UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-227

Friday, August 31, 2007

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 07-0344/AR.  U.S. v. Kevin P. STOESER.  CCA 20030596.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, we note that the convening authority reprimanded Appellant in his action.  However, a reprimand was not part of the adjudged sentence.  Accordingly, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted, and that the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed as to findings and to only so much of the sentence as provides for reduction to pay grade E-1, confinement for 13 years, and a dishonorable discharge. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.] 

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 07-0344/AR.  U.S. v. Kevin P. STOESER.  CCA 20030596. [See also APPEALS-SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 03-0389/NA.  U.S. v. Alvin N. CUENTO.  CCA 200100281.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to October 5, 2007.

 

No. 07-0730/AR.  U.S. v. Robb A. DITSCHEIT Jr.  CCA 20070092.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to September 28, 2007.

 

No. 07-0747/AR.  U.S. v. DeVaughn F. SIMPSON.  CCA 20060158.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to petition granted to October 1, 2007.

 

No. 07-0750/MC.  U.S. v. Rodderick L. CARTER.  CCA 200601139.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to October 1, 2007.

 

No. 07-0477/AR.  U.S. v. Nicholas A. MCCARTY.  CCA 20060387.  On consideration of Appellant’s petition for grant of review, it is ordered that Appellant shall file either a supplement to the petition for grant of review or resubmit a motion to withdraw the petition, on or before September 10, 2007.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-226

Thursday, August 30, 2007

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 07-0241/MC.  U.S. v. Thomas H. KING.  CCA 200401338.

No. 07-0383/NA.  U.S. v. Trixie R. ROWE.  CCA 200600046.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0827/AR.  U.S. v. Javier O. MORALEZ.  CCA 20060123.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-225

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

 
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0820/AF.  U.S. v. Nolan P. DILL.  CCA S31276.

No. 07-0821/AF.  U.S. v. John H. HARDY.  CCA 36590.

No. 07-0822/NA.  U.S. v. Walter F. BOYED.  CCA 200601262.

No. 07-0823/AR.  U.S. v. Eric R. CHISMAN.  CCA 20050925.

No. 07-0824/CG.  U.S. v. Daniel K. VANTERPOOL.  CCA 1255.

No. 07-0825/AR.  U.S. v. Beverly A. WHISENHUNT.  CCA 20061274.

No. 07-0826/AR.  U.S. v. Bennie B. GOGUE.  CCA 20050650.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-224

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 07-0519/AR.  U.S. v. Luis A. AGUILAR.  CCA 20021439.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER, IN LIGHT OF CRAWFORD v. WASHINGTON, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), THE ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS COMMITTED REVERSIBLE LEGAL ERROR BY AFFIRMING THE ADMISSION OF TESTIMONY BY A SEXUAL ASSAULT NURSE EXAMINER, WHO SERVED AS A CONDUIT FOR THE INADMISSIBLE HEARSAY STATEMENTS OF AN ABSENT BUT AVAILABLE VICTIM.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 07-0437/AR.  U.S. v. Jeffrey S. CRABB.  CCA 20051528.

No. 07-0651/AR.  U.S. v. Brian L. WHISMAN.  CCA 20060877.

No. 07-0752/MC.  U.S. v. Michael ESTRADA.  CCA 200700310.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0817/NA.  U.S. v. Maurice O. MILLER.  CCA 200401906.

No. 07-0818/MC.  U.S. v. Nicholas W. RIGGS.  CCA 200600768.

No. 07-0819/AR.  U.S. v. Melvin E. CORREA.  CCA 20061270.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-223

Monday, August 27, 2007

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0814/AR.  U.S. v. Joshua B. ARBOGAST.  CCA 20060304.

No. 07-0815/AR.  U.S. v. Derrick T. VALCHAR.  CCA 20060456.

No. 07-0816/AR.  U.S. v. Shane BARCUS.  CCA 20060852.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-222

Friday, August 24, 2007

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 07-0275/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher D. GOODMAN.  CCA 20021215.

