PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No. 00-0042/AR. U.S. v. Lorenzo L. MILLS. CCA 9701731.
No. 00-0084/AR. U.S. v. Stephen L. BURNETT. CCA 9801389.
No. 00-0085/AF. U.S. v. Amanda K. GREGORY. CCA S29628.
No. 00-0087/AR. U.S. v. Leland J. RICHARDSON. CCA 9701035.
No. 00-0098/AF. U.S. v. David M. DOBROWOLSKI. CCA 33743.
No. 00-0106/AF. U.S. v. Andrea F. CORSON. CCA 33645.
No. 00-0107/AF. U.S. v. Kevin L. SMITH. CCA S29706.
No. 00-0108/AF. U.S. v. Bernard S. SCHWARTZ, Jr. CCA 33693.
No. 00-0116/AF. U.S. v. Lawrence C. PARR. CCA S29538.
No. 00-0118/AF. U.S. v. James K. CANTU. CCA 33737.
No. 00-0119/AF. U.S. v. David M. JORDAN. CCA 33764.
No. 00-0123/NA. U.S. v. Kenneth O. WYCHE. CCA 98-1942.
No. 00-0124/MC. U.S. v. Harry E. GALLIOS. CCA 99-0775.
No. 99-0982/AR. U.S. v. Jorge L. JOLY. CCA 9701546.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 00-0237/AR. U.S. v. Woodrow JACKSON. CCA 9801653.
No. 00-0238/AR. U.S. v. Donald R. SHIELDS. CCA 9801570.
No. 00-0239/MC. U.S. v. Jeremy L. NORTON. CCA 99-0753.
PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED
No. 99-0838/AF. U.S. v. Shelley S. ROGERS. CCA 32711. Appellant’s petition for reconsideration of the order of the Court issued on December 14, 1999, denied.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 00-0173/AR. U.S. v. Matthew W. FLEMINGS III. CCA 9800219. Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to March 1, 2000.
No. 99-0232/AR. U.S. v. Robert W. MARTIN. CCA 9600413. Appellant's motion concerning oral argument granted.
No. 99-0499/AF. U.S. v. Richard M. LATORRE, Jr. CCA 33262. Appellee's motion to substitute corrected page out of time granted.
No. 99-0618/AR. U.S. v. McTyran T. LANIER. CCA 9700598. Appellee's motion to correct errata granted.
No. 99-0901/AR. U.S. v. Derrick E. PATTERSON. CCA 9800417. Appellee's motion to extend time to file answer to final brief granted up to and including February 14, 2000.
No. 99-0911/MC. U.S. v. Douglas A. ANDERSON. CCA 97-0058. Appellant's motion to attach unsworn declaration denied.
SULLIVAN, Judge (dissenting): I would grant the motion.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 00-077
Wednesday, February 02, 2000
HEARINGS
No. 99-0232/AR. U.S. v. Robert W. MARTIN. CCA 9600413.
No. 99-0417/AR. U.S. v. Samuel G. BROWNING. CCA 9601041.
No. 99-0499/AF. U.S. v. Richard M. LATORRE, Jr. CCA 33262.
No. 99-0604/AF. U.S. v. Chris D. LITTLEWOOD. CCA 32763.
No. 99-0651/AF. U.S. v. Jesse L. KIRKLAND. CCA 33064.
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 99-0656/AR. U.S. v. Nicky A. THOMPSON. CCA 9600798. Review granted on the following issues:
II. WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY ABANDONING HIS IMPARTIAL ROLE AND BECOMING A PARTISAN ADVOCATE FOR THE GOVERNMENT WHICH DENIED APPELLANT A FAIR TRIAL.
II. WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED BY REFUSING TO CONSIDER LEARNED MEDICAL TREATISES, NOT SUBJECT TO REASONABLE DISPUTE, AS OUTSIDE THE RECORD OF THE CASE IN FORMING ITS LEGAL TEST FOR WHETHER AN INFANT IS "BORN ALIVE."
III. WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED BY USING THE DEFINITION OF "LIVE BIRTH" FROM STATE VITAL STATISTICS RECORDATION STATUTES AND A STATE CIVIL STATUTE REGARDING ABORTION AS THE DEFINITIION OF "BORN ALIVE."
IV. WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN DECIDING THAT APPELLANT WAS CULPABLY NEGLIGENT IN GIVING BIRTH WITHOUT MEDICAL ASSISTANCE.
V. WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN HOLDING THAT A MOTHER IN THE THROES OF CHILDBIRTH HAS A DUTY TO EVALUATE THE CONDITION OF HER INFANT AND TO PROVIDE MEDICAL ASSISTANCE TO THE INFANT.
VI. WHETHER THE EVIDENCE IS LEGALLY SUFFICIENT TO FIND APPELLANT GUILTY OF INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 119, UCMJ.
VII. WHETHER THE DECISION OF THE LOWER COURT VIOLATES DUE PROCESS AND THE EX POST FACTO CLAUSE OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION BY JUDICIALLY ENLARGING A LEGAL RULE AND APPLYING THE ENLARGEMENT RETROACTIVELY.
VIII. WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN FAILING TO FIND THAT THE EVIDENCE WAS INSUFFICENT TO PROVE APPELLANT MADE ANY FALSE OFFICIAL STATEMENTS BECAUSE THE MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL CLEARLY INDICATES THAT ARTICLE 107, FALSE OFFICIAL STATEMENT, DOES NOT APPLY TO STATEMENTS MADE BY AN ACCUSED DURING AN INTERROGATION.
No. 98-0811/AR. U.S. v. Ezell MCCALPINE, Jr. CCA 9701508.
No. 00-0115/AF. U.S. v. Malcolm P. WILLIAMS. CCA S29684.
PETITIONS FOR NEW TRIAL DENIED
No. 98-0811/AR. U.S. v. Ezell MCCALPINE, Jr. CCA 9701508.
PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED
No. 99-0131/MC. U.S. v. Darryl A. ANTLE. CCA 97-1026. Appellant's motion for reconsideration of summary affirmance denied.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 99-0761/AF. U.S. v. Cara R. SANCHEZ. CCA 33117. Appellee's motion to submit document denied.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 00-078
Thursday, February 03, 2000
HEARINGS
No. 99-0618/AR. U.S. v. McTyran T. LANIER. CCA 9700598.
No. 99-0619/AR. U.S. v. David M. MELANSON. CCA 9801266.
No. 99-0724/MC. U.S. v. Matthew J. ALVES. CCA 97-1610.
No. 99-0912/NA. U.S. v. Aaron P. PRITT. CCA 98-1660.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No. 00-0075/AR. U.S. v. Lawrence N. PRINCE, Jr. CCA 9701353.
No. 00-0089/MC. U.S. v. Johanne M. KALLMYER. C 99-0781.
No. 00-0094/MC. U.S. v. Enrique ANDAVERDE. CCA 99-0363.
No. 00-0120/MC. U.S. v. Raymond B. HORNER. CCA 97-1306.
No. 00-0127/NA. U.S. v. James P. LANGWORTHY. CCA 99-0717.
No. 00-0130/AR. U.S. v. Benjamin J. BRICKEY. CCA 9900662.
No. 00-0132/AF. U.S. v. Mary Ann J. FARRALES. CCA 33772.
No. 00-0133/MC. U.S. v. Daniel P. KANDZIORSKI. CCA 99-1139.
No. 00-0136/NA. U.S. v. Roy S. SALING. CCA 99-0764.
No. 00-0137/MC. U.S. v. Jeffrey D. LEE. CCA 98-1918.
No. 00-0142/NA. U.S. v. Coleman B. DOLL. CCA 99-0329.
No. 00-0143/AR. U.S. v. Michael T. SPIEGLER. CCA 9801111.
No. 00-0145/MC. U.S. v. Matthew J. LAIRSEY. CCA 99-0668.
No. 00-0154/AF. U.S. v. Michelle L. WRIGHT. CCA 33680.
No. 00-0163/AF. U.S. v. Bharat A. PATEL. CCA 33190.
No. 00-0167/AR. U.S. v. Cory D. YATES. CCA 9900253.
No. 00-0168/AR. U.S. v. Thomas E. SMITH. CCA 9900130.
No. 00-0172/AF. U.S. v. Timothy D. WILLIAMS. CCA 33804.
No. 00-0180/AF. U.S. v. Deana M. SILVEY. CCA 33390.
No. 00-0181/AF. U.S. v. Tarrance T. COVINGTON. CCA S29645.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 00-0240/NA. U.S. v. Dana L. GRIMES. CCA 98-0955.
No. 00-0241/MC. U.S. v. Zoxleavon WALTON. CCA 98-0097.
