UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-203

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 08-0759/AR.  U.S. v. Edmond H. BAYTAN.  CCA 20070408.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby denied.

 

    BAKER, J. (concurring in the result).

 

I concur in the result based on my separate opinion in United States v. Rodriguez, 67 M.J. 110, 120 (C.A.A.F. 2009) (Baker, J., dissenting).  However, it bears noting that, having concluded that Article 67(c), UCMJ, prescribes a sixty-day mandatory and jurisdictional filing deadline, the majority now concludes that this mandatory and jurisdictional sixty days does not expire if the sixtieth day falls on a weekend or holiday.  This conclusion is not based on Article 67, UCMJ, which makes no reference to weekends, holidays, or other calendar accounting exceptions.  Rather, the majority finds the exception to the mandatory and jurisdictional filing deadline under Article 67, UCMJ, in the Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States.  The Supreme Court’s Rules, of course, make good sense.  If a court is closed on the day a pleading is due, then the court should accept the filing on the next available day if the law permits this course of action.  But the well-founded rules cannot amend statutory language that a majority of this Court found “mandatory and jurisdictional.”  Rodriguez, 67 M.J. at 113.  I wish the majority had been as eager to apply this Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure to inform and interpret Article 67, UCMJ, as it now seems willing to do with the Supreme Court’s Rules.

 

No. 08-0802/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher J. KELLY.  CCA 36897.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby denied.

 

    BAKER, J. (concurring in the result).

 

I concur in the result based on my separate opinion in United States v. Rodriguez, 67 M.J. 110, 120 (C.A.A.F. 2009) (Baker, J., dissenting).  However, it bears noting that, having concluded that Article 67(c), UCMJ, prescribes a sixty-day mandatory and jurisdictional filing deadline, the majority now concludes that this mandatory and jurisdictional sixty days does not expire if the sixtieth day falls on a weekend or holiday.  This conclusion is not based on Article 67, UCMJ, which makes no reference to weekends, holidays, or other calendar accounting exceptions.  Rather, the majority finds the exception to the mandatory and jurisdictional filing deadline under Article 67, UCMJ, in the Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States.  The Supreme Court’s Rules, of course, make good sense.  If a court is closed on the day a pleading is due, then the court should accept the filing on the next available day if the law permits this course of action.  But the well-founded rules cannot amend statutory language that a majority of this Court found “mandatory and jurisdictional.”  Rodriguez, 67 M.J. at 113.  I wish the majority had been as eager to apply this Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure to inform and interpret Article 67, UCMJ, as it now seems willing to do with the Supreme Court’s Rules.

 

No. 09-0077/AR.  U.S. v. Concetta J. TATE.  CCA 20080068.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby denied.

 

    BAKER, J. (concurring in the result).

 

I concur in the result based on my separate opinion in United States v. Rodriguez, 67 M.J. 110, 120 (C.A.A.F. 2009) (Baker, J., dissenting).  However, it bears noting that, having concluded that Article 67(c), UCMJ, prescribes a sixty-day mandatory and jurisdictional filing deadline, the majority now concludes that this mandatory and jurisdictional sixty days does not expire if the sixtieth day falls on a weekend or holiday.  This conclusion is not based on Article 67, UCMJ, which makes no reference to weekends, holidays, or other calendar accounting exceptions.  Rather, the majority finds the exception to the mandatory and jurisdictional filing deadline under Article 67, UCMJ, in the Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States.  The Supreme Court’s Rules, of course, make good sense.  If a court is closed on the day a pleading is due, then the court should accept the filing on the next available day if the law permits this course of action.  But the well-founded rules cannot amend statutory language that a majority of this Court found “mandatory and jurisdictional.”  Rodriguez, 67 M.J. at 113.  I wish the majority had been as eager to apply this Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure to inform and interpret Article 67, UCMJ, as it now seems willing to do with the Supreme Court’s Rules.

 

No. 09-0102/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher ASUNCION.  CCA 36946.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby denied.

 

    BAKER, J. (concurring in the result).

 

I concur in the result based on my separate opinion in United States v. Rodriguez, 67 M.J. 110, 120 (C.A.A.F. 2009) (Baker, J., dissenting).  However, it bears noting that, having concluded that Article 67(c), UCMJ, prescribes a sixty-day mandatory and jurisdictional filing deadline, the majority now concludes that this mandatory and jurisdictional sixty days does not expire if the sixtieth day falls on a weekend or holiday.  This conclusion is not based on Article 67, UCMJ, which makes no reference to weekends, holidays, or other calendar accounting exceptions.  Rather, the majority finds the exception to the mandatory and jurisdictional filing deadline under Article 67, UCMJ, in the Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States.  The Supreme Court’s Rules, of course, make good sense.  If a court is closed on the day a pleading is due, then the court should accept the filing on the next available day if the law permits this course of action.  But the well-founded rules cannot amend statutory language that a majority of this Court found “mandatory and jurisdictional.”  Rodriguez, 67 M.J. at 113.  I wish the majority had been as eager to apply this Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure to inform and interpret Article 67, UCMJ, as it now seems willing to do with the Supreme Court’s Rules.

 

No. 08-0547/NA.  U.S. v. Krystal A. ESPOSITO.  CCA 200700348.

