PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 99-0854/AR. U.S. v. Steven L. BECKER. CCA 9400644.
No. 99-0855/AF. U.S. v. John F. TULODIESKI III. CCA S29666.
No. 99-0856/AF. U.S. v. Steven J. REEDY. CCA 33540.
No. 99-0857/AF. U.S. v. Michael PASTVA. CCA S29614.
No. 99-0858/AF. U.S. v. Stephen J. HICKS. CCA 33623.
No. 99-0859/AF. U.S. v. Clinton CALHOUN III. CCA 32314.
No. 99-0860/AF. U.S. v. Michael E. BUTTS. CCA 33590.
No. 99-0861/NA. U.S. v. James N. MORRIS. CCA 98-1604.
No. 99-0862/NA. U.S. v. Rodney E. CHILES. CCA 99-0333.
No. 99-0863/NA. U.S. v. Lowman W. STEPHENS. CCA 98-0934.
No. 99-0864/MC. U.S. v. Michael A. CHRISTIAN. CCA 98-1338.
No. 99-0865/MC. U.S. v. Derrick D. JOHNSON. CCA 98-1524.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 93-7001/AR. U.S. v. Ronald A. GRAY. CCA 8800807. Appellee's motion to extend time to file response to appellant's petition for reconsideration granted to August 20, 1999.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 99-206
Tuesday, August 03, 1999
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No. 99-0638/AF. U.S. v. Furman L. JOHNSON, Jr. CCA 33436.
No. 99-0659/AR. U.S. v. Paul B. LEWIS. CCA 9801110.
No. 99-0673/AF. U.S. v. Paul A. ENGST. CCA 33073.
No. 99-0699/AF. U.S. v. Henry R. COLLARD. CCA 33340.
No. 99-0706/AR. U.S. v. Jeremy J. HREBEN. CCA 9900040.
No. 99-0711/AR. U.S. v. Charles E. SYKES. CCA 9800873.
No. 99-0715/AF. U.S. v. Christopher A. GAMAGE. CCA 33250.
No. 99-0719/AF. U.S. v. Eric T. ROBBS. CCA S29603.
No. 99-0725/MC. U.S. v. Desmond D. RHODEN. CCA 99-0019.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 99-0073/AR. U.S. v. Morris T. COBIA. CCA 9601645. Appellee's motion to file answer to final brief over 50 pages granted.
No. 99-0683/NA. U.S. v. Ricky W. BAUR. CCA 96-2110. Appellant's second motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including August 18, 1999; absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.
No. 99-0695/MC. U.S. v. Matthew T. YUNK. CCA 98-0228. Appellee's motion to extend time to file answer to supplement to petition for grant of review granted to August 9, 1999.
No. 99-0702/MC. U.S. v. Darnnelle L. ELLISON. CCA 98-1926.
No. 99-0703/NA. U.S. v. Tonia L. GLOVER. CCA 98-1603.
In each of the above two cases, appellant's second motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including August 27, 1999; absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 99-207
Wednesday, August 04, 1999
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 99-0866/NA. U.S. v. Vincent CLAY. CCA 97-2001.
No. 99-0867/AF. U.S. v. Eric D. BOYD. CCA 33089.
No. 99-0868/AF. U.S. v. Christopher L. THOMSON. CCA 33667.
No. 99-0869/AR. U.S. v. Scott D. SNYDER. CCA 9800622.
No. 99-0870/AF. U.S. v. Brian S. DANIELS. CCA 33579.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 99-0778/AF. U.S. v. Paul G. HUBERTY. CCA 32574. Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to September 1, 1999.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 99-208
Thursday, August 05, 1999
APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
No. 95-0342/AF. U.S. v. Daniel
L. BARTLEY. CCA 30605.
On consideration of the petition
for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court
of Criminal Appeals on further review, said petition is hereby granted
and the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals
on further review is affirmed. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
this date.]
No. 99-0247/AR. U.S. v. Dennis
L. BOYD. CCA 9600953.
On consideration of the petition
for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of
Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby granted and the decision of the
United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed. [See also ORDERS
GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 95-0342/AF. U.S. v. Daniel L. BARTLEY. CCA 30605.[See also APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]
No. 99-0247/AR. U.S. v. Dennis L. BOYD. CCA 9600953. [See also APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]
No. 99-0487/AF. U.S. v. Sherrie L. MATTHEWS. CCA S29326. Review granted on the following issues:
II. WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED BY NOT STRICTLY APPLYING MIL.R.EVID 311(b) WHILE SIDESTEPPING THE QUESTION OF WHETHER THE RESULTS OF APPELLANT'S COMMAND-DIRECTED URINALYSIS WERE ILLEGALLY SEIZED EVIDENCE UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT.
III. WHETHER ADMISSION OF THE RESULTS OF APPELLANT'S COMMAND-DIRECTED URINALYSIS IN HER COURT-MARTIAL VIOLATED HER FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO BE FREE FROM UNLAWFUL SEARCH AND SEIZURE.
IV. WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE'S RULING THAT APPELLANT OPENED THE DOOR TO ADMISSION OF APPELLANT'S COMMAND-DIRECTED URINALYSIS UNDER MIL.R.EVID. 311(b) WAS AN ABUSE OF DISCRETION.
V. WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED WHEN THEY CONCLUDED THE APPELLANT RAISED THE "UNKNOWING INGESTION" DEFENSE, CONTRARY TO THIS HONORABLE COURT'S OPINION IN UNITED STATES V. GRAHAM, 50 M.J. 56 (1999).
VI. WHETHER THE ADMISSION OF APPELLANT'S COMMAND-DIRECTED URINALYSIS UNDER MIL.R.EVID 404 WAS AN ABUSE OF DISCRETION.
II. WHETHER THE EVIDENCE IS LEGALLY INSUFFICIENT TO PROVE APPELLANT GUILTY OF ASSAULT AND BATTERY AS SPECIALIST CALVERT'S CONDUCT GAVE APPELLANT THE MISTAKEN BELIEF THAT SHE CONSENTED TO THE TOUCHING.
II. WHETHER APPELLANT'S PLEAS TO ALL CHARGES AND SPECIFICATIONS WERE IMPROVIDENT BECAUSE A MATERIAL PROVISION IN THE PRETRIAL AGREEMENT, THE FINE/FORFEITURE SENTENCE LIMITATION, WAS NEGOTIATED AND AGREED UPON BY THE GOVERNMENT AND APPELLANT BASED UPON A "MUTUAL MISTAKE".
No. 99-0437/AF. U.S. v. Philip T. SLADEWSKI. CCA 32741.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW - OTHER SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
No. 98-0971/AR. U.S. v. Moses LOVER, Jr. CCA 9500726. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, we note that the members found appellant guilty of three of the five specifications under Charge III and of Charge III. The convening authority set aside the findings of guilty to those specifications and ordered them dismissed. However, he took no such action with respect to Charge III and thereby implicitly approved the finding of guilty to Charge III. Because "it is the specification which is the basis of guilt or innocence and criminality of an accused," United States v. Dilday, 47 CMR 172, 174 (ACMR 1973), and because this issue was first raised here, we believe that the court below should review it first. Accordingly, the petition for grant of review is denied as to Issues I, II, and III raised by appellate defense counsel; the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is set aside; the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for remand to that court for review of Issue IV raised by appellate defense counsel; and thereafter, Article 67, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 867, will apply.
Judge CRAWFORD dissents.
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS
Misc. No. 99-8027/AR. United States, appellee, v. Christian N. DAVIS, appellant. Writ-appeal petition for review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals on application for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of habeas corpus filed under Rule 27(b)
Misc. No. 99-8028/AR. United States, appellee, v. Anthony L. NEHRING, appellant. Notice is hereby given that a motion for extension of time to file a writ-appeal petition, which was construed as a writ-appeal petition for review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals on application for extraordinary relief, and motion for extension of time to file a supporting brief were filed under Rule 27(b).
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 99-209
Friday, August 06, 1999
CERTIFICATES FOR REVIEW FILED
No. 99-5005/AR. United States, appellant, v. Audrey J. VALIGURA, appellee. CCA 9800225. The Judge Advocate General of Army requests that action be taken with respect to the following issue:
No. 99-0505/AF. U.S. v. Sherrard J. ADAMS. CCA 33110.
No. 99-0688/AF. U.S. v. Jeffrey M. ENGLE. CCA 33430.
No. 99-0696/MC. U.S. v. Joseph L. MCBRIDE. CCA 98-2076.
No. 99-0760/AF. U.S. v. Fernando C. VELAZQUEZ. CCA S33426.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 99-0871/NA. U.S. v. Lowell J. THOMAS. CCA 99-0436.
No. 99-0872/MC. U.S. v. William J. BAER. CCA 97-2044.
No. 99-0873/AF. U.S. v. Jon R. LANNING. CCA 32736.
No. 99-0874/AF. U.S. v. Henry P. JOHNSON Jr. CCA 33471.
No. 99-0875/AF. U.S. v. Konya C. HURT. CCA 32991.
No. 99-0876/AF. U.S. v. Stephen W. SPOHN. CCA 33243.
No. 99-0877/AF. U.S. v. David A. SMITH. CCA 33371.
No. 99-0878/AF. U.S. v. Kevin R. WILLIAMS. CCA S29649.
MANDATES ISSUED
No. 98-0237/AR. U.S. v. Brian T. WARDEN. CCA 9502034.
No. 98-0388/AR. U.S. v. Derek C. ARMON. CCA 9601892.
No. 98-0825/MC. U.S. v. Shanard R. MCDANIELS. CCA 97-0570.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 99-210
Monday, August 09, 1999
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 99-0536/AF. U.S. v. Robert J. MONROE. CCA 32592. Review granted on the following issue:
No. 99-0606/AR. U.S. v. Kevin M. RAIFORD. CCA 9701162.
No. 99-0662/NA. U.S. v. Patrick S. KIELTY. CCA 98-0799.
No. 99-0701/MC. U.S. v. Christopher J. HYDE. CCA 97-1164.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 99-0879/AR. U.S. v. Raymond GAYHEART. CCA 9801778.
No. 99-0880/AR. U.S. v. Omar J. WALKER. CCA 9600561.
No. 99-0881/AR. U.S. v. Seamus L. ROONEY. CCA 9801085.
No. 99-0882/NA. U.S. v. Charles K. WINSTON. CCA 98-0411.
