UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 06-123

Friday, March 31, 2006

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 06-0470/AR.  U.S. v. Tirrell A. WHITE.  CCA 20020726.

No. 06-0471/MC.  U.S. v. Jill R. SMITH.  CCA 200300497.

No. 06-0472/AF.  U.S. v. Jessica R. COLLINS.  CCA S30766.

No. 06-0473/AF.  U.S. v. David R. HABER.  CCA S30811.

No. 06-0474/AF.  U.S. v. Ashontia K. HARROW.  CCA 35257.

No. 06-0475/AF.  U.S. v. Jonathan D. HOWARD.  CCA 36177.

No. 06-0476/AF.  U.S. v. Adam M. MCALILEY.  CCA 35978.

No. 06-0477/AF.  U.S. v. Jason A. MESSINA.  CCA S30880.

No. 06-0478/AF.  U.S. v. Timothy D. PIERCE.  CCA 35914.

No. 06-0479/AF.  U.S. v. Gregory S. RADER.  CCA 36185.

No. 06-0480/AF.  U.S. v. Edward A.R. RUALO.  CCA 35889.

No. 06-0481/AF.  U.S. v. Amanda D. SCHMIDT.  CCA 36063.

No. 06-0482/AF.  U.S. v. Bill J. SMITH.  CCA 35832.

No. 06-0483/AF.  U.S. v. Richard M. YOUNG II.  CCA 35965.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 06-0243/AR.  U.S. v. Lorenzo D. GRAYS.  CCA 20040740.  Appellee's motion to attach granted.

 

No. 06-0320/MC.  U.S. v. Michael A. JONES.  CCA 200100889.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to May 1, 2006.

 

No. 06-0381/NA.  U.S. v. Donald D. BRAMLETT.  CCA 200101150.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to May 1, 2006.

 

No. 06-0382/AR.  U.S. v. Jeremy D. RILEY.  CCA 20020176.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to May 1, 2006.

 

No. 06-0383/AR.  U.S. v. Eric S. FISCHER.  CCA 20030828.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to May 1, 2006.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 06-122

Thursday, March 30, 2006

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 06-0469/AR.  U.S. v. Robert J. WINGO.  CCA 20030172.

 

PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED

 

No. 05-0266/MC.  U.S. v. Thomas A. CRAWFORD.  CCA 9901590.  Appellant's petition for reconsideration of this Court’s decision, 62 M.J. 404 (C.A.A.F. 2006), denied.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 06-0191/NA.  U.S. v. Timothy L. JONES.  CCA 200501193.  Appellant's motion to attach granted.

 

No. 06-0377/AR.  U.S. v. Jace D. SCHNABL.  CCA 20050768.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to April 28, 2006.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 04-0578/AR.  U.S. v. Charles J. WOLFORD.  CCA 20001042.

No. 05-0462/AF.  U.S. v. Jamahl D. GASTON.  CCA S30372.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 06-121

Wednesday, March 29, 2006

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 03-0270/AF.  U.S. v. Robert J. POLFLIET Jr.  CCA 34652.  On further consideration of the issue granted review by this Court (59 M.J. 32 (C.A.A.F. 2003)), and the issues specified by this Court (62 M.J. 373 (C.A.A.F. 2005)), and in light of this Court’s decisions in United States v. Martinelli, 62 M.J. 52 (C.A.A.F. 2005), and United States v. Cendejas, 62 M.J. 334 (C.A.A.F. 2006), it is ordered that the following additional issue is specified for review by the Court:

 

WHETHER 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(A) APPLIES TO CONDUCT ENGAGED IN OUTSIDE THE TERRITORIAL LIMITS OF THE UNITED STATES WHEN CHARGED UNDER CLAUSE 3 OF ARTICLE 134, UCMJ.

 

and

 

     That Specification 2 of Charge V is amended to read as follows:

 

In that AIRMAN BASIC ROBERT J. POLFLIET, JR., United States Air Force, 374th Communications Squadron, did, at Yokota Air Base, Japan, on land and in a building owned by, leased to, used by or under the control of the United States Government, on divers occasions between on or about 24 August 1999 and on or about 16 June 2000, knowingly possess computer files containing images of child pornography in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2252A(a)(5).

It is further ordered that the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed as to Charge V and its specifications as amended and in all other respects.

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 03-0071/AF.  U.S. v. Joseph W. LEE.  CCA S29894.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE DENIED THE DEFENSE REQUEST FOR AN EXPERT CONSULTANT IN THE FIELD OF FORENSIC COMPUTER EXAMINATION.

 

     Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 05-0745/AR.  U.S. v. Richard L. TURNER.  CCA 20011100.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE 444 DAY DELAY BETWEEN TRIAL AND THE CONVENING AUTHORITY TAKING ACTION FOR A 263 PAGE GUILTY PLEA RECORD OF TRIAL WARRANTS RELIEF.

 

     Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 05-0755/AF.  U.S. v. Richard S. WINCH.  CCA 35234.

No. 05-0776/AF.  U.S. v. Clinton C. THORNTON.  CCA 35563.

No. 06-0043/MC.  U.S. v. Kenyatta F. PEPPERS.  CCA 200301247.

No. 06-0100/NA.  U.S. v. Michael E. BROWN.  CCA 200201647.

No. 06-0196/AF.  U.S. v. William A. MCNEILL.  CCA 35671.

No. 06-0220/AR.  U.S. v. Thomas D. BROWN.  CCA 20050157.

