UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-058

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0158/AR.  U.S. v. Robert P. FRITZE.  CCA 20100009.

No. 11-0159/AR.  U.S. v. Alvin L. CANNON.  CCA 20090185.

No. 11-0160/AR.  U.S. v. Travockeous D. PORTER.  CCA 20090974.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 10-0461/NA.  U.S. v. Joseph A. SWEENEY.  CCA 200900468.  Appellee's motion to correct errata granted.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 10-0334/AF.  U.S. v. Dennis R. SAVARD.  CCA 37346.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-057

Monday, November 29, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 11-0095/AR.  U.S. v. Justin A. TOUBY.  CCA 20100339.

No. 11-0107/AR.  U.S. v. Miguel FLORES.  CCA 20100122.

No. 11-0108/AR.  U.S. v. William J. SHALLENBURGER.  CCA 20100389.

No. 11-0110/AR.  U.S. v. Charles N. LABORN.  CCA 20100107.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0155/AR.  U.S. v. Erik D. GRIFFITH.  CCA 20100001.

No. 11-0156/AR.  U.S. v. Robert C. DEAN.  CCA 20090522.

No. 11-0157/AR.  U.S. v. Tommi J. GOSSETT.  CCA 20090736.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-056

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 11-0034/AF.  U.S. v. Jonathan G. WEEKS.  CCA S31625.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE AFCCA ERRED, AFTER FINDING TESTIMONIAL EVIDENCE HAD BEEN IMPROPERLY ADMITTED AT TRIAL, BY CONCLUDING THAT THE TRIAL ERROR WAS HARMLESS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.

 

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-055

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 11-0021/AR.  U.S. v. Anthony N. RAMOS.  CCA 20090099.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER APPELLANT IS ENTITLED TO A NEW REVIEW AND ACTION BECAUSE THE STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE’S RECOMMENDATION WAS PREPARED BY A LEGAL OFFICER WHO WAS DISQUALIFIED BECAUSE HE WAS NOT NEUTRAL.

 

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 11-0088/AR.  U.S. v. Austin S. LEDBETTER.  CCA 20090993.

No. 11-0099/AR.  U.S. v. Paul L. HARRIS III.  CCA 20100240.

No. 11-0101/AR.  U.S. v. Wendy R. HANSEN.  CCA 20080520.

No. 11-0103/AR.  U.S. v. Joshua HARRISON.  CCA 20090728.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0142/AR.  U.S. v. Victor M. COLON-ROSA.  CCA 20090174.

No. 11-0143/AR.  U.S. v. Aaron R. STANLEY.  CCA 20050703.

No. 11-0144/AR.  U.S. v. Lee P. BRENIZER.  CCA 20100165.

No. 11-0145/AR.  U.S. v. Nicholas L. HOBBS.  CCA 20100060.

No. 11-0146/AR.  U.S. v. Donald E. ALBAUGH.  CCA 20100598.

No. 11-0147/NA.  U.S. v. Ryan G. VOSS.  CCA 201000239.

No. 11-0148/MC.  U.S. v. David J. PHILLIPS.  CCA 200900568.

No. 11-0149/MC.  U.S. v. James N. FOSLER.  CCA 201000134.

No. 11-0150/MC.  U.S. v. Ahmed C. BURDEN.  CCA 201000277.

No. 11-0151/AR.  U.S. v. James C. JOHNSON.  CCA 20100033.

No. 11-0152/AF.  U.S. v. Jeremy S. DENT.  CCA 37616.

No. 11-0153/AF.  U.S. v. Matthew T. GRIFFIS.  CCA S31693.

No. 11-0154/CG.  U.S. v. Wilson MEDINA.  CCA 1325.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 10-0512/AR.  U.S. v. Troy D. GADDIS.  CCA 20080150.  Appellee’s motion to extend time to file a brief granted, up to and including December 17, 2010, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 11-0066/AR.  U.S. v. Kyle G. TAVEL.  CCA 20100108.  Appellant’s motion for leave to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review out of time is hereby granted.

