UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-225

Friday, July 31, 2009

 

CERTIFICATES FOR REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-5006/AF.  U.S. v. Michael T. NERAD.  CCA 36994.  Notice is hereby given that a certificate for review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals and Appellant’s brief were filed under Rule 22 on this date on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN NULLIFYING APPELLEE’S FACTUALLY AND LEGALLY SUFFICIENT CONVICTION FOR POSSESSION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY.

 

Appellee will file an answer regarding the certified issue on or before the 31st day of August, 2009.  Appellant may file a reply no later than 10 days after the filing of Appellee’s answer.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0529/AF.  U.S. v. Jon Austin RAY.  CCA S31431.

No. 09-0532/MC.  U.S. v. Tewa H. CANTERBURY.  CCA 200800712.

No. 09-0666/AF.  U.S. v. Brandon D. KEARNS.  CCA S31597.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0771/MC.  U.S. v. Steven G. CARLSON.  CCA 200100209.

 

PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED


No. 09-5002/NA.  United States, Appellant v. Willie A. BRADLEY, Appellee.  CCA 200501089.  Appellant’s petition for reconsideration of this Court’s order issued July 6, 2009, to provide briefing on a specified issue, _ M.J._ (C.A.A.F. 2009), denied.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-224

Thursday, July 30, 2009

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 08-0344/AR.  U.S. v. Ryan G. ANDERSON.  CCA 20040897.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file a reply to Appellee’s brief granted, up to and including August 10, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 09-0380/AF.  U.S. v. James N. DURBIN.  CCA 36969.  Appellee's motion to dispense with the joint appendix requirement is hereby denied without prejudice to the parties filing a supplement to the joint appendix, if desired.

 

No. 09-0693/AR.  U.S. v. Kenneth A. ZEPEDA.  CCA 20080129.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including August 6, 2009.

 

No. 09-0694/AR.  U.S. v. Ruben CONTRERAS.  CCA 20080879.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including August 10, 2009.   

 

No. 09-0695/AR.  U.S. v. Phillip R. FRANKE.  CCA 20081070.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including August 10, 2009. 

 

No. 09-0696/AR.  U.S. v. Michael A. MCQUOWN.  CCA 20081078.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including August 10, 2009.

 

No. 09-0704/AR.  U.S. v. Cable G. HODGES.  CCA 20081007.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including August 11, 2009.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 09-0010/AR.  U.S. v. James D. WILSON.  CCA 20061187.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-223

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 09-0530/AF.  U.S. v. Bennie C. MELSON.  CCA 36523.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that the petition for review is granted, and the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.[See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.] 

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 09-0530/AF.  U.S. v. Bennie C. MELSON.  CCA 36523.  [See also APPEALS-SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

CERTIFICATES FOR REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-5005/AF.  U.S. v. George L. MOORE.  CCA S31502.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0006/AR.  U.S. v. Alicia S. BETHEA.  CCA 20050763.

No. 09-0313/CG.  U.S. v. Chad J. BLAIR.  CCA 1261.

No. 09-0371/AR.  U.S. v. Dana L. DUNN.  CCA 20060370.

No. 09-0436/AR.  U.S. v. Charles L. LANIER.  CCA 20080296.

No. 09-0481/AR.  U.S. v. Jason E. PADEN.  CCA 20070556.

No. 09-0524/AF.  U.S. v. Nina M. MERENE.  CCA S31492.

No. 09-0540/AR.  U.S. v. Austin C. GOODWIN.  CCA 20080463.

No. 09-0546/AF.  U.S. v. Samuel E. GARCIA.  CCA S31426.

No. 09-0573/AR.  U.S. v. Marcus D. SMITH.  CCA 20080032.

No. 09-0595/AR.  U.S. v. David J. LINDSEY.  CCA 20080465.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0766/AF.  U.S. v. Jewel B. SMITH.  CCA S31609.

No. 09-0767/AF.  U.S. v. Victor J. RODGERS.  CCA 37323.

No. 09-0768/AF.  U.S. v. Vanessa GARCIA.  CCA 37302.

No. 09-0769/AF.  U.S. v. Perry M. DOIG.  CCA S31527.

No. 09-0770/AR.  U.S. v. William D. CONGER.  CCA 20090304.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-222

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0433/AR.  U.S. v. James A. HAWKINS.  CCA 20080660.

No. 09-0472/AR.  U.S. v. Edgar L. OLIVA, Jr.  CCA 20080774.

No. 09-0542/AR.  U.S. v. Heather N. POMEROY.  CCA 20080600.

No. 09-0569/AR.  U.S. v. Benjamin A. BOYER.  CCA 20080467.

No. 09-0572/AR.  U.S. v. Chandra D. KUFFOUR.  CCA 20080232.

No. 09-0590/AR.  U.S. v. Dean R. GUAY, Jr.  CCA 20071066.

No. 09-0593/MC.  U.S. v. David M. SOSEBEE.  CCA 200800277.

No. 09-0598/AF.  U.S. v. Jeffrey W. DALTON.  CCA S31508.

No. 09-0600/AF.  U.S. v. Ryan E. OSWALD.  CCA S31554.

