PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No. 01-0484/AF. U.S. v. Steven T. HALL. CCA 34317.
No. 01-0487/AF. U.S. v. Steven L. MARINO. CCA 33735.
No. 01-0496/AF. U.S. v. Brian J. BENAVIDES. CCA 34309.
No. 01-0507/AF. U.S. v. Wesley A. DANSBY. CCA S29882.
No. 01-0508/AF. U.S. v. Daniel P. GARCIA. CCA S29792.
No. 01-0510/AF. U.S. v. Yvette G. LOGAN. CCA 34227.
No. 01-0514/AR. U.S. v. Matthew P. COTTMAN, Jr. CCA 9900271.
No. 01-0527/MC. U.S. v. Joshua K. DRYDEN. CCA 200000535.
No. 01-0529/AR. U.S. v. Jean-Pierre CELESTIN. CCA 20001019.
No. 01-0531/AR. U.S. v. Michael J. ARROYO. CCA 9901032.
No. 01-0545/AF. U.S. v. Sixtos R. SANTOS. CCA 34223.
No. 01-0551/AF. U.S. v. Amber L. KUNSELMAN. CCA 34322.
No. 01-0557/AR. U.S. v. Russell T. STODDARD. CCA 20000203.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 97-0569/AR. U.S. v. Matthew M. CLARK. CCA 9501018.*/
No. 01-0646/AF. U.S. v. Lavaughn K. KEY. CCA S29751.
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
Misc. No. 01-8033/NA. In Re Prince D. BROWN, petitioner. Appellant’s motion to request reasons for denial of petition for extraordinary relief denied.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 00-0159/AR. U.S. v. James A. BROWN. CCA 9801503. Appellant's motion to submit supplemental brief pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 MJ 431 (CMA 1982), denied.
MANDATES ISSUED
No. 00-0268/MC. U.S. v. Nolan P. GREEN. CCA 99-0162.
No. 00-0412/AF. U.S. v. Adrian D. FULTON. CCA 33568.
No. 01-0056/AR. U.S. v. Tracie D. STRINGER. CCA 9900211.
_____
*/ Second petition filed in this case.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 01-183
Thursday, June 28, 2001
APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
No. 01-0224/AR. U.S. v. Rochester THOMAS. CCA 9502100. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby granted and the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]
No. 01-0528/AR. U.S. v. Devon C. CHISOM. CCA 9900606. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby granted and the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 01-0224/AR. U.S. v. Rochester THOMAS. CCA 9502100. [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]
No. 01-0466/AF. U.S. v. Robert W. PINSON, III. CCA 32963. Review granted on the following issues:
II. WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN FAILING TO SUPPRESS APPELLANT'S PRETRIAL STATEMENTS TO ICELANDIC AUTHORITIES TAKEN DURING A JOINT INVESTIGATION, IN VIOLATION OF HIS FOURTH AMENDMENT AND ARTICLE 31, UCMJ, RIGHTS, AND BECAUSE THE STATEMENTS WERE INVOLUNTARY.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 01-0645/AR. U.S. v. James R. WOOD. CCA 9900196.
PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED
No. 00-0551/AR. United States, appellee, v. Rafael MEDINA-LOPEZ, appellant. CCA 9800610. Appellant’s petition for reconsideration of the order of the Court issued on January 17, 2001, denied.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 01-182
Wednesday, June 27, 2001
APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
No. 00-0517/AF. U.S. v. Joshawah S. ALBERTER. CCA 33933. On further consideration of the granted issue, it is ordered that the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.
No. 00-0656/AF. U.S. v. Timothy L. EVERETT. CCA S29769. On further consideration of the granted issue, it is ordered that the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.
No. 00-0657/AF. U.S. v. Salomon CORONA, Jr. CCA S29781. On further consideration of the granted issue, it is ordered that the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No. 01-0116/MC. U.S. v. Daniel A. MCALISTER. CCA 99-1173.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 01-0637/AR. U.S. v. Mark C. BRATCHER. CCA 9800550.
No. 01-0638/AR. U.S. v. Kevin M. BENEKIN. CCA 20000535.
No. 01-0639/MC. U.S. v. Allen R. BOLDEN. CCA 200000438.
No. 01-0640/MC. U.S. v. Kenneth A. EDWARDS. CCA 200001890.