No. 00-0242/NA. U.S. v. Erick D. LAABS. CCA 99-0622.
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS
Misc. No. 00-8005/AR. U.S. v. Ian C. McROBERTS. Writ-appeal petition for review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals on application for extraordinary relief filed under Rule 27(b).
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 95-0865/AR. U.S. v. Hershell VEAL. CCA 9601448. Appellant's motion for 2-week extension of time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to February 14, 2000; absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.
No. 99-0631/MC. U.S. v. Edward L. JENKINS. CCA 97-1567. Motion filed by Lieutenant John D. Holden to withdraw as appellate counsel granted.
No. 00-0146/AF. U.S. v. Donald G. STRYKER. CCA 33620.
No. 00-0148/AF. U.S. v. Derron W. JOHNSON. CCA 33588.
No. 00-0149/AF. U.S. v. Perry R. LAKE. CCA 33778.
No. 00-0150/AF. U.S. v. Jorge E. PEDROZA-DIAZ. CCA S29630.
No. 00-0151/AF. U.S. v. Jared E. ROACH. CCA S29674.
In each of the above five cases, appellant's motion to file supplement to petition for grant of review out of time granted.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 00-079
Friday, February 04, 2000
HEARINGS
No. 99-0640/AR. U.S. v. Michael G. NEW. CCA 9600263.
No. 99-0681/AR. U.S. v. Rogelio PABLO. CCA 9700481.
No. 99-0911/MC. U.S. v. Douglas A. ANDERSON. CCA 97-0058.
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 96-0659/AR. U.S. v. Steven L. BECKER. CCA 9600644. Review granted on the following issues:
II. WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED AS A MATTER OF LAW AND TO THE SUBSTANTIAL PREJUDICE OF APPELLANT WHEN HE INCORRECTLY INSTRUCTED THE PANEL MEMBERS OVER DEFENSE OBJECTION, THAT APPELLANT COULD BE SENTENCED TO A PERIOD OF CONFINEMENT IN EXCESS OF 10 YEARS IN LIEU OF A PUNITIVE DISCHARGE, WHERE HIS ORIGINAL SENTENCE INCLUDED NO CONFINEMENT.
No. 00-0021/MC. U.S. v. Jamie L. HANNAH. CCA 97-0159. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is set aside; and that the record is returned to the Judge Advocate General for remand to the Court of Criminal Appeals. That court will consider whether appellant is within the class of persons who are entitled to relief under United States v. Gorski, 47 MJ 370 (1997). If the court concludes that appellant is within such class, the court will refer the case to the Judge Advocate General for a determination as to the amount of relief that is warranted, if any.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 97-0963/AF. U.S. v. Charles E. HANLEY III. CCA 32370.*/
No. 00-0243/AF. U.S. v. Sidney J. ROBINSON. CCA 33835.
No. 00-0244/AF. U.S. v. Candace R. VAUGHAN. CCA 33801.
No. 00-0245/NA. U.S. v. James
A. CHO. CCA 99-1205.
_____
*/ Third petition filed in this case.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED
FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 00-080
Monday, February 07, 2000
APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
No. 98-1098/AR. U.S. v. Terry KELLEY. CCA 9600727. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby granted and the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]
SULLIVAN, Judge (dissenting):
I vote to grant Issue II and hear it with full oral argument in this case. It states:
II
Judge Effron did not participate in the Court’s prior action on this case. See 51 MJ 336 (1999). The case is now before the Court in a manner that does not require determination of the constitutionality under the Ex Post Facto Clause of the amendments to Title 10, United States Code, made by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996, Pub.L.No. 104-106, 110 Stat. 462-63 (1996). Accordingly, Judge Effron has participated in the present matter and will participate in any further proceedings on this case.
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 98-1098/AR. U.S. v. Terry KELLEY. CCA 9600727. [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 00-0246/AF. U.S. v. Charles E. FERRIS. CCA 33798.
No. 00-0247/AF. U.S. v. Jeffery D. HOBBS. CCA 33694.
No. 00-0248/AF. U.S. v. Eric A. JACOBSON. CCA S29729.
No. 00-0249/AF. U.S. v. Anthony M. KING. CCA 33902.
No. 00-0250/AF. U.S. v. Colin C.A. BODE. CCA S29711.
No. 00-0251/NA. U.S. v. Samuel R. LEPRESTI. CCA 97-1671.