No. 07-0292/AF.  U.S. v. Jonathan S. BELKOWITZ.  CCA 36358.

No. 07-0591/AF.  U.S. v. John J. FRELLO, Jr.  CCA 36351.

No. 07-0626/AF.  U.S. v. George L. BOWMAN.  CCA S31172.

No. 07-0633/AR.  U.S. v. Antonio CABRERA.  CCA 20040453.

No. 07-0649/AF.  U.S. v. Mark S. DENEGRE.  CCA 36031.

No. 07-0652/AR.  U.S. v. Richard B. MAYO, Jr.  CCA 20061347.

No. 07-0671/AR.  U.S. v. Steven L. HADLEY.  CCA 20060019.

No. 07-0674/AF.  U.S. v. Mihailo RADOVIC.  CCA S31089.

No. 07-0771/AR.  U.S. v. Yuri MCGEE.  CCA 20061277.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0812/AR.  U.S. v. Emily M. HAMILTON.  CCA 20050735.

No. 07-0813/NA.  U.S. v. Richard S. ROWE.  CCA 200600184.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 07-0020/AR.  U.S. v. Lucille S. DIXON.  CCA 20050954.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to September 24, 2007.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-221

Thursday, August 23, 2007

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 07-0601/MC.  U.S. v. Jason M. RYAN.  CCA 200401577.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby granted, and the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed as to findings but set aside as to sentence.  The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy for remand to the Navy-Marine Corps Court for a new sentence appropriateness review in light of United States v. Baier, 60 M.J. 382 (C.A.A.F. 2005).  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 07-0601/MC.  U.S. v. Jason M. RYAN.  CCA 200401577. [See also APPEALS-SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 07-0271/NA.  U.S. v. Phillip TORRES.  CCA 200600944.

No. 07-0300/MC.  U.S. v. Andrew J. STALEY.  CCA 200600965.

No. 07-0536/AR.  U.S. v. Robert J. GRAVES.  CCA 20050846.

No. 07-0569/AR.  U.S. v. Travis W. MILLS.  CCA 20060631.

No. 07-0585/AR.  U.S. v. Jonathan L. HENSLEY.  CCA 20070022.

No. 07-0586/AR.  U.S. v. Michael R. CHAMBERS.  CCA 20060606.

No. 07-0611/AF.  U.S. v. David K. BOWERS.  CCA 36691.

No. 07-0617/AR.  U.S. v. Jay S. BACOLOD.  CCA 20040780.

No. 07-0659/AR.  U.S. v. Warren D. ARMAN II.  CCA 20060693.

No. 07-0672/AF.  U.S. v. Keith C. BOEGEL.  CCA S31186.

No. 07-0676/MC.  U.S. v. Noah J. KRAMER.  CCA 200602395.

No. 07-0679/AR.  U.S. v. Ashley N. SMALLWOOD.  CCA 20060285.

No. 07-0699/NA.  U.S. v. Neal SABRA.  CCA 200700215.

No. 07-0711/MC.  U.S. v. Woodrow R. STRALEY.  CCA 200602399.*

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0810/AR.  U.S. v. Brett A. BROWN.  CCA 20060168.

No. 07-0811/NA.  U.S. v. Jason T. ROTEN.  CCA 200700110.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 07-0237/NA.  U.S. v. Eddie A. ALMEJO.  CCA 200501051.  Appellant's motion to require counsel for Appellee to file a notice of appearance, and motion to strike answer of Appellee to supplement to the petition for grant of review are denied.

 

No. 07-0522/MC.  U.S. v. James R. AUSTIN.  CCA 200500132.  Appellant's motion to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review out of time granted.

 

No. 07-0631/AR.  U.S. v. Gloria L. GLASSFORD.  CCA 20061094.  Appellant's motion to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review out of time granted.

