UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 12-076

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0419/AR. U.S. v. Bradley L. GUMP. CCA 20100546.*

No. 11-0453/AR. U.S. v. Aaron M. MITCHELL. CCA 20100713.*

No. 12-0229/AR. U.S. v. Rodger S. DANES. CCA 20091072.

No. 12-0230/AR. U.S. v. Jeffery A. HOBART. CCA 20100119.

No. 12-6003/AR. U.S. v. Kevin J. KITMANYEN. CCA 20110609.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 12-8010/AR. In Re Calvin J. DAVENPORT, Petitioner. CCA 20081102. Notice is hereby given that a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of prohibition was filed under Rule 27(a), together with Petitioner's motion for a stay of proceedings under Rule 30, on this date.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 12-0226/AR. U.S. v. Ryan D. PAGE. CCA 20100083. Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 10, 2012.

 

No. 12-8009/AF. In Re Robert C. BRISSETTE. CCA 2011-07. On consideration of the petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of habeas corpus, it is ordered that the United States show cause why the requested relief should not be granted no later that 5:00 p.m. on December 29, 2011.

_________________________

 

* Second petition filed in this case.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 12-075

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0495/AR. U.S. v. Brandon K. PRICE. CCA 20100382.*

No. 12-0227/AR. U.S. v. Jarrod P. ADAMS. CCA 20100696.

No. 12-0228/AR. U.S. v. Carroll J. KIRK, III. CCA 20101048.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 12-8009/AF. In Re Robert C. BRISSETTE, Petitioner. CCA 2011-07. Notice is hereby given that a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of habeas corpus was electronically filed under Rule 27(a) on December 22, 2011, and placed on the docket this 27th day of December, 2011.

___________________

 

* Second petition filed in this case.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 12-074

Thursday, December 22, 2011

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0639/AR. U.S. v. Tanner P. FORRY. CCA 20080334.*

No. 12-0221/AF. U.S. v. Miguel P. MEJIA. CCA S31922.

No. 12-0222/AR. U.S. v. Terrance L. ABERNATHY. CCA 20110229.

No. 12-0223/NA. U.S. v. Aaron L. BOWLES. CCA 201100010.

No. 12-0224/AF. U.S. v. Jamie D. MARTINEZ. CCA S31779.

No. 12-0225/AR. U.S. v. James M. ROBERTS. CCA 20090716.

No. 12-0226/AR. U.S. v. Ryan D. PAGE. CCA 20100083.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 12-0143/MC. U.S. v. Richard A. GARCIA-TOLSON. CCA 2010000610. Appellee's motion to extend time to file an answer granted to December 22, 2011.

 

No. 12-0153/AF. U.S. v. Matthew A. PINGEL. CCA 37783. Appellant's motion to file supplemental issue pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), granted.

_________________________

 

* Second petition filed in this case.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 12-073

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 12-0106/AF. U.S. v. Michael A. CISNEROS. CCA S31871. Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHERE A SPECIFICATION CHARGED UNDER ARTICLE 134, UCMJ, FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE UNDER UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011), BY NOT INCLUDING THE TERMINAL ELEMENTS FOR CLAUSE 1 OR 2, CAN AN ACCUSED PROVIDENTLY PLEAD GUILTY TO SUCH A SPECIFICATION WHERE HE FAILS TO OBJECT TO THE SPECIFICATION AT TRIAL, WHERE THE MILITARY JUDGE ADVISES THE ACCUSED OF THE TERMINAL ELEMENTS DURING THE PROVIDENCE INQUIRY, AND THE ACCUSED ADMITS TO ALL THE ELEMENTS?

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 12-0140/AF. U.S. v. Jeremiah C. SLACK. CCA S31906. Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT'S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT'S OPINION IN UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011).

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 12-0105/AR. U.S. v. John C. BODDY. CCA 20100078.

No. 12-0117/AF. U.S. v. Cedric B. HARDY. CCA S31780.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 12-0215/AR. U.S. v. Aaron J. MEDINA. CCA 20100469. Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 12-072

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 09-0519/NA. U.S. v. Michael S. HODGE. CCA 200601124. Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT'S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT'S OPINION IN UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011).

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 11-0647/MC. U.S. v. Marchello K. HANCOCK. CCA 201000400. Review granted on the following issue:

 

AS IN UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, THE ARTICLE 134 SPECIFICATION FAILED TO ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT AND THEREFORE FAILED TO STATE AN OFFENSE. COULD APPELLANT PLEAD GUILTY TO A SPECIFICATION THAT FAILED TO STATE AN OFFENSE?

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 12-0071/AR. U.S. v. Robert M. BIGBACK. CCA 20101044. Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE SPECIFICATION OF CHARGE II FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE BECAUSE IT DOES NOT ALLEGE, EXPRESSLY OR BY NECESSARY IMPLICATION, THE "TERMINAL ELEMENT" AS REQUIRED BY UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011).