No. 06-0282/AF.  U.S. v. Eric S. DAVIS.  CCA S30507.1/

No. 06-0303/AF.  U.S. v. Kevin D. MARCUM.  CCA 35843.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 06-0467/AR.  U.S. v. Qwesi A. DRAKES.  CCA 20050098.

No. 06-0468/AF.  U.S. v. Tyler T. WILLIAMS.  CCA S30623.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 06-0380/AR.  U.S. v. Steve A. FOSTER, Jr.  CCA 20050243.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to April 28, 2006.

 

No. 06-0386/AR.  U.S. v. Laura A. MULLALLY.  CCA 20040364.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to April 28, 2006.

____________

 

1/  It is directed that the promulgating order be corrected to reflect that the date of the offense in Charge II, Specification 1 was 16 December 2002, vice 2003.

  


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 06-120

Tuesday, March 28, 2006

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 06-0466/AR.  U.S. v. Robert L. CONRADY.  CCA 20050036.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 05-0270/NA.  U.S. v. Roberto RODRIGUEZ-RIVERA.  CCA 9900859.  Appellant's motion to compel production of transcript of the March 14, 2006, proceedings in the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in the case of United States v. Moussaoui is denied.

 

No. 06-0374/NA.  U.S. v. George THOMAS.  CCA 200201613.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to April 26, 2006.

 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 06-119

Monday, March 27, 2006

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 05-0709/NA.  U.S. v. Charles M. BRICKER.  CCA 200001970.  Review granted on the following issue specified by the Court:

 

WHETHER APPELLANT'S DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO A TIMELY REVIEW OF HIS APPEAL HAS BEEN VIOLATED.

 

     Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 06-0091/AF.  U.S. v. Timothy J. PENA.  CCA 35397.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

I.   WHETHER THE APPELLANT WAS IMPROPERLY PLACED ON EXCESS APPELLATE LEAVE AND DENIED PAY AND ALLOWANCES IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 76a, UCMJ, WHEN HIS SENTENCE TO CONFINEMENT WAS NOT COMPLETED OR REMITTED AND HE WAS FORCED TO FULFILL CONDITIONS OF MANDATORY SUPERVISION UPON HIS RELEASE FROM CONFINEMENT.

 

II.  WHETHER THE AIR FORCE CLEMENCY AND PAROLE BOARD INCREASED THE SEVERITY OF APPELLANT'S SENTENCE IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 55, UCMJ, AND THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT WHEN IT FORCED APPELLANT TO FULFILL CONDITIONS OF MANDATORY SUPERVISION THAT ARE NOT AUTHORIZED BY THE UCMJ.

 

III. WHETHER THE IMPOSITION OF CONDITIONS OF MANDATORY SUPERVISION ON APPELLANT VIOLATES THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE BECAUSE THE MILITARY JUDGE DID NOT ANNOUNCE A PERIOD OF MANDATORY SUPERVISED RELEASE OR ANY OF ITS CONDITIONS AS PART OF THE SENTENCE.

 

IV.  WHETHER APPELLANT'S PLEAS OF GUILTY ARE IMPROVIDENT BECAUSE THE MILITARY JUDGE DID NOT INFORM APPELLANT PRIOR TO ACCEPTING HIS PLEAS THAT HE COULD BE ADDITIONALLY PUNISHED IN UNSPECIFIED WAYS.

 

     Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 06-0183/AR.  U.S. v. Yxchel J. CASTILLO.  CCA 20030526.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 04-0350/MC.  U.S. v. Whitman D. WALLACE.  CCA 200001148.1/

No. 06-0452/AR.  U.S. v. Gilbert G. PAGDILAO.  CCA 20040693.

No. 06-0453/AR.  U.S. v. Brian C. HILL.  CCA 20040821.

No. 06-0454/AR.  U.S. v. Esther R. RAMIREZ.  CCA 20041036.

No. 06-0455/AR.  U.S. v. Gerard T. KARYEAH.  CCA 20010779.

No. 06-0456/AR.  U.S. v. Wesley J. PIMENTEL.  CCA 20050622.

No. 06-0457/AR.  U.S. v. Luis E. GOMEZ-GONZALEZ.  CCA 20021205.

No. 06-0458/AF.  U.S. v. Christian D. BARTLETT.  CCA S30755.

No. 06-0459/AF.  U.S. v. Antonio J. GREEN.  CCA S35944.

No. 06-0460/AF.  U.S. v. John M. GRIFFIN.  CCA 35869.

No. 06-0461/AF.  U.S. v. Arnold HOSKINS.  CCA 35738.

No. 06-0462/AF.  U.S. v. Jeffrey T. HRINDA.  CCA 35987.

No. 06-0463/AF.  U.S. v. Brandon L. LAYFIELD.  CCA 36169.

No. 06-0464/AF.  U.S. v. Anthony T. MEADOWS.  CCA S30764.

No. 06-0465/AF.  U.S. v. Daniel F. THEISON.  CCA 36012.

____________

 

1/  Second petition filed in this case.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 06-118

Friday, March 24, 2006

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 06-0096/AR.  U.S. v. Roberto N. LOZADA-MENDOZA.  CCA 20020128.

No. 06-0280/AF.  U.S. v. Jason S. STEVENS.  CCA 35794.

No. 06-0283/AF.  U.S. v. Willie G. DAVIS.  CCA S30546.

No. 06-0325/AR.  U.S. v. Joshua J. PARISI.  CCA 20020970.

No. 06-0334/AR.  U.S. v. Brandon K. JOHNSON.  CCA 20050625.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 06-0444/AF.  U.S. v. Marc V. RYLEE.  CCA 35957.