No. 00-0252/AR. U.S. v. John C. MCALLISTER. CCA 9601134.
No. 00-0253/AR. U.S. v. Francis W. DONMARTIN. CCA 9900834.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 99-1001/MC. U.S. v. Michael A. PEREIRA. CCA 97-1027. Appellee's motion to extend time to file answer to final brief granted up to and including March 1, 2000.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED
FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 00-081
Tuesday, February 08, 2000
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 00-0254/NA. U.S. v. Jerry A. STEEN. CCA 98-2014.
No. 00-0255/AR. U.S. v. James A. WILLIAMS. CCA 9801603.
No. 00-0256/AR. U.S. v. Kenneth E. TAYLOR. CCA 9900665.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 99-0666/NA. U.S. v. Marion H. TANKSLEY. CCA 96-1402. Appellant's motion to extend time to file final brief granted, but only up to and including February 25, 2000; absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.
No. 99-0838/AF. U.S. v. Shelley S. ROGERS. CCA 32711. Appellant's motion to file brief in excess of fifty pages granted.
No. 00-0134/AR. U.S. v. Robert E. BECKLEY. CCA 9701282. Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to February 18, 2000.
No. 00-0156/AF. U.S. v. Kenneth V. KUZEFF. CCA 33346. Appellant's motion to substitute corrected page granted.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED
FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 00-082
Wednesday, February 09, 2000
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 00-0257/MC. U.S. v. Billy A. BELL. CCA 99-0392.
No. 00-0258/AR. U.S. v. Robert C. BARTSCH. CCA 9900244.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 00-0174/MC. U.S. v. Anthony P. DAVIN. CCA 98-1269. Appellant's motion to file supplement to petition for grant of review out of time granted.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED
FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 00-083
Thursday, February 10, 2000
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No. 00-0110/AR. U.S. v. Claude E. PRUITT. CCA 9800284.
No. 00-0112/AR. U.S. v. Marty D. NESBITT. CCA 9701692.
No. 00-0131/AF. U.S. v. Carlon C. CLARKE. CCA S29708.
No. 00-0135/NA. U.S. v. William L. GARRISON. CCA 98-0745.
No. 00-0138/AF. U.S. v. Nerita H. HEARN. CCA 33734.
No. 00-0140/AF. U.S. v. Kirby J. DUPRE. CCA S29722.
No. 00-0158/AF. U.S. v. Margiry UITTERLINDEN. CCA S29691.
No. 00-0164/AF. U.S. v. Mitchell E. PRUITT. CCA 33536.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 00-0259/AR. U.S. v. Brannon K. MCDANIEL. CCA 9801068.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED
FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 00-084
Friday, February 11, 2000
APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
No. 97-0528/AF. U.S. v. James RUIZ. CCA 31955. Upon further consideration of the record of trial and the record of the factfinding hearing ordered by this Court, see United States v. Ruiz, 49 MJ 340 (1998), it is ordered that the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.
No. 97-0773/AF. U.S. v. William S. ROSARIO. CCA 32453. On further consideration of the above-entitled case in light of the order granting reconsideration (49 MJ 169) of the original order of this Court (49 MJ 127), and United States v. Keeney, 49 MJ 388 (1998),*/ it is ordered that the order dated March 5, 1998 (49 MJ 127) is vacated; and that the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.
SULLIVAN, Judge (concurring in part and dissenting in part):
The question in this case is whether the 14-day rule of Article 57(a)(1), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 857(a)(1), was applied to appellant in violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause of the Constitution. Article 57(a)(1), which was added in 1996 and became effective for courts-martial held beginning April 1, 1996, provides that the adjudged forfeiture and reduction would take effect the earlier of 14 days after sentence is announced or on the date of the convening authority’s action. Appellant was sentenced on October 24, 1996, and his only offense (distribution of cocaine) was found to have occurred "on divers occasions, between 1 January 1996 and on or about 26 April 1996."
The decision of this Court in United States
v. Gorski, 47 MJ 370 (1997), found an ex post facto violation
in the application of Article 57(a)(1) to cases where the offenses were
committed prior to April 1, 1996. However, RCM 307(c)(4), Manual for Courts-Martial,
United States, 1984, states that "[c]harges and specifications alleging
all known offenses by an accused may be preferred at the same time." Here,
the record shows that appellant’s offense, at least in part, occurred after
April 1, 1996. Therefore, application of the 14-day rule may have been
authorized on this basis alone. United States v. Garfinkel, 29 F.3d
1253, 1259 (8th Cir. 1994); United States v. Brady, 26 F.3d 282,
291 (2d Cir. 1994); Wright v.
