YOUR BROWSER'S FIND FUNCTION CAN BE USED TO LOCATE ON THIS PAGE A SPECIFIC DATE, NAME, DOCKET NUMBER, OR TYPE OF ACTION.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
NO. 99-20
NOVEMBER 2, 1998

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

No. 98-0359/AF. U.S. v. Raymond D. KERR. CCA 32249. Review granted on the following issues raised by appellate defense counsel:

I. WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN FINDING APPELLANT WAS NOT PREJUDICED BY THE MILITARY JUDGE’S ERROR IN ALLOWING THE PROSECUTION TO REBUT DEFENSE EVIDENCE OF APPELLANT’S GOOD MILITARY CHARACTER WITH SPECIFIC ACTS OF PRIOR MISCONDUCT OFFERED SOLELY TO REBUT THE CHARACTER EVIDENCE.

II. WHETHER THE ADMISSION OF THE EVIDENCE OF THE SPECIFIC ACTS OF UNCHARGED MISCONDUCT BY THE APPELLANT HAD A PREJUDICIAL SPILLOVER EFFECT ONTO CHARGE III, SPECIFICATION 1.

III. WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN FINDING THE APPELLANT SUFFERED NO PREJUDICE DESPITE FINDING THE ARTICLE 133 AND 134 CHARGES, CITING THE SAME UNDERLYING MISCONDUCT WERE MULTIPLICIOUS.

and the following issue specified by the Court: WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN ALLOWING THE PROSECUTION TO REBUT DEFENSE EVIDENCE OF APPELLANT’S GOOD MILITARY CHARACTER WITH SPECIFIC ACTS OF PRIOR MISCONDUCT OFFERED SOLELY TO REBUT THE CHARACTER EVIDENCE, AND, IF SO, WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN FINDING APPELLANT WAS NOT PREJUDICED.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No. 99-0096/MC. U.S. v. Carlos GONZALEZ. CCA 98-0827.

No. 99-0097/MC. U.S. v. Albert E. FRANCIS. CCA 98-0840.

No. 99-0098/MC. U.S. v. Adin H. GODOYQUINONEZ. CCA 97-1029.

No. 99-0099/NA. U.S. v. Shawn L. RULE. CCA 97-0774.

No. 99-0100/NA. U.S. v. Jason D. BRADSHAW. CCA 98-0165.

No. 99-0101/AF. U.S. v. James S. COKER. CCA 32047.

No. 99-0102/AF. U.S. v. Frank E. LAPCHESKE. CCA 33229.

No. 99-0103/AR. U.S. v. Eduardo V. BUTLER. CCA 9501566.

No. 99-0104/AR. U.S. v. Robert J. REILLY. CCA 9701756.

No. 99-0105/AR. U.S. v. Brian D. MCCOY. CCA 9800297.

No. 99-0106/AR. U.S. v. William J. BOCKSTOCE. CCA 9800242.

No. 99-0107/AR. U.S. v. Ramona HOLLOWAY. CCA 9701720.

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

Misc. No. 99-8004/NA. Thomas W. DOWTY, appellant, v. UNITED STATES, appellee. CCA 96-1535. Writ appeal petition for review of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals denial of petition for extraordinary relief filed under Rule 27(b). Appellee will file an answer on or before the 13th day of November, 1998.

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

No. 98-0114/AF. U.S. v. Michael A. PERKINS. CCA 32547.

No. 98-0877/AF. U.S. v. Shane P. MILLER. CCA 32833.

No. 98-0917/AF. U.S. v. Terry L. ODHAM. CCA 32931.

    In each of the above three cases, appellant’s motion to withdraw the motion to extend time to file petition for reconsideration granted.

    Judge Effron did not participate in these decisions. See United States v. Gorski, 48 MJ 317 (1997). This is without prejudice to his future participation in these cases should they subsequently be presented to this Court in a manner that does not require determination of the application of the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution to the amendments to Title 10, United States Code, made by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal year 1996, Pub.L.No. 104-106, 110 Stat. 462-63 (1996).

No. 98-0258/AR. U.S. v. Clifford WILLIAMS, Jr. CCA 9501893. Appellant’s motion to reschedule oral argument granted.

No. 98-0752/AR. U.S. v. John M. McCLAIN, Jr. CCA 9501831.

No. 98-0837/AR. U.S. v. Paul E. WHITNER. CCA 9501034.

    In each of the above two cases, appellant’s motion to extend time to file final brief granted to November 30, 1998.


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
NO. 99-21
NOVEMBER 3, 1998

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

No. 98-0037/MC. U.S. v. Kevin M. HOLT. CCA 94-2003. Review granted on the following issues:

I. WHETHER THE NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED AS A MATTER OF LAW WHEN IT RULED THAT, ALTHOUGH THE ARTICLE 32b INVESTIGATING OFFICER DEPARTED FROM HIS PERMISSIBLE ROLE BY ACQUIRING THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT PIECE OF EVIDENCE TO CONVICT APPELLANT, AND THEN TURNED THAT EVIDENCE OVER TO THE TRIAL COUNSEL, SAID ACTION BY THE INVESTIGATING OFFICER DID NOT PREJUDICE APPELLANT.