 

No. 11-0079/CG.  U.S. v. William L. OWENS.  CCA 1333.  Appellant’s motion to supplement the record and Appellee’s motion to supplement the record are hereby denied.

 

SPECIAL DOCKET MATTERS

 

No. 09-01.  In the Matter of James F. Clark, III.  Pursuant to Rule 15(b), Rules of Practice and Procedure of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, the above-named attorney was suspended from the practice of law before the Court on October 1, 2008, and ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred.  This suspension was a reciprocal action following his suspension by the Supreme Court of Alaska due to the attorney’s guilty plea in the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska to a violation of Title 18, U.S. Code § 371.  Sentencing was continued to October 15, 2010.  In reply to the show cause order, he requested a postponement of further proceedings pending further order of the Court, which was granted with the condition that he notify the Court of any further action by the Alaska State bar or the Supreme Court of Alaska. 

On October 13, 2010, the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska granted Mr. Clark’s motion to dismiss the information filed against him.  The Supreme Court of Alaska reinstated him to the practice of law on November 5, 2010.  He now petitions for reinstatement before this Court.

In view of the above, the Petition for Reinstatement to Practice Law before the Court from James F. Clark, III, is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the Bar of this Court effective the date of this Order.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-054

Monday, November 22, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 11-0093/AR.  U.S. v. Roberto V. TORRES, Jr.  CCA 20100160.

No. 11-0094/MC.  U.S. v. Jonathon D. RAMON.  CCA 201000144.

No. 11-0096/AR.  U.S. v. Jonathan D. FERDON.  CCA 20100253.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0141/AR.  U.S. v. Angelina A. MEEKS.  CCA 20100162.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 10-0512/AR.  U.S. v. Troy D. GADDIS.  CCA 20080150.  Appellant's motion to file volume II of the joint appendix under seal is hereby denied.  The parties are to review the joint appendix, and by December 13, 2010, submit an unsealed version that minimizes sealing through the use of alternatives such as redactions and summaries (e.g., similar to the summaries used for classified information under Military Rule of Evidence 505).

 

SPECIAL DOCKET MATTERS

 

No. 11-03.  In the Matter of Paul W. Bergrin.  It appearing that the above-named attorney is a member of the Bar of this Court, that he was disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Judicial Department, and suspended by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, that pursuant to Rule 15(b), Rules of Practice and Procedure, United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, said attorney was suspended from the practice of law before the Court and was ordered to show cause within 30 days why he should not be disbarred, that no response has been received within the allotted time, it is ordered that Paul W. Bergrin is hereby disbarred from the practice of law before this Court effective the date of this Order.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-053

Friday, November 19, 2010

 

APPEALS SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 11-0052/MC.  U.S. v. Daniel J. FIELDS.  CCA 200900589.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, we note that this general court-martial sentenced Appellant, inter alia, to be reduced to the pay grade E-1 and “to forfeit $3,226.20 pay per month for three months.”  The convening authority approved the sentence.  This was error for two reasons.  First, the amount was not based on the pay grade to which Appellant was reduced, and second, the amount was not stated in a whole dollar amount.  See Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 1003(b)(2).  The Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals failed to correct this error when it incorrectly stated the adjudged forfeitures as “total forfeitures for three months” and then affirmed the sentence “as approved by the convening authority.”  Accordingly it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE AFFIRMED FORFEITURE OF $3,226.20 PAY PER MONTH FOR THREE MONTHS WAS ILLEGAL UNDER R.C.M. 1003(b)(2).

 

The decision of the Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed as to findings and to only so much of the sentence as provides for reduction to pay grade  E-1, forfeiture of $1,399.00 pay per month for three months, confinement for three months, and a dishonorable discharge.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 10-0572/AF.  U.S. v. Alejandro V. ARRIAGA.  CCA 37439.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

I.  WHETHER, IN LIGHT OF THIS COURT'S RECENT DECISION IN UNITED STATES v. JONES, 68 M.J. 465, 468 (C.A.A.F.   2010), THE APPELLANT'S CONVICTION FOR HOUSEBREAKING MUST BE SET ASIDE BECAUSE THE MILITARY JUDGE ISSUED ERRONEOUS AND MISLEADING INSTRUCTIONS SUPPORTING HOUSEBREAKING AS AN AVAILABLE LESSER-INCLUDED OFFENSE TO THE ORIGINAL BURGLARY CHARGE.