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 12-0073/MC. U.S. v. Mark A. LEUBECKER. CCA 201100091. Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE LOWER COURT MISAPPLIED UNITED STATES v. FOSLER AND UNITED STATES v. WATKINS, IN FINDING THAT, DESPITE FAILING TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE THE TERMINAL ELEMENT, THE ARTICLE 134 SPECIFICATIONS STATE AN OFFENSE.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 12-0099/AR. U.S. v. Matthew J. MCCLAIN. CCA 20090446. Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE EVIDENCE IS LEGALLY SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT APPELLANT'S CONVICTION OF POSSESSING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 12-0131/AR. U.S. v. Robert L. MURCHISON. CCA 20101052. Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE SPECIFICATION OF ADDITIONAL CHARGE II FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE AS IT DOES NOT ALLEGE, EXPRESSLY OR BY NECESSARY IMPLICATION, THE "TERMINAL ELEMENT" AS REQUIRED BY UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011).

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 11-0243/AR. U.S. v. John A. MCCARY. CCA 20090601.

No. 12-0015/AR. U.S. v. Marvin C. SIMPSON. CCA 20091039.

No. 12-0151/AF. U.S. v. Andrew SILVA. CCA 37846.

No. 12-0152/AF. U.S. v. Benjamin C. MCKINNEY. CCA 37801.

No. 12-0154/AF. U.S. v. Jeffrey S. MANLEY. CCA S31884.

No. 12-0156/AR. U.S. v. Antonie HILLIARD. CCA 20091034.

No. 12-0157/AF. U.S. v. Jonathan D. MORRISON. CCA S31880.

No. 12-0158/AR. U.S. v. Christopher L. PARKER. CCA 20110209.

No. 12-0161/AR. U.S. v. Anthony S. ALMAGRO. CCA 20100872.

No. 12-0162/AR. U.S. v. Justin J. GORDON. CCA 20110164.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0580/AR. U.S. v. Gregory A. ROBINSON. CCA 20100495.*

No. 12-0217/AR. U.S. v. Hal M. WARNER. CCA 20090152.

No. 12-0218/AR. U.S. v. Jeffrey C. HAGEMAN. CCA 20110027.

No. 12-0219/AR. U.S. v. Daniel MORENO. CCA 20100120.

No. 12-0220/AR. U.S. v. Andrew T. STRONG. CCA 20100635.

_________________________

 

* Third petition filed in this case.



 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 12-071

Monday, December 19, 2011

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 12-0150/AR. U.S. v. Joshua C. HOWARD. CCA 20110156.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 12-0212/AR. U.S. v. Ismael A. VILLANUEVA. CCA 20090967.

No. 12-0213/AR. U.S. v. Matthew J. BAILEY. CCA 20100979.

No. 12-0214/AR. U.S. v. Jordan L. WILSON. CCA 20110003.

No. 12-0215/AR. U.S. v. Aaron J. MEDINA. CCA 20100469.

No. 12-0216/AR. U.S. v. Donald A. WHITTEN III. CCA 20100353.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 12-8008/AR. Julian ASSANGE, and WIKILEAKS, Appellants v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Lieutenant Colonel Paul ALMANZA, Appellees. CCA 20111146. Notice is hereby given that a writ-appeal petition for review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals on application for extraordinary relief was filed under Rule 27(b) on this date.

 


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 12-070

Friday, December 16, 2011

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 11-0374/AR. U.S. v. Lelan M. SHANKLES. CCA 20100307.*

No. 12-0201/MC. U.S. v. Victor G. RAMOS. CCA 201100264.

No. 12-0202/NA. U.S. v. Michael IGNACIO. CCA 201100062.

No. 12-0203/AR. U.S. v. Jacob A. RACINE. CCA 20100021.

No. 12-0204/AR. U.S. v. Rodolfo SERNA-RAMIREZ. CCA 20100129.

No. 12-0205/AR. U.S. v. Winston C. BRIERLEY. CCA 20110122.

No. 12-0206/AR. U.S. v. Tommie L. OLDS. CCA 20091044.

No. 12-0207/AR. U.S. v. Tiuti VAIMAONA. CCA 20110185.

No. 12-0208/AF. U.S. v. Tommy MAHONEY, Jr. CCA S31854.

No. 12-0209/AF. U.S. v. Thomas T. JONES. CCA 37788.

No. 12-0210/AF. U.S. v. Edward A. JIMENEZ. CCA S31920.

No. 12-0211/AF. U.S. v. David A. HOLLINGSWORTH. CCA 37765.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 12-6001/AF. U.S. v. Scott M. DEASE, Jr. CCA 2011-04. On consideration of the motion to consider Appellant's reply brief on its merits, said motion is hereby denied.

