answer brief.

 

No. 24-0175/AF. U.S. v. Daniel R. Csiti. CCA 40386. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is granted on the following issues:

 

I. WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES HAS STATUTORY AUTHORITY TO DECIDE WHETHER A CONVICTION IS FACTUALLY SUFFICIENT.

 

II. WHETHER APPELLANT'S CONVICTION FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT IS FACTUALLY AND LEGALLY INSUFFICIENT BECAUSE AH WAS CAPABLE OF CONSENTING – AND DID CONSENT – TO SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH APPELLANT.

 

III. WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRONEOUSLY INTERPRETED AND APPLIED THE AMENDED FACTUAL SUFFICIENCY STANDARD UNDER ARTICLE 66(d)(1)(B), UCMJ.

 

Appellant will file a brief on or before October 11, 2024, Appellee will file an answer brief no later than 30 days after the filing of Appellant's brief, and Appellant may file a reply brief no later than 10 days after the filing of Appellee's answer brief.

 

Interlocutory Orders

 

No. 24-0125/NA. U.S. v. Jeremy W. Harborth. CCA 202200157. Appellee/Cross-Appellant's motion to extend time to file a reply brief is granted to September 27, 2024.

 

No. 24-0226/CG. U.S. v. Eliud I. Lopez. CCA 1487. Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review is granted to October 1, 2024.

 

No. 24-0227/AF. U.S. v. Adjani K. Daughma. CCA 40385. Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review is granted to October 1, 2024.

 

No. 24-0228/AF. U.S. v. Robert D. Schneider. CCA 40403. Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review is granted to October 1, 2024.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

Monday, September 9, 2024

 

Petitions for Grant of Review Filed

 

No. 24-0226/CG. U.S. v. Eliud I. Lopez. CCA 1487.

No. 24-0227/AF. U.S. v. Adjani K. Daughma. CCA 40385.

No. 24-0228/AF. U.S. v. Robert D. Schneider. CCA 40403.

 

Interlocutory Orders

 

No. 24-0224/AF. U.S. v. Desiree M. Holmes. CCA 2024-1. Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review is granted to September 30, 2024.

 

No. 24-0225/AF. U.S. v. Austin J. Van Velson. CCA 40401. Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review is granted to September 30, 2024.

 

Mandate Issued

 

No. 23-0140/NA. U.S. v. Thomas L. Wheeler. CCA 202100091.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

Friday, September 6, 2024

 

Petition for Grant of Review Filed

 

No. 24-0225/AF. U.S. v. Austin J. Van Velson. CCA 40401.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

Thursday, September 5, 2024

 

Petition for Grant of Review Filed

 

No. 24-0224/AF. U.S. v. Desiree M. Holmes. CCA 2024-1.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

Wednesday, September 4, 2024

 

Petition for Grant of Review Denied

 

No. 24-0200/AR. U.S. v. Brad S. Barlow. CCA 20230380.

 

Order Granting Petition for Review

 

No. 24-0186/MC. U.S. v. Kyle A. Shelby. CCA 202200213. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals on appeal by the United States under Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 862 (2018), it is ordered that said petition is granted on the following issue:

 

DID THE MILITARY JUDGE ERR WHEN HE DISMISSED CHARGE II WITH PREJUDICE AFTER "CONSIDERING THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE, THE ACCUSED'S RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL, AND THE CUMULATIVE ERROR" OF THE GOVERNMENT?

 

Pursuant to C.A.A.F. R. 19(a)(7)(A), no further pleadings will be filed.

 

Interlocutory Orders

 

No. 24-0152/AR. United States, Appellant v. Tayron D. Davis, Appellee. CCA 20220272. Appellant's motion to amend the certificate for review is denied.

 

No. 24-0186/MC. U.S. v. Kyle A. Shelby. CCA 202200213. On consideration of Appellee's motions to correct errata, to withdraw as appellate government counsel, and for leave to file an answer to the supplement to the petition for grant to review out of time, it is ordered that the motion to withdraw as appellate government counsel is granted, that the motion for leave to file an answer to the supplement to the petition for grant to review out of time is granted, and the motion to correct errata is denied as moot.

 

No. 24-0214/AR. U.S. v. Joshua L. Lopezalgarin. CCA 20230630. On consideration of the motion filed by Major Chase C. Cleveland to withdraw as appellate government counsel, it is ordered that the motion is granted.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

Tuesday, September 3, 2024

 

Petition for Grant of Review Filed

 

No. 24-0223/NA. U.S. v. Chad M. Kaczkowski. CCA 202300045.

 

Petition for Grant of Review Denied

 

No. 24-0205/AR. U.S. v. Nathaniel R. Stewart. CCA 20230255.

 

Order Granting Petition for Review

 

No. 24-0206/AF. U.S. v. Dennis A. George, Jr. CCA 40397. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is granted on the following issues:

 

I.  WHETHER APPELLANT'S CONVICTION FOR ATTEMPTED SEXUAL ASSAULT WAS LEGALLY INSUFFICIENT BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT DID NOT PROVE THE ALLEGED OVERT ACT.

 

II.  WHETHER THE GOVERNMENT CAN PROVE THAT 18 U.S.C. § 922 IS CONSTITUTIONAL AS APPLIED TO APPELLANT WHEN HE WAS CONVICTED OF A NONVIOLENT OFFENSE.

 

III.  WHETHER THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES HAS JURISDICTION TO DIRECT MODIFICATION OF THE 18 U.S.C. § 922 PROHIBITION NOTED ON THE STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE'S INDORSEMENT TO THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT.

 

On or before 3 October 2024, Appellant will file a brief on Issue I only, Appellee will file an answer brief no later than 30 days after the filing of Appellant's brief, and Appellant may file a reply brief no later than 10 days after the filing of Appellee's answer brief.

 

Interlocutory Orders

 

No. 23-0210/AR. U.S. v. Isac D. Mendoza. CCA 20210647. On consideration of the motion filed by Major Chase C. Cleveland to withdraw as appellate government counsel, it is ordered that the motion is granted.

 

No. 24-0015/AR. U.S. v. Jaheemee J. Williams. CCA 20230048. On consideration of the motion filed by Major Chase C. Cleveland to withdraw as appellate government counsel, it is ordered that the motion is granted.

 

No. 24-0152/AR. United States, Appellant v. Tayron D. Davis, Appellee. CCA 20220272. On consideration of the motion filed by Major Chase C. Cleveland to withdraw as appellate government counsel, it is ordered that the motion is granted.

 

No. 24-0156/AR. United States, Appellant v. Ross E. Downum, Appellee. CCA 20220575. On consideration of the motion filed by Major Chase C. Cleveland to withdraw as appellate government counsel, it is ordered that the motion is granted.

 

No. 24-0194/NA. U.S. v. Derek J. Hemry. CCA 202300051. Appellee's motion for leave to file a 10-day answer letter out of time is denied.

 

No. 24-0223/NA. U.S. v. Chad M. Kaczkowski. CCA 202300045. Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review, is granted to September 23, 2024.

 

Mandate Issued

 

No. 23-0085/AF. U.S. v. Jonel H. Guihama. CCA 40039.



Home Page |  Opinions & Digest  |  Daily Journal  |  Scheduled Hearings  |  Search Site