No. 06-0445/AF.  U.S. v. David L. BENNETT.  CCA 36215.

No. 06-0446/AF.  U.S. v. Sy W. HOLSINGER.  CCA S30776.

No. 06-0447/AF.  U.S. v. Stephen J. KUZIA.  CCA 36115.

No. 06-0448/AF.  U.S. v. Michael W. MCMURRY.  CCA 35885.

No. 06-0449/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher B. NOLAN.  CCA 35979.

No. 06-0450/AR.  U.S. v. Jose J. GONZALES.  CCA 20010690.

No. 06-0451/AR.  U.S. v. Jose A. ZABALA, Jr.  CCA 20040798.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 06-8012/NA.  Hawan T. CAMPBELL, Petitioner, v. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, Respondent.  CCA 200400093.  Notice is hereby given that a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus under Rule 27(a), together with a motion for a stay of proceedings and a motion to attach were filed on this 24th day of March, 2006.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 06-117

Thursday, March 23, 2006

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 04-0295/AR.  U.S. v. Eric M. MCNUTT.  CCA 20020022.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is granted and the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 04-0295/AR.  U.S. v. Eric M. MCNUTT.  CCA 20020022.  [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 06-0072/AR.  U.S. v. Danny F. FRIDDLE.  CCA 20041066.

No. 06-0123/AR.  U.S. v. Danny W. SMITH.  CCA 20040975.

No. 06-0133/AF.  U.S. v. Nicholas R. PARKER.  CCA S30583.

No. 06-0177/MC.  U.S. v. Edward M. WERKHEISER.  CCA 200100455.

No. 06-0246/AR.  U.S. v. Paul A. MCCATHRON.  CCA 20021424.

No. 06-0258/NA.  U.S. v. Ivan D. HOME.  CCA 200301382.

No. 06-0343/AR.  U.S. v. Jeffrey M. LENZ.  CCA 20050410.

No. 06-6004/CG.  U.S. v. Matthew J. LAYTON.  CCA 001-62-05.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 06-0443/AR.  U.S. v. Jonathan C. KOVACH.  CCA 20050674.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 06-8010/NA.  Salvador DIAZ, Petitioner, v. United States, Respondent.  CCA 200200374.  On consideration of the petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of habeas corpus, said petition is denied.

 

SPECIAL DOCKET FILINGS

 

Spec. Dkt. No. 06-08/MC.  W. C. BRAGG, Petitioner, v. Commanding General, Western Recruiting Region, Respondent.  CCA 200600228.  On consideration of the Petitioner’s pro se petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus, it appears that additional information is needed to determine whether Petitioner is represented by appellate defense counsel.  Accordingly, it is ordered that the petition is remanded to the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals; the Court of Criminal Appeals will inquire into whether Petitioner has appointed appellate defense counsel and, if not, whether counsel should be appointed pursuant to Article 70(c), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 870(c) (2000); and thereafter, the Court of Criminal Appeals will consider the merits of the petition.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 05-0551/MC.  U.S. v. Justin M. LEWIS.  CCA 200200089.  On consideration of Appellee's motion to reschedule oral argument, said motion is granted; and that the Hearing Notice issued March 8, 2006, is hereby vacated.  It is further ordered that the above-entitled action be called for hearing at 10:00 a.m. on the 2nd day of May, 2006.  Each side will be allotted 30 minutes to present oral argument.

 

No. 05-0594/AR.  U.S. v. Jeremiah D. HARDING.  CCA 20020454.  Appellee's motion to attach granted.

 

No. 06-0289/NA.  U.S. v. Isreal D. HARVEY.  CCA 200401281.

Appellant's second motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including April 7, 2006; and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 06-0297/NA.  U.S. v. Samuel E. TOOTLE.  CCA 9801945.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including April 24, 2006; and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 06-0314/AF.  U.S. v. Keith M. TERRY.  CCA 35801.  Appellant's motion to file pleading in excess of 30 pages granted.

 

No. 06-0362/NA.  U.S. v. Jose L. NEGRO-CRUZ.  CCA 200202247.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to April 24, 2006.

 

No. 06-0363/NA.  U.S. v. Jeffrey C. PTASZKOWSKI.  CCA 200201497.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to April 24, 2006.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 05-0255/AF.  U.S. v. Stephen P. GOSSELIN II.  CCA S30200.

No. 05-0423/CG.  U.S. v. Christopher S. BUNGERT.  CCA 1203.

 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 06-116

Wednesday, March 22, 2006

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 06-0053/AF.  U.S. v. Mark A. CORRALEZ.  CCA 35415.

No. 06-0104/AF.  U.S. v. William R. MARTIN.  CCA 35599.

No. 06-0138/AF.  U.S. v. Brandy L. KETCHUM.  CCA 35567.

No. 06-0172/AR.  U.S. v. John T. TREVINO.  CCA 20030353.

No. 06-0174/NA.  U.S. v. John  L. HENDY.  CCA 200500462.

No. 06-0179/AR.  U.S. v. Benjamin P. ROOF.  CCA 20050714.

No. 06-0190/AR.  U.S. v. John M. PATTERSON.  CCA 20031200.

No. 06-0208/AF.  U.S. v. Kyle R. REGAN.  CCA 36029.

No. 06-0249/AF.  U.S. v. Michael J. WILCZEWSKI.  CCA 35686.

No. 06-0286/AF.  U.S. v. James R. GALLEGOS.  CCA S30470.

No. 06-0295/AR.  U.S. v. Woong HU.  CCA 20020941.