 

No. 07-0719/AR.  U.S. v. Michael G. RHOADES.  CCA 20050592. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to September 21, 2007.

 

No. 07-0720/AR.  U.S. v. Jeffery B. DENNING.  CCA 20030963. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to September 21, 2007.

 

No. 07-0586/AR.  U.S. v. Michael R. CHAMBERS.  CCA 20060606.  Appellant's motion to file matters pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), granted.

____________________


* Those portions of the convening authority’s action and the court-martial promulgating order that purport to execute the punitive discharge are a nullity.  A punitive discharge may be ordered executed only after a final judgment within the meaning of R.C.M. 1209 has been rendered in the case.  See R.C.M. 1113(c)(1)(B).

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-220

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0807/AR.  U.S. v. Keith A. DOWNS.  CCA 20061027.

No. 07-0808/AF.  U.S. v. Weldon B. LUSK.  CCA 36617.

No. 07-0809/MC.  U.S. v. Andrew C. TAYLOR.  CCA 200602223.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-219

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 07-0654/AF.  U.S. v. Thurstan L. FREEMAN.  CCA 36836.

No. 07-0669/AF.  U.S. v. William F. NORTHCUT, Jr.  CCA 36864.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0803/AR.  U.S. v. Jessie R. LUNO, II.  CCA 20070306.

No. 07-0804/AR.  U.S. v. Jayson L. LANDERS.  CCA 20060874.

No. 07-0805/AR.  U.S. v. Fredderick A. MONASTERIO.  CCA 20070087.

No. 07-0806/AR.  U.S. v. Raymundo BERNAL, Jr.  CCA 20060665.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-218

Monday, August 20, 2007

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 07-0415/AR.  U.S. v. Derrick Q. WHITE, Jr.  CCA 20060641.

No. 07-0471/AR.  U.S. v. Albert T. GOINS, Jr.  CCA 20040523.

No. 07-0566/AF.  U.S. v. Christopher B. SKINNER.  CCA 36692.

No. 07-0599/NA.  U.S. v. Travis D. GREENE.  CCA 200401272.

No. 07-0605/AR.  U.S. v. Michael L. MUNOZ.  CCA 20060772.

No. 07-0638/AR.  U.S. v. Nathaniel C. BELL.  CCA 20070047.

No. 07-0641/AR.  U.S. v. David A. DEROZARIO.  CCA 20060927.

No. 07-0643/AR.  U.S. v. Carl B. WALKER.  CCA 20060481.

No. 07-0645/AR.  U.S. v. Richard ZINGER.  CCA 20061339.

No. 07-0646/AR.  U.S. v. Kevin M. BENDERMAN.  CCA 20050955.

No. 07-0655/AF.  U.S. v. Jody R. LOVEJOY.  CCA S31088.

No. 07-0695/MC.  U.S. v. Stanley R. PATTERSON, Jr.  CCA 200600896.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 07-0794/AF.  U.S. v. Adam D. STALLINGS.  CCA 36861.

No. 07-0795/AF.  U.S. v. Jeffrey R. RUTHERFORD.  CCA 36651.

No. 07-0796/AF.  U.S. v. Antonyo T. ADAMS.  CCA 36226.

No. 07-0797/AR.  U.S. v. Barbarita F. MONTOYA.  CCA 20060739.

No. 07-0798/AR.  U.S. v. Daniel R. BARLETT.  CCA 20060288.

No. 07-0799/AR.  U.S. v. Andrew F. MIRANDA.  CCA 20061290.

No. 07-0800/NA.  U.S. v. David B. HAWKINS.  CCA 200501456.

No. 07-0801/MC.  U.S. v. Shawn A. BOGGS.  CCA 200600984.

