2013 (September Term) United States v. Elespuru, 73 M.J. 326 (whereas multiplicity addresses double jeopardy principles, unreasonable multiplication is aimed at preventing prosecutorial overreaching).
2009 (September Term) United
States v. Craig, 68 M.J. 399 (an
unconditional guilty plea waives
multiplicity claims when the offenses are not facially duplicative).
(appellant’s unconditional
guilty pleas waived
the issue of whether the specifications charging appellant with receipt
and
possession of the same child pornography were multiplicious, where the
specifications were not facially duplicative because appellant received
the
files of the images on one medium and stored them on another). United States v. Anderson, 68 M.J. 378 (if
a court, contrary to the intent of Congress, imposes multiple
convictions and
punishments under different statutes for the same act or course of
conduct, the
court violates the double jeopardy clause of the Constitution). United
States v. Gladue, 67 M.J. 311 (the prohibition
against multiplicity is
grounded in compliance with the constitutional and statutory
restrictions
against double jeopardy).
2008 (September Term)