No. 09-0612/AR.  U.S. v. Reno S. ASLIN.  CCA 20080789.

No. 09-0623/AR.  U.S. v. Bradley A. DUMONT.  CCA 20080516.

No. 09-0635/AR.  U.S. v. John M. REID.  CCA 20081032.

No. 09-0667/AF.  U.S. v. Joshua L. PRUITT.  CCA S31545.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0762/AR.  U.S. v. Ryan G. BARROWS.  CCA 20081137.

No. 09-0763/AR.  U.S. v. Caleb L. GRIFFEE.  CCA 20070629.

No. 09-0764/NA.  U.S. v. John H. MAZE.  CCA 200900027.

No. 09-0765/MC.  U.S. v. Richard D. HALL.  CCA 200800240.

 

PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED

 

No. 08-0615/NA.  United States, Appellee v. Stephen P. CHATFIELD, Appellant.  CCA 200602256.  Appellant’s petition for reconsideration of this Court’s decision, 67 M.J. 432 (C.A.A.F. 2009), denied. 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-221

Monday, July 27, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0758/MC.  U.S. v. Mark A. HEMM, JR.  CCA 200800329.

No. 09-0759/NA.  U.S. v. Larry CRAIG.  CCA 200800716.

No. 09-0760/AR.  U.S. v. Antwan D. SMITH.  CCA 20080583.

No. 09-0761/AR.  U.S. v. Lucas A. THOMAS.  CCA 20081083.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-220

Friday, July 24, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0754/AF.  U.S. v. Gabriel R. CONTRERAS.  CCA 37233.

No. 09-0755/AF.  U.S. v. Stephen A. LLOYD.  CCA 37220.

No. 09-0756/AR.  U.S. v. Donald E. SCHEUERMAN.  CCA 20080304.

No. 09-0757/NA.  U.S. v. Michael L. HICKS.  CCA 200800471. 




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-219

Thursday, July 23, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0177/AR.  U.S. v. Victor E. SANGA.  CCA 20060574.

No. 09-0300/AR.  U.S. v. John F. GRIMES.  CCA 20060361.

No. 09-0498/AR.  U.S. v. Michael J. ANDERSEN.  CCA 20071006.

 

PETITION FO RECONSIDERATION DENIED

 

No. 09-0010/AR.  U.S. v. James D. WILSON.  CCA 20061187.  Appellee’s petition for reconsideration of this Court’s decision, 67 M.J. 423 (C.A.A.F. 2009), denied.
 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0753/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher M. WALKER.  CCA 20081105.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0010/AR.  U.S. v. James D. WILSON.  CCA 20061187.  Appellee’s motion for oral argument is denied.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 08-0805/MC.  U.S. v. Manasses A. PAIGE.  CCA 200600587.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-218

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 08-0644/AR.  U.S. v. Charles J. CLAYTON.  CCA 20070145.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN DENYING APPELLANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS THE EVIDENCE SEIZED FROM APPELLANT'S QUARTERS.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 09-0252/AF.  U.S. v. Herbert L. GRAYBILL.  CCA 37005.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRONEOUSLY ACCEPTED APPELLANT'S PLEA OF GUILTY TO WILLFULLY SUFFERING THE DAMAGE OF A MILITARY FIRE EXTINGUISHER, AND THE OWER COURT ERRED BY AFFIRMING THE FINDING OF GUILTY TO THAT SPECIFICATION.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 09-0429/MC.  U.S. v. Jason M. BAGSTAD.  CCA 200602454.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION IN DENYING APPELLANT'S CHALLENGE FOR CAUSE OF CAPTAIN STOJKA, CREATING SERIOUS DOUBTS AS TO WHETHER APPELLANT HAD A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL PANEL WHERE THE SENIOR MEMBER AND ONE OF HIS SUBORDINATES COMPRISED THE TWO-THIRDS MAJORITY SUFFICIENT TO CONVICT APPELLANT.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 09-0445/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher D. DREW.  CCA 37067.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION BY FAILING TO GRANT APPELLANT'S RECUSAL MOTION UNDER R.C.M. 902(a).

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0430/AF.  U.S. v. Willie L. MAY.  CCA 37192.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0751/AF.  U.S. v. Natasha J. CROCKETT.  CCA S31589.

No. 09-0752/AR.  U.S. v. Shane A. TRUMBLE.  CCA 20081155.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 08-0660/NA.  U.S. v. Patrick P. CAMPBELL.  CCA 200700643.  Appellee's motion to remand the above-entitled case to the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is denied.

 

No. 09-0720/MC.  U.S. v. Rob B. YAMMINE.  CCA 200800052.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including August 24, 2009.

 

No. 09-5004/NA.  U.S. v. Raymond L. NEAL.  CCA 200800746.  Appellee's second motion to stay trial proceedings granted.  Trial proceedings are hereby stayed pending further order of this Court.

 

No. 09-8029/AF.  U.S. v. Michael FREECK.  CCA 2009-04.  Appellant's motion to attach the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals to the writ appeal petition is granted.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-217

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0471/AR.  U.S. v. Cody R. SMITH.  CCA 20080957.

No. 09-0536/AR.  U.S. v. Eric J. ESPINOSA.  CCA 20080506.