No. 01-0641/NA. U.S. v. Joseph C. CROSS. CCA 200000771.
No. 01-0642/MC. U.S. v. Andrew S. FELDMAN. CCA 200000953.
No. 01-0643/MC. U.S. v. Michael E. MARTENS. CCA 200000359.
No. 01-0644/MC. U.S. v. Gerard J. MILHOUSE. CCA 200001435.
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
Misc. No. 01-8034/NA. United States, appellee, v. Douglas A. ANDERSON, Jr., appellant. Writ-appeal petition denied.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 99-0640/AR. U.S. v. Michael G. NEW. CCA 9600263. Appellant's motion for a decision by the Court denied as moot.
No. 01-0049/AR. U.S. v. Terrence C. HERNDON. CCA 9800600. Appellee's motion to file an answer letter out of time granted.
No. 01-0337/NA. U.S. v. Mark K. HOLLIS. CCA 9900297. Appellant's motion to extend time to file reply brief granted to June 28, 2001.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED
FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 01-181
Tuesday, June 26, 2001
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No. 01-0347/MC. U.S. v. Joshua D. WOODEN. CCA 200000324.
No. 01-0442/AF. U.S. v. Percy G. COLLINS. CCA 33562.
No. 01-0455/AF. U.S. v. Damon R. YOUNG. CCA 33521.
No. 01-0481/AR. U.S. v. Jamal T. WEBER. CCA 20000505.
No. 01-0490/AF. U.S. v. Randall P. NETTLE. CCA 34288.
No. 01-0495/AF. U.S. v. Christopher E. CARTER. CCA 34274.
No. 01-0499/MC. U.S. v. Gregory D. KROGER. CCA 200001437.
No. 01-0504/AF. U.S. v. James E. ELASH. CCA 33917.
No. 01-0505/AR. U.S. v. Jose E. REYES-RIVERA. CCA 20000079.
No. 01-0549/AF. U.S. v. Paul J. GADDY. CCA 33827.
No. 01-0550/AF. U.S. v. Jai D. GAMBLE. CCA S29760.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW - OTHER SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
No. 01-0560/AF. U.S. v. Paul V. BURDULIS. CCA 33788.
Appellant's motion to withdraw petition for grant of review granted.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 01-0633/AR. U.S. v. Mark A. ARAB. CCA 9801645.
No. 01-0634/AR. U.S. v. Joshua T. CULP. CCA 20000887.
No. 01-0635/AR. U.S. v. James C. HUDSON, Jr. CCA 9900313.
No. 01-0636/AR. U.S. v. Toby W. BOGARD. CCA 20000685.
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS
Misc. No. 01-8034/NA. United States, appellee, v. Douglas A. ANDERSON, Jr., appellant. Writ-appeal petition for review of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals decision on application for extraordinary relief was filed under Rule 27(b) on June 11, 2001, and placed on the docket this date.
PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED
No. 01-0381/AR. United States, appellee, v. Antoine D. IRICK, appellant. CCA 20000731. Petition for reconsideration denied and appellant’s motion to submit supplemental brief pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 MJ 431 (CMA 1982), denied.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 01-0047/AR. U.S. v. Charles W. SIMPSON.
CCA 9700925.
Appellant's motion to file matters in Grostefon
to supplemental brief for grant of review out of time denied.
SULLIVAN, Judge (dissenting): I would grant the motion.
No. 01-0241/AF. U.S. v. Hanalei M. TERLEP.
CCA 33408.
Appellant's motion for leave to file opinion
of the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals granted.
No. 01-0249/AF. U.S. v. James R. CRAVENS. CCA 33438. Appellant's motion to extend time to file final brief granted to July 2, 2001.