No. 06-0310/AR.  U.S. v. Brent C. PILGREEN.  CCA 20030874.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 06-0441/AF.  U.S. v. Tashika N. LEWIS.  CCA S30984.

No. 06-0442/AF.  U.S. v. Jason A. PETERS.  CCA 36194.

 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 06-115

Tuesday, March 21, 2006

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 03-0620/AR.  U.S. v. William T. LUNDY.  CCA 20000069.

No. 05-0453/MC.  U.S. v. James H. FINCH.  CCA 200000056.

No. 05-0674/AR.  U.S. v. Jeremy M. PHILLIPPE.  CCA 20040616.

No. 05-5003/AF.  U.S. v. Joseph J. HARDING.  CCA 2005-02.

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 02-0257/AF.  U.S. v. James E. STOOPS.  CCA 34491.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals on further review dated 17 December 2004, said petition is hereby granted and the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed as to findings.  However, we affirm only so much of the sentence as includes a bad-conduct discharge and reduction to pay grade E-1.  See United States v. Josey, 58 M.J. 105 (C.A.A.F. 2003); United States . Rosendahl, 53 M.J. 344 (C.A.A.F. 2000); Rule for Courts-Martial 1003(b)(2).  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 02-0257/AF.  U.S. v. James E. STOOPS.  CCA 34491.  [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 05-0567/MC.  U.S. v. Joseph FELICIES.  CCA 9900206.

No. 05-0770/AR.  U.S. v. Omar E. WATSON.  CCA 20020377.

No. 05-0775/AF.  U.S. v. Adam R. LOPEZ.  CCA 35820.

No. 06-0003/NA.  U.S. v. Ramon RODRIGUEZ.  CCA 200400744.1/

No. 06-0159/AR.  U.S. v. Jason W. WIELAND.  CCA 20030208.

No. 06-0168/AR.  U.S. v. Carlos R. VIZHNAY.  CCA 20040608.

No. 06-0181/AR.  U.S. v. Mark L. DARENSBURG.  CCA 20040229.

No. 06-0201/AR.  U.S. v. Frederick W. GLASGOW.  CCA 20041287.

No. 06-0202/AF.  U.S. v. Matthew A. ALT.  CCA 36051.

No. 06-0206/AF.  U.S. v. Jonathan P. GILLIAM.  CCA 35674.

No. 06-0224/AR.  U.S. v. Kevin D. JOBE.  CCA 20041285.

No. 06-0250/AR.  U.S. v. Jacob L. TERRY.  CCA 20050163.

No. 06-0257/NA.  U.S. v. Mark C. WILHELM.  CCA 200400776.

No. 06-0292/AF.  U.S. v. Terry J. BOUTWELL.  CCA 35741.

No. 06-0313/AR.  U.S. v. Rashard C. JACKSON.  CCA 20010355.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 03-0620/AR.  U.S. v. William T. LUNDY.  CCA 20000069.  Appellee's motion for leave to attach documents granted.

 

No. 06-0072/AR.  U.S. v. Danny F. FRIDDLE.  CCA 20041066.  Appellant's motion to file additional matters pursuant to U.S. v Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), granted.

 

No. 06-269/AF.  U.S. v. Dante S. MILLER.  CCA 35703.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, we note that in Appellant’s supplement, the charged UCMJ article, summarized offense, pleas, and findings reference a not guilty plea to wrongful marijuana use instead of a guilty plea by exceptions and substitutions to desertion.  Accordingly, it is ordered that within 10 days of the date of this Order, counsel for Appellant will clarify the supplement to the petition; and that thereafter, appellate government counsel will have 10 days in which to file an answer.

_________________

 

1/  It is directed that the promulgating order be corrected to reflect that the guilty finding as to Additional Charge II was to a violation of Article 80, UCMJ, vice Article 112a, UCMJ.

 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 06-114

Monday, March 20, 2006

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW - OTHER SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 06-0312/NA.  U.S. v. Eduardo V. OCHOA.  CCA 200501077.  Appellant’s motion to withdraw petition for grant of review granted.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 06-0434/AR.  U.S. v. Joseph F. PIOTROWSKI.  CCA 20010721.

No. 06-0435/AR.  U.S. v. Matthew C. THOMPSON.  CCA 20031083.

No. 06-0436/AR.  U.S. v. Markeith D. LYNCH.  CCA 20021180.

No. 06-0437/AR.  U.S. v. Michael T. SANDERS.  CCA 20020734.

No. 06-0438/AR.  U.S. v. Steven M. BAILEY.  CCA 20021218.

No. 06-0439/AF.  U.S. v. Jess M. DAVIS.  CCA 35932.

No. 06-0440/NA.  U.S. v. Scott R. MCCLELLAND.  CCA 200101300.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 03-0473/NA.  U.S. v. Troy B. JENKINS.  CCA 200101151.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to April 3, 2006.

 

No. 05-0453/MC.  U.S. v. James H. FINCH.  CCA 200000056.  Appellant's motion for ten additional minutes of time to present oral argument granted and motion for leave to file reply to brief of Amicus Curiae granted, but only up to and including April 7, 2006.  Absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 06-0237/AR.  U.S. v. Ryan C. TAYLOR.  CCA 20040533.  Appellee's motion to file out of time an answer letter to the supplement to petition for grant of review granted.

 

No. 06-0291/NA.  U.S. v. David D. TATE.  CCA 200201202.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including April 4, 2006; and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 06-113

Friday, March 17, 2006

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 06-0428/AF.  U.S. v. Jaime PEDROZA.  CCA 36568.