Superior Court, 936 P.2d 101, 107-8
(Cal. 1997). Accordingly, I vote to remand this case to the court below
pursuant to my separate opinion in United States v. Gorski, 47 MJ
370, 376 (1997)(concurring in part and in the result).
____
*/ Because the approved sentence included total forfeitures, Article 58b, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 858b, did not apply.
Senior Judge Everett did not participate.
Judge Effron did not participate in this decision. See United States v. Gorski, 48 MJ 317 (1997). This is without prejudice to his future participation in this case should it subsequently be presented to this Court in a manner that does not require determination of the application of the Ex PostFactoClause of the United States Constitution to the amendments to Title 10, United States Code, made by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996, Pub.L.No. 104-106, 110 Stat. 462-63 (1996).
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 00-0260/AF. U.S. v. Robert B. BUTCHART. CCA 33782.
No. 00-0261/MC. U.S. v. Raymond S. ARMENDARIZ. CCA 98-1735.
No. 00-0262/NA. U.S. v. David L. BOARD. CCA 98-2061.
No. 00-0263/NA. U.S. v. Charles C. HAMMOCK. CCA 98-1461.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED
FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 00-085
Monday, February 14, 2000
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No. 00-0039/AR. U.S. v. Arther L. BREWER. CCA 9701710.
No. 00-0097/AF. U.S. v. Jere H. WESSELL. CCA 33033.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 00-0264/AR. U.S. v. Ryan L. PRICE. CCA 9801782.
No. 00-0265/AF. U.S. v. Donald J. DIERKSEN. CCA 33861.
No. 00-0266/AF. U.S. v. James C. POLCHES. CCA 33842.
No. 00-0267/MC. U.S. v. Roger J. STOTTS. CCA 98-1484.
No. 00-0268/MC. U.S. v. Nolan P. GREEN. CCA 99-0162.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 00-0200/NA. U.S. v. Galen E. SOTHEN. CCA 98-0738. Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to February 22, 2000.
No. 93-0157/AF. U.S. v. Charles M. HANEY, Jr. CCA 29000. Appellant's motion to file brief in excess of fifty pages granted.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED
FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 00-086
Tuesday, February 15, 2000
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 00-0095/AR. U.S. v. Paul J. FULLER. CCA 9701004. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE EVIDENCE IS LEGALLY SUFFICIENT TO SUSTAIN ANo. 00-0111/AR. U.S. v. Derrick C. WILLIAMS. CCA 9701161. Review granted on the following issues:
CONVICTION FOR CRUELTY AND MALTREATMENT OF PFC M
(SPECIFICATION 1 OF CHARGE II) WHERE PFC M TESTIFIED
AND PROVIDED SWORN STATEMENTS THAT SHE VOLUNTARILY
DRANK ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND ENGAGED IN SEX WITH
APPELLANT.
I. WHETHER THE ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED TO THESUBSTANTIAL PREJUDICE OF APPELLANT BY ALLOWING A
CONVENING AUTHORITY TO ACT AS SENTENCE AUTHORITY AND
REASSESS APPELLANT'S SENTENCE.II. WHETHER THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS, IN REVIEWING THE SENTENCE AFTER REASSESSMENT BY THE CONVENING AUTHORITY, ERRED BY NOT SPECIFICALLY DETERMINING WHETHER THE REASSESSED SENTENCE PROVIDED APPROPRIATE RELIEF
REQUIRED BY UNITED STATES V. SALES, 22 MJ 305 (CMA
1986), AND UNITED STATES V. JONES, 39 MJ 315 (CMA 1994).
No. 00-0129/AR. U.S. v. Darryl O. JONES. CCA 9800296.
No. 00-0144/AR. U.S. v. Michael STRONG. CCA 9700791.
No. 99-0750/MC. U.S. v. Carl D. DAGNESE. CCA 97-0212.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 99-0092/AR. U.S. v. Ricky M. JOHNSON. CCA 9601024. Appellee's motion to file answer to final brief out of time granted.