No. 07-0802/AR.  U.S. v. Alvin JONES.  CCA 20041071.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 07-0173/AR.  U.S. v. Darnyell R. RHOADES.  CCA 20040109.  Appellee's motion to extend time to file a brief granted, up to and including September 12, 2007, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 07-0253/NA.  U.S. v. John A. HALSEMA.  CCA 20001337.  Appellant's motion to attach and motion to suspend briefing are denied without prejudice to consideration of the security clearance issue if raised by Appellant in his supplement to the petition for grant of review, and Appellant will file his supplement no later than September 20, 2007.   

 

No. 07-0316/NA.  U.S. v. Dennis R. TOY.  CCA 200001418.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file a reply to Appellee's brief granted, up to and including September 4, 2007, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 07-0706/AR.  U.S. v. Douglas W. EMMETT.  CCA 20041035.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to September 14, 2007.

 

No. 07-0708/NA.  U.S. v. Michael D. BUSH.  CCA 200700177.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to September 17, 2007.

 

No. 07-0712/MC.  U.S. v. Hubert A. LUCAS.  CCA 200600564.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to September 14, 2007.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-217

Friday, August 17, 2007

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 07-0384/MC.  U.S. v. Anthony T. HALL.  CCA 200600805.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN STATING THAT APPELLANT HAD RECEIVED A DISHONORABLE DISCHARGE AT TRIAL, WHEN THE MEMBERS SENTENCED HIM TO A BAD-CONDUCT DISCHARGE, AND THE CONVENING AUTHORITY APPROVED ONLY A BAD-CONDUCT DISCHARGE.

 

WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN FINDING THAT THE MILITARY JUDGE'S DECISION TO ALLOW, OVER DEFENSE OBJECTION, A NONEXPERT NCIS AGENT TO PROVIDE EXPERT TESTIMONY TO THE MEMBERS WAS HARMLESS, WHERE THIS WAS IN VIOLATION OF MILITARY RULE OF EVIDENCE 701(c), AND THE GOVERNMENT HAS CONCEDED THAT THIS TESTIMONY WAS BOTH MATERIAL TO ITS CASE AND WAS OF HIGH QUALITY.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25 on Issue II only.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 06-0918/MC.  U.S. v. Raymon F. THOMAS.  CCA 200401149.*

No. 07-0791/AR.  U.S. v. Matthew HEDRINGTON.  CCA 20060567.

No. 07-0792/AR.  U.S. v. Jason J. BOWMAN.  CCA 20051023.

No. 07-0793/AR.  U.S. v. Pete A. VALDEZ.  CCA 20031278.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 07-0430/AR.  U.S. v. Henry L. HALL II.  CCA 20051505.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that counsel for the parties submit briefs on the following specified issue:

 

WHETHER THE EVIDENCE LEGALLY WAS SUFFICIENT TO CONVICT APPELLANT OF MAKING A FALSE OFFICIAL STATEMENT THAT HE “WAS NOT PRESENT AT THE TIME OF THE ALLEGED ACT.”   

 

Appellant’s brief will be filed within 30 days of the date of this Order.  Appellee’s brief will be filed within 30 days of the filing of Appellant’s brief.  A reply may be filed by Appellant no later than 10 days after the filing of Appellee’s brief.

 

No. 07-0477/AR.  U.S. v. Nicholas A. MCCARTY.  CCA 20060387.  Appellant's motion to withdraw the petition for grant of review denied without prejudice to resubmitting the motion in compliance with Rule 30.

 

No. 07-0594/AF.  U.S. v. James L. MILLER.  CCA 36252.  Appellant's motion for leave to file pleading in excess of 30 pages is denied.  Appellant will file a supplement to the petition for grant of review that complies with the limitations in Rule 24 on or before August 31, 2007.

 

No. 07-6004.  U.S. V. Eric LOPEZ de VICTORIA.  CCA 20061248.  On consideration of Appellant’s petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals on appeal by the United States under Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 862, it is ordered that Appellee will file an Answer to the assigned issue; that the above pleading will be filed no later than August 27, 2007, and that Appellant may file a Reply no later than 5 days after the filing of Appellee’s Answer.

