United States Court of Appeals
for the Armed Forces
450 E Street, Northwest Washington D.C. 20442-0001
Wednesday,
September 17, 2008
9:00
a.m.
United
States v. |
Frank
D. Wuterich |
No.
08-6006/MC |
(Appellee) |
(Appellant) |
(audio) |
Counsel
for Appellant: LT Kathleen L. Kadlec, JAGC, USN
Counsel
for Appellee: LT Timothy H. Delgado, JAGC, USN
CBS
Broadcasting, Inc. v. |
United
States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, United States,
and Frank D. Wuterich, Staff Sergeant,
E-6, U.S. Marine Corps |
No.
08-8020/MC |
(Petitioner) |
(Respondents) |
|
Counsel
for Petitioner: Lee Levine, Esq.
Counsel
for Respondent United States: LT Timothy H. Delgado, JAGC, USN
In
Re |
Frank
D. Wuterich |
No.
08-8021/MC |
Counsel
for Petitioner: LT Kathleen L. Kadlec, JAGC, USN
Counsel
for Respondent: LT Timothy H. Delgado, JAGC, USN
Case
Summary: GCM prosecution for dereliction of duty and manslaughter.
At trial, the prosecution issued a subpoena to CBS Broadcasting, Inc.
for outtakes of a 60 Minutes interview of the Appellant, however, the
military judge granted a motion filed by CBS to quash the subpoena.
The prosecution brought an appeal to the U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court
of Criminal Appeals under Article 62, UCMJ. That court directed the
military judge to conduct an in camera review over any material that
CBS asserted a privilege, to develop a factual and legal basis for CBS’s
refusal to comply with the subpoena if any of the undisclosed material
is relevant and necessary, and to address whether and to what extent
any news-gathering privilege applies. The Appellant filed a petition
for grant of review of the lower court’s decision. CBS has filed
a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ or prohibition
and/or mandamus to vacate the lower court’s ruling and reinstate
the military judge’s ruling. Appellant also filed a petition for
extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus to vacate the
lower court’s ruling.
NOTE:
Counsel for Appellant/Petitioner, counsel for CBS Broadcasting, Inc.,
and counsel for Appellee/Respondent United States will each be allotted
20 minutes to present oral argument.
Monday, September 22, 2008
9:00 a.m.
United
States v. |
Bennie
B. Gogue |
No.
07-0826/AR |
(Appellee) |
(Appellant) |
(audio) |
Counsel
for Appellant: Eugene Ham, Esq.
Counsel
for Appellee: Capt Michael G. Pond, JA, USA
Case
Summary: SPCM conviction of AWOL, failure to go to appointed
place of duty, disobeying an NCO, use of methamphetamines, marijuana,
cocaine, and ecstasy. Granted issue questions whether, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3585, Appellant is entitled to credit toward the confinement
adjudged at a court-martial for confinement at state facilities served
for charges unrelated to his court-martial sentence and not credited
against another sentence. Specified issue questions whether, under United
States v. Wilson, 503 U.S. 329 (1992), military judges lack the authority
to calculate and apply pretrial confinement credit.
NOTE:
Counsel for each side will be allotted 20 minutes to present oral argument
in this case.
Followed
by:
United
States v. |
Mark
R. Conliffe |
No.
08-0158/AR |
(Appellee) |
(Appellant) |
(audio) |
Counsel
for Appellant: Capt Melissa E. Goforth Koenig, JA, USA
Counsel
for Appellee: Capt Adam S. Kazin, JA, USA
Case
Summary: GCM conviction of housebreaking and conduct unbecoming
an officer and a gentleman. Granted issue questions whether Appellant’s
pleas of guilty to the three specifications of Charge II, housebreaking,
are improvident where the intended criminal offense upon entry, conduct
unbecoming an officer and a gentleman, is a purely military offense.
NOTE:
Counsel for each side will be allotted 20 minutes to present oral argument
in this case.
Tuesday,
September 23, 2008
3:00
p.m.
United
States v. |
Carlos
J. Rodriguez |
No.
07-0900/MC |
(Appellee) |
(Appellant) |
(audio) |
Counsel
for Appellant: LT Brian D. Korn, JAGC, USN
Counsel
for Appellee: LT Timothy H. Delgado, JAGC, USN
Case
Summary: GCM
conviction of forcible sodomy and indecent acts. Granted issues question:
(1) whether the military judge improperly shifted the burden of proof
to Appellant in asking Appellant to explain the victim’s motives
in accusing him of sexual abuse; and (2) whether this Court has jurisdiction
to consider Appellant’s untimely petition in light of Bowles v.
Russell, 127 S.Ct. 2360 (2007).
NOTE:
Counsel for each side will be allotted 20 minutes to present oral argument
in this case.
Wednesday,
September 24, 2008
9:00
a.m.
United
States v. |
David
V. Mendoza |
No.
08-0246/NA |
(Appellee) |
(Appellant) |
(audio) |
Counsel
for Appellant: LT Kathleen L. Kadlec, JAGC, USN
Counsel
for Appellee: Capt Geoffrey S. Shows, USMC
Case
Summary: SPCM
conviction for writing bad checks. Granted issue questions whether the
lower court erred in not mandating a new staff judge advocate recommendation
in compliance with Rule for Courts-Martial 1106(f) be served on Appellant’s
trial defense counsel after it remanded Appellant’s case to a
new convening authority for clarification of an ambiguous action.
NOTE:
Counsel for each side will be allotted 20 minutes to present oral argument
in this case.
Followed
by:
United
States v. |
Derek
C. Burch |
No.
08-0092/MC |
(Appellee) |
(Appellant) |
(audio) |
Counsel
for Appellant: LT Heather L. Cassidy, JAGC, USN
Counsel
for Appellee: Maj James W. Weirick, USMC
Case
Summary: SPCM conviction for damaging military property and
assault. Granted issue questions whether the lower court erred where,
after finding a constitutional violation, it held that Appellant was
not prejudiced when he was confined for over seven months beyond the
date he should have been released under the convening authority’s
unambiguous action.
NOTE:
Counsel for each side will be allotted 20 minutes to present oral argument
in this case.