II. WHETHER THE NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED WHEN IT REFUSED TO REMAND THIS CASE TO THE CONVENING AUTHORITY FOR A DUBAY HEARING, DESPITE EVIDENCE GOVERNMENT WITNESSES TAMPERED WITH THE MOST SIGNIFICANT PIECE OF EVIDENCE USED TO CONVICT APPELLANT.

III. WHETHER THE NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED WHEN IT RULED GOVERNMENT AGENTS HAD NOT VIOLATED THE RULE OF UNITED STATES V. GARRIES, DESPITE THEIR DESTRUCTION OF POTENTIALLY EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE THROUGH LUMINOL TESTING WHICH DEGRADED OR DESTROYED SAID EVIDENCE.

IV. WHETHER THE NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN FINDING THE EVIDENCE LEGALLY SUFFICIENT TO PROVE APPELLANT GUILTY OF PREMEDITATED MURDER.

No. 98-0822/AR. U.S. v. Grady D. GLOVER. CCA 9600736. Review granted on the following issue: WHETHER THE FAILURE TO INSTRUCT THE PANEL ON THE ELEMENT OF WRONGFULNESS NECESSARY FOR FINDINGS OF GUILTY IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OF CHARGE IV WAS PLAIN ERROR BY THE MILITARY JUDGE. No. 98-0825/MC. U.S. v. Shanard R. MCDANIELS. CCA 97-0570. Review granted on the following issue: WHETHER SPECIFICATION 1 OF CHARGE II, WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF A LAWFUL ORDER, FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE BECAUSE THE ORDER WAS AN ILLEGAL ONE.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW - OTHER SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

No. 98-0992/NA. U.S. v. Eugene A. DOGANS. CCA 96-1525. Appellant’s motion to withdraw case from appellate review granted.

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No. 99-0108/NA. U.S. v. Rick A. FISH. CCA 98-0169.

No. 99-0109/MC. U.S. v. Timothy S. DUNCAN. CCA 96-0701.

No. 99-0110/MC. U.S. v. Kenneth J. LUEDICKE. CCA 98-0995.

No. 99-0111/NA. U.S. v. Brian H. HENSLEY. CCA 98-0225.

No. 99-0112/MC. U.S. v. Jason C. HOYT. CCA 98-0908.

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

Misc. No. 98-8021/CG. UNITED STATES, appellee, v. DeMauri M. FRAZIER, appellant. CCA 001-98. On consideration of appellant’s motion to file documents and writ appeal petition, we note that appellant’s case is undergoing direct review under Article 66(c) and that he has been released from confinement. Accordingly, appellant’s motion to file documents is granted and appellant’s writ appeal petition is denied, without prejudice to his right to raise the issues contained therein on direct review or to petition this Court for relief if the deferment of his confinement is rescinded.

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

No. 98-0133/AF. U.S. v. Jerry W. OWENS. CCA 32468. Motion filed by Emory University School of Law seeking permission to appear as amicus curiae and present oral argument granted.

No. 98-0502/AF. U.S. v. Kerry S. EGGEN. CCA 32541. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file final brief granted to November 27, 1998.

No. 98-0745/AF. U.S. v. Steven G. OSTBERG. CCA S29463. Appellant’s motion to withdraw the motion to extend time to file petition for reconsideration granted.

    Judge Effron did not participate in this decision. See United States v. Gorski, 48 MJ 317 (1997). This is without prejudice to his future participation in this case should it subsequently be presented to this Court in a manner that does not require determination of the application of the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution to the amendments to Title 10, United States Code, made by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal year 1996, Pub.L.No. 104-106, 110 Stat. 462-63 (1996).

No. 98-1124/AF. U.S. v. Thomas R. DAVILA. CCA S29407. Appellant’s motion to file supplement to petition for grant of review out of time granted.

No. 98-1143/AF. U.S. v. Dennis P. WORSHAM. CCA 32615.

No. 99-0001/AF. U.S. v. Marshall T. LANE. CCA 32473.

    In each of the above two cases, appellant’s motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to November 30, 1998.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
NO. 99-22
NOVEMBER 4, 1998

HEARINGS

No. 98-0133/AF. U.S. v. Jerry W. OWENS. CCA 32468.*/

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

No. 98-0901/MC. U.S. v. Eric A. RAMIREZ. CCA 96-2400.

No. 98-0956/AR. U.S. v. Michael D. RICKEY. CCA 9501597.

No. 98-0960/AR. U.S. v. Erwin L. FOLEY. CCA 9701857.

No. 98-0974/AR. U.S. v. Michael L. RODGERS. CCA 9800292.

No. 98-1019/AR. U.S. v. Cinquetta F. BROWN-SIMPKINS. CCA 9601938.

No. 98-1048/AF. U.S. v. Felix A. OTERO, III. CCA S29545.

No. 98-1053/AF. U.S. v. Preston K. MORALES. CCA 32831.

No. 98-1054/AR. U.S. v. Michael L. KRIER. CCA 9701668.

No. 98-1055/AR. U.S. v. Ruadz A. BROS. CCA 9800108.

No. 98-1057/NA. U.S. v. Jack E. AUTREY. CCA 98-0290.

No. 98-1058/NA. U.S. v. Brian L. HANLEY. CCA 98-0622.