No. 99-0925/MC. U.S. v. Charles M. KHO. CCA 98-1646. Appellant's motion to extend time to file final brief granted, but only up to and including March 3, 2000; absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 00-087
Wednesday, February 16, 2000
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 00-0104/AR. U.S. v. Holly M. BALDWIN. CCA 9800230. Appellant's third motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to March 7, 2000.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 00-088
Thursday, February 17, 2000
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 94-0796/AR. U.S. v. Stephen E. BOONE, Jr. CCA 9200231.*/
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 99-0560/NA. U.S. v. Kerry V. LYNN. CCA 97-1482. Appellant's motion to extend time to file final brief granted, but only up to and including March 13, 2000; absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.
No. 00-0210/MC. U.S. v. John R. CLOUGH. CCA 99-0183.
No. 00-0211/MC. U.S. v. Jonathan GUTIERREZ. CCA 99-0678.
In each of the above two cases, appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to March 20, 2000.
MANDATES ISSUED
No. 99-0052/NA. U.S. v. Dudley C. WILLIAMS. CCA 97-0227.
No. 99-0242/MC. U.S. v. Wayne E. BURTON. CCA 98-0805.
No. 99-5002/CG. U.S. v. Joselito
C. TUALLA. CCA 1079.
_____
*/ Third petition filed in same case.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 00-089
Friday, February 18, 2000
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 00-0269/NA. U.S. v. Curtis BATTLE. CCA 98-1015.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 99-0811/MC. U.S. v. Rockey J. REED. CCA 97-1378. Appellee's motion to extend time to file answer to final brief granted up to and including March 10, 2000.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 00-090
Tuesday, February 22, 2000
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 99-0595/AR. U.S. v. Timothy W. SHELTON. CCA 9600456. Review granted on the following issues:
No. 00-0073/AF. U.S. v. Darrin G. WAGONER. CCA 33271.
SULLIVAN, Judge (dissenting):
I would grant the following issue:
No. 00-0270/AR. U.S. v. Billy K.J. MONDAY. CCA 9800082.
No. 00-0271/AR. U.S. v. Andrew A. SZENTMIKLOSI. CCA 9701049.
No. 00-0272/AR. U.S. v. Junior S. PHILLIP. CCA 9700398.
No. 00-0273/MC. U.S. v. Bryan W. MORRIS. CCA 99-0657.
No. 00-0274/MC. U.S. v. Jason P. WINGATE. CCA 99-1336.
No. 00-0275/MC. U.S. v. Joseph A. WRIGHT. CCA 99-1317.
No. 00-0276/MC. U.S. v. Sabrina M. FOSTER. CCA 99-0885.
No. 00-0277/MC. U.S. v. Shinhao LAI. CCA 99-1329.
No. 00-0278/MC. U.S. v. Jason P. WINGATE. CCA 99-0776.
No. 00-0279/MC. U.S. v. Anthony T. YOUNG. CCA 98-0505.
No. 00-0280/AF. U.S. v. Marilyn M. FARRELL-FRANCIS. CCA 32907.
No. 00-0281/AF. U.S. v. Jeremy S. MATHIAS. CCA 33506.
No. 00-0282/AF. U.S. v. Richard A. MCLEAN. CCA 33280.
No. 00-0283/AF. U.S. v. Raymond T. SATTERLEY, III. CCA 33214.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 00-091
Wednesday, February 23, 2000
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 99-0967/AR. U.S. v. Murali S. KULATHUNGAM. CCA 9700340. Review granted on the following issues:
II. WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE IMPROPERLY ENTERED FINDINGS REGARDING APPELLANT'S GUILT AFTER FINAL ADJOURNMENT IN A POST-TRIAL 39(a) SESSION TO THE SUBSTANTIAL PREJUDICE OF APPELLANT.
III. WHETHER THE GOVERNMENT'S MANUFACTURING OF PART OF THE TRIAL PROCEEDINGS IN THE RECORD OF TRIAL AND THE PROFFERING OF THE RECORD OF TRIAL AS ACCURATE TO THE MILITARY JUDGE FOR AUTHENTICATION SO DIRECTLY IMPACTED UPON APPELLANT'S RIGHTS TO A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL REVIEW BY THE CONVENING AUTHORITY AND THE APPELLATE COURTS, THAT DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE IS WARRANTED.
No. 00-0284/MC. U.S. v. Joseph VALLEJOS. CCA 99-0922.
No. 00-0285/MC. U.S. v. Manuel A. TISCARENORENTARIA. CCA 99-1346.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 98-0938/AR. U.S. v. Benjamin T. FIELD. CCA 9700785. Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to March 15, 2000.
