UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-116

Monday, February 28, 2011

 

CERTIFICATES FOR REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-5003/NA.  U.S. v. Thomas J. HAYES.  CCA 201000366.  Notice is hereby given that a certificate for review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals was filed under Rule 22 on this date on the following issues:

 

WHETHER THE NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED WHEN IT HELD THAT APPELLANT’S UNSWORN STATEMENT DURING PRESENTENCING RAISED THE “POSSIBLE DEFENSE” OF DURESS.

 

WHETHER THE NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED, AS A MATTER OF LAW, WHEN IT FOUND THAT THE ACCUSED’S UNSWORN STATEMENT RAISED THE POSSIBILITY OF A DEFENSE WHEN THE FACTS ON THE RECORD DID NOT ESTABLISH A PRIMA FACIE CASE FOR DURESS.

 

WHETHER THE NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED WHEN IT SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS AND SENTENCE DUE TO THE MILITARY JUDGE’S FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE APPELLANT’S PLEA FOR THE POSSIBILITY OF A DURESS DEFENSE BECAUSE SUICIDE CANNOT, AS A MATTER OF LAW, BE THE THREAT NECESSARY TO ESTABLISH THE DEFENSE OF DURESS.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0365/AR.  U.S. v. Michael S. EUBANKS.  CCA 20100604.

No. 11-0366/NA.  U.S. v. Kenneth R. RITLAND.  CCA 201000567.

No. 11-0367/AR.  U.S. v. Georgio V. CRUZ.  CCA 20090553.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 11-8017/AR.  In Re Daniel GASKINS, Petitioner v. Colonel John B. Hoffman, Colonel David L. Conn, Colonel Mark L. Johnson, Colonel Theresa A. Gallagher, Colonel Eugene E. Baime, and Lieutenant Colonel Paulette V. Burton, Respondents.  CCA 20080132.  Notice is hereby given that a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus and a motion for a stay of proceedings were filed under Rules 27(a) and 30 on this date.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 11-0362/AR.  U.S. v. Thomas G. GENTRY.  CCA 20080985.  Appellant's motion for leave to file supplement separately from the petition for grant of review granted up to and including the 17th day of March 2011.

 

No. 11-0363/AR.  U.S. v. Phillip M.T. HUERTA.  CCA 20090194.  Appellant's motion for leave to file supplement separately from the petition for grant of review granted up to and including the 17th day of March 2011.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-115

Friday, February 25, 2011

 

CERTIFICATE FOR REVIEW

 

No. 11-6003/AR.  U.S., Appellant v. Michael A. PRINCE, Appellee.  CCA 20100939. Notice is hereby given that a certificate for review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals was filed under Rule 22 on this date on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE U.S. ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN AFFIRMING THE MILITARY JUDGE’S RULING TO SUPPRESS THE ACCUSED’S STATEMENTS TO A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION COMMAND (CID) AGENT.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 11-0189/AR.  U.S. v. Adrian CORDERO.  CCA 20090365.

No. 11-0275/AR.  U.S. v. Richard E. IKOLA.  CCA 20090788.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0362/AR.  U.S. v. Thomas G. GENTRY.  CCA 20080985.

No. 11-0363/AR.  U.S. v. Phillip M.T. HUERTA.  CCA 20090194.

No. 11-0364/AR.  U.S. v. Anthony J. PEREZ.  CCA 20100147.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-114

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

 

APPEALS-SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 09-0660/AF.  U.S. v. Moises GARCIA-VARELA.  CCA S31466.  On further consideration of the granted issues, 68 M.J. 241 (C.A.A.F. 2009), and the briefs of the parties, it is ordered that the decision of the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is set aside.  The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for remand to that court for consideration of the granted issues in light of United States v. Blazier, 69 M.J. 218 (C.A.A.F. 2010), and United States v. Blazier, 68 M.J. 439 (C.A.A.F. 2010), and to determine whether the erroneous admission of the cover memorandum of the drug testing report was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