 

II. WHETHER APPELLANT WAS DEPRIVED OF HIS RIGHT TO SPEEDY POST-TRIAL REVIEW WHEN OVER 243 DAYS ELAPSED BETWEEN THE DATE OF SENTENCING AND THE DATE THE CONVENING AUTHORITY TOOK ACTION AND WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRONEOUSLY HELD THAT ANY DELAY WAS HARMLESS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT DESPITE IT APPROVING ONLY TWO YEARS OF APPELLANT'S FOUR-YEAR SENTENCE TO CONFINEMENT.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 11-0052/MC.  U.S. v. Daniel J. FIELDS.  CCA 200900589.  [See also APPEALS SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0138/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher A. ARBUCKLE.  CCA 20100538.

No. 11-0139/AR.  U.S. v. John A. CAMPBELL.  CCA 20100237.

No. 11-0140/AR.  U.S. v. Thomas H. PRASENSKI.  CCA 20080573.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-052

Thursday, November 18, 2010

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 11-0046/NA.  U.S. v. Kevin T. ROMANOSKY.  CCA 201000009.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

IN ORDER TO CONVICT AN ACCUSED FOR AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT UNDER ARTICLE 120(c), THE GOVERNMENT MUST PROVE THAT THE VICTIM WAS INCAPACITATED OR SUBSTANTIALLY INCAPABLE OF APPRAISING THE NATURE OF THE SEXUAL ACT. ARTICLE 120 OF THE UCMJ PROVIDES AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE IF THE ACCUSED CAN SHOW, BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE, THAT THE VICTIM USED WORDS OR OVERT ACTS INDICATING AGREEMENT TO THE SEXUAL CONDUCT AT ISSUE AND WAS COMPETENT.  THIS STATUTORY SCHEME VIOLATES DUE PROCESS OF LAW BY PLACING A BURDEN ON THE ACCUSED TO DISPROVE AN ELEMENT OF THE GOVERNMENT'S CASE.

 

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

  

No. 11-0089/AR.  U.S. v. Mervyn W. OLIVER Jr.  CCA 20091109.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE EVIDENCE WAS LEGALLY SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT THE FINDING OF GUILTY TO DESERTION.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 11-0032/AR.  U.S. v. Kevin M. BENEFIEL.  CCA 20090411.

No. 11-0051/AR.  U.S. v. Paul M. GARZA.  CCA 20090953.

No. 11-0070/AR.  U.S. v. Juan G. SALINAS.  CCA 20090225.

No. 11-0084/AR.  U.S. v. Matthew S. LEMPERGEL.  CCA 20091108.

No. 11-0086/NA.  U.S. v. Shane R. DILLMAN.  CCA 200900504.

No. 11-0087/AR.  U.S. v. Richard BONET, Jr.  CCA 20091033.

No. 11-0090/NA.  U.S. v. Terry H. HAMPLETON.  CCA 200900645.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0135/AR.  U.S. v. Collin L. MCLEROY.  CCA 20090965.

No. 11-0136/AR.  U.S. v. Alisha R. WILLIAMS.  CCA 20100099.

No. 11-0137/AF.  U.S. v. Linda GRAHAM.  CCA 37403.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 10-6010/CG.  U.S., Appellant v. Andrew L. DALY, Appellee.  CCA 001-62-10.  On consideration of the certificate for review of the decision of the United States Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals on appeal by the United States under Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice, (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 862 (2006), it is ordered that Appellant show cause on or before December 3, 2010, why Appellant’s appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as untimely filed in view of the date trial counsel provided written notice of appeal.  See Article 62(a) (2), UCMJ.  Appellee may file a reply to Appellant’s response no later than December 17, 2010.  