No. 98-1059/MC. U.S. v. Christopher S. MCNEELY. CCA 97-1964.

No. 98-1062/AR. U.S. v. Matthew J. MONTANEZ. CCA 9800240.

No. 98-1063/AF. U.S. v. Venita P. GREENE. CCA S29557.

No. 98-1066/NA. U.S. v. Kevin A. WADE. CCA 98-0226.

No. 98-1067/AR. U.S. v. Kelly R. MILLS. CCA 9701989.

No. 98-1077/AR. U.S. v. Jason S. ATKINSON. CCA 9601328.

No. 98-1078/AF. U.S. v. Brett A. ZERNICK. CCA 33223.

No. 98-1080/AF. U.S. v. Christopher M. LAWRENCE. CCA 33093.

No. 98-1083/AF. U.S. v. Norman J. TRAIL. CCA S29547.

No. 98-1088/MC. U.S. v. Jeremie J. SOLTERMANN. CCA 98-0507.

No. 98-1091/MC. U.S. v. Dalwin T. FLEMING. CCA 98-0993.

No. 98-1099/AR. U.S. v. Michael C. LAURAIN. CCA 9800080.

No. 98-1103/AR. U.S. v. Johnny GUTIERREZ. CCA 9700131.

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No. 99-0113/AF. U.S. v. David C. CROMER, Jr. CCA 33253.

No. 99-0114/AF. U.S. v. Brian D. CRAWLEY. CCA S29420.

No. 99-0115/AF. U.S. v. Bryan J. BRYANT. CCA 32253.

No. 99-0116/AF. U.S. v. Roderick T. GRIFFIN. CCA S29553.

No. 99-0117/AF. U.S. v. David F. STRUNK. CCA 33216.

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

No. 96-1157/AR. U.S. v. Joseph K. AVERY, Jr. CCA 9500062. To December 4, 1998.

No. 98-1145/AR. U.S. v. Orci L. RAMOS. CCA 9701476. To November 9, 1998.

No. 99-0019/AR. U.S. v. David M. WAITE. CCA 9701017. To December 2, 1998.

    In each of above three cases, appellant’s motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to the date indicated.

No. 97-1164/CG. U.S. v. Orison S. ACEVEDO. CCA 1066. Appellee’s motion to submit supplemental citation of authority granted.

No. 98-0987/AR. U.S. v. Charlie SCOTT. CCA 9502201. Appellant’s motion to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted.

_____________

*/ This case was heard at Emory University School of Law, Atlanta, Georgia.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
NO. 99-23
NOVEMBER 5, 1998

HEARINGS

No. 98-0182/AR. U.S. v. Steven B. THOMPSON. CCA 9402089.*/

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

No. 98-0910/MC. U.S. v. Felix G. FOGG. CCA 96-1958. Review granted on the following issue:

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN DENYING THE DEFENSE MOTION TO SUPPRESS VIDEOTAPES WHICH WERE VIEWED AND SEIZED DURING A SEARCH OF APPELLANT’S RESIDENCE, WHEN THE WARRANT FOR THE SEARCH, ITS APPLICATION, AND ACCOMPANYING AFFIDAVIT MADE NO MENTION OF VIDEO CAMERAS OR VIDEOTAPES. No. 98-0947/AR. U.S. v. Jason L. ROCK. CCA 9700192. Review granted on the following issue: WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY APPLYING 240 DAYS OF ARTICLE 13, UCMJ, SENTENCE CREDIT (R. at 117) AGAINST THE COURT’S ADJUDGED 61-MONTH SENTENCE (R. at 118), RATHER THAN APPLYING THE CREDIT AGAINST THE SENTENCE LIMITATION CONTAINED IN THE PRETRIAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN APPELLANT AND THE CONVENING AUTHORITY. No. 98-0949/NA. U.S. v. Timothy R. DOTY. CCA 97-0745. Review granted on the following issue: WHETHER APPELLANT WAS DENIED HIS RIGHT TO SPEEDY TRIAL WHEN HE WAS NOT BROUGHT TO TRIAL UNTIL DECEMBER 11, 1996, 126 DAYS AFTER THE PREFERRAL OF CHARGES, BECAUSE THE ARTICLE 39(a) SESSION CALLED BY THE GOVERNMENT ON DECEMBER 4, 1996, TO ARRAIGN HIM WAS A "SHAM ARRAIGNMENT" TO STOP THE SPEEDY TRIAL CLOCK. No. 98-1021/MC. U.S. v. Robert C. MARINE. CCA 96-2491. Review granted on the following issue: WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRONEOUSLY ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE A MARIJUANA CIGARETTE WHICH WAS IMPROPERLY SEIZED FROM APPELLANT AS FRUIT OF A TAINTED TERRY STOP.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

No. 98-0828/NA. U.S. v. Cortney A. RILEY. CCA 97-0631.

No. 98-0972/MC. U.S. v. Charles CHATMAN. CCA 97-0129.

No. 98-0981/AF. U.S. v. Shan L. WILLIAMS. CCA S29360.

No. 98-0990/AF. U.S. v. Seth D. LEWIS. CCA 32965.

No. 98-0993/MC. U.S. v. David RANGEL, Jr. CCA 98-0560.