No. 06-0429/AF.  U.S. v. Anna M. RAGONE.  CCA S30929.

No. 06-0430/AF.  U.S. v. Kimberly E. TYSON.  CCA S30814.

No. 06-0431/AF.  U.S. v. Neil J. WERNER.  CCA S30996.

No. 06-0432/AF.  U.S. v. Travis L. WHITE.  CCA 35566.

No. 06-0433/AR.  U.S. v. Nicholas B. ALLEN.  CCA 20050151.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 05-0453/MC.  U.S. v. James H. FINCH.  CCA 200000056.  Motion filed by Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law, Military and National Security Law Students Association, for leave to file Amicus Curiae brief and participate in oral argument is granted.  Amicus Curiae will be allotted 10 minutes to present oral argument.

 

No. 06-0052/NA.  U.S. v. Lori L. SPENCER.  CCA 200401948.  Motion filed by Lieutenant Jennie L. Goldsmith to withdraw as appellate defense counsel, it appears that the Judge Advocate General has assigned another counsel to represent Appellant and that the new counsel has assumed the representation of said Appellant, said motion is hereby granted.

 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 06-112

Thursday, March 16, 2006

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 05-0649/AR.  U.S. v. Timothy WARD.  CCA 20000078.  Review granted on the following issue specified by the Court:

 

WHETHER THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS LEGALLY ERRED WHEN IT FOUND THE OFFENSE OF VOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER WAS NOT RAISED BY THE EVIDENCE IN THIS CASE.

 

     Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 06-0426/AR.  U.S. v. Terry L. VANWEORT, Jr.  CCA 20040882.

No. 06-0427/AR.  U.S. v. Darrell L. LAWRENCE.  CCA 20030471.

 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 06-111

Wednesday, March 15, 2006

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 05-0440/AR.  U.S. v. Salvador E. GONZALEZ.  CCA 20020077.  On further consideration of the granted issue, 62 M.J. 391 (C.A.A.F. 2005), and in light of the Government’s concession, the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed as to Specification 3 of Charge II and as to the sentence, but is affirmed in all other respects.  The finding of guilty as to Specification 3 of Charge II is set aside and that specification is dismissed.  The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for remand to the Court of Criminal Appeals.  That court may either reassess the sentence or order a rehearing.

 

No. 05-0642/AR.  U.S. v. Benjamin J. PARRISH, III.  CCA 20020178.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THIS COURT MAY APPROVE THE FINDINGS OF GUILTY TO SPECIFICATIONS 9 THROUGH 11 OF ADDITIONAL CHARGE I WHERE THE GOVERNMENT'S EVIDENCE DID NOT ESTABLISH A WRONGFUL WITHHOLDING UNDER ITS THEORY OF THE CASE, BUT PROVED A WRONGFUL OBTAINING WHICH OCCURRED OUTSIDE OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.

 

     The decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed as to Specifications 9, 10, and 11 of Additional Charge I, but is affirmed in all other respects.  Because the offenses in Specifications 9, 10, and 11 of Additional Charge I are barred by the statute of limitations, the guilty findings to those specifications are set aside, and those specifications are dismissed.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 05-0642/AR.  U.S. v. Benjamin J. PARRISH, III.  CCA 20020178.  [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 06-0424/AR.  U.S. v. Myrikk R. THOMAS.  CCA 20041205.

No. 06-0425/AR.  U.S. v. Keith A. DEJOY.  CCA 20040992.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 06-8011/NA.  Todd R. FORBES, Appellant, v. Commander Christian REIMEIER, JAGC, USN, Military Judge; The Judge Advocate General of the Navy; and the United States, Appellees.  CCA 9901454.  Notice is hereby given that a writ-appeal petition for review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals on application for extraordinary relief was filed under Rule 27(b), together with a motion for a stay of the proceedings under Rule 30, were filed this 15th day of March, 2006.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 05-0692/MC.  U.S. v. Matthew D. HAKALA.  CCA 200400709.  Motion filed by Lieutenant Robert E. Salyer to withdraw as appellate defense counsel denied as moot.

 

No. 05-0779/MC.  U.S. v. Jermaine M. CLAY.  CCA 200101952.  On consideration of the motion filed by Lieutenant Robert E. Salyer to withdraw as appellate defense counsel, it appears that the Judge Advocate is making provisions to reassign this case, said motion is therefore granted.

 

No. 06-0305/NA.  U.S. v. Jeffrey N. CLYDE.  CCA 200500492.  Motion filed by Lieutenant Robert E. Salyer to withdraw as appellate defense counsel, it appears that the Judge Advocate General is making provisions to reassign this case, said motion is therefore granted.

 

No. 06-0339/AR.  U.S. v. James B. DIETZ.  CCA 20030323.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to April 13, 2006.

 

No. 06-0348/MC.  U.S. v. Victor M. MENDOZA.  CCA 200101870.  Motion filed by Lieutenant Robert E. Salyer to withdraw as appellate defense counsel, it appears that the Judge Advocate General is making provisions to reassign this case, said motion is therefore granted.

 

No. 06-0374/NA.  U.S. v. George THOMAS.  CCA 200201613.  Motion filed by Lieutenant Robert E. Salyer to withdraw as appellate defense counsel, it appears that the Judge Advocate General has assigned another counsel to represent Appellant and that the new counsel has assumed the representation of said appellant, said motion is therefore granted.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 06-110

Tuesday, March 14, 2006

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 05-0654/MC.  U.S. v. Ricardo S. VERA.  CCA 200400714.

No. 05-0767/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher T. LEE.  CCA 20030826.