 

ORDERS GRANTING REVIEW

 

No. 10-0461/NA.  U.S. v. Joseph A. SWEENEY.  CCA 200900468.  On further consideration of the granted issues, 69 M.J. 270 (C.A.A.F. 2010), and the briefs of the parties, it is ordered that the petition is hereby granted on the following additional specified issue:

 

WHETHER THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED AS A MATTER OF LAW IN DECLINING TO APPLY MELENDEZ-DIAZ v. MASSACHUSETTS, 129 S. CT. 2527 (2009), IN ASSERTING THAT UNITED STATES v. MAGYARI, 63 M.J. 123 (C.A.A.F. 2006), “FOUND DRUG LABORATORY REPORTS TO BE NON-TESTIMONIAL IN NATURE,” AND IN HOLDING (1) THAT DRUG LABORATORY DOCUMENTS WERE NON-TESTIMONIAL IN NATURE, (2) THAT THE LAB REPORT WAS A RECORD OF A REGULARLY CONDUCTED ACTIVITY OF THE NAVY DRUG SCREENING LABORATORY THAT QUALIFIED AS A BUSINESS RECORD AND FIRMLY ROOTED HEARSAY EXCEPTION UNDER M.R.E. 803(6), AND (3) THAT THERE WAS NOTHING TO SUGGEST THAT THE LAB REPORT WAS GENERATED FOR COURT-MARTIAL USE.  SEE UNITED STATES v. BLAZIER, 69 M.J. 218 (C.A.A.F. 2010); UNITED STATES v. BLAZIER, 68 M.J.439 (C.A.A.F. 2010); AND UNITED STATES v. HARCROW, 66 M.J. 154 (C.A.A.F. 2008).

 

Appellant’s brief on this issue shall be filed within 20 days of the date of this order.  Appellee’s brief shall be filed within 20 days of the filing of Appellant’s brief.  A reply may be filed by Appellant within 5 days of Appellee’s brief.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 11-0248/AR.  U.S. v. Brian I. CURUP.  CCA 20090230.

No. 11-0265/AR.  U.S. v. Angel GASCOT.  CCA 20090326.

No. 11-0271/AR.  U.S. v. Ian D. CARTER.  CCA 20100355.

No. 11-0273/AR.  U.S. v. Joseph W. GRANDE.  CCA 20100345.

No. 11-0274/AR.  U.S. v. John K. KLEPPER.  CCA 20100434.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0360/AR.  U.S. v. Dominic E. SPRIVEY.  CCA 20090482.

No. 11-0361/AR.  U.S. v. Mark C. CHARTIER.  CCA 20100312.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-113

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 11-0154/CG.  U.S. v. Wilson MEDINA.  CCA 1325.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE GOVERNMENT VIOLATES THE APPELLANT'S CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED LIBERTY INTERESTS BY FAILING TO MEET THE MANDATORY FACTORS IDENTIFIED BY THIS COURT FOR A CONVICTION UNDER UCMJ, ARTICLE 125.

 

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0352/AR.  U.S. v. Joseph S. BALOGUN.  CCA 20100168.

No. 11-0353/AR.  U.S. v. Justin C. MOORE.  CCA 20100503.

No. 11-0354/AF.  U.S. v. Charles T. SLAYTON.  CCA 37663.

No. 11-0355/AF.  U.S. v. Lee E. SIMS, Jr.  CCA S31798.

No. 11-0356/AF.  U.S. v. Elonmarie DANAHER.  CCA S31806.

No. 11-0357/AF.  U.S. v. Timothy A. TRACY.  CCA S31774.

No. 11-0358/AF.  U.S. v. Scott A. SMITH.  CCA S31804.

No. 11-0359/AF.  U.S. v. Brian K. AYRES.  CCA S31790.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 11-0345/AR.  U.S. v. Daniel L. STALEY.  CCA 20080477.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including March 10, 2011.

