UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-217

Friday, July 30, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 10-0536/AR.  U.S. v. Thomas M. HILL.  CCA 20080712.

No. 10-0594/AF.  U.S. v. Tyree R. PITTMAN.  CCA 37567.

No. 10-0602/AF.  U.S. v. Joshua W. STONE.  CCA 37427.

No. 10-0628/AR.  U.S. v. Joel A. CASTRO, Jr.  CCA 20090771.

No. 10-6007/AF.  U.S. v. Adam G. COTE.  CCA 2009-15.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0649/AF.  U.S. v. Dean E. THOMPSON.  CCA 37380.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 10-8028/AR.  Sterling Terrance HOSPEDALES, Petitioner v. Secretary of the Army, Respondent.  Notice is hereby given that a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus was filed by mail under Rule 27(a) on July 20, 2010, and placed on this docket this 30th day of July, 2010.  On consideration thereof, it is ordered that said petition is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 10-0648/AR.  U.S. v. Matthew E. JOHNSON.  CCA 20081165.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including August 18, 2010. 




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-216

Thursday, July 29, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0647/AR.  U.S. v. Benjamin J. TOBIN.  CCA 20090457.

No. 10-0648/AR.  U.S. v. Matthew E. JOHNSON.  CCA 20081165.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 10-8027/AR.  United States, Appellee v. Ricardo K. GONZALES, Appellant.  CCA 20100475.  Notice is hereby given that a writ-appeal petition for review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals on application for extraordinary relief was received by mail under Rule 27(b) on this date.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 10-0586/AF.  U.S. v. Michael J. KANE.  CCA S31641.

No. 10-0602/AF.  U.S. v. Joshua W. STONE.  CCA 37427.

No. 10-0611/AF.  U.S. v. Jessie M. HOLT.  CCA S31712.

No. 10-0634/AF.  U.S. v. David L. KOEBELE.  CCA 37381.

 

On consideration of the motion filed by Major Marla J. Gillman, USAF, for leave to withdraw as counsel in the above-entitled cases, it appears that the Judge Advocate General has assigned another counsel to represent the appellants and that the new counsel has assumed representation of said appellants.  Accordingly, it is ordered that said motion is hereby granted.

 

No. 10-6007/AF.  U.S. v. Adam G. COTE.  CCA 2009-15.  Appellee's motion to submit documents granted.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-215

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 10-0560/AR.  U.S. v. Valdez R. DEAR.  CCA 20080786.

No. 10-0563/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher A. CRAVEN.  CCA 37451.

No. 10-0570/AF.  U.S. v. Creon D. FAISON.  CCA 37464.

No. 10-0604/AF.  U.S. v. Shawn BRILEY.  CCA S31735.

No. 10-0610/AR.  U.S. v. Derrick A. FLORES.  CCA 20090142.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0646/AF.  U.S. v. Patrick M. FANNING.  CCA S31610.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-214

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 10-0514/AR.  U.S. v. Timothy N. OSBURN.  CCA 20090695.  Review granted on the following issue specified by the Court:

 

WHETHER THE AFFIRMED FORFEITURE OF $1099.00 PAY PER MONTH FOR SEVEN MONTHS AT A SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL WAS ILLEGAL UNDER ARTICLE 19, UCMJ, AND RULE FOR COURTS-MARTIAL 1003(b)(2), WHEN APPELLANT WAS REDUCED TO E-1 AS PART OF THE SENTENCE.

 

The decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed as to findings and to only so much of the sentence as provides for forfeiture of $933.00 pay per month for seven months, confinement for six months, reduction to pay grade E-1, and a bad-conduct discharge. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 10-0514/AR.  U.S. v. Timothy N. OSBURN.  CCA 20090695.  [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 10-0591/AR.  U.S. v. Jessie J. DONOVAN.  CCA 20091125.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 05-0157/NA.  U.S. v. Ivor G. LUKE.  CCA 200000481.  Appellee's motion to correct errata granted.

 

No. 05-0157/NA.  U.S. v. Ivor G. LUKE.  CCA 200000481.  Appellee's motion to substitute the joint appendix granted.

 

No. 10-0644/AF.  U.S. v. Joshua RODRIGUEZ.  CCA 37454.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including August 16, 2010.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-213

Monday, July 26, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 10-0460/NA.  U.S. v. Elijah SCOTT.  CCA 200900322.

No. 10-0488/AR.  U.S. v. Eric L. ADKINS.  CCA 20090346.