No. 98-1009/NA. U.S. v. Arnold L. DURHAM, II. CCA 97-2172.

No. 98-1018/AR. U.S. v. Robert c. WAID. CCA 9700551.

No. 98-1027/NA. U.S. v. Robert L. SAUNDERS. CCA 98-0018.

No. 98-1042/AR. U.S. v. Antonio L. JONES. CCA 9700934.

No. 98-1070/AR. U.S. v. Archie L. HARGETT. CCA 9800380.

No. 98-1074/AR. U.S. v. Patricia D. NAGEEULLAH. CCA 9800257.

No. 98-1079/NA. U.S. v. Michael J. BOMBONATI, Jr. CCA 98-0253.

No. 98-1081/AF. U.S. v. Mario MONGE, Jr. CCA 33199.

No. 98-1084/MC. U.S. v. Steven R. JOCELYN. CCA 97-1686.

No. 98-1087/MC. U.S. v. Charles L. DAVIS, Jr. CCA 98-0759.

No. 98-1110/AR. U.S. v. Michael V. BLEZNYK. CCA 9701958.

No. 98-1133/AF. U.S. v. Katrina D. WILLIAMS. CCA S29554.

No. 99-0012/AF. U.S. v. Deandrake R. ANDERSON. CCA 33246.

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No. 99-0118/MC. U.S. v. Randy A. ALFORD. CCA 98-0792.

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

Misc. No. 99-8005/AR. UNITED STATES, appellee, v. David M. MELANSON, appellant. CCA 9801349. Writ appeal petition for review of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals denial of petition for extraordinary relief filed under Rule 27(b). Appellee will file answer on or before the 16th day of November, 1998.

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

No. 97-0963/AF. U.S. v. Charles E. HANLEY, III. CCA 32370. Appellee’s motion to submit document granted.

No. 98-0957/AR. U.S. v. Gregory S. WILLIS. CCA 9500730. Appellant’s third motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to December 1, 1998.

________

*/ This case was heard at The Citadel, Charleston, South Carolina.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
NO. 99-24
NOVEMBER 6, 1998

REMAND FROM SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

No. 95-0521/AF. U.S. Edward G. SCHEFFER. CCA 30304. This case was returned to the Clerk’s Office on the 8th day of May, 1998, and was placed in the docket system on October 6, 1998, in accordance with the order of the Supreme Court of the United States dated March 31, 1998, remanding the case to this Court for further consideration.

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No. 97-0506/AR. U.S. v. John A. ROBINSON. CCA 9301094.*/

No. 99-0119/AF. U.S. v. Ryan J. WOOD. CCA S29462.

No. 99-0120/AF. U.S. v. Shonnon D. WILSON. CCA 32849.

No. 99-0121/AF. U.S. v. Scott M. TURNICK. CCA 33123.

No. 99-0122/AF. U.S. v. Brandon N. ASHCRAFT. CCA S29460.

No. 99-0123/AF. U.S. v. Eddie M. ALEX. CCA 33108.

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

No. 98-0488/AR. U.S. v. Lawrence P. ROCKWOOD, II. CCA 9500872. Appellant’s motion to file brief in excess of fifty pages granted.

No. 98-0783/NA. U.S. v. Michael W. FRICKE. CCA 96-1293. Appellant’s fifth motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to December 3, 1998.

No. 98-1121/AF. U.S. v. Raul R. SALGADO, Jr. CCA 32549. Appellant’s motion to extend time out of time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to November 20, 1998.

No. 98-1144/AR. U.S. v. Fidel AYALA, Jr. CCA 9701268. To December 2, 1998.

No. 99-0013/AF. U.S. v. Paul G. EBNER. CCA 32721. To December 4, 1998.

    In each of the above two cases, appellant’s motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to the date indicated.

____________

*/ Second petition filed in same case.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
NO. 99-25
NOVEMBER 9, 1998

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No. 97-0432/AR. U.S. v. Tereasa M. HICKS. CCA 9502205.*/

No. 99-0124/AR. U.S. v. Darren L. GARVIE. CCA 9800275.

No. 99-0125/AF. U.S. v. Montell B. ASHBY, Jr. CCA S29483.

No. 99-0126/AF. U.S. v. Beau T. BUGALA. CCA 33122.

No. 99-0127/AF. U.S. v. David W. COUSINS. CCA S29493.

No. 99-0128/AF. U.S. v. Anthony L. MATHIS. CCA 32657.

No. 99-0129/AF. U.S. v. Ross A. MCFADYEN. CCA 32878.

No. 99-0130/NA. U.S. v. Ralph E. AQUINO. CCA 98-0392.

No. 99-0131/MC. U.S. v. Darryl A. ANTLE. CCA 97-1026.

No. 99-0132/NA. U.S. v. Jose A. CASESLORENTE. CCA 98-0362.

No. 99-0133/NA. U.S. v. Michael A. LUCAS. CCA 96-1537.

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

No. 98-0109/AF. U.S. v. Jeffrey R. RICHTER. CCA 32106. Appellee’s motion to submit supplemental citations of authority granted.

No. 98-0248/NA. U.S. v. Claudius L. MITCHELL. CCA 96-0587. Appellant’s motion to correct errata granted.