No. 09-0170/AR.  U.S. v. Kevin D. LATIMER.  CCA 20060065.

No. 09-0424/AR.  U.S. v. Michael J. GEORGE.  CCA 20080333.

No. 09-0480/AR.  U.S. v. Enrique O. HINTON.  CCA 20080451.

No. 09-0490/AF.  U.S. v. Anesha C. JENNINGS.  CCA S31447.

No. 09-0500/CG.  U.S. v. Christopher E. HUPP.  CCA 1284.

No. 09-0507/AR.  U.S. v. Clarence N. CALDWELL.  CCA 20080798.

No. 09-0584/AF.  U.S. v. Heather L. OGLETREE.  CCA 37168.

No. 09-0653/AR.  U.S. v. Tyler J. MILLS.  CCA 20081008.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW - OTHER SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 08-0736/AR.  U.S. v. Jose M. GALDAMEZ-RAMIREZ.  CCA 20070916.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals and in light of United States v. Rodriguez, 67 M.J. 110 (C.A.A.F. 2009), said petition is hereby dismissed.

 

EFFRON, Chief Judge (concurring in the result):

 

I concur in the result and note that Appellant’s case remains subject to review in our Court under Article 67(a)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 867(a)(2).  See United States v. Angell, No. 09-0098/AR, ___ M.J. ___ (C.A.A.F. 2009) (Effron, C.J., concurring in the result).

 

BAKER, J. (concurring in the result):

 

I concur in the result.  See United States v. Angell, ___ M.J. ___ (C.A.A.F. 2009) (Baker, J., concurring) and United States v. Rodriguez, 67 M.J. 110, 120 (C.A.A.F. 2009) (Baker, J., dissenting).

 

No. 09-0121/AR.  U.S. v. Valerie L. EMERSON.  CCA 20080123.

On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals and in light of United States v. Rodriguez, 67 M.J. 110 (C.A.A.F. 2009), said petition is hereby dismissed.

 

EFFRON, Chief Judge (concurring in the result):

 

I concur in the result and note that Appellant’s case remains subject to review in our Court under Article 67(a)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 867(a)(2).  See United States v. Angell, No. 09-0098/AR, ___ M.J. ___ (C.A.A.F. 2009) (Effron, C.J., concurring in the result).

 

BAKER, J. (concurring in the result):

 

I concur in the result.  See United States v. Angell, ___ M.J. ___ (C.A.A.F. 2009) (Baker, J., concurring) and United States v. Rodriguez, 67 M.J. 110, 120 (C.A.A.F. 2009) (Baker, J., dissenting).

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0707/NA.  U.S. v. Marcus G. FRANKLIN.  CCA 200800640.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0648/AR.  U.S. v. Donald A. WOOLFOLK.  CCA 20070684.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including July 14, 2009.

 

No. 09-0651/AR.  U.S. v. Ahamed AKANBI.  CCA 20080412.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including July 16, 2009.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-202

Monday, June 29, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0705/NA.  U.S. v. Kevin J. RONAN.  CCA 200800154.

No. 09-0706/NA.  U.S. v. Carlton A. JAMISON.  CCA 200800409.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 08-0757/AR.  U.S. v. Jerry J. EDIGER.  CCA 20060275.  Appellee's motion to extend time to file an answer to Appellant's brief granted, up to and including July 27, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 09-0380/AF.  U.S. v. James N. DURBIN.  CCA 36969.  Appellant's motion to attach amended joint appendix granted.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-201

Friday, June 26, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0269/AF.  U.S. v. Alfredo E. PRECIADO.  CCA 35871.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 08-0307/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher R. MILLER.  CCA 36829.*

No. 09-0698/AF.  U.S. v. Darrin E. JONES.  CCA 37122.

No. 09-0699/AF.  U.S. v. Michael BAILON.  CCA 36912.

No. 09-0700/AF.  U.S. v. Nikkia K. RUSSELL.  CCA S31548.

No. 09-0701/AF.  U.S. v. Denton M. STEVENS.  CCA 37160.

No. 09-0702/NA.  U.S. v. Anthony E. BROWN.  CCA 200800149.

No. 09-0703/MC.  U.S. v. Michael R. CROTCHETT.  CCA 200800770.

No. 09-0704/AR.  U.S. v. Cable G. HODGES.  CCA 20081007.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0621/AR.  U.S. v. Fermin NUNEZ.  CCA 20061021.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including July 10, 2009.  

 

No. 09-0630/AR.  U.S. v. Kendall M. AMAZAKI, Jr.  CCA 20070676.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including July 10, 2009.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 09-0164/AF.  U.S. v. Wren A. NANCE.  CCA S31445.

____________________

 

* Second petition filed in this case.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-200

Thursday, June 25, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW - OTHER SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 09-0030/AR.  U.S. v. Josh R. RITTENHOUSE.  CCA 20050411.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals and in light of United States v. Rodriguez, 67 M.J. 110 (C.A.A.F. 2009), said petition is dismissed as untimely filed.

