UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-098

Friday, January 29, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 10-0171/AR.  U.S. v. Eric P. LINSCOMB.  CCA 20090568.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0246/AR.  U.S. v. Don P. MATHERNE.  CCA 20090677.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-097

Thursday, January 28, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0244/AR.  U.S. v. William R. KING, III.  CCA 20090205.

No. 10-0245/AR.  U.S. v. Walter A. MACLAREN.  CCA 20090551.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 08-0683/AR.  U.S. v. Sydonna A. JONES.  CCA 20060821.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including February 16, 2010.

 

No. 09-0597/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher J. COLVANO.  CCA 37121.  Appellant's motion to file attachment granted.

 

RYAN, Judge, with whom ERDMANN, Judge, joins (dissenting):

 

Article 67(a), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 867(a) (2006), authorizes this Court to “review the record” in certain cases.  The attachment at issue is not part of “the record”: it was presented neither at trial nor at the Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA).  Appellant gives no reason for his failure to add this material to the record before now.

C.A.A.F. R. 30A(a) recognizes that we “will normally not consider any facts outside of the record established at the trial and the Court of Criminal Appeals.”  Since this limitation is consonant with Article 67, UCMJ, it seems a prudent rule.  Nothing indicates that the circumstances under which this attachment is presented are extraordinary: Appellant asserts that the document he seeks to attach is “necessary to show . . . what contributed to [his] negative behavior, the severity of his PTSD, and his need for continued therapy,” but he proffers no reason, let alone good cause, for failing to present it to the CCA.  Before we depart from the “normal” practice memorialized in Rule 30A(a), a movant must show that his situation is somehow unusual.  Because Appellant has not done so, I would follow the mandate of Article 67, UCMJ, and the “normal” practice discussed in Rule 30A(a) and deny the motion.

 

No. 10-0074/AR.  U.S. v. Samuel J. PERRY.  CCA 20071338.  Appellant's motion to attach affidavit granted.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-096

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 10-0034/AR.  U.S. v. Robert A. SWICK.  CCA 20080725.

No. 10-0095/AR.  U.S. v. Mikel H. MARTIN, Jr.  CCA 20090075.

No. 10-0127/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher S. STERLING.  CCA 37298.

No. 10-0180/AR.  U.S. v. Henry R. PAYNE.  CCA 20090172.

No. 10-0189/AF.  U.S. v. Michael A. COX.  CCA S31575.

No. 10-0194/AR.  U.S. v. Mack D. WOLFE II.  CCA 20081010.

No. 10-0200/AR.  U.S. v. Raphael E. RAMOS.  CCA 20080659.

No. 10-0207/AR.  U.S. v. Joshua L. WINDEY.  CCA 20080164.

No. 10-0209/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher R. MARTINEZ.  CCA S31570.

No. 10-0210/AF.  U.S. v. Alexander S. PATINO.  CCA S31683.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW - OTHER SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 09-0795/MC.  U.S. v. Derrick O. LASTER.  CCA 200400143.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals and in light of United States v. Rodriguez, 67 M.J. 110 (C.A.A.F. 2009), it is ordered that said petition is dismissed as untimely filed.

 

EFFRON, Chief Judge (concurring in the result):

 

I concur in the result and note that Appellant’s case remains subject to review in our Court under Article 67(a)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 867(a)(2).  See United States v. Angell, 68 M.J. 79, 80 (C.A.A.F. 2009) (Effron, C.J., concurring in the result).

 

BAKER, Judge (concurring in the result):

 

I concur in the result because I would deny the petition.  See United States v. Angell, 68 M.J. 79, 80 (C.A.A.F. 2009) (Baker, J., concurring in the result) and United States v. Rodriguez, 67 M.J. 110, 120 (C.A.A.F. 2009) (Baker, J., dissenting).

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0242/AR.  U.S. v. Lonnie A. STORY.  CCA 20061014.

No. 10-0243/MC.  U.S. v. Bassa CISSE.  CCA 200900072.