__________

*/ Second petition filed in same case.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
NO. 99-26
NOVEMBER 10, 1998

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No. 99-0134/AR. U.S. v. Lawrence E. BATTLE, Jr. CCA 9701959.

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

No. 98-0095/NA. U.S. v. Lester E. OLINGER, IV. CCA 96-1319. Appellant’s motion to cite supplemental authority granted.

No. 98-0207/AF. U.S. v. David E. RUSSELL. CCA 32662. Appellee’s motion to file supplemental citation of authority granted.


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
NO. 99-27
NOVEMBER 12, 1998

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No. 99-0135/MC. U.S. v. Chad L. YERKEY. CCA 97-1065.

No. 99-0136/AR. U.S. v. Robert L. WILLIAMS, III. CCA 9800549.

No. 99-0137/AF. U.S. v. Christopher M. MASON. CCA S29566.

No. 99-0138/AF. U.S. v. Marcus T. LANIER. CCA S29573.

No. 99-0139/AF. U.S. v. Paul E. KILLMAN. CCA 32703.

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

No. 98-0078/AR. U.S. v. Ervin M. GRAVES. CCA 9401271. Appellee’s motion to correct errata granted; appellant’s motion to substitute caption granted; verified motion for reconsideration of motion for determination of appellant’s mental capacity denied; motion to admit defense appellate exhibit one granted; counsel representing appellant shall file supplement on or before December 14, 1998.

No. 98-0232/AR. U.S. v. Kurt M. BERTIE. CCA 9600846. Appellant’s motion to reschedule oral argument granted.

No. 98-0471/MC. U.S. v. Rodney O. MORRIS. CCA 96-1146. Appellant’s motion to attach and to amend scope of issue presented granted.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
NO. 99-28
NOVEMBER 13, 1998

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No. 99-0140/AF. U.S. v. Harold C ALVIS. CCA 33319.

No. 99-0141/AF. U.S. v. Jamal K. BRANTLEY. CCA 32984.

No. 99-0142/AF. U.S. v. Robert P. CHAMBERS. CCA 33245.

PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED

No. 98-0930/AF. U.S. v. Sean S. BAILEY. CCA 33177. Appellant’s petition for reconsideration denied.

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

No. 98-6001/NA. U.S. v. John J. FERRARA. CCA 98-0608. Appellee’s motion for oral argument denied without prejudice to further consideration of this case by the Court for oral argument.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
NO. 99-29
NOVEMBER 16, 1998

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No. 97-1056/AR. U.S. v. Richard F. JENSEN. CCA 9601495.*/

No. 99-0143/MC. U.S. v. Donald R. DINKEL. CCA 97-0531.

No. 99-0144/MC. U.S. v. Sheldon R. SWINDELL. CCA 98-0632.

No. 99-0145/NA. U.S. v. Christopher D. MITCHELL. CCA 98-0646.

No. 99-0146/MC. U.S. v. Harrison L. BURTON. CCA 98-0826.

No. 99-0147/MC. U.S. v. Michael A. GONZALES. CCA 97-1285.

No. 99-0148/AF. U.S. v. Larry R. GRIFFIN, II. CCA S29583.

No. 99-0149/AF. U.S. v. Rosemary K. TUCKER. CCA S29578.

No. 99-0150/AF. U.S. v. Antonio H. JAMES. CCA S29515.

No. 99-0151/AF. U.S. v. Stephanie J. WILLIAMS. CCA 33305.

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

No. 98-0095/NA. U.S. v. Lester E. OLINGER, IV. CCA 96-1319. Appellee’s motion to cite supplemental citation of authority granted.

No. 98-0439/AR. U.S. v. Clevell S. ROSEBORO, II. CCA 9600788. Appellee’s motion to admit government appellate exhibits A, B, and C granted; appellant’s motion to extend time to file reply to brief on behalf of appellee in answer to show cause order granted.

No. 98-0979/AF. U.S. v. Terry R. JOUETT. CCA 32618. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to December 9, 1998.

No. 99-0036/AF. U.S. v. James H. BOYETT, II. CCA S29526.

No. 99-0037/AF. U.S. v. Tracy L. REYNOLDS. CCA 33287.

No. 99-0038/AF. U.S. v. Stirling C. OWENS. CCA S29540.

    In each of the above three cases, appellant’s motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to December 14, 1998.

__________

*/ Second petition filed in same case.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
NO. 99-30
NOVEMBER 17, 1998

HEARINGS

No. 98-0095/NA. U.S. v. Lester E. OLINGER, IV. CCA 96-1319.

No. 98-0109/AF. U.S. v. Jeffrey R. RICHTER. CCA 32106.

No. 98-0207/AF. U.S. v. David E. RUSSELL. CCA 32662.

No. 98-0265/NA. U.S. v. Darrin L. SHORT. CCA 95-1617.

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No. 99-0152/NA. U.S. v. Paul D. JONES. CCA 97-1979.

No. 99-0153/AR. U.S. v. Alfonzo W. MURRAY. CCA 9601163.

No. 99-0154/AR. U.S. v. Sylvester L. KELLY. CCA 9600774.

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

No. 98-0251/MC. U.S. v. Timothy A. BROWN. CCA 96-1443. Appellee’s motion to cite supplemental authority granted.