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
Misc. No. 99-8026/NA. United States, appellee, v. James W. FUHRMAN, appellant. On consideration of the writ-appeal petition for review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals on application for extraordinary relief and appellant’s motion for stay of proceedings, said writ-appeal petition is hereby denied without prejudice to appellant’s right to assert the issue raised in the writ-appeal petition during normal appellate review if he is convicted; appellant’s motion for stay of proceedings is denied.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 98-1098/AR. U.S. v. Terry KELLEY. CCA 9600727. On consideration of the petition for grant of review filed by counsel for the appellant on July 9, 1999, under Article 67(a), UCMJ, 10 USC § 867(a)(1994), which was docketed under Docket Number 99-0783/AR, and it now appearing that said petition is in fact a second petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, earlier filed under Docket Number 98-1098/AR, the original docket number in this case, it is hereby ordered that Docket Number 98-1098/AR be forthwith assigned to this case; and that Docket Number 99-0783/AR be removed from this case and reassigned in due course to an appropriate newly filed petition.
No. 99-0202/NA. U.S. v. Robert L. WILSON. CCA 98-0333. Appellant's motion to file final brief out of time granted.
No. 99-0271/MC. U.S. v. Jerrimaine
C. RAMSEY. CCA 98-0007.
Appellee's motion to dismiss
denied.
No. 99-8028/AR. U.S. v. Anthony L. NEHRING. Appellant's motion to extend time to file supporting brief granted to August 11, 1999.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 99-211
Tuesday, August 10, 1999
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 98-0385/AR. U.S. v. Daniel J. DE SANTI. CCA 9601323. */
No. 99-0783/NA. U.S. v. Louis ABRAHAM. CCA 98-1832.
No. 99-0883/NA. U.S. v. Michael A. HOPEK. CCA 98-1033.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 99-0661/NA. U.S. v. Brian A. KOCH. CCA 98-0483. Appellant's motion to file supplement to petition for grant of review out of time granted.
No. 99-0780/NA. U.S. v. Aaron K. ECHOLS. CCA 98-1059. To September 1, 1999.
No. 99-0788/AF. U.S. v. James M. ALLEN. CCA 32727. To September 9, 1999.
No. 99-0796/AF. U.S. v. Robert K. MANN. CCA 32558. To September 8, 1999.
No. 99-0831/NA. U.S. v. Javier RIOS. CCA 98-0248. To September 22, 1999.
In each of the above four cases, appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to date indicated.
_____________________
*/ Third petition filed in same case.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 99-212
Wednesday, August 11, 1999
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 99-0884/MC. U.S. v. Martin E. CLOVER. CCA 98-0777.
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
Misc. No. 99-8027/AR. United States, appellee, v. Christian N. DAVIS, appellant. Writ-appeal petition for review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals denied.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 96-0669/NA. U.S. v. Charles W. JOHNSON. CCA 94-1674. Appellant's motion to attach granted as to exhibit B but denied as to exhibit C; appellee’s motion to extend time to file answer to supplement to petition for grant of review granted to September 10, 1999.
No. 98-1098/AR. U.S. v. Terry KELLEY. CCA 9600727. To September 9, 1999.
No. 99-0803/NA. U.S. v. Frederick L. COZART. CCA 97-1396. To August 20, 1999.
In each of the above two case, appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to date indicated.
No. 99-0707/AR. U.S. v. Gregory R. TENNIN. CCA 9700742. Appellant's second motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including August 30, 1999; absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.
No. 99-0865/MC. U.S. v. Derrick
D. JOHNSON. CCA 98-1524.
Appellant's motion to extend
time to file response to appellee's motion to dismiss granted to August
27, 1999.
PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED
No. 98-0721/NA. U.S. v. Teresa S. MILEY. CCA 96-0822. Appellant’s petition for reconsideration of the order dated April 21, 1999, denied as moot. Appellant’s motion to attach documents (May 25, 1999) and appellee’s motion to file motion to attach document (May 28, 1999) denied as moot.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 99-213
Thursday, August 12, 1999
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No. 99-0637/AF. U.S. v. Glenn E. SNYDER. CCA S29612.
No. 99-0642/AR. U.S. v. Oswald B. VANN. CCA 9701196.
No. 99-0655/AR. U.S. v. Peter A. NOTARO. CCA 9801134.
No. 99-0680/NA. U.S. v. Marlon K. BROWN. CCA 99-0011.
No. 99-0690/MC. U.S. v. Manuel A. MUNOZ. CCA 99-0191.
No. 99-0692/AR. U.S. v. Adam R. PUGH. CCA 9800791.
No. 99-0693/AR. U.S. v. Keoki K. CARRUTHERS. CCA 9701133.
No. 99-0700/AF. U.S. v. Robert D. HINTON. CCA S29617.
No. 99-0713/AF. U.S. v. Robert E. CHESTER. CCA 33554.
No. 99-0718/AF. U.S. v. Lonnie L. MURVIN, Jr. CCA 33423.
No. 99-0722/AF. U.S. v. Ismael TORRES, Jr. CCA 33564.
No. 99-0728/AF. U.S. v. Keith A. PHILLIPS. CCA 33416.
No. 99-0736/AF. U.S. v. Kerry E. PHIPPS, Jr. CCA 33458.
No. 99-0771/AR. U.S. v. Arthur E. WALKER. CCA 9900086.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 99-0885/MC. U.S. v. Michael J. STRICKING. CCA 99-0357.