No. 98-1023/AR. U.S. v. Keith HENRY. CCA 9402015. Appellee's motion to attach original granted.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 00-092
Thursday, February 24, 2000
APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
No. 99-0990/MC. U.S. v. Christopher E. MILLER. CCA 98-1228. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, we conclude that the checks which appellant contemporaneously stole from Seaman Holliday’s checkbook and Seaman Thorpe’s checkbook, which he found in Seaman Holliday’s drawer (specifications 2 and 5, Charge II), were a single larceny, even though the checks belonged to two different seamen. Therefore, these two specifications are hereby consolidated. See para. 46c(1)(h)(ii), Part IV, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (1998 ed.); see also United States v. Martin, 36 MJ 315 (CMA 1993). However, we are completely satisfied that appellant was not prejudiced as to sentence by the military judge’s failure to consolidate these specifications prior to findings. Accordingly, it is ordered that the petition is granted; that specifications 2 and 5 of Charge II are consolidated as specification 2, to read as follows:
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 99-0990/MC. U.S. v. Christopher E. MILLER. CCA 98-1228. [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 00-0286/AR. U.S. v. Steven D. JEFFERS. CCA 9701201.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 00-093
Friday, February 25, 2000
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 00-0287/AR. U.S. v. Thaddeis L. ELLIS. CCA 9801668.
No. 00-0288/AR. U.S. v. Modesto ORTEGA. CCA 9900732.
No. 00-0289/MC. U.S. v. Carlton E. LEWIS. CCA 99-0289.
No. 00-0290/NA. U.S. v. Robert M. BIANCONI. CCA 98-1445.
No. 00-0291/AF. U.S. v. Cornelius A. WILSON. CCA 33713.
No. 00-0292/AF. U.S. v. Shane A. WALKER. CCA 33477.
No. 00-0293/AF. U.S. v. Jeneane A. BLACINE. CCA S29686.
No. 00-0294/AF. U.S. v. Nathan L. BERGERON. CCA S29727.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 00-0076/AR. U.S. v. Anthony J. BAUMANN. CCA 9701765. Appellant's motion to file final brief out of time granted.
No. 00-0102/AR. U.S. v. Juan O. ALVARADO-ALBELO. CCA 9800265. Appellant's motion to file index to final brief granted.
No. 00-0215/AF. U.S. v. Christopher G. ROBB. CCA 32857. Appellant's motion to attach document granted.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 00-094
Monday, February 28, 2000
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 00-0109/AF. U.S. v. Eddie L. CHANEY. CCA S29638. Review granted on the following issue:
No. 00-0295/AF. U.S. v. Michael C. BROWN. CCA 32906.
No. 00-0296/AR. U.S. v. Leland M. TILGHMAN. CCA 9801442.
No. 00-0297/AR. U.S. v. Patrick S. TIMMONS. CCA 9801558.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 95-0865/AR. U.S. v. Hershell W. VEAL. CCA 9601448. Appellee's motion to correct errata granted.
No. 99-0731/AR. U.S. v. Ronald L. HARRIS. CCA 9301182. Appellee's motion to correct errata granted.
No. 00-0227/NA. U.S. v. Shawn M. PROMIN. CCA 98-0929. Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to March 29, 2000.
No. 00-0252/AR. U.S. v. John C. MCALLISTER. CCA 9601134.
No. 00-0256/AR. U.S. v. Kenneth E. TAYLOR. CCA 9900665.
In each of the above two cases, appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to April 10, 2000.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 00-095
Tuesday, February 29, 2000
HEARINGS
No. 99-0731/AR. U.S. v. Ronald L. HARRIS. CCA 9301182.
No. 99-0872/NA. U.S. v. William J. BAER. CCA 97-2044.
No. 99-0901/AR. U.S. v. Derrick E. PATTERSON. CCA 9800417.
No. 99-0915/MC. U.S. v. Noel A. PINEDA. CCA 98-1659.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 00-0298/AR. U.S. v. George W. DE LA CRUZ. CCA 9800864.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 99-0750/MC. U.S. v. Carl D. DAGNESE. CCA 97-0212. Appellant's motion to extend time to file petition for reconsideration granted to March 25, 2000.
No. 00-0010/NA. U.S. v. Sharon Y. NELSON. CCA 97-1978. Appellant's motion to extend time to file final brief granted, but only up to and including March 17, 2000; absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.