No. 98-0389/AR. U.S. v. James O. WRIGHT. CCA 9601769.

No. 98-0440/AR. U.S. v. John H.I. WARNER. CCA 9601510.

No. 99-0040/AR. U.S. v. Ronald L. DIGGS. CCA 9700186.

    In each of the above three cases, appellant’s motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to December 16, 1998.

No. 98-0811/AR. U.S. v. Ezell MCCALPINE, Jr. CCA 9701508. Appellant’s fifth motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to December 23, 1998.

No. 98-1022/AR. U.S. v. Mark J. MAYO. CCA 9700501. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file final brief granted to December 20, 1998.

No. 98-1111/AR. U.S. v. James W. HUFF, Jr. CCA 9600772. Appellant’s second motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to December 23, 1998.

No. 99-0059/AR. U.S. v. Wilferd E. HARPER. CCA 9601935. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to December 23, 1998.

No. 99-0103/AR. U.S. v. Eduardo V. BUTLER. CCA 9501566. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to January 4, 1999.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
NO. 99-31
NOVEMBER 18, 1998

MOMENT OF SILENCE

At the beginning of Court hearings this morning Chief Judge Walter T. Cox III asked all present to observe a moment of silence in memory of Alfred C. Proulx, the first Clerk of this Court, who was appointed in July 1951 and served with distinction in that position until his retirement in June 1972. Mr. Proulx provided inspirational guidance to this Court during its creation and development. His years of leadership built a firm foundation for the Court’s future growth.

HEARINGS

No. 98-0100/NA. U.S. v. Angel A. IZQUIERDO. CCA 96-1116.

No. 98-0146/AF. U.S. v. Leslie D. RILEY. CCA 32183.

No. 98-0208/AF. U.S. v. Michael T. WILLIAMS. CCA S29431.

No. 98-0251/MC. U.S. v. Timothy A. BROWN. CCA 96-1443.

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

No. 98-0930/AF. U.S. v. Sean S. BAILEY. CCA 33177.

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No. 98-0468/AR. U.S. v. David E. NIX. CCA 9600778.*/

No. 99-0155/AR. U.S. v. William R. ATKINSON, III. CCA 9701768.

No. 99-0156/AF. U.S. v. Ryan D. WILLIS. CCA S29584.

No. 99-0157/AF. U.S. v. Maureen A. WILLIFORD. CCA 33344.

No. 99-0158/AF. U.S. v. Howard M. COOLEY, Jr. CCA 32978.

No. 99-0159/AF. U.S. v. Jason A. JAMES. CCA 33126.

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

Misc. No. 99-8003/AR. UNITED STATES, appellee, v. Brett WRIGHT, appellant. CCA 9801387. Writ appeal petition for review of denial of petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of writ of habeas corpus denied without prejudice to appellant’s right to assert the issues raised in the petition during the course of normal appellate review.

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

Misc. No. 99-8006/NA. Robert L. SEWELL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, respondent. CCA 93-1591. Petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of writ of error coram nobis filed under Rule 27(a).

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

No. 98-0160/NA. U.S. v. Antonio D. SCHULER. CCA 96-1316. Appellee’s motion to cite supplemental authority granted.

No. 98-0471/MC. U.S. v. Rodney O. MORRIS. CCA 96-1146. Appellee’s motion to extend time to file final answer granted to December 28, 1998.

No. 98-0617/AR. U.S. v. Thomas D. MORRISON. CCA 9600461. Appellant’s motions to file additional pleadings and to file additional appellate exhibit denied.

    Judge Effron did not participate in the decision on this motion. See United States v. Gorski, 48 MJ 317 (1997). This is without prejudice to his future participation in this case should it subsequently be presented to this Court in a manner that does not require determination of the application of the ex post facto clause to the amendments to Title 10, United States Code, made by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996, Pub.L.No. 104-106, 110 Stat. 462-63 (1996).

No. 98-0784/MC. U.S. v. Jason M. ABRAMS. CCA 96-1714. Appellee’s motion to extend time to file final answer granted to December 18, 1998.

No. 98-1072/AR. U.S. v. Johnny C. MILLER. CCA 9701295. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted.

No. 99-0024/MC. U.S. v. William J. LAY. CCA 97-1542. Appellant’s motion to file supplement to petition for grant of review out of time granted.

_______________

*/ Second petition filed in same case.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
NO. 99-32
NOVEMBER 19, 1998

HEARINGS

No. 98-0029/MC. U.S. v. Keith W. SCHRODE. CCA 96-0449.

No. 98-0160/NA. U.S. v. Antonio D. SCHULER. CCA 96-1316.

No. 98-0306/MC. U.S. v. Kenneth R. WATT. CCA 96-1587.

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No. 99-0160/NA. U.S. v. Luis R. GALLEGOS. CCA 89-3843.

No. 99-0161/AR. U.S. v. Peter J. QUICK. CCA 9500749.

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

Misc. No. 99-8006/NA. Robert L. SEWELL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, respondent. CCA 93-1591. Petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of writ of error coram nobis denied.

PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED

No. 97-0804/MC. U.S. v. Robert S. NADEL. CCA 95-0467. Appellant’s petition for reconsideration denied.