No. 01-0304/AR. U.S. v. Trevis D. MOSBY. CCA 9900437. Appellant's motion to extend time to file final brief granted to July 10, 2001.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED
FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 01-180
Monday, June 25, 2001
APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
No. 01-0396/AR. U.S. v. Rafael A. GONZALEZ. CCA 9701146. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby granted and the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 01-0289/AR. U.S. v. Anson D. BENTON. CCA 9800862. Review granted on the following issues:
No. 01-0396/AR. U.S. v. Rafael A. GONZALEZ. CCA 9701146. [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]I. WHETHER THE ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED BY FINDING NO PREJUDICE TO APPELLANT, DESPITE FINDING THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION IN REFUSING TO PERMIT THE DEFENSE TO ELICIT THE EXCULPATORY PORTIONS OF A GOVERNMENT INTRODUCED CONFESSION.II. WHETHER THE ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED BY CONCLUDING THAT A CO-ACCUSED'S ADMISSION TO A CELLMATE THAT HE THREATENED APPELLANT WITH A GUN AT THE TIME OF THE OFFENSES WAS NEITHER AGAINST DECLARANT'S PENAL INTEREST NOR SUFFICIENTLY TRUSTWORTHY.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 01-0632/AR. U.S. v. Rian W. HANSEN. CCA 20000532.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 01-0214/AF. U.S. v. Michael W.HAWKINS. CCA 33087. On further consideration of the granted issues (Daily Journal May 25, 2001), it is ordered that briefs will be filed under Rule 25. Appellant’s brief is due no later than 30 days after the date of this order.
MANDATES ISSUED
No. 00-0403/AF. U.S. v. Bruce A. LUSTER. CCA S29525.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED
FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 01-179
Friday, June 22, 2001
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No. 01-0447/AR. U.S. v. William R. HOOK. CCA 9901030.
No. 01-0459/AF. U.S. v. Jason D. WOOD. CCA 33441.
No. 01-0509/AF. U.S. v. Richard W. MOORE, II. CCA 34381.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 00-0315/AR. U.S. v. Troy W. CARBAUGH. CCA 9701612.*/
No. 01-0631/AR. U.S. v. Roosevelt BRADFORD. CCA 9900366.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 98-1089/AR. U.S. v. Sean G. GRIGORUK. CCA 9600949. Appellant's second motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to July 2, 2001.
No. 01-0535/AF. U.S. v. Darren P. McCORMICK. CCA 33676. Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to July 18, 2001.
No. 01-0537/AR. U.S. v. Sean L. EVANS. CCA
9900925.
Appellant's motion to extend time to file
supplement to petition for grant of review granted to July 20, 2001.
No. 01-0539/AR. U.S. v. Frederick J. WOODHOUSE. CCA 9801033. Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to July 20, 2001.
No. 01-0542/AR. U.S. v. Joe L. LINEN. CCA 9801162. Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to July 20, 2001.
_____
*/ Second petition filed in this case.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED
FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 01-178
Thursday, June 21, 2001
APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
No. 99-0556/AR. U.S. v. Benjiman JOHNSON. CCA 9602016. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby granted and the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]
No. 99-0944/AR. U.S. v. Jeffery L. AYERS, Sr. CCA 9701847. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby granted and the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 99-0556/AR. U.S. v. Benjiman JOHNSON. CCA 9602016. [See APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]
No. 99-0944/AR. U.S. v. Jeffery L. AYERS, Sr. CCA 9701847. [See APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED
FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 01-177
Wednesday, June 20, 2001
APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
No. 01-0240/AF. U.S. v. Antony W. PHILLIPS. CCA 33730. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is granted; and that the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 01-0226/MC. U.S. v. Lester R. HARRIS. CCA 2000-0354. Review granted on the following issue:
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No. 01-0273/AF. U.S. v. Damon A. HARTLEY. CCA 33803.
No. 01-0280/AF. U.S. v. Michael D. FEAGINS. CCA 33377.
No. 01-0282/AF. U.S. v. Darimedrick K. MAGEE. CCA S29513.
No. 01-0324/AR. U.S. v. Walter L. ROSS. CCA 9900615.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 01-0011/AR. U.S. v. Pedro CHAPA, III. CCA 9801043. Appellee's motion to extend time to file an answer to final brief granted to July 25, 2001.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED
FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 01-176
Tuesday, June 19, 2001
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 01-0630/AR. U.S. v. Lionel E. RINCON. CCA 20000697.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 01-0521/MC. U.S. v. Kelvin HARGROVE. CCA 99-0667. Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to July 13, 2001.
No. 98-1089/AR. U.S. v. Sean G. GRIGORUK. CCA 9600949. Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to June 22, 2001.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED
FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 01-175
Monday, June 18, 2001
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 00-0628/AR. U.S. v. John H. WHITE. CCA 9900800.*/
No. 01-0595/AR. U.S. v. Brandon M. LAWSON. CCA 20000837.
