UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
07-183
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
07-0664/AF.
No.
07-0665/AF.
No.
07-0666/AF.
No.
07-0667/AF.
No.
07-0668/AF.
No.
07-0669/AF.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No.
06-0870/AR.
No.
06-0934/NA.
No.
07-0585/AR.
No.
07-0600/NA.
No.
07-0601/MC.
No.
07-0608/AR.
UNITED STATES
COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 07-182
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 07-0229/NA.
WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED WHEN HE DENIED APPELLANT'S CHALLENGE
FOR CAUSE AGAINST LIEUTENANT
[B]
Briefs
will be filed under Rule 25.
No. 07-0412/AR.
WHETHER THE ARMY
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN FINDING
APPELLANT'S PLEA OF GUILTY TO THE SPECIFICATION OF CHARGE I AND TO
CHARGE I,
FALSE OFFICIAL STATEMENT, PROVIDENT WHEN THE STATEMENT IN QUESTION WAS
NOT, IN
FACT, FALSE.
Briefs
will be filed under Rule 25.
No. 07-0553/NA.
Review
granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE
ACTION OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
IN AFFIRMING A CLAUSE 2 (SERVICE DISCREDITING CONDUCT) OFFENSE UNDER
ARTICLE
134, UCMJ, AFTER IT FOUND CHARGED CLAUSE 3
(CRIME AND
OFFENSE NOT CAPITAL) OFFENSE TO BE IMPROVIDENT, ADDED AN ELEMENT TO THE
OFFENSE
IN CONTRAVENTION OF APPRENDI v.
NEW JERSEY,
530 U.S. 466 (2000), JONES v. UNITED STATES, 526 U.S. 227 (1999),AND SCHMUCK v. UNITED STATES, 489
Briefs
will be filed under Rule 25.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No. 07-0121/MC.
No. 07-0306/NA.
No. 07-0356/AR.
No. 07-0371/AR.
No. 07-0390/MC.
No. 07-0423/AF.
No. 07-0470/AR.
No. 07-0478/CG.
No. 07-0481/AR.
No. 07-0488/AF.
No. 07-0493/AF.
No. 07-0505/AF.
No. 07-0520/AR.
No. 07-0121/MC.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 07-0658/MC.
No. 07-0659/AR.
No. 07-0660/AR.
No. 07-0661/AR.
No. 07-0662/AR.
No. 07-0663/AR.
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
07-181
Tuesday,
June 26, 2007
APPEALS-SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
No. 06-0907/AF.
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 06-0907/AF.
No. 07-0407/AR.
WHETHER
APPELLANT'S PLEAS TO ALL CHARGES AND SPECIFICATIONS
ARE NOT PROVIDENT BECAUSE THE MILITARY JUDGE DID NOT EXPLAIN THE
DEFENSE OF
LACK OF MENTAL RESPONSIBILITY TO APPELLANT, DID NOT SATISFY HERSELF
THAT
COUNSEL HAD EVALUATED THE VIABILITY OF THE DEFENSE, AND DID NOT ELICIT
FACTS
FROM APPELLANT THAT NEGATED THE DEFENSE.
Briefs
will be filed under Rule 25.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No.
07-0369/AR.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 07-0657/MC.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 07-0028/MC.
No. 07-0096/AR.
No. 07-0286/AR.
No. 07-0371/AR.
No. 07-0383/NA.
No. 07-0478/CG.
No. 07-0485/AR.
No. 07-0496/NA.
No. 07-0510/NA.
No. 07-0526/NA.
No. 07-0559/AR.
No. 07-0567/MC.
No. 07-0574/AR.
No. 07-0576/AR.
No. 07-0584/AR.
No. 07-0587/AR.
Appellant's
motion
to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of
review
granted to
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
07-180
Monday,
June 25, 2007
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No.
07-0330/AR.
No.
07-0448/AR.
No.
07-0461/AF.
No.
07-0502/NA.
No.
07-0506/AF.
No.
07-0651/AR.
No.
07-0652/AR.
No.
07-0653/AF.
No.
07-0654/AF.
No.
07-0655/AF.
No.
07-0656/AF.
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
07-179
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF
REVIEW DENIED
No.
07-0313/AF.
No.
07-0434/AF.
No.
07-0438/AR.
No.
07-0459/AF.
No.
07-0606/AR.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
07-0648/AF.
No.
07-0649/AF.
No.
07-0650/AR.
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
07-178
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF
REVIEW DENIED
No.
07-0285/AR.
No.
07-0329/AR.
No.
07-0345/AR.
No.
07-0357/AR.
No.
07-0375/AF.
No.
07-0409/AF.
No.
07-0422/AF.
No.
07-0428/AR.
No.
07-0456/AR.
No.
07-0457/AF.
No.
07-0486/AR.
No.
07-0487/AF.
No.
07-0513/AF.
No.
07-0533/AF.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
07-0643/AR.
No.
07-0644/AR.
No.
07-0645/AR.
No.
07-0646/AR.
No.
07-0647/AR.
MANDATES ISSUED
No.
06-0611/MC.
No.
06-0657/AF.
ORDER IN RE TERM OF COURT
It is by the
Court, this 21st day of June 2007,
ORDERED:
That the Term of
Court policy, 27 M.J. 412 (C.M.A. 1988), will
apply as follows with respect to the current term of Court and
succeeding
terms:
(a) the current Term of Court will
end on
(b) the Term of Court beginning on
“October 2007- August 2008 Term of Court (Transition)”; and
(c) the Term of Court beginning on
beginning on September 1 of each year
and ending on August
31 of the following calendar year, and will be
designated as the September Term of
Court of the year in
which the term begins.
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
07-177
APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
On further
consideration of the granted issue, 64 M.J.
401 (C.A.A.F.), and in view of this Court’s
decision in United
States v. Rankin, 64 M.J. 348 (C.A.A.F.) 2007), it is ordered that the decision
of the
United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is hereby
affirmed.
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 06-0833/AF.
WHETHER THE
MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN FAILING TO SUPPRESS
APPELLANT'S CONFESSION WHERE THE CONFESSION WAS NOT FREELY AND
VOLUNTARILY
GIVEN.
WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS
DISCRETION BY DENYING THE DEFENSE REQUEST FOR THE
APPOINTMENT OF A
FORENSICALLY-QUALIFIED
EXPERT CONSULTANT.
WHETHER THE
MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY ADMITTING EVIDENCE OF
UNCHARGED MISCONDUCT AND BAD CHARACTER IN VIOLATION OF MILITARY RULE OF
EVIDENCE 404(b).
Briefs
will
be filed under Rule 25.
No. 07-0397/AF.
WHETHER THE
MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN ADMISSION OF RC'S STATEMENTS
TO THE REGISTERED NURSE AND SOCIAL WORKER AS MEDICAL EXCEPTIONS TO
HEARSAY.
Briefs
will
be filed under Rule 25.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW - OTHER SUMMARY
DISPOSITIONS
No. 07-0541/CG.