  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-095

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 09-0441/AF.  U.S. v. Joshua C. BLAZIER.  CCA 36988.

No. 09-0589/AR.  U.S. v. Robert C. HUNTZINGER.  CCA 20060976.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 10-0202/AR.  U.S. v. Patrick L. THOMAS.  CCA 20090466.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 10-5002/NA.  U.S. v. Walter S. STEVENSON.  CCA 200301272.  On December 18, 2009, the United States filed a motion for enlargement of time in which to file a certificate of review in the above-captioned case.  The Court granted that motion to January 25, 2010, (Daily Journal, December 29, 2009).  On January 25, 2009, the United States filed a notice of intent not to certify this case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.  In view of this notice, it is ordered that the above-captioned case is hereby removed from the Court’s docket this date.  

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 10-0240/NA.  U.S. v. Tyrone C. HUDSON.  CCA 200900287.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including February 16, 2010.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-094

Monday, January 25, 2010

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 07-0870/AF.  U.S. v. Charles S. ROACH.  CCA S31143.

No. 10-0020/AF.  U.S. v. Andrew J. FERGUSON.  CCA 37272.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0240/NA.  U.S. v. Tyrone C. HUDSON.  CCA 200900287.

No. 10-0241/NA.  U.S. v. Carlton THOMAS, Jr.  CCA 200900367.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 08-0757/AR.  U.S. v. Jerry J. EDIGER.  CCA 20060275.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-093

Friday, January 22, 2010

 

APPEALS-SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 09-5005/AF.  U.S. v. George L. MOORE.  CCA S31502.  Upon consideration of the certified issue1 and our decisions in United States v. Hardison, 64 M.J. 279 (C.A.A.F. 2007), United States v. Shupe, 36 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1993), United States v. Ross, 34 M.J. 183 (C.M.A. 1992), and United States v. Mullens, 29 M.J. 398 (C.M.A. 1990), standing for, inter alia, the proposition that admission of aggravation evidence necessarily involves a contextual judgment, the certified issue is answered in the affirmative and the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed.  We conclude that in light of the continuing offense doctrine and a lack of material prejudice to Appellee in this case, there was no plain error regarding the admission of two urinalysis tests on sentencing in this military judge alone trial.  In the absence of a more developed trial record, we do not decide whether the offered material might properly have been admitted as aggravation evidence under Rule for Courts-Martial 1001(b)(4) had there been a timely objection.

 

The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for remand to the Court of Criminal Appeals for a new review under Article 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866.  Thereafter, Article 67, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 867 shall apply.

___________________

 

1 WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN HOLDING THAT THAT ADMISSION OF TWO PROSECUTION EXHIBITS EVIDENCING APPELLANT’S CONTINUED DRUG USE CONSTITUTED PLAIN ERROR.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0239/AR.  U.S. v. Michael W. KNOX, Jr.  CCA 20080908.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0589/AR.  U.S. v. Robert C. HUNTZINGER.  CCA 20060976.  Appellant's motion to correct errata granted.

 

No. 10-0144/AR.  U.S. v. Terrance A. NORMAN.  CCA 20070851.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file a reply granted, up to and including February 1, 2010.

 

No. 10-5001/NA.  U.S. v. David W. SERIANNE.  CCA 200900330.  On consideration of Appellee’s motion to reschedule oral argument, it is ordered that said motion is hereby granted, that said Hearing Notice issued January 14, 2010, setting the above-entitled case for oral argument is hereby vacated, and that the above-entitled case will be called for hearing on March 2, 2010, at 9:30 a.m.