No. 06-0011/AF.  U.S. v. Eric C. PETERS.  CCA S30368.

No. 06-0023/AF.  U.S. v. Tracie R. BARNES.  CCA S30620.

No. 06-0030/AR.  U.S. v. Sim DILL IV.  CCA 20011104.

No. 06-0165/AR.  U.S. v. Jonathan E. DEAN.  CCA 20030576.

No. 06-0210/MC.  U.S. v. Lateef R. LUCAS.  CCA 200400005.

No. 06-0214/AR.  U.S. v. Adam J. CHRISTIE.  CCA 20040915.

No. 06-0223/AR.  U.S. v. Chase L. MAYO.  CCA 20041122.

No. 06-0271/AF.  U.S. v. Murray M. JONES, Jr.  CCA 36034.

No. 06-0276/AR.  U.S. v. Dwight R. MCARTHUR.  CCA 20050077.

No. 06-0331/AR.  U.S. v. Tae E. KIM.  CCA 20040894.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 06-0421/AR.  U.S. v. Travis E. BARNES.  CCA 20040767.

No. 06-0422/AR.  U.S. v. Moses L. HAMILTON.  CCA 20030574.

No. 06-0423/AR.  U.S. v. Ross G. COLE.  CCA 20050902.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 06-8009/NA.  United States, Appellee, v. David A. HERNANDEZ-ALVERADO, Appellant.  CCA 200600037.  Appellant’s motion to withdraw writ-appeal petition is granted.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 03-0394/AF.  U.S. v. Hector R. GONZALEZ Jr.  CCA 34691.

No. 04-0428/AF.  U.S. v. Javier CENDEJAS.  CCA 34864.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 06-109

Monday, March 13, 2006

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 06-0411/AR.  U.S. v. Leo J. JOHNSON, Jr.  CCA 20041304.

No. 06-0412/AR.  U.S. v. William L. WILES, III.  CCA 20051054.

No. 06-0413/AR.  U.S. v. Francisco J. NUNEZ-FLORES.  CCA 20040278.

No. 06-0414/AR.  U.S. v. Luis A. JUSTINIANO.  CCA 20041313.

No. 06-0415/AR.  U.S. v. Tirrell L. WILLIAMS.  CCA 20020972.

No. 06-0416/AR.  U.S. v. Robert M. HORTON.  CCA 20040938.

No. 06-0417/NA.  U.S. v. Joseph R. KAMELY.  CCA 200201248.

No. 06-0418/AF.  U.S. v. Walter M. PLUSH.  CCA 35134.

No. 06-0419/AF.  U.S. v. Kevin J. PENOUILH.  CCA S30494.

No. 06-0420/AF.  U.S. v. Jose Luis LOMELI.  CCA 36168.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 06-108

Friday, March 10, 2006

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 05-0670/AF.  U.S. v. Jimmy J. RICOTTONE.  CCA S30337.

No. 06-0026/AF.  U.S. v. Gary M. HUBBARD.  CCA 35758.

No. 06-0041/AF.  U.S. v. Jeremy D. MAYS.  CCA 35310.

No. 06-0061/AF.  U.S. v. Jasmine E. CHASTAIN.  CCA 35452.

No. 06-0092/AF.  U.S. v. Aaron C. TURNER.  CCA 35555.

No. 06-0093/NA.  U.S. v. James B. GARROD.  CCA 200301530.

No. 06-0225/AF.  U.S. v. Heath M. MCCASKILL.  CCA S30536.

No. 06-0233/AF.  U.S. v. Gregory RICHARDSON.  CCA 35720.

No. 06-0274/AF.  U.S. v. David E. DEL CASTILLO.  CCA S30731.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 06-0404/AR.  U.S. v. Trevor A. DELGADO.  CCA 20020929.

No. 06-0405/AF.  U.S. v. Larry R. LANDON, Jr.  CCA 35831.

No. 06-0406/AF.  U.S. v. Thomas W. NELSON, Jr.  CCA 36096.

No. 06-0407/AF.  U.S. v. Seth A. KIRKPATRICK.  CCA S30934.

No. 06-0408/NA.  U.S. v. Leonard Y. DURAN.  CCA 200000781.

No. 06-0409/MC.  U.S. v. Timothy W. HARRIS.  CCA 200301095.

No. 06-0410/NA.  U.S. v. Michael T. BLUE.  CCA 200500847.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 05-0649/AR.  U.S. v. Timothy WARD.  CCA 20000078.  Appellant's motion for leave to file additional matters pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), granted.

 

No. 06-0191/NA.  U.S. v. Timothy L. JONES.  CCA 200501193.  Appellant's motion to attach granted.

 

No. 06-0327/AF.  U.S. v. Ian J. GROSHONG.  CCA 35675.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to April 10, 2006.

 

No. 06-0333/AR.  U.S. v. Henry R. MARIN.  CCA 20030276.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to April 10, 2006.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 06-107

Thursday, March 09, 2006

 

APPEALS –SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 03-0647/AR.  U.S. v. Ray T. LEAK.  CCA 20000356.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is granted and the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

No. 05-0379/AR.  U.S. v. Aaron L. BROKENBOROUGH.  CCA 20040986.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is granted and the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 03-0647/AR.  U.S. v. Ray T. LEAK.  CCA 20000356.  [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

No. 05-0379/AR.  U.S. v. Aaron L. BROKENBOROUGH.  CCA 20040986.  [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

No. 05-0681/MC.  U.S. v. Matthew D. PERRY.  CCA 200200144.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

I.   WHETHER THE ORDER DIRECTING APPELLANT TO RECEIVE ANTHRAX VACCINE ABSORBED ON FEBRUARY 28, 2000, WAS UNLAWFUL.

 

II. WHETHER THE ORDER DIRECTING APPELLANT TO RECEIVE THE ANTHRAX VACCINE VIOLATED HIS CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED LIBERTY INTEREST IN REFUSING UNWANTED MEDICAL TREATMENT.