 

EFFRON, Chief Judge (concurring in the result):

 

I concur in the result and note that Appellant’s case remains subject to review in our Court under Article 67(a)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 867(a)(2).  See United States v. Angell, No. 09-0098/AR, ___ M.J. ___ (C.A.A.F. 2009) (Effron, C.J., concurring in the result)

 

BAKER, Judge (dissenting):

 

I dissent for the reasons stated in United States v. Rodriguez, 67 M.J. 110, 120 (C.A.A.F. 2009) (Baker, J., dissenting).



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-199

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 08-0770/MC.  U.S. v. Richard J. ASHBY.  CCA 200000250.

No. 08-0746/MC.  U.S. v. Joseph P. SCHWEITZER.  CCA 200000755.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0316/AR.  U.S. v. Antoine A. ARMBRISTER.  CCA 20070619.

No. 09-0365/AR.  U.S. v. Samuel J. BELL III.  CCA 20060302.

No. 09-0443/AF.  U.S. v. Willie J. COFFIE, Jr.  CCA S31495.

No. 09-0450/MC.  U.S. v. Dwayne F. BAILEY.  CCA 200800692.

No. 09-0462/AF.  U.S. v. Robert B. O’NEILL III.  CCA S31582.

No. 09-0464/AF.  U.S. v. Joshua N. HELMAN.  CCA S31489.

No. 09-0465/AF.  U.S. v. Marciano A. ESPINOZA.  CCA 36944.

No. 09-0511/AR.  U.S. v. Alexander D. VOGEL.  CCA 20080077.

No. 09-0514/MC.  U.S. v. Jason D. SCHOLZ.  CCA 200800512.

No. 09-0520/NA.  U.S. v. Adam W. JOHNSTON.  CCA 200500848.

No. 09-0522/AF.  U.S. v. Hogan M. DAVID.  CCA S31478.

No. 09-0562/AF.  U.S. v. Chane JACKSON.  CCA S31516.

No. 09-0563/AF.  U.S. v. Jamie F. SANTOS.  CCA 37223.

No. 09-0565/AF.  U.S. v. Jamario C. SNOW.  CCA S31496.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0694/AR.  U.S. v. Ruben CONTRERAS.  CCA 20080879.

No. 09-0695/AR.  U.S. v. Phillip R. FRANKE.  CCA 20081070.

No. 09-0696/AR.  U.S. v. Michael A. MCQUOWN.  CCA 20081078.

No. 09-0697/NA.  U.S. v. Shawn M. MULKINS.  CCA 200800824.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-198

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 09-0376/AF.  U.S. v. James A. COWGILL.  CCA S31404.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HER DISCRETION IN DENYING THE DEFENSE MOTION TO SUPPRESS ALL EVIDENCE FROM APPELLANT'S HOME.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0400/AR.  U.S. v. Ryan N. JACKSON.  CCA 20080944.

No. 09-0401/AR.  U.S. v. Zosimo R. MELENDEZ.  CCA 20050851.

No. 09-0431/AR.  U.S. v. Celedonio CORTEZ, III.  CCA 20080847.

No. 09-0448/AR.  U.S. v. Robert L. MCMILLIAN, Jr.  CCA 20071073.

No. 09-0454/AR.  U.S. v. John D. WATRIN.  CCA 20080607.

No. 09-0478/AR.  U.S. v. James L. NIELSEN.  CCA 20080149.

No. 09-0512/AR.  U.S. v. Joe M. ROMERO.  CCA 20081014.

No. 09-0550/AR.  U.S. v. Ahmad R. SALEH.  CCA 20080766.

No. 09-0552/AR.  U.S. v. Victoria V. CLAYTON.  CCA 20080674.

No. 09-0554/AR.  U.S. v. Stephan DW WILLIAMS.  CCA 20081053.

No. 09-0578/AR.  U.S. v. Paul S. DUNBAR.  CCA 20080468.

No. 09-0591/AR.  U.S. v. Clara L. SANTILLIANFLORES.  CCA 20080905.

No. 09-0628/AR.  U.S. v. Terry D. FULTON.  CCA 20070817.

 

SPECIAL DOCKET MATTERS

 

No. 09-09.  In the Matter of Nathan H. WASSER.  It appearing that the above-named attorney is a member of the Bar of this Court, that he was disbarred by consent from the practice of law by the Court of Appeals of Maryland on February 3, 2009, and that having been suspended by this Court and ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred by this Court pursuant to Rule 15(b), Rules of Practice and Procedure, United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, said attorney has not responded, it is ordered that Nathan H. Wasser is hereby disbarred from the practice of law before this Court effective this date.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 08-0644/AR.  U.S. v. Charles J. CLAYTON.  CCA 20070145.  Appellant's motion to file the additional supplement out of time is granted.

 

No. 09-0236/AR.  U.S. v. Vincent QUESADA, IV.  CCA 20060940.  On consideration of Appellee’s motion to dismiss the petition for grant of review for lack of jurisdiction and Appellant’s motion to attach defense appellate exhibits and motion to substitute original, it is ordered that Appellant’s motion to attach defense appellate exhibits and motion to substitute original are hereby granted, and that Appellee’s motion to dismiss the petition is hereby denied.

 

No. 09-0252/AF.  U.S. v. Herbert L. GRAYBILL.  CCA 37005.  Appellant's motion to raise issues pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982) granted.

 

No. 09-0316/AR.  U.S. v. Antoine A. ARMBRISTER.  CCA 20070619.  Appellee's motion to dismiss the petition for grant of review for lack of jurisdiction is hereby denied.