 

No. 10-8007/AR.  Josh R. RITTENHOUSE, Petitioner v. United States, Respondent.  CCA 20050411.  On consideration of the petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of error coram nobis, it is ordered that Respondent show cause on or before February 1, 2010, why the requested relief should not be granted.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-092

Thursday, January 21, 2010

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 10-0001/AR.  U.S. v. Tony D. RANSOM.  CCA 20060591.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby granted, and the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 09-0822/AR.  U.S. v. Jessica E. ESTRADA.  CCA 20070778.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE ARMY COURT ERRONEOUSLY AFFIRMED APPELLANT'S SENTENCE WHICH INCLUDED A BAD-CONDUCT DISCHARGE WHERE APPELLANT RECEIVED A VALID HONORABLE DISCHARGE FROM THE U.S. ARMY RESERVES AFTER THE COURT-MARTIAL BUT BEFORE INITIAL ACTION.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 10-0001/AR.  U.S. v. Tony D. RANSOM.  CCA 20060591.  [See also APPEALS-SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0801/AR.  U.S. v. Charles A. HORN.  CCA 20050373.

No. 10-0201/AR.  U.S. v. Robert A. CRAYTON.  CCA 20090052.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0235/AF.  U.S. v. James E. KELLY.  CCA 37383.

No. 10-0236/AF.  U.S. v. Charles D. PETTY.  CCA 37297.

No. 10-0237/AF.  U.S. v. Timothy J. STATON.  CCA 37356.

No. 10-0238/AF.  U.S. v. Danny L. FRALEY Jr.  CCA 37444.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-091

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0810/AR.  U.S. v. Jonathan M. WRIGHT.  CCA 20081024.

No. 10-0105/AF.  U.S. v. Jeremy S. RUSSELL.  CCA 37319.

No. 10-0124/AF.  U.S. v. Matthew C. HUFF.  CCA 37431.

No. 10-0136/AR.  U.S. v. Mario A. ROBINSON.  CCA 20090284.

No. 10-0186/MC.  U.S. v. Sean B. JANSEN.  CCA 200900248.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0228/AR.  U.S. v. Justin K. MILLER.  CCA 20090646.

No. 10-0229/AR.  U.S. v. Ryan A. TOZOUR.  CCA 20090548.

No. 10-0230/AR.  U.S. v. Larry W. GRANT III.  CCA 20090283.

No. 10-0231/AR.  U.S. v. John T. GRIFFITH.  CCA 20090701.

No. 10-0232/AF.  U.S. v. Dustin L. ROSATA.  CCA 37359.

No. 10-0233/AF.  U.S. v. Jessie GAINES III.  CCA 37429.

No. 10-0234/AF.  U.S. v. Gregory B. BURNEY.  CCA S31601.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0759/NA.  U.S. v. Larry CRAIG.  CCA 200800716.  Appellee's motion to substitute joint appendix is granted.

 

No. 10-0222/MC.  U.S. v. Kristen M. SILVERS.  CCA 200900349.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including February 8, 2010.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-090

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0658/AF.  U.S. v. Ricky R. HARVEY.  CCA 36641.

No. 09-0803/MC.  U.S. v. Kenneth D. MADDOX.  CCA 2009001604.

No. 09-0805/AR.  U.S. v. Joshua A. GLOVER.  CCA 20080507.

No. 10-0036/MC.  U.S. v. Jason D. WHITE.  CCA 200900183.

No. 10-0133/AR.  U.S. v. Francesco C. CECI.  CCA 20081094.

No. 10-0140/AR.  U.S. v. Dennis V. BRYANT.  CCA 20090396.

No. 10-0166/AR.  U.S. v. David G. REEVES.  CCA 20080927.

No. 10-0191/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher T. ENGLAND.  CCA S31594.

No. 10-0195/NA.  U.S. v. Jonathan M. STRYDIO.  CCA 200900420.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0222/MC.  U.S. v. Kristen M. SILVERS.  CCA 200900349.

No. 10-0223/AF.  U.S. v. James C. HENDERSON II.  CCA S31552.

No. 10-0224/AF.  U.S. v. James R. WELCH.  CCA S31656.

No. 10-0225/AF.  U.S. v. San Jivan RAI.  CCA 37324.

No. 10-0226/AF.  U.S. v. Steven W. DAVIS.  CCA S31680.

No. 10-0227/AF.  U.S. v. Travis B. CHADWELL.  CCA S31631.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0658/AF.  U.S. v. Ricky R. HARVEY.  CCA 36641.  The motion of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network to participate in oral argument on the merits is denied as moot.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-089

Friday, January 15, 2010

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 08-0283/MC.  U.S. v. Roosevelt D. ROBERTS.  CCA 200700027.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby granted, and the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

No. 08-0307/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher R. MILLER.  CCA 36829.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby granted, and the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

No. 08-0779/AR.  U.S. v. Bradley W. MARSHALL.  CCA 20060229.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby granted, and the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 07-0401/NA.  U.S. v. Russell B. MULLINS.  CCA 200200988.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN HOLDING THAT THERE WAS NOTHING IMPERMISSIBLE IN THE MILITARY JUDGE ALLOWING THE GOVERNMENT TO INTRODUCE LIE DETECTOR TESTIMONY IN VIOLATION OF MILITARY RULE OF EVIDENCE 702.

 

WHETHER THE LOWER COURT DENIED APPELLANT DUE PROCESS WHEN IT DENIED HIM RELIEF DUE TO EXCESSIVE POST-TRIAL PROCESSING DELAY AND DENIED HIS SUPPLEMENTAL ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 08-0283/MC.  U.S. v. Roosevelt D. ROBERTS.  CCA 200700027.  [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

No. 08-0307/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher R. MILLER.  CCA 36829.  [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

No. 08-0779/AR.  U.S. v. Bradley W. MARSHALL.  CCA 20060229.  [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

No. 09-0729/MC.  U.S. v. Jerry A. GARNER.  CCA 200800481.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN AFFIRMING APPELLANT'S CONVICTION FOR ATTEMPTING TO ENTICE A MINOR TO ENGAGE IN ILLEGAL SEXUAL ACTIVITY, IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 2422(b), WHERE THE RECORD OF TRIAL FAILED TO SHOW THAT APPELLANT TOOK THE "SUBSTANTIAL STEP" NECESSARY FOR AN ATTEMPT CONVICTION UNDER THE STATUTE.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 09-0754/AF.  U.S. v. Gabriel R. CONTRERAS.  CCA 37233.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE HOUSEBREAKING CHARGE SHOULD BE SET ASIDE BECAUSE THE UNDERLYING CRIMINAL OFFENSE, INDECENT ACTS WITH ANOTHER UNDER ARTICLE 134, UCMJ, IS A PURELY MILITARY OFFENSE.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0549/MC.  U.S. v. Anthony J. MACKMORE II.  CCA 200800032.

No. 09-0617/AR.  U.S. v. Camillo E. MEJIA-CASTILLO.  CCA 20040654.

No. 09-0619/NA.  U.S. v. Michael A. KROL.  CCA 200800728.

No. 09-0744/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher J. GURRY.  CCA 37145.

No. 09-0811/AF.  U.S. v. Garron MERRITT.  CCA 37133.

No. 10-0026/MC.  U.S. v. Richard B. TOSCHIADDI.  CCA 200800044.

No. 10-0066/AR.  U.S. v. Brittany L. BANKS-ABRAM.  CCA 20080398.

No. 10-0084/AF.  U.S. v. William C. DEROSIER.  CCA 37285.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0221/AR.  U.S. v. Ray A. GUZMAN, Jr.  CCA 20080967.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0658/AF.  U.S. v. Ricky R. HARVEY.  CCA 36641.  On consideration of the motion filed by the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network for leave to file an amicus brief in support of Appellant’s supplement to the petition for grant of review, it is ordered that said motion is hereby granted.

 

No. 09-0810/AR.  U.S. v. Jonathan M. WRIGHT.  CCA 20081024.  Appellant's motion to file additional matters pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), is granted.

 

No. 10-0036/MC.  U.S. v. Jason D. WHITE.  CCA 200900183.  Appellant's motion to attach granted.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-088

Thursday, January 14, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 10-0003/AR.  U.S. v. Joseph M. KAPCHUS.  CCA 20061080.