 

III. WHETHER APPELLANT'S DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO TIMELY REVIEW OF HIS APPEAL HAS BEEN DENIED.

 

     Briefs will be filed under Rule 25 on Issue III only.

 

No. 06-0064/NA.  U.S. v. Vangle S. HARDISON.  CCA 200200753.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED BY CONCLUDING THAT THE MILITARY JUDGE HAD NOT COMMITTED PLAIN ERROR BY ADMITTING EVIDENCE OF APPELLANT'S PRESERVICE DRUG USE AND A SERVICE WAIVER FOR THAT DRUG USE.

 

     Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 06-0128/MC.  U.S. v. Robert J. SANKEY.  CCA 200401526.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

     I.   WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN HOLDING THAT THE

551-DAY DELAY BETWEEN THE END OF THE COURT-MARTIAL AND THE CONVENING AUTHORITY'S ACTION "CONSIDERING ALL THE POST-TRIAL ATTENTION THAT IT RECEIVED, WAS NOT, ON ITS FACE, UNREASONABLE."

 

II. WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN HOLDING THAT APPELLANT DID NOT SUFFER ANY PREJUDICE FROM THE 551-DAY DELAY IN CONVEYING THE MILITARY JUDGE'S CLEMENCY RECOMMENDATION TO THE CONVENING AUTHORITY FOR HIS CONSIDERATION.

 

     Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 05-0715/AF.  U.S. v. Raymond M. AMADOR.  CCA 35494.

No. 06-0005/AF.  U.S. v. Peter J. ALOGNA.  CCA 35652.

No. 06-0078/AR.  U.S. v. Robert L. HEALY.  CCA 20020420.

No. 06-0113/AR.  U.S. v. Joseph A. ALVESTEFFER.  CCA 20030805.

No. 06-0141/AF.  U.S. v. Craig A. BUKOWSKI.  CCA 35743.

No. 06-0157/AF.  U.S. v. Macario B. ROMBAOA.  CCA S30447.

No. 06-0279/AR.  U.S. v. Rodger L. HERRICK.  CCA 20041013.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 02-0498/AF.  U.S. v. Daryl A. HAMMER.  CCA 33663.  Appellant's motion to file a request for reconsideration out of time denied.

 

No. 05-0440/AR.  U.S. v. Salvador E. GONZALEZ.  CCA 20020077.  It is, by the Court, ordered that the Court’s prior order dated January 24, 2006, ordering a hearing the above-entitled action is hereby vacated.  The case is deemed submitted.

 

No. 06-8006/AR.  Dwight J. LOVING, Petitioner, v. United States, Respondent.  On consideration of Respondent’s motion for extension of time to file a response to the petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of habeas corpus, it is ordered that said motion is hereby granted to April 17, 2006; that petitioner may file a reply on or before April 28, 2006; and the above-entitled action be called for hearing at 1:00 p.m. on the 16th day of May, 2006, in the Courtroom of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 450 E Street, Northwest, Washington, D.C.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 06-106

Wednesday, March 08, 2006

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 06-0394/AR.  U.S. v. Sergio A. GONZALEZMONZON.  CCA 20050683.

No. 06-0395/AR.  U.S. v. Neil M. COUILLARD.  CCA 20050226.

No. 06-0396/AR.  U.S. v. Brett E. VILLALOBOS, Jr.  CCA 20050921.

No. 06-0397/AR.  U.S. v. Sean C. MACMURRAY.  CCA 20021284.

No. 06-0398/AF.  U.S. v. Mellissa A. FARLEY.  CCA S30747.

No. 06-0399/AF.  U.S. v. Pito J. FRAZIER.  CCA S30770.

No. 06-0400/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher L. LOFLIN.  CCA S30793.

No. 06-0401/AF.  U.S. v. John W. MORALES.  CCA 36164.

No. 06-0402/AF.  U.S. v. Brandon L. TONER.  CCA 35080.

No. 06-0403/MC.  U.S. v. Damien B. SHAW.  CCA 200300312.

 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 06-105

Tuesday, March 07, 2006

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 05-0627/MC.  U.S. v. Mikki E. ASHLEY.  CCA 9901546.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that Appellant’s motion for leave to file an additional supplement to the petition for grant of review is granted; that said petition is granted on the following issue assigned by appellate defense counsel:

 

I.  WHETHER APPELLANT WAS DENIED DUE PROCESS OF LAW WHERE THE LOWER COURT DECIDED HER CASE 2,618 DAYS AFTER HER COURT-MARTIAL.

 

     And the following specified issue by the Court:

 

II. WHETHER THE LOWER COURT'S SENTENCE APPROPRIATENESS DETERMINATION USED AN INCORRECT LEGAL STANDARD.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25 on Issue I only.  [See also INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 06-0393/NA.  U.S. v. Forrest J. ZELL.  CCA 200501474.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 05-0627/MC.  U.S. v. Mikki E. ASHLEY.  CCA 9901546.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

No. 06-0259/AR.  U.S. v. Jeffery O. MARTINOLICH.  CCA 20040344.  Appellee's motion to file an answer to Appellant's supplement to the petition for grant of review out of time granted.