 

No. 09-0615/AR.  U.S. v. Merlyn D. SEELEY, JR.  CCA 20070577.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including July 7, 2009.  

 

No. 09-0646/AF.  U.S. v. David A. VALOIS.  CCA 36841.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including July 14, 2009.

 

No. 08-0746/MC.  U.S. v. Joseph P. SCHWEITZER.  CCA 200000755.

No. 08-0770/MC.  U.S. v. Richard J. ASHBY.  CCA 200000250.

Upon this Court’s receipt of notification of the June 12, 2009, passing of Senior Judge Robinson O. Everett, and upon the request of Acting Chief Judge Charles E. “Chip” Erdmann, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., on this 23rd day of June 2009, designated Chief Judge Joseph R. Goodwin, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, to perform the duties of a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces for each of the above cases pursuant to Article 142(f), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 942(f) (2000).*

 

No. 09-8025/AR.  Hasan K. AKBAR, Petitioner v. United States, Respondent.  CCA 20050514.  On consideration of the petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus, filed on May 19, 2009, it is ordered that Respondent show cause on or before July 6, 2009, why the requested relief should not be granted, and that Respondent’s pleading in response to this Order be consolidated with the response to be filed in Petitioner’s other pending petition (#09-8026/AR).

 

No. 09-8026/AR.  Hasan K. AKBAR, Petitioner v. The Army Court of Criminal Appeals, Colonel Paul P. Holden, Colonel John B. Hoffman, and Colonel Annamary Sullivan, and the United States, Respondents.  On consideration of the petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus, filed on May 26, 2009, it is ordered that Respondents show cause on or before July 6, 2009, why the requested relief should not be granted.  The proceedings pending at the Army Court of Criminal Appeals are hereby stayed pending further order of this Court, and the Respondents’ pleading in response to this Order will be consolidated with the response to be filed in Petitioner’s other pending petition (#09-8025/AR).

__________________

 

*  Senior Judge Everett had been asked by Acting Chief Judge Erdmann and had consented to participate in these cases pursuant to Article 142(e)(1)(A)(iii), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 942(e)(1)(A)(iii) (2000).  Chief Judge Andrew S. Effron, Judge James E. Baker, and Judge Margaret A. Ryan have recused themselves from these cases and did not participate in this notification.  Senior Judge Walter T. Cox III and Senior Judge H. F. “Sparky” Gierke have been called upon by Acting Chief Judge Erdmann and consented to participate in these cases pursuant to Article 142(e)(1)(A)(iii), UCMJ.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-197

Monday, June 22, 2009

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 07-0148/AR.  U.S. v. Jason A. DONNELLY.  CCA 20031026.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals,  said petition is hereby granted, and the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FO REVIEW this date.]

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 07-0148/AR.  U.S. v. Jason A. DONNELLY.  CCA 20031026.  [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 08-0740/AR.  U.S. v. John L. TANNER.  CCA 20070453.

No. 08-0769/AR.  U.S. v. Benjamin A. VISH.  CCA 20071196.

No. 09-0017/AR.  U.S. v. Ira B. DAVIS.  CCA 20061148.

No. 09-0262/AF.  U.S. v. David J. E. FLATT.  CCA S31440.

No. 09-0353/AF.  U.S. v. Carlos D. SANTIAGO.  CCA S31398.

No. 09-0375/AF.  U.S. v. Charles L. CHANDLER.  CCA 36967.

No. 09-0384/AF.  U.S. v. Shane W. LEWIS.  CCA S31400.

No. 09-0409/AF.  U.S. v. Larrin S. SUZAWA.  CCA S31437.

No. 09-0446/NA.  U.S. v. Daniel J. CUTLER.  CCA 200800658.

No. 09-0492/AF.  U.S. v. Robert L. CAMNETAR.  CCA 36448.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0870/AF.  U.S. v. Charles S. ROACH.  CCA S31143.*

No. 09-0688/AF.  U.S. v. Simone M. DAWSON.  CCA S31512.

No. 09-0689/AF.  U.S. v. David B. HILL.  CCA S31511.

No. 09-0690/AF.  U.S. v. Joshua R. LOCKMAN.  CCA 37215.

No. 09-0691/AF.  U.S. v. Rebecca H. SPENCER.  CCA S31547.

No. 09-0692/NA.  U.S. v. Jacob L. IMLER.  CCA 200800650.

No. 09-0693/AR.  U.S. v. Kenneth A. ZEPEDA.  CCA 20080129.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0072/AR.  U.S. v. Ganon S. MCCLORY.  CCA 20061042.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including July 6, 2009.  

 

No. 09-0370/AR.  U.S. v. Janis M. GALL-MARTIN.  CCA 20051415. On consideration of Appellant’s supplement to the petition for grant of review (and the attached materials at Appendix A to the supplement), it appears that Appellant’s pleading, submitted under United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), does not comply with the requirements of Grostefon for appellate defense counsel to list or identify the specific issues asserted under Grostefon.  While it is appropriate to attach Appellant’s submission for consideration by the Court, this does not relieve appellate defense counsel of the obligation to identify the specific issues, even if they do not require extensive briefing.  Grostefon, 12 M.J. at 437.  Accordingly, it is ordered that appellate defense counsel file an additional pleading that lists or identifies the specific issues for the Court’s consideration under Grostefon, and that this pleading be filed with the Court within 10 days of the date of this Order.