_______________________

 

* Second petition filed in this case.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 12-069

Thursday, December 15, 2011

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 12-0167/AR. U.S. v. Dantonio L. LYNCH. CCA 20110086. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted, and the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.* [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

* It is directed that the promulgating order be corrected to reflect that the finding of the Specification of Charge I was "Guilty, except the words 'locking her bedroom door and'; Of the excepted words: Not guilty."    

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 10-5004/AF. U.S. v. Ryan D. HUMPHRIES. CCA 37491. Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER A CONTESTED ADULTERY SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE AN ARTICLE 134 TERMINAL ELEMENT BUT THAT WAS NOT CHALLENGED AT TRIAL STATES AN OFFENSE.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 12-0053/AR. U.S. v. Richard L. EASTON. CCA 20080640. Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE ARMY COURT ERRED IN HOLDING THE APPELLANT'S TRIAL DID NOT VIOLATE HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT AGAINST DOUBLE JEOPARDY BECAUSE JEOPARDY DID NOT ATTACH AND EVEN IF IT DID, MANIFEST NECESSITY JUSTIFIED THE CONVENING AUTHORITY'S DECISION TO WITHDRAW CHARGES.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 12-0167/AR. U.S. v. Dantonio L. LYNCH. CCA 20110086. [See also APPEALS-SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 10-0179/AF. U.S. v. Deanna T. THORNTON. CCA S31692.

No. 12-0145/AF. U.S. v. Rebecca A. BURGESS. CCA S31908.

 


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 12-068

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 11-0615/AR. U.S. v. Darrian S. NEALY. CCA 20100654.

No. 11-0413/NA. U.S. v. Anthony P. BALLAN. CCA 201000242.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 12-0200/NA. U.S. v. Joshua D. WYLY. CCA 201100005.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 12-0108/AF. U.S. v. Megan L. COOPER. CCA S31727. On consideration of Appellee's motion to supplement the record and Appellant's motion to remand, it is ordered that said motions are hereby denied.

 

No. 12-0196/AF. U.S. v. Timothy R. ESTES. CCA S31886.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 3, 2012.

 

No. 12-0198/NA. U.S. v. Calvin D. GRIFFITTS. CCA 201000673. Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 3, 2012.

 


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 12-067

Monday, December 12, 2011

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 11-0583/NA. U.S. v. Michael D. King. CCA 201000406.

No. 11-0523/MC. U.S. v. Alexander M. Watson. CCA 201000623.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 11-0520/AR. U.S. v. Christopher L. YOUNG. CCA 20090614.

No. 12-0036/AR. U.S. v. James E. CRAWFORD. CCA 20100247.

No. 12-0104/AF. U.S. v. Joedon CARRILLO. CCA S31831.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 12-0194/AR. U.S. v. Evan VELA. CCA 20080133.

No. 12-0195/AR. U.S. v. Chad E. GIBBS. CCA 20110083.

No. 12-0196/AF. U.S. v. Timothy R. ESTES. CCA S31886.

No. 12-0197/AR. U.S. v. Anthony J. CRUSE. CCA 20080148.

No. 12-0198/NA. U.S. v. Calvin D. GRIFFITTS. CCA 201000673.

No. 12-0199/AF. U.S. v. Erik W. BULLENS. CCA S31737.

 


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 12-066

Friday, December 9, 2011

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 12-0192/AR. U.S. v. Jeremy J. PARKER. CCA 20110043.

No. 12-0193/AF. U.S. v. Clay K. CORNETTE. CCA S31849.

 


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 12-065

Thursday, December 8, 2011

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 12-0116/AF. U.S. v. John A. JACKSON, Jr. CCA 37417.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 12-0191/AF. U.S. v. Manuel A. HERNANDEZ. CCA 37860.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 11-0583/NA. U.S. v. Michael D. KING, Jr. CCA 201000406. Appellant's motion to correct errata granted.

 

No. 12-0036/AR. U.S. v. James E. CRAWFORD. CCA 20100247. On consideration of Appellant's motion to consider matters pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), it is ordered that said motion is hereby granted.

 


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 12-064

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 12-0048/AR. U.S. v. Bobby D. JAMES. CCA 20081163. Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE SPECIFICATION OF CHARGE II FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE BECAUSE IT DOES NOT ALLEGE, EXPRESSLY OR BY NECESSARY IMPLICATION, THE "TERMINAL ELEMENT" AS REQUIRED BY UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011).


The decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is vacated. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for remand to that court for consideration of the granted issue in light of United States v. Fosler, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011). [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

BAKER, Chief Judge (dissenting):

 

I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Fosler. United States v. Fosler, 70 M.J. 225, 240-47 (C.A.A.F. 2011).

