UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 08-119

Monday, March 31, 2008

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 08-0174/AR.  U.S. v. Jacqulyn F. WILLIAMS.  CCA 20061097.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 08-0444/AR.  U.S. v. Gregory D. ROBERTSON.  CCA 20050565.

No. 08-0445/AR.  U.S. v. David TORRES, Jr.  CCA 20070470.

No. 08-0446/AR.  U.S. v. Cory T. MICKELSON.  CCA 20071055.

No. 08-0447/AR.  U.S. v. Richard M. DEAN.  CCA 20070430.

No. 08-0448/NA.  U.S. v. Matthew C. KUEMMERLE.  CCA 200700899.

No. 08-0449/NA.  U.S. v. Ariel J. WEINMANN.  CCA 200700362.

No. 08-0450/AF.  U.S. v. Brendan W. CAVANAUGH.  CCA 37023.

No. 08-0451/AF.  U.S. v. Jacob A. DILL.  CCA S31211.

No. 08-0452/AF.  U.S. v. Matthew W. GLADUE.  CCA 36580.

No. 08-0453/AF.  U.S. v. Scott A. JONES.  CCA S31231.

No. 08-0454/AF.  U.S. v. Gavin G. TICHNELL.  CCA S31347.

No. 08-0455/AF.  U.S. v. Stacy J. SHIELDS.  CCA S31018.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 08-118

Friday, March 28, 2008

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 08-0439/MC.  U.S. v. James MOORE.  CCA 200700642.

No. 08-0440/MC.  U.S. v. Chad M. MCCRACKEN.  CCA 200600484.

No. 08-0441/AF.  U.S. v. Timothy K. POLIAK.  CCA S31336.

No. 08-0442/AF.  U.S. v. Michael J. DAHL.  CCA 36582.

No. 08-0443/AF.  U.S. v. Scott V. BRIDGES.  CCA 36977.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 08-117

Thursday, March 27, 2008

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 08-0126/AR.  U.S. v. Edward P. JOHNSTON.  CCA 20070197.

No. 08-0127/AR.  U.S. v. Samuel P. RICHIE.  CCA 20060380.

No. 08-0135/AF.  U.S. v. Jennifer M. DAVID.  CCA S31122.

No. 08-0181/AR.  U.S. v. Cabot A. MILLER.  CCA 20070494.

No. 08-0193/AR.  U.S. v. Joe J. PARKS III.  CCA 20070630.

No. 08-0198/AF.  U.S. v. Gregory H. PEACE II.  CCA S31328.

No. 08-0216/NA.  U.S. v. Michael E. TYMOWCZAK.  CCA 200700365.

No. 08-0224/AR.  U.S. v. Robert B. SCHMIDT.  CCA 20070654.

No. 08-0235/AF.  U.S. v. Ryan W. LEFEVRE.  CCA 37042.

No. 08-0243/AR.  U.S. v. Gregory D. STEIN.  CCA 20070809.

No. 08-0252/AF.  U.S. v. Andre S. JAMES.  CCA 36740.

No. 08-0257/AR.  U.S. v. Amanda F. MACPHAIL.  CCA 20070512.

No. 08-0304/AR.  U.S. v. Heath A. YOUNG.  CCA 20061354.

No. 08-0309/AF.  U.S. v. James M. GILLIAM, III.  CCA S31293.

No. 08-0324/AR.  U.S. v. Kimberly D. KELLEY.  CCA 20060045.

No. 08-0350/AR.  U.S. v. Ian S. RUBLE.  CCA 20070505.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 08-0437/AR.  U.S. v. Miguel O. SANCHEZ.  CCA 20060958.

No. 08-0438/AR.  U.S. v. Vianka S. DELCID.  CCA 20070986.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 07-0379/NA.  U.S. v. David A. CZACHOROWSKI.  CCA 200400735.  Appellant's motion to correct erratum granted.

 

No. 07-0765/NA.  U.S. v. Sean C. SNYDER.  CCA 200602367.  Appellee's motion to extend time to file a brief granted, up to and including April 29, 2008, and no further extension of time will be granted in this case. 

 

No. 08-0029/AR.  U.S. v. William M. RIGBY, Jr.  CCA 20050708.  Appellant's motion to correct errata granted.