 

No. 11-0347/AR.  U.S. v. David E. RUTHERFORD.  CCA 20090199.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including March 10, 2011.

 

No. 11-0348/AR.  U.S. v. Timothy B. FILLINGER.  CCA 20100155.  On further consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals filed in the above-entitled action and docketed under Docket No. 11-0348/AR on February 18, 2011, it appears that said petition was a second petition filed in the case and was inadvertently given a new docket number.  Accordingly, it is ordered that Docket No. 11-0348/AR issued February 18, 2011, be rescinded in this case, that Docket No. 11-0067 be substituted and used on all future documents in this case, and that Docket No. 11-0348/AR be removed from this case and will not be assigned to any case in the future.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 10-0447/AF.  U.S. v. Audrey M. POPE.  CCA S31578.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-112

Friday, February 18, 2011

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0345/AR.  U.S. v. Daniel L. STALEY.  CCA 20080477.

No. 11-0346/AR.  U.S. v. Stacy L. LAURITSEN.  CCA 20090350.

No. 11-0347/AR.  U.S. v. David E. RUTHERFORD.  CCA 20090199.

No. 11-0348/AR.  U.S. v. Timothy B. FILLINGER.  CCA 20100155.

No. 11-0349/AF.  U.S. v. Kenneth D. BEAVER, II.  CCA 37654.

No. 11-0350/AF.  U.S. v. Michael V. GOULETTE.  CCA 37650.

No. 11-0351/AF.  U.S. v. Billie C. BARNARD.  CCA 37638.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 11-0148/MC.  U.S. v. David J. PHILLIPS.  CCA 200900568.  Appellee's motion to extend time to file a brief granted, up to and including March 16, 2011, and no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-111

Thursday, February 17, 2011

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0343/AR.  U.S. v. Willie R. MABRY.  CCA 20100194.

No. 11-0344/AR.  U.S. v. Bobby D. JAMES.  CCA 20090339.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-110

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 11-0214/AR.  U.S. v. Sean M. WILLIAMS.  CCA 20100305.

No. 11-0222/AR.  U.S. v. Shawn L. HASS.  CCA 20090116.

No. 11-0223/AR.  U.S. v. Jose L. CASTILLO.  CCA 20100226.

No. 11-0261/AF.  U.S. v. Willie L. COOLIN.  CCA 37583.

No. 11-0262/AF.  U.S. v. Daniel J. DUNCAN.  CCA S31795.

No. 11-0263/AF.  U.S. v. Stephen M. MORANT.  CCA S31785.

No. 11-0264/AR.  U.S. v. Michelle E. BECKWITH.  CCA 20100217.

No. 11-0266/AR.  U.S. v. Kevin D. STOVALL.  CCA 20090293.

No. 11-0267/AR.  U.S. v. David S. VAUGHAN.  CCA 20100590.

No. 11-0268/AR.  U.S. v. Samuel L. WAITS.  CCA 20100446.

No. 11-0269/AR.  U.S. v. Kyle W. PARRILL.  CCA 20100159.

No. 11-0270/AR.  U.S. v. Gabriel PEREZ.  CCA 20100386.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0339/AR.  U.S. v. Joshua J. SPURGEON.  CCA 20100097.

No. 11-0340/AR.  U.S. v. Larry S. ROBERTS.  CCA 20100834.

No. 11-0341/AR.  U.S. v. Kiel W. PAAVOLA.  CCA 20080890.

No. 11-0342/MC.  U.S. v. Adrian A. TAYLOR.  CCA 201000219.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 11-0123/AR.  U.S. v. Bryant K. MARSH.  CCA 20080382.  Appellee's motion to supplement the joint appendix granted.

 

No. 11-0154/CG.  U.S. v. Wilson MEDINA.  CCA 1325.  Appellant's motion to supplement the record is denied.