No. 01-0596/AR. U.S. v. Daniel E. WHEELER. CCA 20000703.
No. 01-0597/AR. U.S. v. Lavelle SWINTON-CONWAY. CCA 9900238.
No. 01-0598/AF. U.S. v. Keno K. ARMSTRONG. CCA 33640.
No. 01-0599/AF. U.S. v. Bryan J. FRANCIS. CCA S29672.
No. 01-0600/AF. U.S. v. Jeremy E. FRANCIS. CCA 34259.
No. 01-0601/AF. U.S. v. David L. FIELDS. CCA 33736.
No. 01-0602/AF. U.S. v. Jon M. DOWNING. CCA 33953.
No. 01-0603/AF. U.S. v. Phines J. DOUGLAS, III. CCA 33784.
No. 01-0604/AF. U.S. v. Robert J. DILLON. CCA S29904.
No. 01-0605/AF. U.S. v. Jason M. DEBARR. CCA 34253.
No. 01-0606/AF. U.S. v. Clayton W. DEAN. CCA 34391.
No. 01-0607/AF. U.S. v. Bertram T. DANIELS. CCA 33761.
No. 01-0608/AF. U.S. v. James E. BERKHEIMER. CCA 33971.
No. 01-0609/AF. U.S. v. Jeremy S. BARR. CCA 34034.
No. 01-0610/AF. U.S. v. Jacob W. BALDWIN. CCA 33906.
No. 01-0611/AF. U.S. v. Nathaniel GATES. CCA 34116.
No. 01-0612/AF. U.S. v. Sabrina N. JOHNSON. CCA S29770.
No. 01-0613/AF. U.S. v. William H. JOHNSTON, III. CCA S29912.
No. 01-0614/AF. U.S. v. Brian S. KANACH. CCA 34426.
No. 01-0615/AF. U.S. v. Josh R. LEAVITT. CCA 33681.
No. 01-0616/AF. U.S. v. Delanna H. LEMON. CCA 34271.
No. 01-0617/AF. U.S. v. Casey L. MCARTHUR. CCA 34431.
No. 01-0618/AF. U.S. v. David J. MOORE. CCA 34365.
No. 01-0619/AF. U.S. v. Jason T. OHLRICH. CCA S29926.
No. 01-0620/AF. U.S. v. Lesly PHANPHIL. CCA 33484.
No. 01-0621/AF. U.S. v. Jody D. POTOSKY. CCA 33926.
No. 01-0622/AF. U.S. v. Douglas A. PRICE. CCA 33503.
No. 01-0623/AF. U.S. v. Jeremy B. ROSE. CCA 34039.
No. 01-0624/AF. U.S. v. Richard J. SALAS. CCA 34229.
No. 01-0625/AF. U.S. v. Marwan H. TALEB. CCA 33992.
No. 01-0626/AF. U.S. v. Rodolfo VILLAREAL, Jr. CCA 34152.
No. 01-0627/AF. U.S. v. Roscoe P. WINSTON, Jr. CCA S29701.
No. 01-0628/AF. U.S. v. Helen J. VOGEL. CCA 33945.
No. 01-0629/AF. U.S. v. James W. LAPREE. CCA 34424.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 00-0679/AR. U.S. v. Jermain J. BEST. CCA 9701222. Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to July 13, 2001.
_____
*/ Second petition filed in this case.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 01-174
Friday, June 15, 2001
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 01-0590/NA. U.S. v. Timothy J. ELLIS. CCA 98-0729.
No. 01-0591/MC. U.S. v. David W. GRAY. CCA 99-0529.
No. 01-0592/AF. U.S. v. Meredith D. SCHOWALTER. CCA 34400.
No. 01-0593/AF. U.S. v. Shane M. HEIL. CCA S29854.
No. 01-0594/AF. U.S. v. Vincent E. CHILDS. CCA 33783.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 01-0534/AF. U.S. v. Tedio ALAMEDA, Jr. CCA 33529. Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to July 18, 2001.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 01-173
Thursday, June 14, 2001
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No. 01-0423/AF. U.S. v. Jerrod J. BOBBITT. CCA 33636.