No. 09-0622/AR.  U.S. v. Phillip W. HARRIS.  CCA 20080587.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 08-0417/AR.  U.S. v. Robert B. CLAYTON.  CCA 20040903.*

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 08-0344/AR.  U.S. v. Ryan G. ANDERSON.  CCA 20040897.  Appellant's motion for leave to file the appeal to the Information Security Classification Appeal Panel is denied.

 

No. 09-0466/AF.  U.S. v. Adam D. DOUGLAS.  CCA S31059.  On consideration of Appellant’s motion to extend time to file a brief, it is noted that military appellate counsel explain that additional time is needed because civilian appellate counsel was retained after this Court granted review.  It is further noted that the same civilian counsel represented Appellant before the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, but said counsel has not entered an appearance with this Court in accordance with Rule 16(a).  Accordingly, it is ordered that said motion is hereby granted, but only up to and including July 23, 2009, and that, in the absence of good cause shown, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.  Attention of counsel is invited to Rule 16(a).

 

No. 09-8019/AR.  Joshua A. DIXON, Appellant v. F.L. Hagenbeck, Lieutenant General, U.S. Army Convening Authority, and Andrew J. Glass, Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army, Military Judge, and The United States, Appellees.  CCA 20090001.  Appellant's motion for leave to allow supplemental briefing and to stay proceedings below denied.

 

No. 09-6006/MC.  Michael R. CROTCHETT.  CCA200800770.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review filed by counsel for Appellant on June 26, 2009, under Rule 19(a)(5)(B), Rules of Practice and Procedure, United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, and docketed under Docket Number 09-0703, and it now appearing that said petition is in fact a petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals on appeal by the United States under Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 862, it is ordered that Docket Number 09-6006/MC be assigned to this case, and that Docket Number 09-0703/MC be removed from this case and not be assigned to any other case.  The Clerk of the Court and counsel for both parties herein will promptly ensure that the new docket number assigned to this case be noted on all future pleadings filed in this matter.

________________________

 

*  Second petition filed in this case.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-216

Monday, July 20, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0547/AF.  U.S. v. Charlie PARKER, Jr.  CCA 37071.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0742/AR.  U.S. v. Keith B. LAFAVOR.  CCA 20080062.

No. 09-0743/AF.  U.S. v. George L. MOORE.  CCA S31502.

No. 09-0744/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher J. GURRY.  CCA 37145.

No. 09-0745/AF.  U.S. v. Jabari L. HINES.  CCA S31515.

No. 09-0746/NA.  U.S. v. Martin M. RAFTERY.  CCA 200800616.

No. 09-0747/AR.  U.S. v. Joshua B. FRANKS.  CCA 20090122.

No. 09-0748/AR.  U.S. v. Sergio S. FARIAS.  CCA 20090043.

No. 09-0749/AR.  U.S. v. Quinton D. GOODMAN.  CCA 20081122.

No. 09-0750/AR.  U.S. v. Justin M. NEWBERRY.  CCA 20080676.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-215

Friday, July 17, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0592/AR.  U.S. v. Kyle S. SMITH.  CCA 20080444.

No. 09-0629/AR.  U.S. v. Mario D. PRATT.  CCA 20080841.

No. 09-0641/AF.  U.S. v. Timothy R. MAIN.  CCA S31518.

No. 09-0649/AF.  U.S. v. Keith L. HARMAN.  CCA S31493.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW - OTHER SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 07-0385/NA.  U.S. v. Kenneth E. HARRIS.  CCA 200401897.  On consideration of Appellee’s motion to deny the petition for grant of review due to the death of the Appellant, which the Court construes as a motion to dismiss the petition due to the death of the Appellant, and Appellant’s motion for leave to file an answer to Appellee’s motion out of time, it is ordered that Appellant’s motion to file an answer out of time is hereby granted, and that Appellee’s motion to dismiss the petition for grant of review due to the death of the Appellant is hereby granted.  See United States v. Rorie, 58 M.J. 399 (C.A.A.F. 2003).

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0735/AR.  U.S. v. Andrew D. LEACH.  CCA 20080878.

No. 09-0736/AR.  U.S. v. Kayla M. COFFIN.  CCA 20081135.

No. 09-0737/MC.  U.S. v. Bradley J. KAMPA.  CCA 200800526.

No. 09-0738/AF.  U.S. v. Aaron T. MOORE.  CCA 37286.

No. 09-0739/AF.  U.S. v. Brandon M. GAYOS.  CCA S31521.

No. 09-0740/AF.  U.S. v. Wayne A. WINGFIELD.  CCA 37309.

No. 09-0741/AR.  U.S. v. Roland PEREZ.  CCA 20071308.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 09-8030/AF.  Lee W. PAYTON, Appellant v. Major General Roger W. Burg, 20th AF/CC General Court-Martial Convening Authority F.E. Warren AFB, WY, and Colonel Michael E. Fortney, 341st MW/CC Special Court-Martial Convening Authority Malmstrom AFB, MT, and Lieutenant Colonel Don Christensen, HQ AF/JAT, Military Judge and United States, Appellees.  CCA 2009-03.  Notice is hereby given that a writ-appeal petition for review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals on application for extraordinary relief was filed under Rule 27(b) on this 17th day of July, 2009.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0433/AR.  U.S. v. James A. HAWKINS.  CCA 20080660.  Appellant's motion for leave to file supplement to the petition for grant of review out of time granted.

 

No. 09-0584/AF.  U.S. v. Heather L. OGLETREE.  CCA 37168.  Appellant's motion to attach document denied.

 

No. 09-0614/MC.  U.S. v. Wayne J. DIGGS.  CCA 200800633.  Appellant's motion for leave to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review out of time granted.

 

No. 09-0651/AR.  U.S. v. Ahamed AKANBI.  CCA 20080412.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant for review granted, up to and including July 31, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 09-0679/AR.  U.S. v. Corey R. CLAGETT.  CCA 20070082.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including August 17, 2009.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-214

Thursday, July 16, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0461/AF.  U.S. v. Latrice D. PAYNE.  CCA S31556.

No. 09-0517/AR.  U.S. v. James M. BLANKS.  CCA 20071155.

No. 09-0527/AF.  U.S. v. Kevin M. SHERWIN.  CCA S31477.

No. 09-0548/AR.  U.S. v. Emory J. NEWTON.  CCA 20080317.

No. 09-0638/AF.  U.S. v. Bryan A. GORDON.  CCA 37337.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0731/AR.  U.S. v. Lonnie L. FOSTER.  CCA 20060930.

No. 09-0732/AR.  U.S. v. Jonathan C. SMITH.  CCA 20081162.

No. 09-0733/AR.  U.S. v. Alexander T. CARLSTROM.  CCA  20090004.

No. 09-0734/AR.  U.S. v. Daryl M. QUINONES.  CCA 20090006.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0169/AR.  U.S. v. Michael J. SMITH.  CCA 20060541.  Appellee's motion for leave to file a supplement to the joint appendix granted.

 

No. 09-0414/NA.  U.S. v. Daniel V. TREW.  CCA 200800250.  Appellee's motion for an enlargement of time to file a certificate for review, granted, up to and including August 3, 2009.

 

No. 09-0648/AR.  U.S. v. Donald A. WOOLFOLK.  CCA 20070684.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including July 29, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will granted in this case.

 

No. 09-0676/AR.  U.S. v. Edward GOODWIN.  CCA 20011125.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including July 31, 2009.

 

No. 09-0683/AR.  U.S. v. Joshua I. COVER.  CCA 20080667.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including August 3, 3009.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-213

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

 

RULES CHANGES

 

Upon careful consideration of certain proposed changes to the Rules of Practice and Procedure, United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, which were presented to and reviewed by the Rules Advisory Committee of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and thereafter published in the Federal Register for comment, it is ordered that effective September 1, 2009, Rules 19(a)(5), 20(e), 21(c)(2), 37(a), 37(b)(2), and 40(b)(3) are hereby amended as provided in the attachment to this Order.

 

RULE 19.  TIME LIMITS

 

(a) Petition for grant of review/supplement/answer/reply.

 

(1)-(4) Unchanged.

 

(5) Delete existing paragraphs (A) and (B) and replace with the following:

 

(A) In all cases where the petition is filed by counsel, a supplement to the petition establishing good cause in accordance with Rule 21 shall be filed contemporaneously with the petition.  A motion for leave to file the supplement separately from the petition will be considered under Rule 30.  If granted, the supplement shall be filed within 20 days of the order.  Any further motion for enlargement of time to file the supplement, while disfavored, will be granted for good cause shown.  An appellee’s answer to the supplement to the petition, except for cases on appeal by the United States under Article 62, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 862 (2000), may be filed no later than 20 days after the filing of the supplement.  See Rule 21(e).  A reply may be filed by the appellant no later than 5 days after the filing of appellee’s answer.  An appellee’s answer to the supplement in a case under appeal by the United States under Article 62, UCMJ, may be filed no later than 10 days after the filing of the supplement; an appellant may file a reply no later than 5 days after the filing of appellee’s answer.

 

(B) In all cases where the petition is filed by the appellant, a supplement to the petition shall be filed by counsel no later than 20 days after the issuance by the Clerk of a notice of docketing of the petition.  See Rule 10(c).  An appellee’s answer to the supplement to the petition and an appellant’s reply may be filed in accordance with the time limits contained in Rule 19(a)(5)(A).

 

RULE 20.  FORM OF PETITION FOR GRANT OF REVIEW

 

(a)-(d) Unchanged.

 

(e) Upon issuance by the Clerk under Rule 10(c) of a notice of docketing of a petition for grant of review filed personally by an appellant, counsel for the appellant shall file a supplement to the petition in accordance with the applicable time limit set forth in Rule 19(a)(5)(A) or (B), and the provisions of Rule 21.

 

RULE 21.  SUPPLEMENT TO PETITION FOR GRANT OF REVIEW

 

(a)-(c)(1) Unchanged.

 

(c)(2) Answer/reply in other appeals.  An appellee’s answer to the supplement to the petition for grant of review in all other appeal cases may be filed no later than 30 20 days after the filing of the supplement; see Rule 21(e); (remainder of paragraph is unchanged).

 

RULE 37.  PRINTING, COPYING AND STYLE REQUIREMENTS

 

(a) Printing.  Except for records of trial and as otherwise provided by Rules 24(f) and 27(a)(4) or any order of the Court regarding the electronic filing of pleadings, all pleadings and other papers relative to a case shall be typewritten and double-spaced, printed on one side only on white unglazed paper, 8.5 by 11 inches in size, securely fastened in the top left corner.  (Remainder of paragraph is unchanged.)

 

(b) Copying.

 

(1) Unchanged.

 

(2) Except for electronically filed pleadings, Aan original and 7 legible copies of all pleadings or other papers or other papers relative to a case shall be filed.

 

RULE 40.  HEARINGS

(a)-(b)(2) Unchanged.

 

(3) Time Allowed.  Each side will normally be allotted 30    20 minutes to present oral argument.



ORDER

IN RE ELECTRONIC FILING

 

Effective September 1, 2009, the following pleadings may be filed on paper or electronically in accordance with the guidelines attached to this Order:

(a) petitions for grant of review filed by counsel under Rule 18(a)(1);

(b) supplements to petitions for grant of review filed under Rule 21;

(c) answers (including 10-day letters to the Clerk) and replies filed under Rule 21(c); and

(d) motions filed under Rule 30 that concern the pleadings described in paragraphs (a)-(c), and replies thereto, when such motions are filed prior to the Court’s action granting or denying a petition for grant of review.

It is further ordered that the Orders pertaining to electronic filing issued on May 8, 2003 (58 M.J. 282) and August 5, 2004 (60 M.J. 308) are hereby rescinded, effective September 1, 2009.

 

Guidelines for Electronic Filing of Pleadings

 

1.  Scope.

 

The United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces adopts the following provisions to govern the filing of the documents described in paragraphs (a)-(d) of the order (hereinafter collectively referred to as “petition documents”):

 

a. This Order applies to all petition documents filed electronically on or after September 1, 2009.  An appendix to the supplement to the petition for grant of review (containing the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals, matters submitted pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), and other required matter) is included in this requirement to be filed electronically unless it consists of more than 50 pages.  In such a case, the appendix may be submitted on paper and the supplement submitted electronically.  In lieu of submitting an appendix in excess of 50 pages on paper, counsel may submit it in a CD or DVD format and note in the supplement that it is being filed in that format under separate cover.  Record matters in the form of video media on CD-ROM or DVD may be submitted in a separate volume of the appendix that is filed in accordance with Rule 21(b).

 

b. A petition for grant of review filed personally by an appellant shall be filed on paper as provided under Rule 20(a).  All subsequent petition documents filed by counsel in such a case may be filed on paper or electronically except as provided in section 1.c of these guidelines.

 

c.   This Order does not provide for electronic filing

of documents concerning other matters, such as documents concerning certified cases; mandatory review cases; writ-appeal petitions; petitions for extraordinary relief; petitions for new trial; and petitions for reconsideration.  In a case arising under Article 67(a)(3), UCMJ (petitions for grant of review), the Order permits electronic filing only with respect to documents filed before the Court issues an order granting or denying review.

 

2.  Electronic Filing Address.

 

Counsel shall file petition and motion documents at the following e-mail address: efiling@armfor.uscourts.gov.  For questions or help concerning the electronic filing of pleadings, counsel should contact the Clerk’s Office at (202) 761-1448.

 

3.  Procedure.

 

a. The electronic filing of a petition document shall be deemed filed as of the date and time of the transmission of the electronic mail message.

 

b. The electronic mail message shall contain the following in the subject block: (1) the name of the case; (2) the docket number if a docket number has been assigned; and (3) the words “electronic filing.”  A description of what is being attached will be included in the body of the electronic mail message.

 

c. The pleading shall be attached to the electronic mail message in Portable Document Format (PDF), and, when printed, shall be in compliance with the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Court.

 

d. Counsel shall send an electronic copy of the message and all attachments to opposing counsel to accomplish service of the pleading under Rule 39.  This may be accomplished by listing opposing counsel as a “cc” recipient of the electronic message.

 

e. The pleading attached to an electronic filing shall contain the conformed signature (“/s/”) or digital signature of the attorney of record.  This will comply with Rule 38.

 

f. If a pleading is filed electronically in accordance with this Order, the party is not required to prepare and file printed copies under Rules 37(a) and 37(b)(2).  The Court will send a reply electronic message to the sender indicating receipt of the electronic filing.

 

g. Classified material and material under seal will not be filed electronically.  If such matters need to be filed, they will be submitted to the Court on paper as a supplemental filing to the document in which they would otherwise appear.  In such cases, counsel will include in the text of the electronic mail message a notation that classified or sealed material is being separately submitted.  The classified or sealed material will be appropriately packaged, marked and delivered, and will include a notation that it accompanies an electronic filing in the case.  All classified material will be handled in accordance with Rule 12.

 

h. Counsel must refrain from including and shall redact the following personal data identifiers from documents filed with the Court:

  Social security numbers

  Names of minors

  Dates of birth

  Financial account numbers

  Home addresses.

 

i. Upon entry of an order granting or denying an  electronically filed petition for grant of review, the Clerk will electronically transmit a copy of the order to counsel.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0537/AR.  U.S. v. Dominique N. FRANCOIS.  CCA 20080796.