 

No. 11-0282/AR.  U.S. v. Bobby D. MORRISSETTE.  CCA 20090166.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including March 7, 2011.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-109

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0327/AR.  U.S. v. Shannon H. KOPP.  CCA 20090933.

No. 11-0328/AR.  U.S. v. Danny S. DHANJAN.  CCA 20100326.

No. 11-0329/AF.  U.S. v. Ryan J. VAN PROOYEN.  CCA S31777.

No. 11-0330/AR.  U.S. v. Greg C. ADAMS.  CCA 20100223.

No. 11-0331/AR.  U.S. v. Rashad R. STRAITE.  CCA 20100690.

No. 11-0332/AF.  U.S. v. Ryan W. GIFFORD.  CCA S31773.

No. 11-0333/AF.  U.S. v. Timothy V. MITCHELL.  CCA 37551.

No. 11-0334/AF.  U.S. v. Jeffrey D. MCKINNEY.  CCA 37559.

No. 11-0335/AF.  U.S. v. Chad A. ARROWSMITH.  CCA 37590.

No. 11-0336/AF.  U.S. v. Joseph D. MINNICK.  CCA 37653.

No. 11-0337/AF.  U.S. v. Francisco J. REYES.  CCA S31742.

No. 11-0338/AF.  U.S. v. Renee M. TEDESCHI.  CCA S31757.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 10-5003/MC.  U.S. v. Lawrence G. HUTCHINS III.  CCA 200800393.  On consideration of Appellee's motion for an enlargement of time for issuance of mandate, the Government’s opposition to Appellee’s motion, and Appellee’s reply to the Government’s opposition, said motion is denied.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 05-0157/NA.  U.S. v. Ivor G. LUKE.  CCA 200000481.

No. 10-5003/MC.  U.S. v. Lawrence G. HUTCHINS III.  CCA  200800393.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-108

Monday, February 14, 2011

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0325/AF.  U.S. v. Adam MOORE.  CCA 37452.

No. 11-0326/CG.  U.S. v. Anthony KOWALSKI.  CCA 1330.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 11-0318/AF.  U.S. v. Nicholas A. WATSON.  CCA 37416.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including March 3, 2011.

 

No. 11-0320/AF.  U.S. v. Crane XU.  CCA 37722.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including March 3, 2011.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-107

Friday, February 11, 2011

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 11-0128/AR.  U.S. v. Jose F. FERNANDEZBRITO.  CCA  20080982.

No. 11-0221/AR.  U.S. v. Malcolm L. CLARKE.  CCA 20100591.

No. 11-0245/AR.  U.S. v. Jerome R. WHITFIELD.  CCA 20100467.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0317/AR.  U.S. v. Aaron M. CALVIN.  CCA 20100671.

No. 11-0318/AF.  U.S. v. Nicholas A. WATSON.  CCA 37416.

No. 11-0319/AF.  U.S. v. Matthew R. LORDIER.  CCA 37601.

No. 11-0320/AF.  U.S. v. Crane XU.  CCA 37722.

No. 11-0321/AF.  U.S. v. Anthony K. BRANCH.  CCA S31691.

No. 11-0322/AR.  U.S. v. Daniel J. ANTONSON.  CCA 20080620.

No. 11-0323/AR.  U.S. v. Nicholas L LOPEZ.  CCA 20100549.

No. 11-0324/AR.  U.S. v. Brandon L. KEMP.  CCA 20100509.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 11-0307/AR.  U.S. v. George A. HENRY.  CCA 20090147.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including March 1, 2011.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-106

Thursday, February 10, 2011

 

APPEALS-SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 10-5004/AF.  U.S. v. Ryan D. HUMPHRIES. CCA 37491.  The Judge Advocate General of the Air Force certified the following issue pursuant to Article 67(a)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 867(a)(2) (2006):

 

WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN FINDING APPELLEE’S SENTENCE INAPPROPRIATELY SEVERE UNDER THE UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THIS CASE AND ERRED IN AN ATTEMPT AT EXERCISING APPELLATE CLEMENCY BY REMANDING THE CASE TO THE CONVENING AUTHORITY WITH INSTRUCTIONS THAT THE CONVENING AUTHORITY MAY APPROVE AN ADJUDGED SENTENCE NO GREATER THAN A SUSPENDED BAD-CONDUCT DISCHARGE AND A REDUCTION TO THE GRADE OF E-1. 