No. 01-0448/AF. U.S. v. Anthony D. HILL. CCA 33581.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 01-0589/AR. U.S. v. Larry A. SCHOOF, Jr. CCA 20000829.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED
FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 01-172
Wednesday, June 13, 2001
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 01-0463/AF. U.S. v. Evette R. WLOCH. CCA S29728. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY NOT DISMISSING CHARGE II (FORGERY) AS AN UNREASONABLE MULTIPLICATION OF CHARGES AFTER APPELLANT PLED GUILTY BEFORE A MILITARY JUDGE AND WAS CONVICTED OF CHARGE I AND ITS SPECIFICATIONS (LARCENY) WHEN THE EVIDENCE CLEARLY INDICATES THAT FORGERIES WERE THE SOLE MEANS BY WHICH THE APPELLANT COMMITTED THE LARCENIES.
No. 00-0384/AR. U.S. v. Willie J. WILLIAMSON, Jr. CCA 9702022.
No. 01-0350/AF. U.S. v. Cheryl L. DAVIS. CCA 33515.
No. 01-0355/AF. U.S. v. Annette L. TUCKER. CCA 33664.
No. 01-0377/AR. U.S. v. Laron M. McGHEE. CCA 9900600.
No. 01-0397/AR. U.S. v. Stephanie D. RICE. CCA 9900195.
No. 01-0404/AF. U.S. v. William D. REDDISH. CCA 33522.
No. 01-0438/MC. U.S. v. Richard L. LARSON. CCA 200001498.
No. 01-0444/AR. U.S. v. Dexter REID. CCA 9801082.
No. 01-0449/AF. U.S. v. Gregory HERNQUIST. CCA 34341.
No. 01-0450/AF. U.S. v. Adrian L. CORBIN. CCA S29890.
No. 01-0451/AF. U.S. v. Donald D. ROBERTSON, III. CCA 34338.
No. 01-0454/AF. U.S. v. Joshua W. WILSON. CCA 34273.
No. 01-0465/AF. U.S. v. Bihn V. TRINH. CCA 34109.
No. 01-0469/NA. U.S. v. John C. WALGREN. CCA 200000415.
No. 01-0470/NA. U.S. v. Phillip J. PETRIDES. CCA 9901298.
No. 01-0471/MC. U.S. v. Robert L. THORNTON. CCA 200001188.
No. 01-0479/AF. U.S. v. Timothy S. BAKER. CCA S29873.
No. 01-0480/MC. U.S. v. Aaron ELDRIDGE. CCA 200000537.
No. 01-0482/AR. U.S. v. Feaz LAWRENCE. CCA 20000320.
No. 01-0485/AF. U.S. v. Everette J. GRANT, Jr. CCA 34305.
No. 01-0486/AF. U.S. v. Bruce A. MADDOX. CCA 34295.
No. 01-0489/AF. U.S. v. Robert L. MILLER, Jr. CCA 33626.
No. 01-0497/AF. U.S. v. David ACOSTA. CCA 34276.
No. 01-0498/MC. U.S. v. John R. WAITS. CCA 200001674.
No. 01-0500/NA. U.S. v. Hubert E. LAWS. CCA 200000442.
No. 01-0513/AR. U.S. v. Jason J. PECHON. CCA 20000591.
No. 01-0524/AF. U.S. v. Trinessa A. JONES. CCA S29925.
No. 01-0526/AR. U.S. v. Reginald C. JARRETT. CCA 9900831.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED
FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 01-171
Tuesday, June 12, 2001
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 01-0294/MC. U.S. v. Richard B. SMITH. CCA 98-2155. Appellant's motion to extend time to file final brief granted, but only up to and including July 12, 2001.
No. 01-0501/AR. U.S. v. Bering D. REECE. CCA 9900753. Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to July 5, 2001.
MANDATES ISSUED
No. 00-0456/AF. U.S. v. Shawn T. BRIDGES. CCA 33369.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED
FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 01-170
Monday, June 11, 2001
APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
No. 00-5005/MC. U.S. v. Robert L. BARNES. CCA 94-1927. On consideration of the certified issue,* in light of United States v. Green, No. 00-0268, ___ MJ ___ (2001), we answer the certified issue in the affirmative. Accordingly, it is ordered and adjudged that the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy for remand to that court for further consideration in light of Green.