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-051

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 11-6001/AF.  U.S. v. Adam C. BORGMAN.  CCA 2010-13.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals on appeal by the United States under Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 862 (2006), and Appellant’s motion to stay trial proceedings, it is ordered that said motion to stay trial proceedings is hereby denied, and that said petition is hereby denied without prejudice to raising the issues asserted during the course of normal appellate review.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 11-8002/NA.  Brian S. WARD, Appellant v. Colonel Eric Belcher, Commandant, U.S. Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, Appellee.  CCA 200600722.  On consideration of the writ-appeal petition for review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals on application for extraordinary relief and Appellant’s motion for leave to file the same out of time, it is ordered that said motion is hereby granted, and that said writ-appeal petition is hereby denied.  

 

Misc. No. 11-8005/NA.  United States, Petitioner v. United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, Respondent.  CCA 9501500.  On consideration of the petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus, it is ordered that said petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus is hereby denied.  The stay of proceedings is hereby lifted.  In accordance with the order of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals issued August 31, 2010, the record of the DuBay hearing may be returned to the Judge Advocate General for remand to an appropriate convening authority for proceedings consistent with the mandate of the Court of Criminal Appeals and mindful of this Court’s decision in United States v. Matthews, 68 M.J. 29 (C.A.A.F 2009).     

 

Misc. No. 11-8010/NA.  Solomon J. TEMPLAR [formerly known as Sergeant Joseph L. Thomas, U.S. Marine Corps], Petitioner v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, and United States Department of the Navy, Respondents.  Notice is hereby given that a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of habeas corpus was filed by mail under Rule 27(a) on September 24, 2010, and placed on the docket this 17th day of November, 2010.  On consideration thereof, it is ordered that said petition is hereby denied.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 10-0317/NA.  U.S. v. William R. SAVALA.  CCA 200800818.  On consideration of Appellee’s motion to seal part of the joint appendix and Appellant's brief and Appellee’s motion to file under seal a portion of Appellee’s answer, it is ordered that said motions are hereby denied.  The parties are to review the joint appendix, and by December 6, 2010, submit an unsealed version that minimizes sealing through the use of alternatives such as redactions and summaries (e.g., similar to the summaries used for classified information under Military Rule of Evidence 505) and by December 6, 2010, the parties are to file unsealed briefs using the materials in the revised, unsealed joint appendix and file a justification for any matter in the trial or appellate record that is proposed for retention under seal. 

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-050

Monday, November 15, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 11-0033/AR.  U.S. v. Dean L. LOWE III.  CCA 20100348.

No. 11-0055/AR.  U.S. v. Rodney A. HORNE, Jr.  CCA 20090892.

No. 11-0076/AR.  U.S. v. Joshua D. SMITH.  CCA 20090758.

No. 11-0077/AR.  U.S. v. Charles W. WALLACE.  CCA 20090860.

No. 11-0078/AR.  U.S. v. Patrick T. MANNEH.  CCA 20100188.

No. 11-0080/AR.  U.S. v. Christian E. MALDONADO.  CCA 20080855.

No. 11-0081/AR.  U.S. v. Richard D. JENKINS.  CCA 20100025.

No. 11-0082/AR.  U.S. v. Alan R. WENDELSCHAFER.  CCA 20100089.

No. 11-0083/AR.  U.S. v. Joshua J. OTTO.  CCA 20100298.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0133/AR.  U.S. v. David L. ZINK.  CCA 20100074.

No. 11-0134/AR.  U.S. v. Michael A. PARVIN.  CCA 20100303.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-049

Friday, November 12, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0131/AF.  U.S. v. Shawn R. HULL.  CCA 37470.

No. 11-0132/AF.  U.S. v. Kenneth J. EAVES.  CCA 37406.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-048

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 10-0664/AR.  U.S. v. James D. YAW.  CCA 20080480.

No. 10-0696/AF.  U.S. v. Jared D. KNIGHT.  CCA S31614.