 

69 M.J. 199.  Upon further consideration of the certified issue, we note that the Court of Criminal Appeals, in its decision of May 24, 2010,1 acted on the sentence without acting on the findings.  This has resulted in having a case before us for review that does not have a complete decision on all findings and the sentence by the Court of Criminal Appeals as required by Article 67(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 867(c) (2006).  See United States v. Rose, __ M.J. ____ (C.A.A.F. Nov. 9, 2010) (order).  Accordingly, it is ordered that the case is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for remand to the lower court for further action consistent with this order.

_____________________

 
1 United States v. Humphries, No. ACM 37491, 2010 CCA LEXIS 236, 2010 WL 2266324 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. May 24, 2010) (unpublished).

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 11-0116/MC.  U.S. v. Lincoln J. CRALL.  CCA 200900503.

No. 11-0129/AR.  U.S. v. Vincent GALIMORE.  CCA 20080554.

No. 11-0157/AR.  U.S. v. Tommi J. GOSSETT.  CCA 20090736.

No. 11-0218/AF.  U.S. v. George W. GATTO.  CCA 37246.

No. 11-0225/AR.  U.S. v. Joey L. FORBES.  CCA 20100454.

No. 11-0228/AR.  U.S. v. Joseph A. PEARSON.  CCA 20090045.

No. 11-0250/AR.  U.S. v. Timothy W. BRANSON, Jr.  CCA  20090588.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW - OTHER SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 11-0104/AF.  U.S. v. Edward T. HUDSON.  CCA 37249.  On consideration of Appellant’s petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, we note that the decision of the court below is not free from ambiguity with respect to the status of the judges on the panel that issued the decision on the petition for new trial.  Accordingly, it is ordered that the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for remand to that court for completion of appellate review under Article 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866 (2006).  Thereafter, Article 67, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 867 (2006), shall apply.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0312/AR.  U.S. v. George B. CLARK, Jr.  CCA 20100103.

No. 11-0313/AR.  U.S. v. Fan FAN.  CCA 20100126.

No. 11-0314/AR.  U.S. v. Eugene R. DEAN, Jr.  CCA 20100557.

No. 11-0315/AR.  U.S. v. Sean D. BELL.  CCA 20090992.

No. 11-0316/AR.  U.S. v. Jorge D. CADENAS.  CCA 20100547.

 




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-105

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 11-0149/MC.  U.S. v. James N. FOSLER.  CCA 201000134.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT'S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT'S RECENT OPINIONS IN MEDINA, MILLER AND JONES.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 11-0167/AR.  U.S. v. Inez T. MARTINEZ, Jr.  CCA 20080699.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER A REASONABLE PERSON WOULD QUESTION THE TRIAL JUDGE'S IMPARTIALITY WHEN A SENIOR MILITARY JUDGE, WHO APPEARED TO HAVE ASSISTED THE GOVERNMENT DURING TRIAL, ENTERED THE TRIAL JUDGE'S CHAMBERS DURING RECESSES AND DELIBERATIONS, IN VIOLATION OF APPELLANT'S RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 11-0178/AR.  U.S. v. Tony M. MAY.  CCA 20090033.

No. 11-0208/AF.  U.S. v. Kayla D. SNIPE.  CCA 37536.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0304/AR.  U.S. v. Jason C. WILLIAMS.  CCA 20090884.

No. 11-0305/AR.  U.S. v. Patrick J. ROSINI.  CCA 20080247.

No. 11-0306/AR.  U.S. v. Ryan C. MARCH.  CCA 20100260.