No. 99-0886/MC. U.S. v. Kyle E. PORTA. CCA 98-1983.
No. 99-0887/AR. U.S. v. William M. SMITH. CCA 9800197.
No. 99-0888/AR. U.S. v. Jason JIRAVA. CCA 9800101.
No. 99-0889/AR. U.S. v. Amanda L. LONG. CCA 9900125.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 99-0073/AR. U.S. v. Morris T. COBIA. CCA 9601645. Appellant's motion to admit affidavit granted.
No. 99-0515/AR. U.S. v. Bradford M. GOSNEY. CCA 9700653. Appellee's motion to file answer to petition for grant of review out of time granted.
No. 99-0802/AF. U.S. v. Jadey D. THOMAS. CCA 33530. To September 13, 1999.
No. 99-0842/AR. U.S. v. Lonnie P. TURNER. CCA 9702038. To September 15, 1999.
In each of the above two cases, appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to date indicated.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 99-214
Friday, August 13, 1999
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 99-0890/AR. U.S. v. Anthony L. WELLS. CCA 9702001.
No. 99-0891/AF. U.S. v. Keith A. BAKER. CCA 33244.
No. 99-0892/AF. U.S. v. Michael C. BLASDEL. CCA 33641.
No. 99-0893/AF. U.S. v. Christopher A. HARDISON. CCA 33383.
No. 99-0894/AF. U.S. v. Daryl A. KIK. CCA S29683.
No. 99-0895/AF. U.S. v. Steven W. LANIER. CCA 33618.
No. 99-0896/AF. U.S. v. Nakia D. OLIVER. CCA 33656.
No. 99-0897/AF. U.S. v. Ernesto A. PACHECO. CCA S29631.
No. 99-0898/AF. U.S. v. Tiffany M. SMITH. CCA S29650.
No. 99-0899/AF. U.S. v. Danielle R. VAUGHAN. CCA 33493.
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS
Misc. No. 99-8029/AR. United States, appellee, v. Charles W. BROWN, Jr., appellant. CCA 9900614. Writ-appeal petition for review of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals decision on application for extraordinary relief filed under Rule 27(b).
Misc. No. 99-8030/NA. Kenneth W. GODDARD, petitioner, v. The Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals and The Navy-Marine Corps Appellate Review Activity, Administrative Support Division (Code 40), respondents. CCA 95-1179. Writ-appeal petition for review of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals decision on application for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus and writ of prohibition filed under Rule 27(b)
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 99-0101/AF. U.S. v. James S. COKER. CCA 32047. Appellant's motion for enlargement of time out of time granted; appellee may file an answer to the supplement on or before September 13, 1999.
No. 99-0660/MC. U.S. v. Samuel C. WALKER. CCA 98-0154. Appellant's motion to file supplement to petition out of time granted.
No. 99-0705/AR. U.S. v. Vance R. LASUEUR. CCA 9700803. Appellant's second motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to August 27, 1999; absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.
No. 99-0810/MC. U.S. v. Scott E. HORTON. CCA 97-2110. Appellant's motion to attach appendices granted to the extent it pertains to the copy of the opinion in the case but denied as to the remaining exhibits.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 99-215
Monday, August 16, 1999
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 98-1089/AR. U.S. v. Sean G. GRIGORUK. CCA 9600949. Review granted on the following issues:
II. WHETHER THE REVIEWING COURT CONDUCTED MEANINGFUL APPELLATE REVIEW WHEN IT FAILED TO ORDER TRIAL DEFENSE COUNSEL TO SUBMIT AN AFFIDAVIT WHEN A VIABLE CLAIM FOR INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL HAD BEEN RAISED.
II. WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN FINDING THAT IT WAS NOT PLAIN ERROR FOR THE MILITARY JUDGE TO ADMIT A WITNESS'S TESTIMONY THAT SHE BELIEVED THE VICTIM.
No. 99-0900/AR. U.S. v. Terrance DAVIS. CCA 9801561.
No. 99-0901/AR. U.S. v. Derrick E. PATTERSON. CCA 9800417.
No. 99-0902/AF. U.S. v. Della C. VOGLE. CCA S29646.
No. 99-0903/AF. U.S. v. Della C. VOGLE. CCA S29665.
No. 99-0904/AF. U.S. v. Earl S. SHARPE. CCA 33518.
No. 99-0905/AF. U.S. v. John S. ARNOLD. CCA S29629.
No. 99-0906/MC. U.S. v. Jose CHACON. CCA 98-0879.
No. 99-0907/NA. U.S. v. Richard A. ALI. CCA 99-0059.
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
Misc. No. 99-8018/NA. United States, respondent, v. Michael H. EDWARDS, petitioner. CCA 98-0514. On consideration of the petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of error coram nobis and petitioner’s motion to attach documents, it appears that the appellant in United States v. Edwards, Docket No. 99-0305/MC, died before the Court denied the petition for grant of review on March 12, 1999. Accordingly, it is ordered that the motion to attach documents is granted; that the petition for extraordinary relief is granted; that the order of the Court in United States v. Edwards, Docket No. 99-0305/MC, dated March 12, 1999, is vacated; that the proceedings against petitioner are abated; and that all rights, privileges and property of which the petitioner has been deprived by virtue of the findings of guilty and the sentence be restored.