 

No. 09-0616/AR.  U.S. v. Lamont K. GOODWIN.  CCA 20080816.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including July 7, 2009.  

___________________

 

*  Third petition filed in this case.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-196

Friday, June 19, 2009

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 08-0720/AF.  U.S. v. Mohamed M. MOHAMED.  CCA 36421.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby granted, and the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.[See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 08-0720/AF.  U.S. v. Mohamed M. MOHAMED.  CCA 36421.  [See also APPEALS-SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

No. 09-0242/MC.  U.S. v. Benjamin W. ROSS.  CCA 200800313.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER, BY FINDING APPELLANT GUILTY OF THE CHARGE AND SPECIFICATION EXCEPT FOR THE WORDS "ON DIVERS OCCASIONS," THE MILITARY JUDGE RENDERED AMBIGUOUS FINDINGS NOT CAPABLE OF REVIEW UNDER ARTICLE 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 09-0414/NA.  U.S. v. Daniel V. TREW.  CCA 200800250.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER, IN LIGHT OF UNITED STATES v. WALTERS, 58 M.J. 391 (C.A.A.F. 2003) AND UNITED STATES v. SEIDER, 60 M.J. 36 (C.A.A.F. 2004), THE CHARGE AND SPECIFICATION MUST BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, BECAUSE THE LOWER COURT COULD NOT CONDUCT A PROPER APPELLATE REVIEW UNDER ARTICLE 66 AND DOUBLE JEOPARDY PREVENTS A REHEARING. SEE UNITED STATES v. WILSON __ M.J. ___ (C.A.A.F. 2009).

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0686/AF.  U.S. v. Kenneth W. DILLON.  CCA 36843.

No. 09-0687/AR.  U.S. v. Gabriel L. JORDAN.  CCA 20081138.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 09-8027/AR.  James E. MULLINS, Petitioner v. Anthony A. Cucolo, Major General, U.S. Army Convening Authority,  Patrick J. Parrish, Colonel, U.S. Army Military Judge, and United States, Respondents.  CCA 20090328.  On consideration of the petition for extraordinary relief for writs of mandamus and prohibition and Petitioner’s motion for an expedited stay of proceedings, said motion is hereby denied and said petition is hereby denied.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0133/MC.  U.S. v. Raheem G. GREEN.  CCA 200800005.  Appellee's motion to substitute the joint appendix granted.

 

No. 09-0580/AR.  U.S. v. Michael J. GRIFFITH.  CCA 20081028.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including July 6, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 09-0607/AR.  U.S. v. Derek W. MILLER.  CCA 20081006.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including July 6, 2009.

 

No. 09-0609/AR.  U.S. v. Juan R. GUTIERREZ.  CCA 20040596.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including July 6, 2009.

 

No. 09-0613/AR.  U.S. v. Virgilio PENATORRES.  CCA 20071353.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including July 7, 2009.


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-195

Thursday, June 18, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0685/AR.  U.S. v. Gary J. SOWELL.  CCA 20081121.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 08-0621/AF.  U.S. v. Jessica L. MALLORY.  CCA S31245.  On consideration of Appellee’s motion to submit document, filed April 8, 2009, and Appellant’s motion for leave to respond to the Government’s reply to Appellant’s response to the show cause order, it is ordered that Appellee’s motion to submit document is hereby denied, and that Appellant’s motion for leave to respond to the Government’s reply to Appellant’s response to the show cause order is hereby granted.

 

No. 08-0740/AR.  U.S. v. John L. TANNER.  CCA 20070453.  Appellant's motion to attach defense appellate exhibits granted.

 

No. 08-0769/AR.  U.S. v. Benjamin A. VISH.  CCA 20071196.  Appellant's motion to attach affidavit granted.

 

No. 09-0017/AR.  U.S. v. Ira B. DAVIS.  CCA 20061148.  On consideration of Appellant’s motion to file out of time and to attach affidavit and Appellee’s motion to dismiss the petition for grant of review for lack of jurisdiction, it is ordered that Appellant’s motion to file out of time and to attach affidavit is hereby granted, and that Appellee’s motion to dismiss the petition for grant of review for lack of jurisdiction is hereby denied.

 

No. 09-0121/AR.  U.S. v. Valerie L. EMERSON.  CCA 20080123.  Appellant's motion to attach defense appellate exhibits granted.

 

No. 09-0371/AR.  U.S. v. Dana L. DUNN.  CCA 20060370.  Appellant's motion to attach defense appellate exhibits and motion to substitute original are granted.

 

No. 09-0573/AR.  U.S. v. Marcus D. SMITH.  CCA 20080032.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including June 30, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 09-0617/AR.  U.S. v. Camillo E. MEJIA-CASTILLO.  CCA 20040654.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including July 7, 2009. 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-194

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0288/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher S. DUTTON.  CCA 20070764.

No. 09-0387/AR.  U.S. v. Kirksey A. AGEE.  CCA 20080828.

No. 09-0417/AR.  U.S. v. Bryan E. HUFF.  CCA 20080671.