No. 11-0307/AR.  U.S. v. George A. HENRY.  CCA 20090147.

No. 11-0308/MC.  U.S. v. Daniel W. HATCHER.  CCA 200900572.

No. 11-0309/AR.  U.S. v. James D. MCKENDRICK.  CCA 20100415.

No. 11-0310/AR.  U.S. v. Zachary W. LOCKARD.  CCA 20100470.

No. 11-0311/AR.  U.S. v. Romell A. TAYLOR-SMITH.  CCA 20100569.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 11-8008/NA.  James D. GUTHRIE, Appellant v. Commandant, U.S. Disciplinary Barracks and the Secretary of the Navy, Appellees.  CCA 9501697.  On consideration of the writ-appeal petition for review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals on application for extraordinary relief, said writ-appeal petition is hereby denied.

 

Misc. No. 11-8013/AR.  U.S., Appellee v. Andrew H. HOLMES, Appellant.  CCA 20100918.  On consideration of the writ-appeal petition, and Appellant’s motion for a stay in the proceedings and motion to waive filing of the joint appendix, said writ-appeal petition is hereby denied without prejudice to further consideration in proceedings, if any, before a military judge.  Said motions are hereby denied as moot.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 11-8016/NA.  Brian S. WARD, Appellant v. Colonel Eric Belcher, Commandant, U.S. Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, Appellee.  CCA 200600722.  Notice is hereby given that a writ-appeal petition for review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals on application for extraordinary relief, was received by mail under Rule 27(b) on January 24, 2011, and placed on the docket this date.  On consideration thereof, said writ-appeal petition is hereby denied.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 07-0253/NA.  U.S. v. John A. HALSEMA.  CCA 20001337.  Appellant's motion to set briefing schedule granted.  Appellant’s brief will be filed no later than March 11, 2011.  Appellee’s brief will be filed no later than 30 days after the filing of Appellant’s brief.  Appellant may file a reply no later than 10 days after the filing of Appellee’s brief.  Requests for enlargement of time to the filing times above will not be granted.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-104

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 11-0242/AR.  U.S. v. Julio A. NARANJO.  CCA 20100421.

No. 11-0244/AF.  U.S. v. Charles J. EDWARDS.  CCA S31791. 

No. 11-0246/AR.  U.S. v. James P. BARKER.  CCA 20061175.

No. 11-0247/AF.  U.S. v. Joseph P. BORDELON.  CCA 37525.

No. 11-0251/AF.  U.S. v. John E. PLEASANTS.  CCA 37589.

No. 11-0252/AR.  U.S. v. Wayne J. BERTRAM, Jr.  CCA 20100554.

No. 11-0253/AR.  U.S. v. Robert SALINAS, Jr.  CCA 20100413.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0302/AR.  U.S. v. Tommy J. FOSTER, Jr.  CCA 20090320.

No. 11-0303/MC.  U.S. v. Thomas R. LIRLEY.  CCA 201000502.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 11-8015/AR.  In Re: Paul Renfro HARBISON, Jr., Petitioner.  Notice is hereby given that a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of error coram nobis, habeas corpus, and mandamus was filed under Rule 27(a) on January 24, 2011, and placed on the docket this date.  On consideration thereof, it is ordered the said petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

 

PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED

 

Misc. No. 11-8015/AR.  U.S. v. Lawrence G. HUTCHINS III.  CCA 200800393.  On consideration of Appellant’s petition for reconsideration of this Court’s decision, United States v. Hutchins, 69 M.J. 282 (C.A.A.F. 2011), it is ordered that said petition for reconsideration be, and the same is, hereby denied.

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 11-8013/AR.  U.S. v. Andrew H. HOLMES.  CCA 20100918.  On consideration of Appellant’s motion to attach a copy of the charge sheet, the advice on disposition of the charges, and the convening authority action on the advice, said motion is granted.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 10-0397/AR.  U.S. v. Sergio SOTO, Jr.  CCA 20090255.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-103

Monday, February 7, 2011

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 10-0291/NA.  U.S. v. Benjamin H. HARTMAN.  CCA 200900389.