__________________

 

* Second petition filed in this case.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 07-216

Thursday, August 16, 2007

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 07-0221/MC.  U.S. v. Joseph M. REYNOSO.  CCA 200401465.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

DID A DEFENSE OBJECTION OF "LACK OF FOUNDATION" TO A SUMMARY DOCUMENT MOVED INTO EVIDENCE UNDER M.R.E. 1006 EITHER INCLUDE OR PRESERVE AN OBJECTION TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF THE UNDERLYING EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE SUMMARY WAS BASED?

 

WAS THE EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE M.R.E. 1006 SUMMARY WAS BASED ADMISSIBLE AS AN EXCEPTION TO HEARSAY AND PROFFERED BY A COMPETENT WITNESS?

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 07-0247/AF.  U.S. v. Dustin M. HART.  CCA 36253.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE CHARGE AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOULD BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 07-0269/AR.  U.S. v. Sean P. BRIGHT.  CCA 20020938.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE EVIDENCE OF RAPE WAS LEGALLY INSUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT CONVICTION WHERE THE GOVERNMENT OFFERED NO EVIDENCE OF IMMEDIATE FORCE AND LACK OF CONSENT AT OR REASONABLY NEAR THE TIME THAT THE PROSECUTRIX, INTER ALIA, ARRANGED FOR OFF-BASE HOTEL ROOMS TO MEET APPELLANT, MADE HER OWN WAY TO HOTEL ROOMS TO ENGAGE IN SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH APPELLANT, SMOKED CIGARETTES AND DRANK BEER IN BED WITH APPELLANT, AND ORDERED PIZZA AND ATE IT IN BED WITH APPELLANT DURING HER MEETINGS WITH APPELLANT WHERE SHE AND APPELLANT ENGAGED IN SEXUAL INTERCOURSE.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 07-0322/CG.  U.S. v. Christopher M. UPHAM.  CCA 1235.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

WHETHER THE COAST GUARD COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN APPLYING A CHAPMAN-TYPE HARMLESS-ERROR ANALYSIS AS OPPOSED TO A STRUCTURAL-TYPE ERROR ANALYSIS AFTER IT CONCLUDED THAT THE MILITARY JUDGE COMMITTED AN ERROR OF CONSTITUTIONAL DIMENSION WHEN HE INSTRUCTED THE MEMBERS THAT A PERSON WHO HAS ENGAGED IN UNINFORMED AND UNPROTECTED SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WHILE HIV POSITIVE HAS COMMITTED AN OFFENSIVE TOUCHING.

 

WHETHER, AFTER THE COAST GUARD COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS SET ASIDE A CONVICTION OF THE GREATER OFFENSE OF AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, THE COURT WAS PROHIBITED FROM AFFIRMING A CONVICTION OF THE LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE OF ASSAULT CONSUMMATED BY A BATTERY WHERE BOTH PARTIES HAD AFFIRMATIVELY WAIVED ANY INSTRUCTION ON THE LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE AND THE MILITARY JUDGE DID NOT INSTRUCT THE MEMBERS ON THE LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 07-0350/CG.  U.S. v. Tom K. HOLBROOK.  CCA 1251.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER APPELLANT'S PLEA TO FRAUDULENT ENLISTMENT (CHARGE I) WAS IMPROVIDENT BECAUSE THE MILITARY JUDGE FAILED TO ELICIT FACTS SUFFICIENT TO ESTABLISH THAT APPELLANT KNEW HE LIED ABOUT A MATERIAL FACT RELEVANT TO HIS QUALIFICATIONS FOR ENLISTMENT.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 07-0436/MC.  U.S. v. Jose C. MIERGRIMADO.  CCA 200501128.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN AFFIRMING THE MILITARY JUDGE'S DECISION AT TRIAL TO INSTRUCT THE MEMBERS ON THE CLAIMED LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE OF ATTEMPTED MANSLAUGHTER OVER THE ACCUSED'S OBJECTION.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED