TRIAL STAGES: Pretrial: Motions


2010 (September Term)


United States v. Savard, 69 M.J. 211 (when one of the parties so requests, RCM 905(h) requires that the military judge hold a hearing on a written motion). 


2003

 

United States v. Wellington, 58 MJ 420 (Article 40, UCMJ, empowers military judges, to grant a continuance for reasonable cause to any party for such time, and as often, as may appear to be just; reasonable cause includes insufficient opportunity to prepare for trial).

(broad discretion must be granted trial courts on matters of continuances; only an unreasoning and arbitrary insistence upon expeditiousness in the face of a justifiable request for delay will result in reversal; on the other hand, possible loss of witnesses is a valid consideration in deciding whether to deny a continuance).

(appellant did not establish any prejudicial error in the denial of his motion for a continuance that was sought to review the victim's medical records in order to determine her medications, her mental status, and the times when she was hallucinating; appellant's counsel cross-examined the victim's doctors about these matters at trial; appellant failed to show what he would have done differently if the government had responded to his discovery request in a timely manner).

1999

United States v. Roland
, 50 MJ 66 (defense must come forward with initial showing of improper member selection, then the government must demonstrate that no impropriety occurred).

United States v. Scott, 51 MJ 326 (MRE 304(d)(4) required any motion to suppress or objection to statements made by the accused to be submitted prior to the pleas; such motions may be deferred for good cause).


Home Page |  Opinions & Digest  |  Daily Journal  |  Scheduled Hearings  |  Search Site