No. 11-0056/AR.  U.S. v. Daphian V. CRENSHAW.  CCA 20080760.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0125/AF.  U.S. v. Lewis CHOI.  CCA 37577.

No. 11-0126/AF.  U.S. v. Leonides S. SORIANO-MCDONALD.  CCA 37596.

No. 11-0127/AR.  U.S. v. Jose M. CARRACEDO.  CCA 20100236.

No. 11-0128/AR.  U.S. v. Jose F. BRITO.  CCA 20080982.

No. 11-0129/AR.  U.S. v. Vincent GALIMORE.  CCA 20080554.

No. 11-0130/AR.  U.S. v. Robert R. SIMMONS, Jr.  CCA 20100073.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 10-0483/AR.  U.S. v. David C. ELLERBROCK.  CCA 20070925.  Appellee's motion to extend time to file a brief granted, up to and including December 9, 2010, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 10-0537/AR.  U.S. v. Alan D. ESLINGER.  CCA 20070335.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file a brief granted to November 26, 2010, and no further extension of time will be granted in this case unless good cause can be shown.

 

No. 11-0128/AR.  U.S. v. Jose F. BRITO.  CCA 20080982.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including November 30, 2010.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-047

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 10-0349/AR.  U.S. v. Dustin A. STEFAN.  CCA 20081097.

No. 10-0447/AF.  U.S. v. Audrey M. POPE.  CCA S31578.

 

APPEALS SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 09-5003/AF.  U.S. v. Brandon T. ROSE.  CCA 36508.  Upon further consideration of the certified issue (69 M.J. 198), we note that because of an ambiguity in this Court’s order of October 28, 2009 (68 M.J. 236), where we set aside the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, but ordered a new review of only Issue II, the Court of Criminal Appeals, in its subsequent decision of June 11, 2010, acted on the findings with respect to Specifications 1, 2, and 3 of Charge V, but not on the remaining findings and the sentence.  This has resulted in having a case before us for review that does not have a complete decision on all findings and a sentence by the Court of Criminal Appeals as required by Article 67(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 867(c) (2006).  Accordingly, it is ordered that the case is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for remand to the lower court to complete its review under Article 66(c), UCMJ, as to the remaining findings and the sentence.  The hearing notice issued on September 28, 2010, is hereby rescinded.

 

No. 11-0067/AR.  U.S. v. Timothy B. FILLINGER.  CCA 20100155.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is noted that in his action, the convening authority failed to approve or disapprove the sentence as required by Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 1107(d)(1).  Rather, he merely ordered parts of the sentence, not to include the bad-conduct discharge, executed.  Such an action is incomplete and ambiguous.  Accordingly, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE CONVENING AUTHORITY'S ACTION THAT FAILED TO APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE THE SENTENCE BUT ORDERED PARTS OF THE SENTENCE, NOT TO INCLUDE THE BAD-CONDUCT DISCHARGE, EXECUTED, IS INCOMPLETE AND AMBIGUOUS.

 

The decision of the Army Court of Criminal Appeals is set aside.  In accordance with R.C.M. 1107(g), the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for submission to the convening authority to withdraw the original action and substitute a corrected action.  Thereafter, Article 66, UCMJ, and Article 67, UCMJ, respectively, will apply. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 10-0291/NA.  U.S. v. Benjamin H. HARTMAN.  CCA 200900389.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER APPELLANT'S CONVICTION UNDER ARTICLE 125, UCMJ, FOR CONSENSUAL SODOMY IN THE PRESENCE OF A THIRD PERSON VIOLATES THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 11-0067/AR.  U.S. v. Timothy B. FILLINGER.  CCA 20100155.  [See also APPEALS-SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 11-0059/AR.  U.S. v. Joshua A. GONZALEZ.  CCA 20090478.

No. 11-0061/AR.  U.S. v. Travis  H. WHEAT.  CCA 20100136.

No. 11-0062/AR.  U.S. v. Robert A. GILES.  CCA 20091168.

