YOU ARE HERE: HOME > HEARING CALENDAR > OCTOBER 2018 TERM > NOVEMBER 2018

United States Court of Appeals
for the Armed Forces
450 E Street, Northwest Washington D.C. 20442-0001

---

Tuesday, November 6, 2018

9:30 a.m.:

United States v.	Jeremiah L. King	No. 18-0288/AF
(Appellee)	(Appellant)	(audio)

Counsel for Appellant: Capt Dustin J. Weisman, USAF (brief)
                                            ----------------------------- (reply brief)
Counsel for Appellee:  Capt Zachary West, USAF (brief)

Case Summary: GCM conviction of attempting to view child pornography, violation of a lawful general regulation (misuse of government computer) and wrongfully viewing child pornography. The issue granted is: the military judge found Appellant guilty of viewing child pornography. But all of the alleged child pornography appellant allegedly viewed was found in unallocated space or a Google cache. Is the evidence legally sufficient?

NOTE: Counsel for each side will be allotted 20 minutes to present oral argument.

Followed by:

United States v.	Jason A. Kohlbek	No. 18-0267/AR
(Appellee)	(Appellant)	(audio)

Counsel for Appellant: Lt Col Christopher Daniel Carrier, JA, USA
                                            -------------------------- (brief) (reply brief)
Counsel for Appellee:  Capt Brian Jones, JA, USA (brief)

Case Summary: GCM conviction (4 specifications) for lewd acts upon a child. Granted issue questions whether the military judge erred by misconstruing Mil.R.Evid. 707 and prohibiting Appellant from presenting evidence relevant to Appellant's post-polygraph statement.

NOTE: Counsel for each side will be allotted 20 minutes to present oral argument.

---

Wednesday, November 7, 2018

* 9:00 a.m.:

United States v.	Anthony M. Bodoh	No. 18-0201/AR
(Appellee)	(Appellant)	(audio)

Counsel for Appellant: Capt Heather M. Martin, JA, USA (brief)
                                              ----------------------------- (reply brief)
Counsel for Appellee:  Capt Brian Jones, JA, USA (brief)

Case Summary: GCM conviction of sexual assault and assault. Granted issue questions whether the military judge plainly erred by allowing the trial counsel to misstate the law and argue that the panel should base its verdict on sharp training.

* Please note earlier start time.

NOTE: Counsel for each side will be allotted 20 minutes to present oral argument.

Followed by:

United States v.	Hector Nicola	No. 18-0247/AR
(Appellee)	(Appellant)	(audio)

Counsel for Appellant: Capt Patrick G. Hoffman, JA, USA (brief)
Counsel for Appellee:  Capt Joshua B. Banister, JA, USA (brief)

Case Summary: GCM conviction of violating a lawful general regulation (prohibited relationship), abusive sexual contact and wrongfully viewing victim's private area. Granted issue questions whether the evidence of indecent viewing in violation of Article 120c, UCMJ, was legally sufficient.

NOTE: Counsel for each side will be allotted 20 minutes to present oral argument.