No. 09-0561/AF.  U.S. v. Erin E. SAJDAK.  CCA S31433.

No. 09-0566/AF.  U.S. v. Daniel J. SHULL.  CCA 37204.

No. 09-0627/AR.  U.S. v. Benjamin J. PHILLIPS.  CCA 20080590.

No. 09-0656/AF.  U.S. v. Steven E. NICHOLAS.  CCA S31507.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW - OTHER SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 08-0621/AF.  U.S. v. Jessica L. MALLORY.  CCA S31245.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals and in light of United States v. Rodriguez, 67 M.J. 110 (C.A.A.F. 2009) said petition is hereby dismissed.

 

    EFFRON, Chief Judge (concurring in the result):

 

 I concur in the result and note that Appellant’s case remains subject to review in our Court under Article 67(a)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 867(a)(2).  See United States v. Angell, No. 09-0098/AR, ___ M.J. ___ (C.A.A.F. 2009) (Effron, C.J., concurring in
   the result).

 

    BAKER, J. (concurring in the result):

 

 I concur in the result.  See United States v. Angell, ___ M.J. ___ (C.A.A.F. 2009) (Baker, J., concurring) and United States v. Rodriguez, 67 M.J. 110, 120 (C.A.A.F. 2009) (Baker, J., dissenting).

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0726/AF.  U.S. v. Derek A. BLANTON.  CCA S31536.

No. 09-0727/AF.  U.S. v. Frederic G. DANIELS.  CCA 37293.

No. 09-0728/AF.  U.S. v. Charles E. ERVIN.  CCA S31530.

No. 09-0729/MC.  U.S. v. Jerry A. GARNER.  CCA 200800481.

No. 09-0730/AR.  U.S. v. James L. PARRISH.  CCA 20080869.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 09-8029/AF.  Michael FREECK, Appellant v. Colonel Ronald Gregory, USAF, Military Judge, and United States, Appellees.  CCA 2009-04. Notice is hereby given that a writ-appeal petition for review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals on application for extraordinary relief in the nature of mandamus or in the alternative prohibition was filed under Rule 27(b) on this 15th day of July, 2009.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-212

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0724/AR.  U.S. v. Donald J. SPEAKMAN.  CCA 20070951.

No. 09-0725/AR.  U.S. v. Andrew S. BROWN.  CCA 20081044.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 07-0870/AF.  U.S. v. Charles S. ROACH.  CCA S31143.  Appellant's motion to summarily grant, vacate, and remand is denied.

 

No. 08-0804/AR.  U.S. v. Sabrina D. HARMAN.  CCA 20050597.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file a brief granted, up to and including July 28, 2009.

 

No. 09-0665/AR.  U.S. v. Marcus D. JOHNSON.  CCA 20080920.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including July 28, 2009.

 

No. 09-8025/AR.  Hasan K. AKBAR, Petitioner v. United States, Respondent.  CCA 20050514.  Respondent’s motion for leave to file a second supplement to the joint appendix granted.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-211

Monday, July 13, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0491/AF.  U.S. v. Brandon A. BROWN.  CCA S31514.

No. 09-0553/AR.  U.S. v. Vernon R. GILLETTE CCA 20080868.

No. 09-0571/AR.  U.S. v. Shermell S. WILLIAMS.  CCA 200868

No. 09-0620/AR.  U.S. v. Cory A. MCGUIRE.  CCA 20080752.

No. 09-0640/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher L. KALAMASZ. CCA S31535.

No. 09-0647/AF.  U.S. v. Kristopher T. WOLDAHL.  CCA S315519.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0722/AF.  U.S. v. David C. STRIGLIO. CCA 37343.

No. 09-0723/NA.  U.S. v. William C. FAIRLEY. CCA 200800762.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-210

Friday, July 10, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0720/MC.  U.S. v. Rob B. YAMMINE.  CCA 200800052.

No. 09-0721/AR.  U.S. v. David J. ROMINGER.  CCA 20080423.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0223/AR.  U.S. v. Jeffrey A. LORENZ.  CCA 20061071.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including July 27, 2009.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 08-0779/AR.  U.S. v. Bradley W. MARSHALL.  CCA 20060229.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-209

Thursday, July 9, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0420/AR.  U.S. v. Gary D. FIELDS.  CCA 20080168.

No. 09-0474/AR.  U.S. v. Patrick T. STEWART.  CCA 20070710.

No. 09-0545/NA.  U.S. v. Andre V. JAMES.  CCA 200800493.

No. 09-0579/AR.  U.S. v. Lashonda N. HARRIS.  CCA 20080310.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0719/AR.  U.S. v. Kentoria H. ALEXANDER.  CCA 20080873. 

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-208

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 09-8028/NA.  Frank J. OSHESKIE, Petitioner v. United States, Respondent.  CCA 200001296.  Petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of habeas corpus filed under Rule 27(a).

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0371/AR.  U.S. v. Dana L. DUNN.  CCA 20060370.  Appellee's motion to dismiss the petition for grant of review for lack of jurisdiction denied.