CRAWFORD, Judge, with whom GIERKE, Judge, joins (dissenting):
I dissent from the order of the Court for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in Berry v. Judges of the United States Army Court of Military Review, 37 MJ 158, 162 (CMA 1993).
Misc. No. 99-8029/AR. United States, appellee, v. Charles W. BROWN, Jr., appellant. CCA 9900614. Writ-appeal petition denied.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 99-0504/AR. U.S. v. Rob W. ROBERTS. CCA 9600785. Appellant's motion to clarify Court’s order of 2 June 1999, and motion for appropriate relief denied; appellant’s motion for summary judgement denied; appellant’s motion to file in excess of page limitation granted; appellant’s motion to correct errata granted; appellant’s motion to attach documents as appendices granted as to exhibits 1 through 20, 22, 23, and 27 but denied as to exhibits 21, 24, 25, 26 and 28. Appellee's motions to consolidate, to file opposition to appellant’s motion to attach, and for extension of time to respond to supplement to petition granted. Appellee's motion to file brief in excess of fifty pages granted.
Misc. No. 99-8030/NA. Kenneth W. GODDARD, petitioner, v. The Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals et al., respondents. CCA 95-1179. On consideration of the writ-appeal petition, it is ordered that respondents show cause, on or before August 26, 1999, why the requested relief should not be granted.
MANDATES ISSUED
No. 98-0658/NA. U.S. v. Darrell J. MUIRHEAD. CCA 96-1211.
No. 98-0679/AR. U.S. v. Carlos V. DIAZ-DUPREY. CCA 9600181.
No. 98-0769/MC. U.S. v. Terrance L. SPANN. CCA 96-1420.
No. 98-0914/AR. U.S. v. Monty J. HARRIS. CCA 9401997.
No. 98-5030/AR. U.S. v. Timothy B. GIBSON. CCA 9600274.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 99-216
Tuesday, August 17, 1999
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 99-0109/MC. U.S. v. Timothy S. DUNCAN. CCA 96-0701. Review granted on the following issues:
II. WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN AFFIRMING THE MILITARY JUDGE'S RULING NOT TO SEVER THE CHARGES CONCERNING MS. ROEBUCH AND MS. MAGGARD.
II. WHETHER IT WAS PLAIN ERROR FOR THE PROSECUTION TO CROSS-EXAMINE APPELLANT AND ARGUE, AND FOR THE MILITARY JUDGE TO PERMIT THE CROSS-EXAMINATION AND ARGUMENT, ABOUT THE FACT THAT APPELLANT DID NOT PROCLAIM HIS INNOCENCE WHEN HE WAS APPROACHED BY THE AAFES STORE DETECTIVES, IN VIOLATION OF APPELLANT'S FIFTH AMENDMENT AND ARTICLE 31 RIGHTS.
II. WHETHER APPELLANT WAS DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WHERE THE TRIAL DEFENSE COUNSEL WAS PREJUDICIALLY DEFICIENT IN FAILING TO CONTACT AND PRESENT EVIDENCE FROM ESSENTIAL WITNESSES IN SENTENCING.
No. 99-0370/AR. U.S. v. James E. GEORGE, Jr. CCA 9700630.
No. 99-0446/MC. U.S. v. Stephen A. MCMILON. CCA 97-0762.
No. 99-0490/MC. U.S. v. Donald J. FORBES. CCA 97-0345.
No. 99-0495/AF. U.S. v. David D. BLANEY. CCA 32568.
No. 99-0574/AF. U.S. v. Robert H. PARMER, Jr. CCA 33220.
No. 99-0578/NA. U.S. v. Joseph D. DIFUSCO. CCA 96-1550.
No. 99-0586/MC. U.S. v. Wayne A. NURIDDIN. CCA 97-0495.
No. 99-0630/AR. U.S. v. Francis A. WILLIS. CCA 9701676.
No. 99-0649/AF. U.S. v. John E. WENDLETON. CCA S29465.
No. 99-0697/NA. U.S. v. Lily D. SHELTON. CCA 98-0352.
No. 99-0698/NA. U.S. v. Ruben ROMERO. CCA 98-1231.
No. 99-0723/MC. U.S. v. Charles E. PALMORE. CCA 97-1674.
No. 99-0726/MC. U.S. v. Ovarias V. CRIEGO. CCA 98-0962.
No. 99-0730/AR. U.S. v. Jonathan E. VOJKUFKA. CCA 9800232.
No. 99-0733/AF. U.S. v. Christopher W. DUNNING. CCA 33570.
No. 99-0739/AF. U.S. v. Michael D. HARRIS. CCA 33501.
No. 99-0745/AF. U.S. v. Christy A. GUERRA. CCA S29624.
No. 99-0746/NA. U.S. v. Nicholas A. WOLFORD. CCA 98-0638.
No. 99-0752/NA. U.S. v. Collin R. TARTELLA. CCA 98-2137.
No. 99-0755/AF. U.S. v. Jeremy T. SETTLES. CCA S29644.
No. 99-0767/MC. U.S. v. Raymond B. THOMAS. CCA 97-1794.
No. 99-0769/AF. U.S. v. Michael SIMMONS. CCA 33505.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW - OTHER SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
No. 99-0818/AF. U.S. v. Roderick DAVIS. CCA S29660. Appellant’s motion to withdraw petition for grant of review granted.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 99-0908/AR. U.S. v. Reynaldo G. ALVARADO. CCA 9701332.