 

No. 08-0363/AR.  U.S. v. Scott W. BLACKSTONE.  CCA 20050561.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to April 24, 2008.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 08-116

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 08-0186/AF.  U.S. v. Dale D. HAYES, Jr.  CCA S31359.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby granted, and the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.*

 

No. 08-0272/AF.  U.S. v. Elizabeth A. SCHWANINGER.  CCA S31380.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby granted, and the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.**

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 07-0800/NA.  U.S. v. David B. HAWKINS.  CCA 200501456.

No. 08-0014/AR.  U.S. v. Debra D. DURDEN.  CCA 20060935.

No. 08-0015/AR.  U.S. v. Debra D. DURDEN.  CCA 20060936.

No. 08-0016/AR.  U.S. v. Matthew D. FURTADO.  CCA 20060086.

No. 08-0074/AF.  U.S. v. Charles S. MORGAN.  CCA S31026.

No. 08-0104/NA.  U.S. v. Arnoldo ALBIAR.  CCA 200602375.

No. 08-0119/AF.  U.S. v. CJ H. MCKEAGUE.  CCA S31187.

No. 08-0143/NA.  U.S. v. Anthony D. HANEY.  CCA 200700142.

No. 08-0161/AR.  U.S. v. Joseph M. RODRIGUEZ.  CCA 20051439.

No. 08-0187/AF.  U.S. v. William G. KLAYMAN.  CCA 36881.

No. 08-0197/AR.  U.S. v. David J. COVINGTON.  CCA 20070595.

No. 08-0202/AR.  U.S. v. Patrick LEGRAND.  CCA 20051029.

No. 08-0214/NA.  U.S. v. Elgin F. MARTINEZ.  CCA 200700046.

No. 08-0279/AR.  U.S. v. Jeremy B. OROZCO.  CCA 20060001.

No. 08-0284/AF.  U.S. v. Aldrian O. NIVERBA.  CCA 36798.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 07-5003/AF.  U.S. v. Demond WEBB.  CCA 2007-01.

________________________

 

* It is directed that the convening authority’s action and the promulgating order be corrected by deleting the words, “and allowances.”



**
It is directed that the promulgating order be corrected to reflect that the sentence was adjudged on August 31, 2007.

 




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 08-115

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 08-0158/AR.  U.S. v. Mark R. CONLIFFE.  CCA 20040721.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER APPELLANT'S PLEAS OF GUILTY TO THE THREE  SPECIFICATIONS OF CHARGE II, HOUSEBREAKING, ARE IMPROVIDENT WHERE THE INTENDED CRIMINAL OFFENSE UPON ENTRY, CONDUCT UNBECOMING AN OFFICER AND GENTLEMAN, IS A PURELY MILITARY OFFENSE.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 07-0852/NA.  U.S. v. Stephen L. OBRIEN.  CCA 8301839.

No. 08-0005/AR.  U.S. v. Jeffery D. JENRETTE.  CCA 20060463.

No. 08-0046/AR.  U.S. v. Jason W. STANFORD.  CCA 20050045.

No. 08-0136/AF.  U.S. v. Cody L. DEVILLE.  CCA S31210.

No. 08-0146/AR.  U.S. v. Branden K. MOORE.  CCA 20070525.

No. 08-0163/AR.  U.S. v. Jaeson D. LYDA.  CCA 20070501.

No. 08-0179/AR.  U.S. v. Taaz L. REDDEN.  CCA 20070500.

No. 08-0183/AF.  U.S. v. Gregory P. GAMBRELL II.  CCA S31358.

No. 08-0189/MC.  U.S. v. Brandon  D. VILLONE.  CCA 200400119.

No. 08-0209/AF.  U.S. v. Patricia A. STRICKLAND.  CCA 36554.

No. 08-0217/MC.  U.S. v. Lonnie P. BOYD.  CCA 200700507.

No. 08-0229/AR.  U.S. v. Fredrick W. LOPEZ, V.  CCA 20070110.

No. 08-0242/AR.  U.S. v. Jameason R. KLINE.  CCA 20070282.

No. 08-0250/AR.  U.S. v. Eduardo SAUCEDO, Jr.  CCA 20070478.

No. 08-0311/AF.  U.S. v. James V. JEFFRIES.  CCA 36999.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 08-0429/AR.  U.S. v. Justin A. RIGGINS.  CCA 20070877.

No. 08-0430/AR.  U.S. v. George W. LOPEZ.  CCA 20070762.

No. 08-0431/AR.  U.S. v. Richard M. DEAN.  CCA 20051336.

No. 08-0432/AR.  U.S. v. Donna D. GOWEN.  CCA 20070714.