No. 10-0509/AR.  U.S. v. Tryan D. ABROM.  CCA 20080884.

No. 10-0535/AR.  U.S. v. Tanika N. JOHNSON.  CCA 20091035.

No. 10-0566/AF.  U.S. v. Justin E. HOLCOMB.  CCA 37510.

No. 10-0586/AF.  U.S. v. Michael J. KANE.  CCA S31641.

No. 10-0593/AR.  U.S. v. Cameron R. DROSTE.  CCA 20090948.

No. 10-0614/AR.  U.S. v. Brandon S. MANSFIELD.  CCA 20090879.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0644/AF.  U.S. v. Joshua RODRIGUEZ.  CCA 37454.

No. 10-0645/AF.  U.S. v. Drew K. WILLIAMS.  CCA S31721.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-5003/AF.  U.S. v. Brandon T. ROSE.  CCA 36508.  Appellee's motion to amend the certificate of service is granted.

 

No. 10-0643/MC.  U.S. v. John D. MENDEZ.  CCA 20100051.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including August 12, 2010.

 

No. 10-8022/AR.  Ricardo K. GONZALES, Appellant v. Commander, United States Disciplinary Barracks, and United States Army, and United States of America, Appellees.  CCA 20100359.  Appellees’ motion for an extension of time to file an answer to the writ-appeal petition granted, but only up to and including August 5, 2010, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-212

Friday, July 23, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0640/AR.  U.S. v. Andrew W. SPALDING.  CCA 20100057.

No. 10-0641/AR.  U.S. v. Ruston K. PREVOST.  CCA 20090107.

No. 10-0642/AR.  U.S. v. Raymond L. GIROUARD.  CCA 20070299.

No. 10-0643/MC.  U.S. v. John D. MENDEZ.  CCA 201000051.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 10-0484/AR.  U.S. v. Jamaal LEWIS.  CCA 20061070.  Appellant's motion to correct errata granted.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-211

Thursday, July 22, 2010

 

ORDER

IN RE ELECTRONIC FILING

 

Effective September 1, 2010, all pleadings, except as noted below, may be filed on paper or electronically in accordance with the guidelines attached to this Order.  Joint Appendices to Briefs, filed under Rule 24(f), Rules of Practice and Procedure, shall be filed in paper form only.  Administrative matters, such as bar admission applications and attorney disciplinary proceedings, may not be filed electronically.  Counsel appearing before the Court are reminded that personal data identifiers must be redacted from documents filed electronically.  See Guideline paragraph 3h.

 

This Order supersedes the Order of the Court of July 15, 2009 (68 M.J. 170), concerning electronic filing of petition documents, and that Order is hereby rescinded effective September 1, 2010.

 

Guidelines for Electronic Filing of Pleadings

 

1.  Scope.

 

The United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces adopts the following provisions to govern the electronic filing of pleadings:

 

a. This Order applies to all pleadings filed electronically on or after September 1, 2010.  Alternatively, pleadings may be filed in a paper format; however, the same pleading may not be filed both electronically and on paper.

 

b. Administrative matters, such as bar admission applications and attorney disciplinary proceedings, may not be filed electronically.

 

c. If the supplement to the petition for grant of review is filed electronically, an appendix to the supplement (containing the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals, matters submitted pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), and other required matter) shall also be filed electronically unless it consists of more than 50 pages.  In such a case, the appendix may be submitted on paper and the supplement submitted electronically.  In lieu of submitting an appendix in excess of 50 pages on paper, counsel may submit it in a CD or DVD format and note in the supplement that it is being filed in that format under separate cover.  Record matters in the form of video media on CD-ROM or DVD may be submitted in a separate volume of the appendix that is filed in accordance with Rule 21(b).

 

d. A petition for grant of review filed personally by an appellant shall be filed on paper, as provided under Rule 20(a).  All subsequent documents related to the petition for grant of review filed by counsel in such a case may be filed on paper or electronically.

 

e. The Joint Appendix to the brief will be filed in paper form only with the required number of paper copies rather than electronically.  If the appellant or petitioner files the brief electronically, the Joint Appendix will be filed on the same day the brief is filed electronically.

 

2.  Electronic Filing Address.

 

Counsel shall electronically file pleadings using an electronic mail message at the following e-mail address: efiling@armfor.uscourts.gov.  For questions or help concerning the electronic filing of pleadings, counsel should contact the Clerk’s Office at (202) 761-1448.