No. 99-0909/NA. U.S. v. Jason L. HILL. CCA 98-2018.
No. 99-0910/NA. U.S. v. Daniel F. BOOMER. CCA 98-0012.
No. 99-0911/MC. U.S. v. Douglas A. ANDERSON. CCA 97-0058.
No. 99-0912/NA. U.S. v. Aaron P. PRITT. CCA 98-1660.
No. 99-0913/NA. U.S. v. Justin L. DEATON. CCA 99-0412.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 98-0043/MC. U.S. v. Jose L. SUAREZ. CCA 97-0646. Appellant's motions to file additional supplement to the petition for grant of review denied; appellant's motion to attach granted.
No. 98-1050/NA. U.S. v. Daniel H. CARPENTER. CCA 97-2146. Appellant's motion to file petition for grant of review of additional issue or, alternately, motion to remand additional issue denied.
No. 99-0708/AR. U.S. v. Thomas E. PIGUES, Jr. CCA 9700744. Appellant's motion to file supplement to petition for grant of review out of time granted.
No. 99-0731/AR. U.S. v. Ronald L. HARRIS. CCA 9301182. Appellant's second motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to September 2, 1999; absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will granted in this case.
MANDATES ISSUED
No. 97-1137/AF. U.S. v. Dudley S. ANDERSON. CCA 31996.
No. 98-0502/AF. U.S. v. Kerry S. EGGEN. CCA 32541.
No. 98-0635/MC. U.S. v. Jason J. SANCHEZ. CCA 96-1020.
No. 98-5031/CG. U.S. v. Jason R. GAMMONS. CCA 1078.
No. 98-5032/NA. U.S. v. Robert L. FINSTER. CCA 97-1882.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 99-217
Wednesday, August 18, 1999
APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
No. 97-0506/AR. U.S. v. John A. ROBINSON. CCA 9301094. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is granted and the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 97-0506/AR. U.S. v. John A. ROBINSON. CCA 9301094. [See APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]
No. 99-0224/AR. U.S. v. Hector RODRIGUEZ. CCA 9700189. Review granted on the following issue:
II. WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE COMMITTED PLAIN ERROR BY NOT GIVING A SPILLOVER INSTRUCTION OR A LIMITING INSTRUCTION FOR RULE 404(b) EVIDENCE.
III. WHETHER THE EVIDENCE WAS LEGALLY SUFFICIENT TO PROVE THAT APPELLANT WAS GUILTY OF ADDITIONAL CHARGE I AND ITS SPECIFICATION (RAPE), AND ADDITIONAL CHARGE II AND ITS SPECIFICATION (BURGLARY).
II. WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE, AND SUBSEQUENTLY THE ARMY COURT, ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN FINDING THAT THE EVIDENCE WAS LEGALLY SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT THE FINDING THAT APPELLANT COMMITTED RAPE, IN LIGHT OF THE JUDGE'S INCORRECT INSTRUCTIONS ON THE LAW OF "CONSENT" AND "INTOXICATION."
No. 99-0914/AF. U.S. v. Cesaer M. ENVERGA. CCA 33257.
No. 99-0915/MC. U.S. v. Noel A. PINEDA. CCA 98-1659.
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
Misc. No. 97-8012/AF. James T. GOLDSMITH, petitioner/appellant, v. President William J.CLINTON et al., respondents/appellees. CCA 96-14. On further consideration of the above-styled case in light of the judgment and opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States (Clinton, et al., v. Goldsmith, __ U.S. __, 119 S.Ct. 1538 (1999)) remanding said case to this Court for further consideration, it is ordered that the opinion of this Court, dated April 29, 1998, and mandate, dated May 27, 1998, are hereby vacated and the writ-appeal petition and petition for extraordinary relief are dismissed.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 99-218
Thursday, August 19, 1999
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No. 99-0617/MC. U.S. v. Richard L. VIGIL. CCA 98-0831.
No. 99-0636/AF. U.S. v. Mark C. MORAN. CCA S29546.
No. 99-0657/AR. U.S. v. Mark P. BANASZAK. CCA 9700949.
No. 99-0686/AR. U.S. v. Hermon W. JAMES, Jr. CCA 9702019.
No. 99-0694/MC. U.S. v. Timothy M. SCHEMBER. CCA 98-0197.
No. 99-0712/AF. U.S. v. Jeffrey J. BANDMAN. CCA 33488.
No. 99-0714/AF. U.S. v. David R. CRUM. CCA 33578.
No. 99-0720/AF. U.S. v. Joseph L. SACK. CCA S29668.
No. 99-0732/AF. U.S. v. Stephen A. ANDERSON. CCA 33495.
No. 99-0734/AF. U.S. v. Donna L. HAYES. CCA S29608.
No. 99-0735/AF. U.S. v. Elias B. MAGISTRADO. CCA S29615.
No. 99-0737/AF. U.S. v. Richard K. RICHMOND. CCA 33454.
No. 99-0740/AF. U.S. v. Renee D. HARRIS. CCA S29634.
No. 99-0753/MC. U.S. v. Edward R. RAMIREZ. CCA 98-1970.
No. 99-0754/AF. U.S. v. Neftali A. RIVERA. CCA S29642.
No. 99-0756/AR. U.S. v. Joseph C. DOMBROWSKY. CCA 9801624.