 

No. 09-0420/AR.  U.S. v. Gary D. FIELDS.  CCA 20080168.  Appellant's motion to attach defense appellate exhibits granted.

 

No. 09-0616/AR.  U.S. v. Lamont K. GOODWIN.  CCA 20080816.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including July 22, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.  

 

No. 09-0660/AF.  U.S. v. Moises GARCIA-VARELA.  CCA S31466.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including July 23, 3009.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 08-0580/AR.  U.S. v. Brandon I. MILLER.  CCA 20060224.

No. 08-0594/MC.  U.S. v. Darrel A. WESTON.  CCA 200600985.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-207

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0235/AR.  U.S. v. Stacy N. SHERROD.  CCA 20070932.

No. 09-0343/AR.  U.S. v. Rolando A. MAITLAND.  CCA 20080347.

No. 09-0390/CG.  U.S. v. Patrick P. CHEN.  CCA 1282.

No. 09-0415/AR.  U.S. v. Michael A. RODRIGUEZ.  CCA 20080515.

No. 09-0503/AR.  U.S. v. David J. LEWIS.  CCA 20080487.

No. 09-0556/AR.  U.S. v. Aaron W. PIERCE, Jr.  CCA 20090038.

No. 09-0574/AR.  U.S. v. Marc E. MORADO.  CCA 20080618.

No. 09-0605/AR.  U.S. v. William S. MARET.  CCA 20080722.

No. 09-0611/AR.  U.S. v. Kevin L. NORRIS.  CCA 20071007.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0718/AR.  U.S. v. Kerry L. LOCKHART.  CCA 20070689.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0242/MC.  U.S. v. Benjamin W. ROSS.  CCA 200800313.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file a brief granted, but only up to and including August 4, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 09-0498/AR.  U.S. v. Michael J. ANDERSON.  CCA 20071006.  Appellant's motion to correct errata granted.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-206

Monday, July 6, 2009

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 09-0258/NA.  U.S. v. Charles M. BURLESON.  CCA 200700143.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER, AT THE TIME OF APPELLANT'S COURT-MARTIAL, ARTICLE 134 (INDECENT ASSAULT), UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE (UCMJ), WAS AN OFFENSE NECESSARILY INCLUDED IN ARTICLE 120 (RAPE), UCMJ, IN LIGHT OF ARTICLE 79, UCMJ, UNITED STATES v. MILLER, 67 M.J 385 (C.A.A.F. 2009), AND MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL, UNITED STATES, PT. IV, PARAS. 45.b(1) AND 63 (2005 ED.).

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 09-5002/NA. U.S. v. Willie A. BRADLEY.  CCA 200501089.  Review granted on the following specified issue:

 

WHETHER APPELLEE WAIVED THE ISSUE OF THE DISQUALIFICATION OF THE TRIAL COUNSEL BY HIS UNCONDITIONAL GUILTY PLEAS.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0714/AR.  U.S. v. Justin A. VOSICKY.  CCA 20070874.

No. 09-0715/NA.  U.S. v. Osman F. ASIF.  CCA 200601040.

No. 09-0716/AF.  U.S. v. Heather M. BREWSTER.  CCA 37247.

No. 09-0717/AF.  U.S. v. Thomas J. FULLER.  CCA 37228.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 08-0719/CG.  U.S. v. Webster M. SMITH.  CCA 1275.  Appellee’s motions for leave to file answer and brief under seal and to attach documents, and Appellant’s motion to file a reply brief under seal are hereby granted.

 

No. 09-0145/AR.  U.S. v. Christine N. THOMPSON.  CCA 20060901.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file a brief granted, up to and including July 27, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 09-0415/AR.  U.S. v. Michael A. RODRIGUEZ.  CCA 20080515.  On consideration of Appellant’s motion to withdraw the motion to withdraw the petition for grant of review and for leave to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review out of time and motion to withdraw Appellant’s petition for grant of review, it is ordered that said motion to withdraw the motion to withdraw the petition for grant of review and for leave to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review out of time are hereby granted, and that said motion to withdraw the petition for grant of review is hereby denied as moot.

 

No. 09-0581/AF.  U.S. v. Devery L. TAYLOR.  CCA 37065.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted.

 

No. 09-0603/NA.  U.S. v. John IRWIN, Jr.  CCA 200800800.  Appellant's motion to attach Appellant's unsworn declaration granted.

 

No. 09-0617/AR.  U.S. v. Camillo E. MEJIA-CASTILLO.  CCA 20040654.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including August 5, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 09-5004/NA.  U.S. v. Raymond L. NEAL.  CCA 200800746.  On consideration of Appellee’s motions to stay proceedings below, and to expedite oral argument, and the motion for expedited review on behalf of the United States Air Force, it is ordered that Appellee’s motion to stay proceedings below is hereby denied without prejudice to further consideration of the request upon a showing as to why a stay is necessary, that Appellee’s motion to expedite oral argument is hereby denied,

that the motion for expedited review on behalf of the United States Air Force is hereby denied, and that the above-entitled action be called for hearing at 9:30 a.m. on the 21st day of September, 2009.  Each side will be allotted 20 minutes to present oral argument.  The hearing will be held in the Courtroom of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 450 E Street, Northwest, Washington, D.C.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-205