No. 11-0063/AR.  U.S. v. Thomas J. YOUNG.  CCA 20091166.

No. 11-0064/AR.  U.S. v. Michael L. LANGHIRT, Jr.  CCA 20100048.

No. 11-0065/AR.  U.S. v. Sandy S. JUSINO.  CCA 20091100.

No. 11-0068/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher G. SABATER.  CCA 20100081.

No. 11-0069/AR.  U.S. v. Corry N. WILLIAMS.  CCA 20100200.

No. 11-0071/AR.  U.S. v. Michael A. KASHIWABARA.  CCA 20090238.

No. 11-0072/AR.  U.S. v. Jeffrey A. DUNHAM.  CCA 20100133.

No. 11-0074/AR.  U.S. v. Chad CZEKNER.  CCA 20100154.

No. 11-0075/AR.  U.S. v. Richard K. TILGHMAN.  CCA 20100218.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0124/NA.  U.S. v. Cornelius W. JACKSON.  CCA 201000310.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 11-0023/AR.  U.S. v. Ryan C. BURTON.  CCA 20090834.  On consideration of Appellant’s motion to attach matters pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), motion to withdraw and file a corrected motion to attach Grostefon matters, and a corrected motion to attach Grostefon matters, and upon further consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals and the matters personally asserted by Appellant, it is ordered that the order issued by this Court dated October 19, 2010, denying the petition for grant of review is hereby vacated, that the corrected motion to attach Grostefon matters is hereby granted, that the motion to attach Grostefon matters and motion to withdraw and file a corrected motion to attach Grostefon matters are hereby denied as moot, and that the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is hereby denied.

 

No. 11-0102/AF.  U.S. v. Nathan D. VAN VLIET.  CCA 36005.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including November 22, 2010, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 11-0104/AF.  U.S. v. Edward T. HUDSON.  CCA 37249.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including November 22, 2010, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-046

Monday, November 8, 2010

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 11-0079/CG.  U.S. v. William L. OWENS.  CCA 1333.  Appellant's motion to correct errata granted.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-045

Friday, November 5, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0123/AR.  U.S. v. Bryant K. MARSH.  CCA 20080382.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 11-8009/MC.  Frank D. WUTERICH, Appellant v. David L. Jones, Lieutenant Colonel, United States Marine Corps, in his capacity as Military Judge, and United States, Appellees.  CCA 200800183.  Notice is hereby given that a writ-appeal petition for review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals on application for extraordinary relief was filed under Rule 27(b) on this date.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-044

Thursday, November 4, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 11-0047/AR.  U.S. v. Daniel FERNANDEZ-MARTINEZ.  CCA 20080551.

No. 11-0057/AR.  U.S. v. Jason B. RIXEY.  CCA 20090934.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0121/AR.  U.S. v. Julius R. GREEN.  CCA 20090864.

No. 11-0122/AR.  U.S. v. Loyd H. MUNGER, Jr.  CCA 20090756.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-043

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 10-0251/AF.  U.S. v. Bruce E. GOOCH.  CCA 37303.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-042

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 08-0335/NA.  U.S. v. William T. JONES III.  CCA 200602320

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 11-0048/AR.  U.S. v. Ted K. BALTIMORE, Jr.  CCA 20090885.

No. 11-0049/AR.  U.S. v. Dillon C. PERALES.  CCA 20091046.

No. 11-0050/AR.  U.S. v. Omar P. PUERTO, Jr.  CCA 20091133.

No. 11-0053/AR.  U.S. v. Paul A. GARCIA, Jr.  CCA 20091002.

No. 11-0054/AR.  U.S. v. Wanda M. PITTS.  CCA 20100034.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 11-041

Monday, November 1, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0119/AR.  U.S. v. Michael A. SALAS.  CCA 20100445.

No. 11-0120/AF.  U.S. v. Hollis L. HILL, II.  CCA 37584.

 


Home Page |  Opinions & Digest  |  Daily Journal  |  Scheduled Hearings  |  Search Site