No. 99-0757/AR. U.S. v. Stacey A. MARTIN. CCA 9801069.
No. 99-0758/AR. U.S. v. Jeffrey A. GRIZZLE. CCA 9801158.
No. 99-0791/AF. U.S. v. Kimberly CLARK-PALM. CCA 33538.
No. 99-0793/AF. U.S. v. Timothy D. JONES. CCA S29616.
No. 99-0794/AF. U.S. v. Hijaz A. LATIF. CCA S29625.
No. 99-0799/AR. U.S. v. Dwight A. BRESEMANN. CCA 9700821.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 99-0916/AR. U.S. v. John R. GONZALEZ. CCA 9701740.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 99-219
Friday, August 20, 1999
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 99-0917/AF. U.S. v. Stephanie M. CONE. CCA S29520.
No. 99-0918/AF. U.S. v. Rachel A. COLLINS. CCA 33517.
No. 99-0919/AF. U.S. v. Rafael M. ROBLES. CCA 33653.
No. 99-0920/AF. U.S. v. Brandon S. LAWSON. CCA 32943.
No. 99-0921/AF. U.S. v. Robert J. HUBBLE II. CCA S29581.
No. 99-0922/AF. U.S. v. Daniel R. SIGMUND. CCA 33494.
No. 99-0923/AF. U.S. v. Alejandro VASQUEZ. CCA S29693.
No. 99-0924/AF. U.S. v. Stacie E. YOUNGBLOOD. CCA 31617.
No. 99-0925/NA. U.S. v. Arturo MARIN. CCA 98-1653.
No. 99-0926/NA. U.S. v. Christopher M. SOTO. CCA 98-1032.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 99-220
Monday, August 23, 1999
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No. 99-0738/AF. U.S. v. Wesley N. ROWE. CCA 32852.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 99-0927/AR. U.S. v. Vernell INGRAM, Jr. CCA 9900096.
No. 99-0928/MC. U.S. v. Richard R. PHILLIPS. CCA 98-0758.
No. 99-0929/AF. U.S. v. William A. KNEUPER. CCA 33557.
No. 99-0930/AF. U.S. v. Derrick D. REA. CCA 33634.
No. 99-0931/AF. U.S. v. Ethan C. SMITH. CCA S29655.
No. 99-0932/AF. U.S. v. Larry D. SMITH, Jr. CCA 32850.
No. 99-0933/AF. U.S. v. Darryl T. WERTS. CCA 32417.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 99-221
Tuesday, August 24, 1999
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 99-0934/NA. U.S. v. Corey L. CARTER. CCA 99-0494.
No. 99-0935/MC. U.S. v. Maxwell G. REID. CCA 98-0032.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 99-0750/MC. U.S. v. Carl D. DAGNESE. CCA 97-0212. To Sept. 10, 1999.
No. 99-0764/NA. U.S. v. Darwinn DAVIS. CCA 97-1012. To Sept. 13, 1999.
In each of the above two cases, appellant's second motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted, but only up to date indicated; absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extensions of time will be granted in either of these cases.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 99-222
Wednesday, August 25, 1999
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 99-0822/NA. U.S. v. Arturo MARIN. CCA 98-1653. On further consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Court of Criminal Appeals filed in the above-entitled case and docketed under Docket No. 99-0925/NA on August 20, 1999, it appears that said petition was a duplicate of a petition filed in an earlier case and was inadvertently given a new docket number. Accordingly, it is ordered that Docket No. 99-0925/NA issued on August 20, 1999, be rescinded in this case; that Docket No. 99-0822/NA be substituted and used on all future documents filed in this case; and that Docket No. 99-0925 be reassigned in due course to a new case. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to September 20, 1999.
No. 99-0826/AR. U.S. v. Albert WEATHERSBY. CCA 9500911. To September 23, 1999.
No. 99-0838/AF. U.S. v. Shelley S. ROGERS. CCA 32711. To September 27, 1999.
In each of the above two cases, appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to date indicated.
No. 99-0935/MC. U.S. v. Maxwell G. REID. CCA 98-0032. Appellant's motion to file petition for grant of review out of time granted.
MANDATES ISSUED
No. 98-0109/AF. U.S. v. Jeffrey R. RICHTER. CCA 32106.
No. 98-0133/AF. U.S. v. Jerry W. OWENS. CCA 32468.
No. 98-0829/NA. U.S. v. Eric L. JOHNSTON. CCA 94-1274.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 99-223
Thursday, August 26, 1999
APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
No. 97-1061/CG. U.S. v. Frank J. DIRE. CCA 1077. On further consideration of the granted issue (49 MJ 131) in light of United States v. Gammons, 51 MJ 169 (1999), we conclude that "consideration of appellant’s nonjudicial punishment (NJP) record at sentencing was not error where the defense consented to its introduction and made the first substantive reference to the record during sentencing." Id. at 173. Moreover, appellant’s "failure to object constituted waiver under the applicable rules." Id. at 181 (citing RCM 1001(b)(2) and 1001(g), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (1998 edition)). Accordingly, the decision of the United States Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 99-0925/MC. U.S. v. Charles M. KHO. CCA 98-1646.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 99-0834/AR. U.S. v. Russell E. MYERS. CCA 9701025.
Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to September 27, 1999.