 

3.  Procedure.

 

a. The electronic filing of a pleading in compliance with these Guidelines shall constitute filing under the Rules of Practice and Procedure.  The pleading will be deemed filed as of the date and time of the transmission of the electronic mail message.

 

b. The electronic mail message shall contain the following in the subject block: (1) the name of the case; (2) the docket number if a docket number has been assigned; and (3) the words “electronic filing.”  A description of the nature of the pleading will be included in the body of the electronic mail message.

 

c. The pleading shall be attached to the electronic mail message in Portable Document Format (PDF), and, when printed, shall be in compliance with the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Court.

 

d. Counsel shall send an electronic copy of the message and all attachments to opposing counsel to accomplish service of the pleading under Rule 39.  This may be accomplished by listing opposing counsel as a “cc” recipient of the electronic message.

 

e. The brief attached to an electronic filing shall contain the conformed signature (“/s/”) or digital signature of the attorney of record.  This will comply with the requirements of Rule 38.

 

f. If a pleading is filed electronically in accordance with this Order, the party filing the pleading is not required to prepare and file printed copies of that pleading under Rules 37(a) and 37(b)(2).  The Court will send a reply electronic message to the sender indicating receipt of the electronic filing.  Electronic filers are advised that if they do not receive a reply electronic message by the following business day, they should immediately contact the Clerk’s Office.

 

g. Classified material and material under seal will not be filed electronically.  If such matters need to be filed, they will be submitted to the Court on paper as a supplemental filing to the document in which they would otherwise appear.  In such cases, counsel will include in the text of the electronic mail message a notation that classified or sealed material is being separately submitted.  The classified or sealed material will be appropriately packaged, marked and delivered, and will include a notation that it accompanies an electronic filing in the case.  All classified material will be handled in accordance with Rule 12.

 

h. Counsel will refrain from including and shall redact the following personal data identifiers from documents filed with the Court:

      • Social security numbers
      • Names of minors
      • Dates of birth
      • Financial account numbers
      • Home addresses.

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 10-0576/AR.  U.S. v. Casey O. FORD.  CCA 20090898.

No. 10-0579/AF.  U.S. v. Torrey T. FENN.  CCA S31706.

No. 10-0590/AR.  U.S. v. Anthony V. CALDWELL.  CCA 20090881.

No. 10-0592/AR.  U.S. v. Kevin A. WYNN.  CCA 20090432.

No. 10-0606/AR.  U.S. v. Darius A. PERKINS.  CCA 20090196.

No. 10-0619/AR.  U.S. v. Zachary K. JACKSON.  CCA 20091005.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0638/AR.  U.S. v. Rodney D. CAMPBELL.  CCA 20081091.

No. 10-0639/AR.  U.S. v. Walter L. SIMS, Jr.  CCA 20080966.

 

SPECIAL DOCKET MATTERS

 

No. 10-10.  In the matter of Steven Jay ROZAN.  It appearing that the above-named attorney is a member of the Bar of this Court and that he has been suspended from the practice of law by orders of the State Bar of Texas and the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, that pursuant to Rule 15(b), Rules of Practice and Procedure, United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, said attorney was suspended from the practice of law before this Court and was directed to show cause why he should not be disbarred, and there being no response to the show cause order, it is ordered that Steven Jay Rozan is hereby suspended indefinitely from the practice of law before this Court effective the date of this Order.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-210

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 10-0408/AF.  U.S. v. Nicholas A. SIMS.  CCA 37300.

No. 10-0479/AF.  U.S. v. Nicholas M. KHAN.  CCA 37307.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0636/AR.  U.S. v. Clifton E. TAVARES.  CCA 20080545.

No. 10-0637/AR.  U.S. v. Victor K. KINDERKNECHT.  CCA 20091102.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 10-8026/AF.  United States, Appellee v. David A. VALOIS, Appellant.  Notice is hereby given that a writ-appeal petition for review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals on application for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of habeas corpus was received by mail under Rule 27(b) on this date.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 10-0488/AR.  U.S. v. Eric L. ADKINS.  CCA 20090346.  Appellant's motion for leave to file additional issues with the supplement to the petition for grant of review is granted.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-209

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 10-0569/AR.  U.S. v. Anibal CANDELARIO Jr.  CCA 20090633.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted, and, that the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.*[See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 10-0569/AR.  U.S. v. Anibal CANDELARIO Jr.  CCA 20090633.  [See also APPEALS-SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 10-0529/AR.  U.S. v. Nathaniel D. BURKS.  CCA 20090795.