No. 08-0433/NA.  U.S. v. Michael S. SHIRLEY.  CCA 200700543.

No. 08-0434/AR.  U.S. v. Marques A. BRYANT.  CCA 20070889.

No. 08-0435/AR.  U.S. v. Micah N. RUE.  CCA 20060742.

No. 08-0436/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher J. DOHERTY.  CCA 20070613.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 08-114

Monday, March 24, 2008
 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 08-0420/AR.  U.S. v. John A. BENTON.  CCA 20070960.

No. 08-0421/AR.  U.S. v. Matthew W. CLAYPOOLE.  CCA 20071301.

No. 08-0422/AR.  U.S. v. Brandon M. JONJOCK.  CCA 20070188.

No. 08-0423/AR.  U.S. v. Corey D. JOHNSON.  CCA 20070866.

No. 08-0424/AR.  U.S. v. Jonathan H. RODRIGUEZ.  CCA 20061046.

No. 08-0425/AR.  U.S. v. Eric B. LEE.  CCA 20070931.

No. 08-0426/AF.  U.S. v. Jareese V. JONES.  CCA 36596.

No. 08-0427/AF.  U.S. v. Scott C. ODOM.  CCA 36953.

No. 08-0428/AF.  U.S. v. Brenda L. TOLLEFSON.  CCA S31092.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 08-8013/NA.  In Re Ali (a.k.a. Anwar Hassan), Thabid (a.k.a. Dawut Abdurehim), Adel Noori, Abdulghappar Abdulrahman, Ahmad Tourson, and Abdul Razakah, Presumptive Prisoners of War, Guantanamo Bay Detainees, Petitioners v. United States, Respondent. Respondent's motion to extend time to comply with the Court’s order granted, up to and including April 23, 2008, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 08-113

Friday, March 21, 2008

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 08-0419/AR.  U.S. v. Charles R. TIMMONS.  CCA 20070005.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 08-112

Thursday, March 20, 2008

 

APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 06-0793/AF.  U.S. v. Jeffrey D. BEATTY.  CCA 35523.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is granted, and the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.

 

No. 07-0696/MC.  U.S. v. Robert A. JOHANSSON.  CCA 200401940.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, it is unclear whether the Court of Criminal Appeals considered the dramatic change in the sentencing landscape when it reassessed the sentence.  See United States v. Buber, 62 M.J. 476 (C.A.A.F. 2006).  Accordingly, said petition is granted on the following issue raised by Appellant:

 

WHETHER THE NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY REASSESSING

APPELLANT’S SENTENCE IN A MANNER THAT DID NOT AFFORD APPELLANT ANY RELIEF.

 

The decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed as to findings, but reversed as to sentence.  The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy for remand to the Court of Criminal Appeals.  The Court of Criminal Appeals may reassess the sentence based on the affirmed findings of guilty after considering the dramatic change in the sentencing landscape or order a rehearing on sentence.  Thereafter, Article 67, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 867 (2000) shall apply.

 

No. 07-0809/MC.  U.S. v. Andrew C. TAYLOR.  CCA 200602223.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, it is noted that Appellant pleaded guilty to two specifications of receiving and/or possessing child pornography while deployed to Qatar, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934 (2000).  The specifications included language indicating that Appellant’s conduct was prejudicial to good order and discipline in the armed forces, of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces, and in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (2000) (charging clauses 1, 2, and 3 of Article 134, UCMJ).  This Court has held that 18 U.S.C. § 2252A does not have extraterritorial application.  United States v. Martinelli, 62 M.J. 52 (C.A.A.F. 2005).  As such, Appellant’s guilty pleas to the 18 U.S.C. § 2252A clause in Specifications 1 and 2 of Charge II are improvident, but are provident to the remaining clauses.  Accordingly, said petition is granted on the following issue:

 

IF THIS COURT DETERMINES THAT THE LOWER COURT AFFIRMED THE FINDINGS OF GUILT FOR VIOLATIONS

OF CLAUSE 3 OF ARTICLE 134, WHETHER SUCH FINDINGS ARE IN CONFLICT WITH THE COURT’S HOLDING IN

UNITED STATES v. MARTINELLI, 62 M.J. 52 (C.A.A.F. 2005), AND MUST BE SET ASIDE.