GIERKE, Judge (concurring in part and dissenting in part):
I disagree with the majority’s decision to decide this case on the basis of the majority opinion in Green. SeeUnited States v. Green, No. 00-0268, ___ MJ ___, ___ (2001) (Gierke, J., dissenting). However, I believe that the facts in this case are sufficiently different from Green to warrant a different result.
It appears to me that the court below may have gone astray in this case when it evaluated the evidence outside the context of appellant’s positive urinalysis and concluded that the testimony of a neighbor whom appellant asked for drugs, standing alone, was insufficient as a matter of law to permit an inference of knowing use. See United States v. Perry, 37 MJ 363 (CMA 1993). Perry held that an "[a]ppellant’s knowledge of the identity of possible drug users neither proves nor disproves that, during the time period alleged, he knowingly used cocaine." Id. at 364. I agree with the Perry holding, but I see a significant difference between the probative value of knowing the identity of possible drug users, as in Perry, and the probative value of asking a neighbor for drugs, as in the present case.
I believe that the court below may have applied an incorrect legal standard to its legal sufficiency determination. In my view, the court below erred in concluding that there could be no permissive inference of knowing drug use without scientific evidence that appellant "experienced the physical and psychological effects of the drug." United States v. Campbell, 52 MJ 386, 388-89 (2000).
The absence of this scientific evidence is important when the prosecution relies solely on the positive urinalysis. However, in this case, the prosecution did not rely solely on the positive urinalysis, but also produced extrinsic evidence of knowing drug use.
I believe that appellant’s conversation with his neighbor must be viewed together with the positive urinalysis test, not independently of it. The question presented to the court below was whether any rational factfinder could have inferred that, based on the positive urinalysis test and the testimony of appellant’s neighbor, appellant knowingly used marijuana on the date charged. See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979); see also United States v. Walker, 42 MJ 67, 71 (1995) (recognizing that prior drug use may be admissible under Mil. R. Evid. 404(b), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2000 ed.), to prove knowledge).
Under the circumstances, it is unclear to me whether the court below applied the correct legal standard in its evaluation of the legal sufficiency of the evidence. Accordingly, I join the majority’s decision to remand the case for reconsideration of the legal sufficiency of the evidence supporting the inference of knowledge.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No. 00-0684/MC. U.S. v. Samuel R. ODOM. CCA 98-1404.
No. 00-0726/AR. U.S. v. Edwin COLLAZO. CCA 9701562.
No. 01-0062/AR. U.S. v. Steven C. FERGUSON. CCA 9801572.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 01-0585/AR. U.S. v. Christopher M. DECKER. CCA 20000287.
No. 01-0586/AR. U.S. v. Keith J. PRIMAVERA. CCA 20000617.
No. 01-0587/AR. U.S. v. Jason H. WATTS. CCA 20000766.
No. 01-0588/AR. U.S. v. Ian J. POMARLEAU. CCA 9800836.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 01-0506/AR. U.S. v. Donald E. REED, Jr. CCA 9702057. Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to July 6, 2001.
MANDATES ISSUED
No. 00-0306/AF. U.S. v. Napolean BAILEY. CCA 32898.
No. 00-0642/AF. U.S. v. Robert HURSEY Jr. CCA 33295.
_____
* WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN FINDING THE EVIDENCE LEGALLY INSUFFICIENT TO PERMIT THE FACTFINDER TO INFER THE ACCUSED’S KNOWING AND WRONGFUL USE OF MARIJUANA WHERE UNITED STATES V. CAMPBELL STATED IT DID NOT CREATE NEW LAW AND WHERE THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED AT TRIAL WAS AT LEAST THE SAME QUANTUM OF EVIDENCE THIS COURT PREVIOUSLY FOUND LEGALLY SUFFICIENT IN NUMEROUS PRE-CAMPBELL CASES.54 MJ 225 (2000).
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED
FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 01-169
Friday, June 08, 2001
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 01-0057/AR. U.S. v. Kirk S. BYINGTON. CCA 9800580.*/
No. 01-0583/AR. U.S. v. Dexter R. IRVING. CCA 9901204.
No. 01-0584/AR. U.S. v. Angela M. ROBBINS. CCA 9701524.