No. 09-0419/AR.  U.S. v. Orry R. JONES.  CCA 20080397.

No. 09-0452/MC.  U.S. v. Jerry ANDERSON, Jr.  CCA 200800180.

No. 09-0473/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher L. MCNEILL.  CCA 20070709.

No. 09-0486/AR.  U.S. v. Chester A. ORDENANA.  CCA 20080143.

No. 09-0516/AR.  U.S. v. Trevor J. COOPER.  CCA 20080882.

No. 09-0528/AF.  U.S. v. Stacy E. TROUTMAN.  CCA 37199.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW - OTHER SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 09-6005/AR.  U.S. v. Michael T. MCNAUGHTON.  CCA 20090089.  On consideration of Appellant’s motion to withdraw the petition for grant of review, it is ordered that said motion is hereby granted without prejudice.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0680/NA.  U.S. v. Christopher C. GAMMON.  CCA 200800324.

No. 09-0681/AR.  U.S. v. Ryan B. MCDANIEL.  CCA 20080645.

No. 09-0682/AR.  U.S. v. Bobby L. PITCHFORD.  CCA 20081107.

No. 09-0683/AR.  U.S. v. Joshua I. COVER.  CCA 20080667.

No. 09-0684/AR.  U.S. v. David E. JONES.  CCA 20090064.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-193

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0401/NA.  U.S. v. Russell B. MULLINS.  CCA 200200988.*

No. 09-0673/AR.  U.S. v. James L. BOLTON.  CCA 20080830.

No. 09-0674/AR.  U.S. v. William Z. HILLESTAD.  CCA 20081033.

No. 09-0675/AR.  U.S. v. Billy J. HARDY.  CCA 20081035.

No. 09-0676/AR.  U.S. v. Edward GOODWIN.  CCA 20011125.

No. 09-0677/AR.  U.S. v. Chauncey J.R. THORNE.  CCA 20080565.

No. 09-0678/AR.  U.S. v. Dartanian L. HOWARD.  CCA 20090102.

No. 09-0679/AR.  U.S. v. Corey R. CLAGETT.  CCA 20070082.

______________________

 

*  Second petition filed in this case.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-192

Monday, June 15, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0349/AF.  U.S. v. Terri S. KING.  CCA S31434.

No. 09-0377/NA.  U.S. v. Renico A. SMITH.  CCA 200800256.

No. 09-0496/AR.  U.S. v. David L. FRANK, Jr.  CCA 20080316.

No. 09-0559/AF.  U.S. v. John  A. DAVIS.  CCA 37212.

No. 09-0564/AF.  U.S. v. Patrick K. PITNER, Jr.  CCA 37217.

No. 09-0567/NA.  U.S. v. Chad M. HUCKABEE.  CCA 200800670.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0666/AF.  U.S. v. Brandon D. KEARNS.  CCA S31597.

No. 09-0667/AF.  U.S. v. Joshua I. PRUITT.  CCA S31545.

No. 09-0668/AF.  U.S. v. Jamal R. HOYE.  CCA S31538.

No. 09-0669/AF.  U.S. v. Matthew T. LAWYER.  CCA 37347.

No. 09-0670/AF.  U.S. v. Lyle W. ODEN.  CCA 37035.

No. 09-0671/AF.  U.S. v. Mark E. COOPER.  CCA 37240.

No. 09-0672/MC.  U.S. v. Pedro E. TRINIDAD.  CCA 200800776.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 08-0806/MC.  U.S. v. Archie L. ONEIL, Jr.  CCA 200602504.  Appellant's motion for leave to file a petition for reconsideration out of time is denied.

 

No. 09-0519/NA.  U.S. v. Michael S. HODGE.  CCA 200601124.  Appellant's motion to attach granted.

 

No. 09-0535/NA.  U.S. v. Matthew M. DIAZ.  CCA 200700970.  On consideration of the motion filed by Captain Kyle R. Kilian for leave to withdraw as counsel in the above-entitled case, it appears that the Judge Advocate General has assigned another counsel to represent the Appellant and that the new counsel has assumed representation of said Appellant.  Accordingly, it is ordered that said motion is hereby granted.

 

No. 09-0569/AR.  U.S. v. Benjamin A. BOYER.  CCA 20080467.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including June 26, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 09-0608/AR.  U.S. v. James Z. YELVERTON.  CCA 418990.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including July 6, 2009.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-191

Friday, June 12, 2009

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 05-0159/AR.  U.S. v. Jeremy T. WILCOX.  CCA 20000876.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including June 26, 2009.

 

No. 09-0514/MC.  U.S. v. Jason D. SCHOLZ.  CCA 200800512.

No. 09-0610/NA.  U.S. v. John W. WIDDOWSON.  CCA 200700252.  On consideration of the motions filed by Captain Kyle R. Kilian for leave to withdraw as counsel in the above-entitled cases, it appears that the Judge Advocate General has assigned another counsel to represent the Appellants and that the new counsel have assumed representation of said Appellants.  Accordingly, it is ordered that said motions are hereby granted.

 

No. 09-0588/AR.  U.S. v. Ricky L. FISHER.  CCA 20080012.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including June 26, 2009.