 

The decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed as to the words and figures “each such reception and possession constituting a separate violation of 18 United States [C]ode §2252A” in Specification 1 of Charge II, and as to the words and figures “each such possession constituting a separate violation of 18 United States Code §2252A” in Specification 2 of Charge II, but is affirmed in all other respects.  The finding of guilty as to those words and figures is set aside and those portions of the specifications are dismissed.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 07-0801/MC.  U.S. v. Shawn A. BOGGS.  CCA 200600984.

No. 07-0868/MC.  U.S. v. Kimberly D. GLADDEN.  CCA 200600905.

No. 08-0009/NA.  U.S. v. Derek R. UNDERHILL.  CCA 200700144.

No. 08-0137/AF.  U.S. v. Paul E. HANDLEY.  CCA 36761.

No. 08-0206/AF.  U.S. v. Charles M. JUNIOR.  CCA S31054.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 08-0416/AR.  U.S. v. Joseph M. VICTORIAN.  CCA 20051303.

No. 08-0417/AR.  U.S. v. Robert B. CLAYTON.  CCA 20040903.

No. 08-0418/AR.  U.S. v. Gilbert R. MEADORS.  CCA 20070893.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 08-8002/AR.  Alberto B. MARTINEZ v. Col Stephen R. HENLEY, Military Judge, et al.  CCA 20071162.  On consideration of the writ-appeal petition and Appellant’s motion to supplement the joint appendix, said motion is granted and said writ-appeal petition is hereby denied without prejudice to Appellant’s right to raise the matters asserted during the ordinary course of any future proceeding.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 05-0528/MC.  U.S. v. Michael S. SNOOK.  CCA 200201598.  Appellant’s motion for leave to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review out of time is granted.

 

No. 05-0647/NA.  U.S. v. Brendan C. FORNEY.  CCA 200200462.  On consideration of Appellant’s petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, Appellee’s general opposition letter, and Appellant’s Reply, the Appellee will file an answer within 30 days of the date of this Order to Issue II raised by Appellant concerning his conviction of Article 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 933 (2000).  Appellant may file a reply within 10 days of the filing of Appellee’s answer.

 

No. 08-0219/AF.  U.S. v. Derek J. GRESKA.  CCA S30987.  Appellee’s motion for leave to file a ten-day waiver letter out of time in answer to the supplement to the petition for grant of review is granted.

 

No. 08-0292/AR.  U.S. v. Ralph CRAWFORD, III.  CCA 20050635.  Appellee’s motion to dismiss the petition for grant of review as untimely filed is granted.

 

No. 08-0348/MC.  U.S. v. Stephen C. BOROSAK.  CCA 200500250.  Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review is granted to April 3, 2008.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 08-111

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

 

APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 06-0906/AF.  U.S. v. Samir S. CHRISTIAN.  CCA 35905.  On further consideration of the granted issues, 65 M.J. 320 (C.A.A.F. 2007), and in view of United States v. Wilson, 66 M.J. 39 (C.A.A.F. 2008), the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.

 

No. 06-0932/NA.  U.S. v. Javan R. GAINOUS.  CCA 200300953.  On further consideration of the granted issues, 65 M.J. 320 (C.A.A.F. 2007), and in view of United States v. Wilson, 66 M.J. 39 (C.A.A.F. 2008), the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.

 

No. 07-0053/NA.  U.S. v. Robert D. FELLS.  CCA 200500668.  On further consideration of the granted issue, 65 M.J. 252 (C.A.A.F. 2007), and in view of United States v. Wilson, 66 M.J. 39 (C.A.A.F. 2008), the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.

 

No. 07-0615/NA.  U.S. v. Xavier R. ALLEN.  CCA 200600562.  On further consideration of the granted issue, 65 M.J. 476 (C.A.A.F. 2007), and in view of United States v. Wilson, 66 M.J. 39 (C.A.A.F. 2008), the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.

 

No. 08-0029/AR.  U.S. v. William M. RIGBY, Jr.  CCA 20050708.  On further consideration of the granted issue, 66 M.J. ___ (C.A.A.F. January 18, 2008), and in view of United States v. Wilson, 66 M.J. 39 (C.A.A.F. 2008), the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 08-0415/AR.  U.S. v. Brandon KENT.  CCA 20060221.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 07-0852/NA.  U.S. v. Stephen L. O’BRIEN.  CCA 8301839.  Appellee’s motion to dismiss is denied.

 

No. 08-0244/MC.  U.S. v. Matthew P. TOUPS.  CCA 200600752.  Appellant’s motion for leave to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review out of time is granted.