    Judge Effron did not participate in this decision. See United States v. Gorski, 48 MJ 317 (1997). This is without prejudice to his future participation in this case should it subsequently be presented to this Court in a manner that does not require determination of the application of the ex post facto clause to the amendments to Title 10, United States Code, made by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996, Pub.L.No. 104-106, 110 Stat. 462-63 (1996).

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

No. 98-0769/MC. U.S. v. Terrance L. SPANN. CCA 96-1420. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file final brief granted to December 21, 1998.

No. 98-1093/AF. U.S. v. Clois J. WEBB. CCA 32521. Appellant’s second motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to December 18, 1998.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
NO. 99-33
NOVEMBER 20, 1998

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

No. 98-0773/AR. U.S. v. Dexter G. HOWARD. CCA 9700204.

No. 98-0964/NA. U.S. v. Robert M. BECKER. CCA 97-1623.

No. 98-1005/MC. U.S. v. Phillip D. HINTON. CCA 95-1115.

No. 98-1038/MC. U.S. v. Richard D. NIXON. CCA 96-0073.

No. 98-1112/AF. U.S. v. Joseph W. BOSTON, Jr. CCA 33016.

No. 98-1114/AF. U.S. v. Michael M. KEPLEY. CCA 32768.

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No. 99-0162/AF. U.S. v. Robert W. LOUGHER. CCA 33347.

No. 99-0163/AF. U.S. v. Jeanne L. KAISER. CCA 33306.

No. 99-0164/AF. U.S. v. Christopher L. BELLECY. CCA 33221.

No. 99-0165/AF. U.S. v. Ronald L. YOUNG. CCA S29562.

No. 99-0166/AR. U.S. v. Willie A. HAYES. CCA 9700443.

No. 99-0167/AR. U.S. v. Willie J. MCCLUE, Jr. CCA 9800666.

No. 99-0174/AF. U.S. v. John R. DIPIERNO. CCA 32693.

No. 99-0175/AF. U.S. v. Richard L. FRY. CCA S29512.

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

Misc. No. 99-8007/NA. John J. HAEGER, appellant, v. UNITED STATES, appellee. CCA 90-0385. Writ appeal petition for review of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals denial of petition extraordinary relief in the nature of writ of mandamus filed under Rule 27(a).

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

No. 98-1023/AR. U.S. v. Keith HENRY. CCA 9402015. Appellant’s third motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to December 21, 1998.

No. 99-0050/AF. U.S. v. John J. TOOMEY, Jr. CCA 33009. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted.

No. 99-0174/AF. U.S. v. John R. DIPIERNO. CCA 32693.

No. 99-0175/AF. U.S. v. Richard L. FRY. CCA S29512.

    In each of the above two cases, a petition for grant of review was offered for filing under Rule 20, together with appellant’s motion to file the same out of time. Appellee shall file an answer to appellant’s motion on or before the 1st day of December, 1998. Further action on the petition shall be held in abeyance pending the Court’s final action on the motion.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
NO. 99-34
NOVEMBER 23, 1998

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No. 99-0168/MC. U.S. v. Kairo T. SHERMAN. CCA 98-1105.

No. 99-0169/MC. U.S. v. Douglas R. LEIBROCK. CCA 98-1135.

No. 99-0170/NA. U.S. v. Vernon T. WILSON. CCA 96-2503.

No. 99-0171/AF. U.S. v. Ruben M. GONZALEZ. CCA S29372.

No. 99-0172/AF. U.S. v. Henry M.T. BURNS. CCA 33006.

No. 99-0173/AF. U.S. v. Derrick L. WILLIAMS. CCA 33297.

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

Misc. No. 99-8007/NA. John J. HAEGER, appellant, v. UNITED STATES, appellee. CCA 90-0385. Writ appeal petition for review of denial of petition extraordinary relief in the nature of writ of mandamus denied; appellant’s motion to file corrected pages granted; appellant’s motions to attach and for research materials denied.

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

Misc. No. 99-8008/AR. Michael A. YARN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, respondent. A document received from petitioner styled as a request for reconsideration has been construed and docketed as a petition for extraordinary relief under Rule 27(a).

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

No. 98-0949/NA. U.S. v. Timothy R. DOTY. CCA 97-0745. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file final brief granted to January 6, 1999.

No. 99-0052/NA. U.S. v. Dudley C. WILLIAMS. CCA 97-0227. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review out of time granted to December 21, 1998.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
NO. 99-35
NOVEMBER 24, 1998

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

No. 98-0991/AF. U.S. v. Tony A. ROBERTS. CCA S29499.

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No. 99-0176/AR. U.S. v. Nathanael W. PURDY. CCA 9800104.

No. 99-0177/AR. U.S. v. Andrew K. LEAL. CCA 9701028.

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

Misc. No. 99-8008/AR. UNITED STATES, appellee, v. Michael A. YARN, appellant. Petition for extraordinary relief denied.

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

No. 98-0034/CG. U.S. v. Scott L. GILBERT. CCA 1067. Appellee’s motion to submit supplemental citation of authority granted.

No. 98-0388/AR. U.S. v. Derek C. ARMON. CCA 9601892. Appellee’s motion to file answer to final brief out of time granted.