No. 10-0532/AR.  U.S. v. Noah A. SERRAU.  CCA 20090963.

No. 10-0538/AR.  U.S. v. Brandon L. FRY.  CCA 20090310.

No. 10-0539/AR.  U.S. v. Earnest D. SWIFT, Jr.  CCA 20080597.

No. 10-0562/AF.  U.S. v. Sarahlyn W. BELTON.  CCA 37484.

No. 10-0571/AR.  U.S. v. Andres GURROLA, Jr.  CCA 20090468.

No. 10-0585/AR.  U.S. v. Michael R. BODINE.  CCA 20091090.

No. 10-0589/AR.  U.S. v. David C. HEDGE.  CCA 20091130.

No. 10-0599/AR.  U.S. v. Joshua A. SISSON.  CCA 20090929.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 10-8025/AR.  Sterling Terrance HOSPEDALES, Petitioner v. United States, Respondent.  Notice is hereby given that a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus was filed under Rule 27(a) on July 9, 2010, and placed on the docket this date.  On consideration thereof, it is ordered that said petition is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0441/AF.  U.S. v. Joshua C. BLAZIER.  CCA 36988.  Appellee's motion to strike is denied.

__________________


*
 It is directed that the promulgating order be corrected to reflect that Appellant was charged with larceny of currency rather than wrongful appropriation of currency.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-208

Monday, July 19, 2010

 

RULES CHANGES

Upon careful consideration of a proposed change to the Rules of Practice and Procedure, United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, which was presented to and reviewed by the Rules Advisory Committee of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and thereafter published in the Federal Register for comment, it is ordered that effective August 1, 2010, Rule 30A(a) is hereby amended, as follows: (change appears in bold typeface)

RULE 30A. FACTFINDING

(a) General.  The Court will normally not consider any facts outside of the record established at the trial and the Court of Criminal Appeals.  Requests to consider factual material that is not contained in the record shall be presented by a motion to supplement the record filed pursuant to Rule 30.  The motion shall include statements explaining why the matter was not raised previously at trial or before the Court of Criminal Appeals and why it is appropriate to be considered for the first time in this Court.  Motions filed pursuant to this Rule will be granted only for good cause shown.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0634/AF.  U.S. v. David L. KOEBELE.  CCA 37381.

No. 10-0635/AR.  U.S. v. Cristobal G. DELACRUZ.  CCA 20091021.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 10-8023/AR.  Billy J. FULTON, Petitioner v. United States, Respondent.  Notice is hereby given that a petition for writ of mandate, extraordinary relief, per Title 10 USCS, was filed under Rule 27(a) on July 1, 2010, and placed on the docket this date.  On consideration thereof, it is ordered that said petition is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

 

Misc. No. 10-8024/AF.  James L. MILLER, Appellant v. United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, Appellee.  CCA 2009-02.  Notice is hereby given that a writ-appeal petition for review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals on application for extraordinary relief was filed under Rule 27(b) on June 23, 2010, and placed on the docket this date.  On consideration thereof, it is ordered that said writ-appeal petition is hereby denied.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 10-0317/NA.  U.S. v. William R. SAVALA.  CCA 200800818.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file a brief granted, up to and including August 23, 2010, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 10-0408/AF.  U.S. v. Nicholas A. SIMS.  CCA 37300.  Appellant’s motion to remand pursuant to Rule 30A, or in the alternative, for any other appropriate relief and motion to submit documents in support of motion to remand are hereby denied.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 09-0754/AF.  U.S. v. Gabriel R. CONTRERAS.  CCA 37233.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-207

Friday, July 16, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0632/AR.  U.S. v. Matthew C. GORDON.  CCA 20100017.

No. 10-0633/AF.  U.S. v. Beverly N. SIMPSON.  CCA S31733.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 10-8022/AR.  Ricardo K. GONZALES, Appellant. v. Commander, United States Disciplinary Barracks, and United States Army, and United States of America, Appellees.  CCA 20100359.  Notice is hereby given that a writ-appeal petition for review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals on application for extraordinary relief was filed under Rule 27(b) on this date.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-206

Thursday, July 15, 2010

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 09-0432/AR.  U.S. v. Charles A. GRANER, Jr.  CCA 20050054.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-205

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 10-0494/AF.  U.S. v. Caleb B. BEATY.  CCA 37478.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE SENTENCE MUST BE SET ASIDE BECAUSE THE MILITARY JUDGE DETERMINED THE SENTENCE BASED ON THE INCORRECT MAXIMUM PUNISHMENT.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

CERTIFICATES FOR REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-5004/AF.  U.S. v. Ryan D. HUMPHRIES.  CCA 37491.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 10-0472/AR.  U.S. v. John B. TURNER.  CCA 20081062.

No. 10-0546/AR.  U.S. v. Derrick K. SHELTON.  CCA 20090057.

No. 10-0548/AR.  U.S. v. James E. WALKER.  CCA 20091001.

No. 10-0555/AF.  U.S. v. Derek E. EVANS.  CCA S31648.

No. 10-0583/AR.  U.S. v. Tyler R. MILLER.  CCA 20090928.

No. 10-0584/AR.  U.S. v. Alex M. WHEELOCK.  CCA 20091037.

No. 10-0595/AF.  U.S. v. Nicholas J. LOMELY.  CCA S31726.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-204

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 10-0397/AR.  U.S. v. Sergio SOTO, Jr.  CCA 20090255.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE PRETRIAL AGREEMENT CONTAINED A PROHIBITED AND UNENFORCEABLE PROVISION REQUIRING APPELLANT TO "OFFER TO REQUEST A BAD[-]CONDUCT DISCHARGE DURING THE SENTENCING PHASE" THEREBY VIOLATING RULE FOR COURTS-MARTIAL 705(c)(1)(B) AND PUBLIC POLICY.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 10-0531/AR.  U.S. v. Robert C. CARRILLO.  CCA 20081087.

No. 10-0542/AR.  U.S. v. Derrick M. GREEN.  CCA 20091142.

No. 10-0550/AF.  U.S. v. Gabriell LOPEZ.  CCA 37455.

No. 10-0557/AF.  U.S. v. James M. CAMPBELL.  CCA S31719.

No. 10-0577/NA.  U.S. v. Steven R. FRANKLIN.  CCA 20100178.

No. 10-0581/AR.  U.S. v. Richard E. HOLMES, II.  CCA 20090861.

No. 10-0587/AR.  U.S. v. Jeremy TRAVIS.  CCA 20090794.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0625/AR.  U.S. v. Randy ORTIZ.  CCA 20091053.

No. 10-0626/AR.  U.S. v. Benjamin R. ANDRES.  CCA 20100005.

No. 10-0627/AR.  U.S. v. Alexander J. MCHELLON.  CCA 20091036.

No. 10-0628/AR.  U.S. v. Joel A. CASTRO, Jr.  CCA 20090771.

No. 10-0629/AR.  U.S. v. Stephen T. NORRED.  CCA 20091019.

No. 10-0630/AF.  U.S. v. John C. CALHOUN.  CCA 37274.

No. 10-0631/AR.  U.S. v. Samuel M. PERRY.  CCA 20090409.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 09-0755/AF.  U.S. v. Stephen A. LLOYD.  CCA 37220.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-203

Monday, July 12, 2010

 

CERTIFICATES FOR REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-5003/AF.  U.S. v. Brandon T. ROSE.  CCA 36508.*

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 10-0261/AF.  U.S. v. Renato S. DEL CARPIO.  CCA 37276.

No. 10-0495/AR.  U.S. v. Bernard A. PENEGOR.  CCA 20080762.

 

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0622/MC.  U.S. v. James J. BOSTON.  CCA 200900157.

No. 10-0623/AR.  U.S. v. Ashley N. WEGER.  CCA 20090840.

No. 10-0624/AR.  U.S. v. Derrick J. RAILEY.  CCA 20091101.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 10-0622/MC.  U.S. v. James J. BOSTON.  CCA 200900157.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including August 2, 2010.

___________________

 

*  Second petition filed in this case.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-202

Friday, July 9, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0185/AR.  U.S. v. Makisha I. MORTON.  CCA 20060458.*

No. 10-0617/AF.  U.S. v. Andrew T. GODFREY II.  CCA 37474.

No. 10-0618/MC.  U.S. v. John T. GOFF.  CCA 200900684.

No. 10-0619/AR.  U.S. v. Zachary K. JACKSON.  CCA 20091005.

No. 10-0620/AR.  U.S. v. Derek S. HARRIS.  CCA 20090484.

No. 10-0621/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher A. WRIGHT.  CCA 20090911.