 

No. 09-0589/AR.  U.S. v. Robert C. HUNTZINGER.  CCA 20060976.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including June 26, 2009.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 08-0495/NA.  U.S. v. Kimberly L. COLLIER.  CCA 200601218.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-190

Thursday, June 11, 2009

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 08-0804/AR.  U.S. v. Sabrina D. HARMAN.  CCA 20050597.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE EVIDENCE IS LEGALLY SUFFICIENT TO SUSTAIN THE FINDINGS OF GUILTY BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 09-0145/AR.  U.S. v. Christine N. THOMPSON.  CCA 20060901.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE ARMY COURT ERRED WHEN IT RULED THAT APPELLANT’S RIGHT TO A SPEEDY TRIAL UNDER ARTICLE 10, UCMJ, WAS NOT VIOLATED.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 09-0304/AF.  U.S. v. Shamush P. MYERS.  CCA 35781.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN FAILING TO GRANT ANY SENTENCE RELIEF TO APPELLANT WHEN THAT COURT FOUND APPELLANT'S DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO TIMELY POST-TRIAL PROCESSING WAS VIOLATED BY THE GOVERNMENT TAKING AN UNREASONABLE 946 DAYS TO RETURN THE RECORD OF TRIAL TO THAT COURT AFTER REMAND FOR NEW POST-TRIAL PROCESSING.

 

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 09-0382/AF.  U.S. v. Daniel L. ELLIS.  CCA 37113.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION BY ALLOWING THE GOVERNMENT'S EXPERT WITNESS TO TESTIFY CONCERNING APPELLANT'S RISK OF RECIDIVISM.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 08-0755/NA.  U.S. v. Kenneth L. HORSLEY.  CCA 200401412.

No. 09-0284/AF.  U.S. v. Elizabeth E. LEAHY.  CCA S31462.

No. 09-0289/AR.  U.S. v. Jose D. VARGAS, JR.  CCA 20070361.

No. 09-0302/MC.  U.S. v. Winfield S. CARSON.  CCA 200600994.

No. 09-0374/AR.  U.S. v. Mark S. BRADY.  CCA 20070888.

No. 09-0385/AF.  U.S. v. Lantz E. NAVE.  CCA 36851.

No. 09-0442/AF.  U.S. v. Phillip M. JAMESON.  CCA S31438.

No. 09-0499/AR.  U.S. v. Daniel J. YOUNG.  CCA 20080738.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0665/AR.  U.S. v. Marcus D. JOHNSON.  CCA 20080920.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-189

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0421/AR.  U.S. v. Jason L. HINSON.  CCA 20071140.

No. 09-0470/NA.  U.S. v. Sheila P. DANIELS.  CCA 200800499.

No. 09-0476/AF.  U.S. v. Jeconiah A. YEHUDAH.  CCA 37244.

No. 09-0504/MC.  U.S. v. Robert J. FLORES.  CCA 200800742.

No. 09-0508/MC.  U.S. v. James G. GUNSCH.  CCA 200800749.

No. 09-0509/AR.  U.S. v. Brandon D. SELF.  CCA 20071118.

No. 09-0518/AF.  U.S. v. Airial A. JOHNSON.  CCA 37226.

No. 09-0587/AF.  U.S. v. Derrick D. BOSS.  CCA 37275.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0223/AR.  U.S. v. Jeffrey A. LORENZ.  CCA 20061071.*

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 08-0720/AF.  U.S. v. Mohamed M. MOHAMED.  CCA 36421.  Appellant's motion to attach documents denied.

 

No. 08-0755/NA.  U.S. v. Kenneth L. HORSLEY.  CCA 200401412.  Appellant's motion to attach granted.

 

No. 09-0420/AR.  U.S. v. Gary D. FIELDS.  CCA 20080168.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file a response to this Court's show cause order granted, up to and including June 16, 2009.

 

No. 09-0434/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher J. FRIEND.  CCA 20080437.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file a response to this Court's show cause order granted, up to and including June 22, 2009.

______________________

 

*  Second petition filed in this case.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-188

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 07-0079/AR.  U.S. v. Rickie E. PARRISH.  CCA 20020916.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby granted, and the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 07-0079/AR.  U.S. v. Rickie E. PARRISH.  CCA 20020916.  [See also APPEALS-SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0560/AF.  U.S. v. Edmon C. MARSHALL.  CCA 37295.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-187

Monday, June 8, 2009

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 09-0466/AF.  U.S. v. Adam D. DOUGLAS.  CCA S31059.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE REVERSIBLY ERRED WHEN SHE DID NOT DISMISS THE CHARGES AND SPECIFICATIONS AFTER SHE FOUND THAT UNLAWFUL COMMAND INFLUENCE EXISTED IN THIS CASE.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0660/AF.  U.S. v. Moises GARCIA-VARELA.  CCA S31466.

No. 09-0661/AF.  U.S. v. Harold T. PETTIGREW, Jr.  CCA 37279.

No. 09-0662/AF.  U.S. v. Joshua E. MCCOWEN.  CCA 37189.

No. 09-0663/AF.  U.S. v. Stony H. SIMON.  CCA 37271.

No. 09-0664/NA.  U.S. v. Robert W. PAYNE.  CCA 200501454.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-186

Friday, June 5, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0656/AF.  U.S. v. Steven E. NICHOLAS.  CCA S31507.