 

No. 12-0064/MC. U.S. v. Andrew L. BIRDWELL. CCA 201100229. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, we note that the convening authority approved the sentence, which included a dishonorable discharge, and then stated,

 

In accordance with the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the Manual for Courts-Martial, applicable regulations, and this action, the sentence is ordered executed.

 

Under Article 71(c)(1), UCMJ, a punitive discharge cannot be ordered executed until, after the completion of direct appellate review, there is a final judgment as to the legality of the proceedings. Thus, to the extent that the convening authority's action purported to execute the dishonorable discharge, it was a nullity. To avoid any error in this regard, we again suggest that the model "Forms for Action" in Manual for Courts-Martial, United States app. 16 at A16-1 - A16-6 (2008 ed.) be revised. See United States v. Politte, 63 M.J. 24, 26 n.11 (C.A.A.F. 2006). Accordingly, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted, and the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

No. 12-0100/AF. U.S. v. Chase C. MONTGOMERY. CCA 37556. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted, and the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.* [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

*  It is directed that the promulgating order be corrected to reflect that the drug used in Specification 13 of Charge III was 3, 4-methylenedioxyamphetamine, vice 3, 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine.

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 12-0048/AR. U.S. v. Bobby D. JAMES. CCA 20081163. [See also APPEALS-SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

No. 12-0064/MC. U.S. v. Andrew L. BIRDWELL. CCA 201100229. [See also APPEALS-SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

No. 12-0100/AF. U.S. v. Chase C. MONTGOMERY. CCA 37556. [See also APPEALS-SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 12-063

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 12-0020/AR. U.S. v. Exavious J. DAVENPORT. CCA 20090507.

No. 12-0029/AR. U.S. v. Antonio L. ROBINSON. CCA 20081086.

No. 12-0103/AR. U.S. v. Robert G. BULECHEK. CCA 20100565.

No. 12-0107/AF. U.S. v. Michael O. CLARK. CCA 37494.

No. 12-0120/AR. U.S. v. Kamien M. KING. CCA 20090912.

No. 12-0129/AR. U.S. v. Jeffery C. JOSEPH. CCA 20110008.

No. 12-0139/AF. U.S. v. Ryan D. HAIGH. CCA S31900.

No. 12-0141/AF. U.S. v. William L. HIGDON II. CCA S31869.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 12-0188/AR. U.S. v. Nicholas M. DEW. CCA 20110307.

No. 12-0189/AR. U.S. v. George SHEARS. CCA 20100027.

No. 12-0190/AR. U.S. v. Ivan H. HUOT. CCA 20100903.

 


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 12-062

Monday, December 5, 2011

 

NOTICES

 

No. 11-0413/NA. U.S. v. Anthony P. BALLAN. CCA 201000242.

No. 11-0523/MC. U.S. v. Alexander M. WATSON. CCA 201000263.

No. 11-0583/NA. U.S. v. Michael D. KING, Jr. CCA 201000406.

No. 11-0615/AR. U.S. v. Darrian S. NEALY. CCA 20100654.

In view of the existence of a vacant position on the Court, notice is hereby given that the Chief Judge has called upon Senior Judge Andrew S. Effron to perform judicial duties in the above cases, and that Senior Judge Effron has consented to perform judicial duties in the cases under Article 142(e)(1) (A)(ii), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. 942(e) (1)(A) (ii)(2006).

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 12-0187/AF. U.S. v. John D. HAGEN. CCA S31915.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 12-8007/AF. In re Robert C. BRISSETTE, Petitioner v. Brigadier General Jon A. Norman, USAF, Commander Robert Stover, USN, and United States, Respondents. CCA 2011-07. Notice is hereby given that a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of habeas corpus or, in the alternative, a writ of mandamus, was filed under Rule 27(a) on November 22, 2011, and placed on the docket this date. On consideration thereof, it is ordered that said petition is hereby denied.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 12-0008/AR. U.S. v. Alaa M. ALI. CCA 20080559. Appellant's motion to extend time to file a brief granted, but only up to and including January 5, 2012, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 12-0148/AR. U.S. v. James O. MORRIS. CCA 20081169. Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to December 15, 2011.

 

No. 12-0149/AR. U.S. v. Christopher L. STADEL. CCA 20090820. Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to December 20, 2011.

 


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 12-061

Friday, December 2, 2011

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 12-0101/AF. U.S. v. Angel D. SANTOS. CCA 37669.

No. 12-0137/AR. U.S. v. Bryan D. SANTIZO. CCA 20100146.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 12-0186/AR. U.S. v. Robert P. CLARK. CCA 20101031.

 


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 12-060

Thursday, December 1, 2011

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 12-0118/AF. U.S. v. Julian D. MOGG. CCA 37840.

No. 12-0135/AR. U.S. v. Julian T. LORENTINO. CCA 20110158.