MANDATES ISSUED
No. 98-0248/NA. U.S. v. Claudius L. MITCHELL. CCA 96-0587.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED
FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 99-224
Friday, August 27, 1999
APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
No. 99-0621/CG. U.S. v. Todd C. PADGETT. CCA 1060. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted and that the decision of the United States Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 99-0621/CG. U.S. v. Todd C. PADGETT. CCA 1060. [See also APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No. 99-0430/MC. U.S. v. Dwane M. DAVIS. CCA 98-1120.
No. 99-0654/AR. U.S. v. Margaret B. LISECKI. CCA 9700511.
No. 99-0759/AR. U.S. v. Bernard J. BLANKENSHIP. CCA 9701159.
No. 99-0765/MC. U.S. v. Sam J. YOON. CCA 98-1521.
No. 99-0766/AR. U.S. v. Paul A. PIERNI. CCA 9800717.
No. 99-0773/MC. U.S. v. Walter S. DOBER. CCA 98-0178.
No. 99-0775/AR. U.S. v. Fabien BERNHARD. CCA 9801444.
No. 99-0776/AR. U.S. v. Tracy B. GARNER. CCA 9900120.
No. 99-0779/AF. U.S. v. Robert P. THOMPSON. CCA 33462.
No. 99-0782/NA. U.S. v. Paul J.M. STURM. CCA 98-1030.
No. 99-0795/AF. U.S. v. Christopher P. LOVE. CCA S29550.
No. 99-0797/AF. U.S. v. Cornelius A. WILSON. CCA S29609.
No. 99-0801/AF. U.S. v. Kathleen R. GONZALES. CCA 33561.
No. 99-0817/AF. U.S. v. Mark W. GIBISON. CCA S29640.
No. 99-0851/AF. U.S. v. Robert E. SPEARS. CCA S29405.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 98-0308/AR. U.S. v. Paul D. PIERCE. CCA 9601171. */
No. 99-0936/AF. U.S. v. Mark BYRAM. CCA S29664.
No. 99-0937/AF. U.S. v. Valerie L. FULLER. CCA 33266.
No. 99-0938/AF. U.S. v. Clifford A. JEFFRIES III. CCA 33660.
No. 99-0939/AF. U.S. v. Alex L. MARTIN. CCA 33727.
No. 99-0940/AF. U.S. v. Michael R. MCELHANEY. CCA 32522.
No. 99-0941/AF. U.S. v. Timothy MCKEEHAN. CCA 33627.
No. 99-0942/AF. U.S. v. Kelly J. ROGERS. CCA S29502.
No. 99-0943/AF. U.S. v. Daniel A. WARREN. CCA 32753.
___________________
*/ Third petition filed in same case.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 99-0853/NA. U.S. v. Clifton L. MANNS. CCA 98-0641. Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to September 30, 1999.
MANDATES ISSUED
No. 98-0704/AF. U.S. v. Jon A. COOPER. CCA 32388.
No. 98-0721/NA. U.S. v. Teresa S. MILEY. CCA 96-0822.
No. 98-0975/MC. U.S. v. Wesley S. GRIMM. CCA 97-1691.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 99-225
Monday, August 30, 1999
APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
No. 99-0368/AR. U.S. v. James E. GEORGE, Jr. CCA 9700180. On further consideration of the granted issue (Daily Journal June 10, 1999) in light of the above-entitled case, we hold that appellant was not prejudiced by the testimony in question. See United States v. Sidwell, 51 MJ 262 (1999). Accordingly, the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 99-0933/AF. U.S. v. Brian J. HOFFMAN. CCA 33628.
No. 99-0944/AR. U.S. v. Jeffery L. AYERS, Sr. CCA 9701847.
No. 99-0945/AR. U.S. v. David D. LUCERO. CCA 9801189.
No. 99-0946/AF. U.S. v. Roland T. STEVENSON. CCA 33491.
No. 99-0947/NA. U.S. v. Jeffrey D. CAUGHEY. CCA 98-1828.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 97-0149/AR. U.S. v. Christopher W. CAMPBELL. CCA 9400527. Appellee's motion to admit government appellate exhibits A and B denied. Appellee's motion for additional time to reply to appellant's answer to petition for reconsideration and appellant's motion to admit defense appellate exhibits A, B, C, D, E, F, and G granted.
No. 98-0017/AF. U.S. v. Darryl T. WERTS. CCA 32417. On further consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals filed in the above-entitled case and docketed under Docket No. 99-0933/AF on August 23, 1999, it appears that said petition was a second petition in an earlier case and was inadvertently given a new docket number. Accordingly, it is ordered that Docket No. 99-0933/AF issued on August 23, 1999, be rescinded in this case; that Docket No. 98-0017/AF be substituted and used on all future documents filed in this case; and that Docket No. 99-0933/AF be reassigned in due course to a new case.
MANDATES ISSUED
No. 98-0199/AF. U.S. v. Wade P. HAWES. CCA 32481.
No. 98-0595/AR. U.S. v. Jonathan E. SIDWELL. CCA 9601596.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 99-226
Tuesday, August 31, 1999
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 99-0803/NA. U.S. v. Frederick L. COZART. CCA 97-1396. Appellant's motion to correct errata granted.
No. 99-0852/MC. U.S. v. Daniel L. HOOD. CCA 98-1639. Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to September 30, 1999.