No. 10-0083/AF.  U.S. v. Blair S. HOWARD, Jr.  CCA 37191.

No. 10-0106/AF.  U.S. v. Dana C. MCCOMMON.  CCA 37305.

No. 10-0163/AR.  U.S. v. Eric T. PEREZ.  CCA 20090249.

No. 10-0170/AR.  U.S. v. Corey D. BOWMAN.  CCA 20080817.

No. 10-0184/AR.  U.S. v. Carlos L. MITTER.  CCA 20090335.

No. 10-0192/AR.  U.S. v. Timothy L. AYERS.  CCA 20080410.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0218/AR.  U.S. v. Joseph D. BROWN.  CCA 20090413.

No. 10-0219/AR.  U.S. v. Jonathan M. CLEMONS.  CCA 20090226.

No. 10-0220/AR.  U.S. v. Justin P. CLEMONS.  CCA 20090377.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0535/NA.  U.S. v. Matthew M. DIAZ.  CCA 200700970.  On consideration of the motion filed by the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers for leave to file brief as Amicus Curiae, said motion is hereby granted.  The request to participate in oral argument is denied.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-087

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 09-0242/MC.  U.S. v. Benjamin W. ROSS.  CCA 200800313.

No. 10-0030/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher J. ROBERTS.  CCA 36905.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 10-0025/AR.  U.S. v. Justin W. PFEUFFER.  CCA 20080276.

No. 10-0086/AR.  U.S. v. John T. MORROW.  CCA 20080087.

No. 10-0098/AR.  U.S. v. William A. KING, Jr.  CCA 20080499.

No. 10-0116/AR.  U.S. v. Jacob D. HILARIO.  CCA 20090175.

No. 10-0147/AR.  U.S. v. Jeffrey AGOSTO.  CCA 20090425.

No. 10-0181/AR.  U.S. v. Richard J. FARR.  CCA 20080099.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0217/AR.  U.S. v. Phillip T. WILLIAMSON.  CCA 20081034.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-086

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 09-0458/AF.  U.S. v. James W. SUTTON.  CCA 37155.

No. 09-0523/AF.  U.S. v. James M. GREEN.  CCA 37074.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0804/AR.  U.S. v. Doel A. SANTANA CAMPOS.  CCA 20080624.

No. 09-0814/AR.  U.S. v. Ian A. PETTIBONE.  CCA 20070485.

No. 10-0151/AR.  U.S. v. Richard E. VARGAS.  CCA 20090371.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0213/AR.  U.S. v. Bruce HITCH.  CCA 20090586.

No. 10-0214/AR.  U.S. v. Nathaniel C. MIDBERRY.  CCA 20090139.

No. 10-0215/AR.  U.S. v. Jeremy J. RICKS.  CCA 20090624.

No. 10-0216/AF.  U.S. v. F. Kale ENGLISH.  CCA 37434.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 10-0208/AF.  U.S. v. Pickett R. CANADA IV.  CCA 37481.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including January 28, 2010.

 

No. 10-5001/NA.  U.S. v. David W. SERIANNE.  CCA 200900330.  Appellee's motion to extend time to file a brief granted, up to and including January 22, 2010, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-085

Monday, January 11, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0211/CG.  U.S. v. Anthony M. MONTUORO.  CCA 1307.

No. 10-0212/AR.  U.S. v. Justin T. KLOCH.  CCA 20080788.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-084

Friday, January 8, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0813/AF.  U.S. v. Marcus A. DE VANEY.  CCA S31551.

No. 10-0120/AR.  U.S. v. Jose A. CLAUDIO, Jr.  CCA 20070560.

No. 10-0125/AF.  U.S. v. Elizabeth A. PUTMAN.  CCA S31546.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0207/AR.  U.S. v. Joshua L. WINDEY.  CCA 20080164.

No. 10-0208/AF.  U.S. v. Pickett R. CANADA IV.  CCA 37481.

No. 10-0209/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher R. MARTINEZ.  CCA S31570.

