2018 (October Term)
United States v. Hale, 78 M.J. 268 (members are permitted to consider evidence of other acts admitted under MRE 404(b) to prove the requisite intent for an offense).
2013 (September Term)
United States v. Kearns, 73 M.J. 177 (the government is free to prove appellant’s intent by circumstantial evidence).
2011 (September Term)
United States v. Vela, 71 M.J. 283 (intent, like other mental states, can be shown by circumstantial evidence).
2000
United
States v. Tanksley, 54 MJ 169 (a pattern of
lustful
intent, established in one set of specifications, can be used by
factfinders as
proof of lustful intent in a different set of specifications).