No. 10-0572/AF.  U.S. v. Alejandro V. ARRIAGA.  CCA 37439.

No. 10-6010/CG.  U.S. v. Andrew L. DALY.  CCA 001-62-10.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 11-0240/AF.  U.S. v. Johnathan N. RUE.  CCA 37634.

No. 11-0241/AF.  U.S. v. Frederick A. ST. HILAIRE, IV.  CCA 37617.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0298/AR.  U.S. v. Scott E. MYERS.  CCA 20100381.

No. 11-0299/AR.  U.S. v. Dwayne D. WHITE.  CCA 20100462.

No. 11-0300/AR.  U.S. v. Andre F. SAENZ.  CCA 20100173.

No. 11-0301/MC.  U.S. v. Jesse A. SPICER.  CCA 201000241.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-102

Friday, February 4, 2011

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 10-0033/AR.  U.S. v. Jerry PEARSON, Jr.  CCA 20080902.

No. 11-0220/AR.  U.S. v. Felicia D. LITTLE-WILLIAMS.  CCA  20100040.

No. 11-0230/AR.  U.S. v. Brandon D. REICHLE.  CCA 20090973.

No. 11-0232/AR.  U.S. v. Francis A. BARRETT.  CCA 20091162.

No. 11-0233/AR.  U.S. v. Ebony M. WILLIAMS.  CCA 20100054.

No. 11-0234/AR.  U.S. v. Frank LOEDDING.  CCA 20100241.

No. 11-0235/AF.  U.S. v. Cheryl L. TREXLER.  CCA S31619.

No. 11-0236/AR.  U.S. v. Marc A. PAPPA.  CCA 20100474.

No. 11-0237/AR.  U.S. v. Ronald E. HOPSTOCK.  CCA 20090159.

No. 11-0238/AR.  U.S. v. Tommy J. BLAS.  CCA 20100431.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0294/AR.  U.S. v. Bowman S. RYAN.  CCA 20100402.

No. 11-0295/AR.  U.S. v. Nathaniel P. MCCOY.  CCA 20100380.

No. 11-0296/AR.  U.S. v. Randoph C. RUSSELL, Jr.  CCA  20100032.

No. 11-0297/AR.  U.S. v. Neio R. WINGATE.  CCA 20100534.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 11-6002/AF.  U.S. v. Rory J. SCHUBER.  CCA 2010-14.  On consideration of Appellant’s motion to stay trial proceedings, we note that Appellee’s answer to the supplement to the petition for grant of review is not due to be filed until on or before February 14, 2011.  Accordingly, until the Court considers the pleadings of the parties, it is ordered that the motion is granted pending further order of the Court.

 

No. 11-8009/MC.  U.S. v. Frank D. WUTERICH.  CCA 200800183.  On consideration of Appellant’s Motion to Grant Appellant’s Counsel Access to Sealed Exhibit, it is ordered that said motion is hereby granted, that Appellant’s supplemental brief mentioned in the Court’s Order of January 11, 2011, will be filed within 20 days of the date of this order, that Appellee’s answer brief will be filed within 10 days of the filing of Appellant’s supplemental brief, and that Appellant may file a reply brief within 5 days of the filing of Appellee’s answer brief.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-101

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0292/MC.  U.S. v. Joseph J. KARRAS.  CCA 201000340.

No. 11-0293/CG.  U.S. v. Kenya BERNARD.  CCA 0262.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 08-0335/NA.  U.S. v. William T. JONES III.  CCA 200602320.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-100

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0291/AF.  U.S. v. Aaron L. HAWKINS.  CCA 37512.

 



Home Page |  Opinions & Digest  |  Daily Journal  |  Scheduled Hearings  |  Search Site