 

No. 08-0351/MC.  U.S. v. Justin R. STRAYER.  CCA 200602358.  Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review is granted.

 

No. 08-0352/MC.  U.S. v. Jeffrey S. KENYON.  CCA 200700382.  Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review is granted.

 

No. 08-0353/NA.  U.S. v. Omar T. MCBEE.  CCA 200500227.  Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review is granted.

 

No. 08-6002/AR.  U.S. v. Ivan AGUILAR.  CCA 20071149.  Appellant’s motion for a stay of proceedings is granted.  Court-martial proceedings are stayed until April 15, 2008.

 

No. 08-6003/AF.  U.S. v. Keith M. TERRY.  CCA 2007-05.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review filed by counsel for the Appellant on March 7, 2008, under Rule 19(a)(5)(A), Rules of Practice and Procedure, United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, and docketed under Docket Number 08-0383/AF, it appears that said petition is in fact a petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals on appeal by the United States under Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 862 (2000).  Accordingly, Docket Number 08-6003/AF is assigned to this case, Docket Number 08-0383/AF is removed from this case and will not be assigned to any case in the future, and the Clerk’s Office and counsel for both parties will ensure that the new docket number assigned to this case will be noted on all pleadings filed in the case.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 08-8007/AR.  Matthew R. LIS, Appellant v. United States, et al., Appellee.  CCA 20071344.  Appellant has filed a writ-appeal petition with this Court, requesting that we issue a writ of habeas corpus ordering the Government to “release him from military custody and control.”  He has also filed a motion to supplement the joint appendix and requests that this Court issue an order staying pending court-martial proceedings until the writ-appeal petition is decided.

 

Appellee has moved to file out of time a motion in opposition to the motion for a stay of proceedings, and an opposition to the writ-appeal petition.  In response, Appellant has filed an opposition to the motion to file out of time and a reply to the Appellee’s opposition.

 

A charge was preferred against the Appellant on August 24, 2007, alleging desertion with intent to shirk important service from on or about October 30, 2006, until he was apprehended on or about July 5, 2007, in violation of Article 85, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); 10 U.S.C. § 885 (2000).  The Appellant is not presently confined, but the Army has exercised jurisdiction over him since his return to military control in July, 2007.

 

The Appellant claims that he is not a member of the armed forces and is therefore not subject to the jurisdiction of a court-martial.  Article 2, UCMJ; 10 U.S.C. § 802 (2000).  However, it appears that there are significant disputed questions of fact with respect to the Appellant’s military status.  On this record, the Appellant has not met the significant burden to obtain extraordinary relief from this Court during the normal processes of trial and appeal.  The necessary processes exist in the Article 32, UCMJ, investigation and the trial, if charges are referred to trial by court-martial, for the resolution of these factual disputes.  The ordinary processes of justice should be allowed to take their course.

 

Accordingly, the Appellant’s motion to supplement the joint appendix is granted; the Appellee’s motion to file out of time is granted; the Appellant’s motion for a stay of proceedings is denied; and the Appellant’s writ-appeal petition is denied without prejudice to raising the issue of jurisdiction during the normal course of appeal should he be convicted of the charge.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 06-0870/AR.  U.S. v. Alexander N. WILSON.  CCA 20040227.

No. 07-0384/MC.  U.S. v. Anthony T. HALL.  CCA 200600805.

No. 07-0397/AF.  U.S. v. Steven M. CUCUZZELLA.  CCA 36280.

No. 07-0407/AR.  U.S. v. Michael D. GLENN.  CCA 20051482.

No. 07-6005/NA.  U.S. v. Joshua M. MICHAEL.  CCA 200700120.

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 08-110

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 07-0379/NA.  U.S. v. David A. CZACHOROWSKI.  CCA 200400735.*

 

APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 07-0519/AR.  U.S. v. Luis A. AGUILAR.  CCA 20021439.  On further consideration of the granted issue, 65 M.J. 330 (C.A.A.F. 2007), and in view of United States v. Harcrow, 66 M.J. __ (C.A.A.F. March 13, 2008), and United States v. Gardinier, 65 M.J. 60 (C.A.A.F. 2007), the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is set aside.  The record is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for remand to the Court of Criminal Appeals for further consideration in view of Harcrow and Gardinier.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 08-0410/AR.  U.S. v. Benjamin M. MILLER.  CCA 20070829.

No. 08-0411/AR.  U.S. v. Steven M. RISNER.  CCA 20070112.

No. 08-0412/AR.  U.S. v. Michael CAR