No. 09-0657/AF.  U.S. v. Kenneth C. LEE.  CCA S31523.

No. 09-0658/AF.  U.S. v. Ricky R. HARVEY.  CCA 36641.

No. 09-0659/AF.  U.S. v. Terrance L. ANDERSON.  CCA 37157.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0466/AF.  U.S. v. Adam D. DOUGLAS.  CCA S31059.  On consideration of Appellant’s motion to attach documents in support of the supplement to the petition for grant of review, it appears said documents were made a part of the record before the Court of Criminal Appeals.  Accordingly, it is ordered that said motion is hereby denied as moot.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 08-0739/AR.  U.S. v. Carrie N. RIDDLE.  CCA 20070756.

No. 09-0013/AF.  U.S. v. Andre M. SANDERS.  CCA 36443.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-185

Thursday, June 4, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW - OTHER SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 09-0634/AR.  U.S. v. Juan R. GUTIERREZ.  CCA 20040596.  On further consideration of the petition for grant of review filed by the appellant on May 28, 2009, under Rule 19(a)(4), Rules of Practice and Procedure, and docketed under Docket Number 09-0634/AR, it appears that said petition is in fact a duplicate petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals and was filed earlier under Docket Number 09-0609/AR.  Accordingly, it is, ordered that Docket Number 09-0609/AR be used on all future documents filed in this case, and that Docket Number 09-0634/AR be rescinded and not be assigned to any other case.  Appellant will file a Supplement to the petition under Rule 21 on or before the 18th day of June, 2009.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0043/AR.  U.S. v. Neil S. LUBASKY.  CCA 20020924.  Appellee’s motion for leave to file a supplement to the joint appendix is granted.

 

No. 09-0541/AR.  U.S. v. Jonathan M. HOGUE.  CCA 20080775.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including June 17, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 09-0542/AR.  U.S. v. Heather N. POMEROY.  CCA 20080600.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including June 17, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 09-0580/AR.  U.S. v. Michael J. GRIFFITH.  CCA 20081028.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including June 18, 2009.

 

No. 09-0610/NA.  U.S. v. John W. WIDDOWSON.  CCA 200700252.  On consideration of the motion filed by Lieutenant Kathleen L. Kadlec for leave to withdraw as counsel in the above-entitled case, it appears that the Judge Advocate General has assigned another counsel to represent the Appellant and that the new counsel has assumed representation of said Appellant.  Accordingly, it is ordered that said motion is hereby granted.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-184

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0259/AR.  U.S. v. Ryan M. SMITH.  CCA 20060177.

No. 09-0373/NA.  U.S. v. Kevin M. BURNETT.  CCA 200800503.

No. 09-0407/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher M. DELANO.  CCA 37126.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0654/AF.  U.S. v. Bradley E. KARR.  CCA 37239.

No. 09-0655/AF.  U.S. v. Jaime MARTINEZ.  CCA 37176.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 09-8027/AR.  James E. MULLINS, Petitioner v. Anthony A. Cucolo, Major General, U.S. Army Convening Authority, and Patrick J. Parrish, Colonel, U.S. Army Military Judge, and United States, Respondents.  CCA 20090328.  Notice is hereby given that a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus was filed under Rule 27(a).



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-183

Tuesday, June 2, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0024/NA.  U.S. v. Brent C. MILLER.  CCA 200700930.

No. 09-0211/MC.  U.S. v. Bruce A. PENN, Jr.  CCA 200401065.

No. 09-0225/AF.  U.S. v. Duane M. FOREHAND.  CCA 37055.

No. 09-0301/AR.  U.S. v. Robert E. INGRAM.  CCA 20060767.

No. 09-0356/MC.  U.S. v. Djalma J. SMITH.  CCA 200800591.

No. 09-0386/AR.  U.S. v. Alan M. HARDY.  CCA 20080615.

No. 09-0427/AR.  U.S. v. David R. JAYROE.  CCA 20080502.

No. 09-0440/AR.  U.S. v. James R. BURMEISTER.  CCA 20080691.

No. 09-0460/AF.  U.S. v. Matthew M. REBSTOCK.  CCA S31488.

No. 09-0489/AF.  U.S. v. Danial A. BEADLE.  CCA 37225.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0652/AR.  U.S. v. Therrel C. CONEY, Jr.  CCA 20080539.

No. 09-0653/AR.  U.S. v. Tyler J. MILLS.  CCA 20081008.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-182

Monday, June 1, 2009

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 09-0073/AR.  U.S. v. Rogelio M. MAYNULET.  CCA 20050412.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED WHEN HE REFUSED TO INSTRUCT THE MEMBERS ON THE DEFENSE OF MISTAKE OF LAW.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0649/AF.  U.S. v. Keith L. HARMAN.  CCA S31493.

No. 09-0650/MC.  U.S. v. Roosevelt D. PRIDE.  CCA 200800811.

No. 09-0651/AR.  U.S. v. Ahamed AKANBI.  CCA 20080412.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 08-0409/NA.  U.S. v. Juan J. CAMPOS.  CCA 200602523.



Home Page |  Opinions & Digest  |  Daily Journal  |  Scheduled Hearings  |  Search Site