_____
*/
Second petition filed in this case.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 01-168
Thursday, June 07, 2001
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No. 01-0380/AR. U.S. v. Damian L. GOSCH. CCA 20000530.
No. 01-0395/AR. U.S. v. Earl M. CAPERS, Jr. CCA 20000089.
No. 01-0425/AR. U.S. v. Willie S. STEED. CCA 20000665.
No. 01-0430/AF. U.S. v. Howard G. JOHNSON. CCA 34292.
No. 01-0431/AF. U.S. v. Shannon M. LEWIS. CCA S29837.
No. 01-0432/AF. U.S. v. James M. LONG, Jr. CCA S29788.
No. 01-0436/AR. U.S. v. Paul R. MORIN. CCA 20000662.
No. 01-0446/AR. U.S. v. Stephen P. GANGER, II. CCA 9801500.
No. 01-0453/AF. U.S. v. Boudy J. VIER. CCA 34287.
No. 01-0457/AR. U.S. v. Mark A. WEAVER. CCA 9900849.
No. 01-0477/AR. U.S. v. James D. GRUHN. CCA 20000869.
No. 01-0494/AF. U.S. v. Michael A. FERNANDEZ. CCA 34342.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 01-0582/AR. U.S. v. Jeremy K. HACKENBERG. CCA 9801652.
MANDATES ISSUED
No. 00-0092/AR. U.S. v. John D. GUNKLE. CCA 9701960.
No. 00-0134/AR. U.S. v. Robert E. BECKLEY. CCA 9701282.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 01-167
Wednesday, June 06, 2001
APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
No. 01-0512/AF. U.S. v. Daniel F. SCULL. CCA 34161. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby granted on the issue raised by appellate defense counsel and the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 01-0267/NA. U.S. v. Jason C. LENTZ. CCA 99000433. Review granted on the following issue:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 01-166
Tuesday, June 05, 2001
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW - OTHER SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
No. 01-0460/AF. U.S. v. Steve E. DOANE. CCA 33234. Appellant's motion to withdraw petition for grant of review granted.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 01-0337/NA. U.S. v. Mark K. HOLLIS. CCA 9900297. Appellant's motion to attach documents denied.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 01-165
Monday, June 04, 2001
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 00-0381/AR. U.S. v. Carl L. BRANCH. CCA 9801790.*/
No. 01-0580/AR. U.S. v. Jake R. HEBERT. CCA 20010224.
No. 01-0581/AF. U.S. v. Elisa S. BACKMON. CCA S29832.
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
Misc. No. 01-8031/NA. In Re Dantwan L. HAMPTON, appellant. CCA 2001-0467. Writ-appeal petition and appellant’s request for stay of proceedings denied.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 01-0240/AF. U.S. v. Antony W. PHILLIPS. CCA 33730. Appellant's motion to submit documents granted and motion to compel discovery denied.
No. 01-0385/NA. U.S. v. Michael
D. WALSER. CCA 9900057. Appellant's second motion to extend
time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to July
2, 2001.
_____
*/ Second petition filed in this case.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED
FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 01-164
Friday, June 01, 2001
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW - OTHER SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
No. 01-0370/AR. U.S. v. Robert S. HODGES. CCA
9900748.
Appellant's motion to withdraw petition for
grant of review granted.
No. 01-0441/AF. U.S. v. Ralph P. STAGG. CCA
S29866.
Appellant's motion to withdraw petition for
grant of review granted.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 01-0575/AR. U.S. v. Eric A. SHARP. CCA 9701883.
No. 01-0576/AR. U.S. v. Jesus MUNOZ, Jr. CCA 20000260.
No. 01-0577/AR. U.S. v. Cesar TORRES, Jr. CCA 9901190.
No. 01-0578/AF. U.S. v. Destinyanne LOUEY. CCA 34332.
No. 01-0579/AF. U.S. v. Allan PICARDO. CCA 34377.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 00-0301/MC. U.S. v. Glenn E. HURN. CCA 98-0200. Appellant's motion to file supplemental issue denied.
No. 01-0442/AF. U.S. v. Percy G. COLLINS. CCA 33562. Appellant's motion to submit documents in support of supplement to petition for grant of review granted to the extent that it pertains to exhibit B but denied to the extent that it pertains to exhibit A.