No. 98-1012/AR. U.S. v. Marcius J. JONES. CCA 9601952. Appellee’s motion to admit government appellate exhibit 1 granted.

No. 98-1050/NA. U.S. v. Daniel H. CARPENTER. CCA 97-2146. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file final brief granted to December 28, 1998.

No. 98-0971/AR. U.S. v. Moses LOVER, Jr. CCA 9500726. To December 9, 1998.

No. 99-0067/MC. U.S. v. Jason M. CONGDON. CCA 97-0312.

No. 99-0068/MC. U.S. v. Cesar A. ORELLANA. CCA 97-0488.

No. 99-0069/NA. U.S. v. Carlos L. GUZMAN. CCA 97-0293.

    In each of the above four cases, appellant’s motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to December 23, 1998, unless otherwise indicated.

No. 99-0109/MC. U.S. v. Timothy S. DUNCAN. CCA 96-0701. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted, but only to January 4, 1999.



NITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

NO. 99-36

NOVEMBER 25, 1998

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

No. 95-0521/AF. U.S. v. Edward G. SCHEFFER. CCA 30304. On further consideration of the granted issue in light of United States v. Scheffer, __ U.S. __, 118 S.Ct. 1261 (1998), it is ordered that the decision of this Court in United States v. Scheffer, 44 MJ 442 (1996), is vacated and that the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No. 99-0178/AF. U.S. v. Jeremy S. MATHIAS. CCA S29590.

No. 99-0179/AF. U.S. v. Ronald D. SUCGANG. CCA 33170.

No. 99-0180/AR. U.S. v. Michel B. NELSON. CCA 9601018.

No. 99-6001/AF. U.S. v. James J. EWING. CCA 98-06.*/

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

Misc. No. 99-8009/AR. Keith HENRY, appellant, v. Colonel Michael A. LANSING, Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks, and the United States of America, appellees. CCA 9801546. Writ-appeal petition for review of Army Court of Criminal Appeals denial of petition for extraordinary relief filed under Rule 27(b).

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

No. 97-1137/AF. U.S. v. Dudley S. ANDERSON. CCA 31996. Appellant’s motion to file corrected pages granted.

No. 98-0248/NA. U.S. v. Claudius L. MITCHELL. CCA 96-0587. Appellee’s motion to cite supplemental authority granted.

No. 98-0431/NA. U.S. v. Stephanie K. FEE. CCA 97-0382. Appellee’s motion to attach documents granted to the extent it pertains to documents relating to the court-martial of Robert J. Fee but denied as to the remaining documents.

No. 98-0534/AR. U.S. v. Edward L. WORTHINGTON. CCA 9601109. To December 23, 1998.

No. 99-0092/AR. U.S. v. Ricky M. JOHNSON. CCA 9601024. To December 30, 1998.

    In each of the above two cases, appellant’s motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to the date indicated.

No. 98-0846/AR. U.S. v. Juan W. BUCK. CCA 9600177. Appellee’s motion to file answer letter granted.

No. 98-1118/NA. U.S. v. Michael CARDREON. CCA 97-0015. Appellee’s motion to extend time to file answer to supplement to petition for grant of review granted to December 23, 1998.

No. 98-1121/AF. U.S. v. Raul R. SALGADO, Jr. CCA 32549. Appellant’s second motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to December 11, 1998.

_________________

*/ On appeal under Article 62, UCMJ, 10 USC § 862.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
NO. 99-37
NOVEMBER 27, 1998

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No. 98-0333/AR. U.S. v. Paul S. WORRELL. CCA 9601261.*/

No. 99-0181/AR. U.S. v. Art A. HERMOSILLA. CCA 9700922.

No. 99-0182/AR. U.S. v. Copelen P. BRADLEY, III. CCA 9800527.

No. 99-0183/AR. U.S. v. John G. RICHARDSON, II. CCA 9600725.

___________

*/ Second petition filed in same case.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
NO. 99-38
NOVEMBER 30, 1998

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW - OTHER SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

No. 99-0022/MC. U.S. v. Paul G. MARTINEZ. CCA 96-1990. Appellant’s motion to withdraw case from appeal granted.

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No. 99-0184/NA. U.S. v. Jessica L. TAVERNI. CCA 98-0461.

No. 99-0185/NA. U.S. v. Jesus B. CABANACAN. CCA 98-0519.

No. 99-0186/AF. U.S. v. Voytek P. CHMIEL. CCA S29582.

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

No. 98-0036/AR. U.S. v. John W. BICKLEY. CCA 9601806.

No. 98-0199/AF. U.S. v. Wade P. HAWES. CCA 32481.

    In each of the above two cases, appellee’s motion to file supplemental citations of authority granted.

No. 98-0199/AF. U.S. v. Wade P. HAWES. CCA 32481. Appellant’s motion to delay oral argument granted.

No. 98-0270/AR. U.S. v. Charles F. ROTH. CCA 9600441. Appellee’s motion to file supplemental citation of authority granted.

No. 98-8021/CG. U.S. v. DeMauri M. FRAZIER. CCA 001-98. On consideration of appellant’s application for an emergency stay and petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of writ of mandamus or prohibition or injunction, it is ordered that the confinement of appellant is stayed pendente lite.

Home Page