No. 10-0210/AF.  U.S. v. Alexander S. PATINO.  CCA S31683.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 10-8006/MC.  Wade L. WALKER, Appellant v. Eugene ROBINSON, Colonel, U.S. Marine Corps, Military Judge, and The United States, Appellees.  CCA 9501607.  On consideration of the writ-appeal petition, Appellant’s motion to stay proceedings in support of the writ-appeal petition, motion for a hearing in support of the writ-appeal petition, motion to attach in support of the writ-appeal petition, motion to submit additional document, and Appellee’s motion to attach, it is ordered that Appellant’s motion to stay proceedings in support of the writ-appeal petition, and motion for a hearing in support of the writ-appeal petition are hereby denied, that Appellant’s motion to attach in support of the writ-appeal petition, and the motion to submit additional document are hereby granted, that the motion of Appellee United States to attach is hereby granted, and that said writ-appeal petition is hereby denied without prejudice to Appellant’s right to raise the issue asserted during the course of normal appellate review.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 10-0188/AR.  U.S. v. Mark A. FRIPP.  CCA 20080400.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including January 15, 2010, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 08-0660/NA.  U.S. v. Patrick P. CAMPBELL.  CCA 200700643.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-083

Thursday, January 7, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0204/AR.  U.S. v. Steven J. ARCENEAUX.  CCA 20090237.

No. 10-0205/AR.  U.S. v. Stephen C. BURLEY.  CCA 20070585.

No. 10-0206/AR.  U.S. v. Jeffrey E. PORTER.  CCA 20080997.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 10-0077/AR.  U.S. v. Raymond D. LILLEY.  CCA 20090233.  Appellant's motion for leave to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review out of time granted.

 

No. 10-0131/AR.  U.S. v. Kyle M. SCHONFIELD.  CCA 20071383.  Appellant's motion for leave to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review out of time granted. 




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-082

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 10-0107/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher M. BRUNING.  CCA S31608.

No. 10-0130/AR.  U.S. v. Andres F. MORANPINTO.  CCA 20090077.

No. 10-0156/AF.  U.S. v. Kevin P. ROWE.  CCA S31655.

No. 10-0162/AR.  U.S. v. Robert A. SCHEUER, IV.  CCA 20090652.

No. 10-0167/AF.  U.S. v. Michael G. STEHLE.  CCA S31627.

No. 10-0169/AF.  U.S. v. Scotty H. LIGHT.  CCA 37400.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-6005/AF.  U.S. v. Adam C. BORGMAN.  CCA 2009-12.  Notice is hereby given that a petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals on appeal by the United States under Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 862, was filed by counsel under Rule 20 accompanied by a motion to file the supplement separately under Rule 30 on this date.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 10-6005/AF.  U.S. v. Adam C. BORGMAN.  CCA 2009-12.  Appellant’s motion to file the supplement separately granted, up to and including January 26, 2010. 




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-081

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 10-0024/MC.  U.S. v. Sidney T. RICHARDSON IV.  CCA 200800316.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, it is unclear whether the portion of the sentence that included total forfeitures was affirmed by the Court of Criminal Appeals.  The Court of Criminal Appeals noted that the military judge sentenced Appellant to, inter alia, total forfeitures but then stated that, “[p]er the mandate of the pretrial agreement, the convening authority approved only so much of the sentence as included confinement for eight months, reduction to pay grade E-1 and a bad-conduct discharge.”  The pretrial agreement, however, permitted approval of adjudged forfeitures, and the convening authority so approved them.  In conclusion, the Court of Criminal Appeals stated “the findings and sentence, as approved, are affirmed.”  Under Article 67(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 867(c) (2006), this Court can only act with respect to the findings and sentence as affirmed by a court of criminal appeals.  If the affirmed sentence is ambiguous, the appropriate remedy is a remand for clarification.  United States v. Kosek, 41 M.J. 60, 65 (C.M.A. 1994) (“The appropriate remedy for incomplete or ambiguous rulings is a remand for clarification.”).  Accordingly, because of the ambiguity as to the affirmed sentence with respect to forfeitures, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following specified issue:

 

WHETHER THE DECISION OF THE UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS IS AMBIGUOUS AS TO WHETHER THE AFFIRMED SENTENCE INCLUDED FORFEITURE OF ALL PAY AND ALLOWANCES.