__________________

 

*  Second petition filed in this case.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-201

Thursday, July 8, 2010

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 10-0317/NA.  U.S. v. William R. SAVALA.  CCA 200800818.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED WHEN IT HELD THAT THE DENIAL OF APPELLANT'S RIGHT TO CROSS-EXAMINE HIS ACCUSER WAS HARMLESS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 10-0443/AF.  U.S. v. Charles J. REDMOND.  CCA S31651.

No. 10-0464/AF.  U.S. v. Jeffrey S. PRATT.  CCA 37500.

No. 10-0552/AF.  U.S. v. Anthony M. GIBBONS.  CCA S31710.

No. 10-0553/AF.  U.S. v. Michael T. KERR.  CCA 37538.

No. 10-0556/AR.  U.S. v. Michael C. SMITH.  CCA 20090724.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0611/AF.  U.S. v. Jessie M. HOLT.  CCA S31712.

No. 10-0612/AF.  U.S. v. Hebert J. MCDOWELL.  CCA 37354.

No. 10-0613/AR.  U.S. v. Roy Lee BLIZZARD.  CCA 20080509.

No. 10-0614/AR.  U.S. v. Brandon S. MANSFIELD.  CCA 20090879.

No. 10-0615/AR.  U.S. v. Robert J.W. HANKINS.  CCA 20091052.

No. 10-0616/AR.  U.S. v. Kiara J. SHEPARD.  CCA 20100056.

No. 10-6009/AF.  U.S. v. Benjamin J. KNELL.  CCA 2010-08.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-200

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 10-0386/AR.  U.S. v. Ian J. THERIOT.  CCA 20080633.

No. 10-0462/AR.  U.S. v. Jay C. GAGE.  CCA 20090113.

No. 10-0480/AR.  U.S. v. Jorge SALAZAR-ENRIQUEZ.  CCA 20090681.

No. 10-0516/AF.  U.S. v. Michael J. GARCIA, Jr.  CCA S31702.

No. 10-0526/AF.  U.S. v. William A. MOORE.  CCA 37529.

No. 10-0568/AR.  U.S. v. James A. YORK.  CCA 20090672.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 08-0703/AR.  U.S. v. Norman R. BREHM.  CCA 20070688.*

No. 10-0605/AF.  U.S. v. Brandon D. BERRY.  CCA 37310.

No. 10-0606/AR.  U.S. v. Darius A. PERKINS.  CCA 20090196.

No. 10-0607/AR.  U.S. v. Ross J. SPEARS.  CCA 20091116.

No. 10-0608/AR.  U.S. v. Jacob R. ESPINOZA.  CCA 20091094.

No. 10-0609/AR.  U.S. v. Jared D. NEWTON.  CCA 20100008.

No. 10-0610/AR.  U.S. v. Derrick A. FLORES.  CCA 20090142.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 07-0253/NA.  U.S. v. John A. HALSEMA.  CCA 20001337.  Appellant’s motion to stay proceedings is granted for 90 days from the date of this order, and if Appellee does not complete the security processing for appellate defense counsel within the 90-day period, Appellee is ordered to explain the reasons therefor. The Court’s order issued May 24, 2010, is hereby vacated.

_________________________

 

* Second petition filed in this case.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-199

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 09-0642/AF.  U.S. v. Brenton MCDANIEL.  CCA 36649.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted, and the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 09-0642/AF.  U.S. v. Brenton MCDANIEL.  CCA 36649.  [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 10-0505/AR.  U.S. v. Jonathan E. TRIPLER.  CCA 20080904.

No. 10-0506/AR.  U.S. v. Omar A. CASTRO.  CCA 20081073.

 

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0602/AF.  U.S. v. Joshua W. STONE.  CCA 37427.

No. 10-0603/AF.  U.S. v. RICARDO J. VALDEZ   Jr.  CCA S31688.

No. 10-0604/AF.  U.S. v. Shawn BRILEY.  CCA S31735.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-198

Friday, July 2, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0600/AR.  U.S. v. Joshua J. STREIFF.  CCA 20090134.

No. 10-0601/AR.  U.S. v. Andre W. WILKERSON-SMITH.  CCA 20090863. 




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-197

Thursday, July 1, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0598/AR.  U.S. v. Terri A. CARVAJAL.  CCA 20090561.

No. 10-0599/AR.  U.S. v. Joshua A. SISSON.  CCA 20090929.

 



Home Page |  Opinions & Digest  |  Daily Journal  |  Scheduled Hearings  |  Search Site