Thursday, July 2, 2009

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 09-0073/AR.  U.S. v. Rogelio M. MAYNULET.  CCA 20050412.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file a brief granted, up to and including July 16, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 09-0608/AR.  U.S. v. James Z. YELVERTON.  CCA 418990.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including August 6, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 09-204

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 08-0789/AR.  U.S. v. Renita M. MILLER.  CCA 20040824.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby granted, and the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

No. 09-0308/AR.  U.S. v. Mario A. LESESNE.  CCA 20070690.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby granted, and the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 08-0789/AR.  U.S. v. Renita M. MILLER.  CCA 20040824.  [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

No. 09-0271/AF.  U.S. v. Steven L. JONES.  CCA 36965.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER APPELLANT'S CONVICTION FOR INDECENT ACTS WITH ANOTHER MUST BE SET ASIDE BECAUSE THE MILITARY JUDGE ISSUED ERRONEOUS AND MISLEADING INSTRUCTIONS SUPPORTING INDECENT ACTS AS AN AVAILABLE LESSER-INCLUDED OFFENSE TO THE ORIGINAL RAPE CHARGE AND THE RESULTING CONVICTION UNDER CHARGE I AND ITS SPECIFICATION AMOUNTED TO A FATAL VARIANCE.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 09-0308/AR.  U.S. v. Mario A. LESESNE.  CCA 20070690.  [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 09-0236/AR.  U.S. v. Vincent QUESADA, IV.  CCA 20060940.

No. 09-0317/AF.  U.S. v. Clifton J. SHELBY.  CCA S31403.

No. 09-0434/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher J. FRIEND.  CCA 20080437.

No. 09-0505/MC.  U.S. v. Denise M. BERKLEY.  CCA 200800649.

No. 09-0521/NA.  U.S. v. David O. FOREMAN.  CCA 200800647.

No. 09-0543/AR.  U.S. v. Jeremy C. HANSON.  CCA 20080067.

No. 09-0555/AR.  U.S. v. Keith C. LAND.  CCA 20080885.

No. 09-0654/AF.  U.S. v. Bradley E. KARR.  CCA 37239.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 09-0708/AF.  U.S. v. Adam J. WHITE.  CCA S31510.

No. 09-0709/AF.  U.S. v. John R. CUPP, Jr.  CCA 37348.

No. 09-0710/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher W. MORGAN.  CCA 20080948.

No. 09-0711/AR.  U.S. v. Belmor G. RAMOS.  CCA 20080837.

No. 09-0712/AR.  U.S. v. Douglas J. HUDSPETH.  CCA 20090186.

No. 09-0713/AR.  U.S. v. Gene R. KING.  CCA 20080861.

 

PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED

 

No. 08-0720/AF.  Mohamed M. MOHAMED.  CCA 36421.  On consideration of Appellant’s petition for reconsideration of this Court’s order denying Appellant’s motion to attach documents, __ M.J. __ (Daily Journal June 10, 2009), said petition for reconsideration is hereby denied.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 07-0253/NA.  U.S. v. John A. HALSEMA.  CCA 20001337.  On consideration of the opinion of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals of December 23, 2008, issued in response to this Court’s order of December 17, 2007 (65 M.J. 478), it is ordered that further appellate proceedings in this case are stayed for a period not to exceed ninety days in order to provide the Government time to process appellate defense counsel’s pending request for SCI clearance.  The Government shall immediately notify the court and appellate defense counsel of the clearance decision.

 

No. 08-0344/AR.  U.S. v. Ryan G. ANDERSON.  CCA 20040897.  Appellee's motion to extend time to file an answer to Appellant's brief granted, up to and including July 21, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 08-0621/AF.  U.S. v. Jessica L. MALLORY.  CCA S31245.  Appellee's motion to submit documents denied.

 

No. 09-0342/AF.  U.S. v. Timeka B. JOHNSON.  CCA S31417.  On consideration of Appellant’s motion to attach document, it is ordered that Appellee file a response to said motion on or before July 8, 2009.

 

No. 09-0396/AF.  U.S. v. Marques L. WILLIAMS.  CCA S31494.  On consideration of Appellant’s motion for leave to respond to the Government’s reply to Appellant’s response to the order to show cause and motion to attach documents, it is ordered that said motions are hereby granted.

 

No. 09-0589/AR.  U.S. v. Robert C. HUNTZINGER.  CCA 20060976.  Appellant's motion to attach a certificate of compliance with Rule 24(d) granted.

 

No. 09-8025/AR.  Hasan K. AKBAR, Petitioner, v. U.S., Respondent.  CCA 20050514.  Respondent's motion to extend time to respond to this Court’s show cause order granted, up to and including July 10, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 09-8026/AR.  Hasan K. AKBAR, Petitioner, v. The Army Court of Criminal Appeals, Colonel Paul P. Holden, Colonel John B. Hoffman, and Colonel Annamary Sullivan, and United States, Respondents.  CCA 20050514.  Respondents’ motion to extend time to respond to this Court’s show cause order, it is ordered that said motion is hereby granted, up to and including July 10, 2009, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.




Home Page |  Opinions & Digest  |  Daily Journal  |  Scheduled Hearings  |  Search Site