 

     The decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed as to findings but set aside as to sentence.  The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy for remand to the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals for clarification as to the affirmed sentence.  Thereafter Article 67, UCMJ, shall apply.

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 10-0013/AF.  U.S. v. Benjamin AYALA.  CCA S31550.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN FINDING APPELLANT'S ADDITIONAL URINALYSES CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO UNITED STATES v. BICKEL, 30 M.J. 277 (C.M.A. 1990), WERE FOR A PERMISSIBLE PURPOSE.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0727/AF.  U.S. v. Frederic G. DANIELS.  CCA 37293.

No. 09-0756/AR.  U.S. v. Donald E. SCHEUERMAN.  CCA 20080304.

No. 09-0787/AR.  U.S. v. Michael C. MOORE.  CCA 20071160.

No. 10-0090/AR.  U.S. v. Gene S. MARR.  CCA 20090217.

 

CERTIFICATES FOR REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-5001/NA.  U.S. v. David W. SERIANNE.  CCA 200900330.  Notice is hereby given that a certificate for review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals was filed under Rule 22 on the 5th day of January, 2010, on the following issues:

 

I.  WHETHER THE NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRONEOUSLY HELD THAT THE DUTY IMPOSED ON SAILORS BY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS INSTRUCTION 5350.4C TO NOTIFY THEIR COMMANDING OFFICER OF AN ARREST BY CIVIL AUTHORITY FOR AN ALCOHOL-RELATED OFFENSE COMPELLED A TESTIMONIAL COMMUNICATION THAT WAS INCRIMINATING.

 

II. WHETHER THE NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRONEOUSLY HELD THAT NO EXCEPTION TO THE FIFTH AMENDMENT SELF-INCRIMINATION CLAUSE, INCLUDING THE REGULATORY EXCEPTION DEVELOPED IN CALIFORNIA v. BYERS, APPLIES TO THE REPORTING REQUIREMENT IN CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS INSTRUCTION 5350.4C.

 

Appellee shall file an answer to Appellant’s brief on or before January 15, 2010.  Appellant may file a reply no later than 5 days after the filing of Appellee’s answer.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 08-0683/AR.  U.S. v. Sydonna A. JONES.  CCA 20060821.

No. 10-0201/AR.  U.S. v. Robert A. CRAYTON.  CCA 20090052.

No. 10-0202/AR.  U.S. v. Patrick L. THOMAS.  CCA 20090466.

No. 10-0203/AR.  U.S. v. Mason A. DAVIS.  CCA 20090616. 




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 10-080

Monday, January 4, 2010

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 10-0052/MC.  U.S. v. Raleigh J. WHITE, Jr.  CCA 200800558.

No. 10-0064/AF.  U.S. v. Cody S. JACKSON.  CCA S31580.

No. 10-0080/AR.  U.S. v. Ryan J. CRANE.  CCA 20080469.

No. 10-0088/AR.  U.S. v. Leon M. HARRIS.  CCA 20090451.

No. 10-0123/AF.  U.S. v. Alexander D. BRADLEY.  CCA S31622.

No. 10-0138/AF.  U.S. v. Michael D. FLANAGAN.  CCA 37268.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 10-0200/AR.  U.S. v. Raphael E. RAMOS.  CCA 20080659.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0441/AF.  U.S. v. Joshua C. BLAZIER.  CCA 36988.  Appellant's motion to attach documents in support of the supplement to the petition for grant of review is denied.  

 

No. 09-0727/AF.  U.S. v. Frederic G. DANIELS.  CCA 37293.  Appellant's motion to submit document denied.




Home Page |  Opinions & Digest  |  Daily Journal  |  Scheduled Hearings  |  Search Site