 

No. 06-0285/AF.  U.S. v. John D. FREDENBURG.  CCA 35880.  Appellant's motion to submit documents granted.

 

No. 06-0288/AF.  U.S. v. Haxel D. MARCENARO.  CCA 35852.  Appellant's motion to submit documents granted.

 

No. 06-0350/NA.  U.S. v. Antonine M. THOMAS.  CCA 200401690.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to April 17, 2006.

 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 06-104

Monday, March 06, 2006

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 06-0390/AR.  U.S. v. Thomas B. TAYLOR.  CCA 20050924.

No. 06-0391/AR.  U.S. v. Matthew G. BARBER.  CCA 20051056.

No. 06-0392/AR.  U.S. v. Damian A. CHERRY.  CCA 20041162.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 06-0318/AR.  U.S. v. Anthony J. WIRMUSKY III.  CCA 20041264.  Notice is hereby given that a petition for grant of review signed by counsel was offered for filing under Rule 20 in response to this Court’s order dated February 6, 2006.  Accordingly, it is ordered that Appellant shall file a supplement to the petition for grant of review on or before April 5, 2006; and that Appellee may file an answer within 30 days thereafter.

 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 06-103

Friday, March 03, 2006

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 06-0388/AR.  U.S. v. Kyle E. GRUBBS.  CCA 20050812.

No. 06-0389/MC.  U.S. v. Christopher J. LINGERFELDT.  CCA 200400123.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 00-0252/AR.  U.S. v. John C. MCALLISTER.  CCA 9601134.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted, up to and including March 6, 2006; and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 06-0011/AF.  U.S. v. Eric C. PETERS.  CCA S30368.

Appellant's motion to attach document granted.

 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 06-102

Thursday, March 02, 2006

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 05-0644/AF.  U.S. v. James A. DOPP.  CCA 35538.

No. 05-0692/MC.  U.S. v. Matthew D. HAKALA.  CCA 200400709.

No. 05-0761/AR.  U.S. v. Armando AVILA.  CCA 20050234.

No. 06-0006/AF.  U.S. v. Hubert C. BROCK.  CCA S30461.

No. 06-0147/AR.  U.S. v. Dominic L. ROBINSON-NEAL.  CCA 20021406.

No. 06-0219/AR.  U.S. v. Timothy SWITZER.  CCA 20030011.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 06-0382/AR.  U.S. v. Jeremy D. RILEY.  CCA 20020176.

No. 06-0383/AR.  U.S. v. Eric S. FISCHER.  CCA 20030828.

No. 06-0384/AR.  U.S. v. Timothy E. TAYLOR.  CCA 20050743.

No. 06-0385/AR.  U.S. v. Lamont D. CLEMONS.  CCA 20040927.

No. 06-0386/AR.  U.S. v. Laura A. MULLALLY.  CCA 20040364.

No. 06-0387/AR.  U.S. v. Collis J. HEARN.  CCA 20021313.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 03-0086/AR.  U.S. v. Stanley E. EDMOND.  CCA 9900904. Appellant's motion to extend time to file brief granted, but only up to and including March 10, 2006; and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 05-0634/MC.  U.S. v. Damon G. JOHNSON II.  CCA 200200401.  Appellee's motion for leave to file an answer to Appellant’s brief out of time granted.

 

No. 06-0177/MC.  U.S. v. Edward M. WERKHEISER.  CCA 200100455.  Appellant's motion for leave to file supplement to petition for grant of review out of time granted.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 06-101

Wednesday, March 01, 2006

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 04-0720/AF.  U.S. v. Donavon F. FREDRICKSON.  CCA 35442.

No. 05-0405/NA.  U.S. v. Brian DEARING.  CCA 200100291.

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 05-0565/AR.  U.S. v. Rafael A. PEREZ.  CCA 9900680.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER APPELLANT RECEIVED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL IN THAT HIS DEFENSE COUNSEL CALLED THE VICTIM AS A WITNESS; ACKNOWLEDGED CREDIBILITY; CONCEDED THAT APPELLANT COMMITTED INTERCOURSE, INDECENT ACTS AND SODOMY; FAILED TO CALL FAVORABLE SENTENCING WITNESSES; AND FAILED TO OBTAIN FAVORABLE CLEMENCY MATTERS FOR PRESENTATION TO THE CONVENING AUTHORITY.

 

     Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 06-0094/AR.  U.S. v. Alexandro I. JONES.  CCA 20021109.

No. 06-6002/AF.  U.S. v. Jason J. HOBBS.  CCA 2005-04.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 06-0381/NA.  U.S. v. Donald D. BRAMLETT.  CCA 200101150.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 06-8008/NA.  Michael W. PARKER, Petitioner, v. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, Respondent.  CCA 200201230.  Petition for extraordinary relief denied.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 06-0320/MC.  U.S. v. Michael A. JONES.  CCA 200100889.  Appellee's motion to dismiss petition for grant of review denied and Appellant's motion to file petition for grant of review out of time granted.  Appellant shall file a supplement to petition under Rule 21 on or before March 31, 2006.  Appellee may file an answer within thirty days thereafter.

 

No. 06-5003/AR.  U.S. v. Sean B. VANDERSCHAAF.  CCA 20050316.  Appellant's motion for leave to file brief out of time granted.

 

No. 06-6004/CG.  U.S. v. Matthew J. LAYTON.  CCA 001-62-05.  Appellant's motion to correct errata granted and motion to stay proceedings denied.

 

Home Page |  Opinions & Digest  |  Daily Journal  |  Scheduled Hearings  |  Search Site