UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
06-141
APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
No. 02-0048/AF.
No. 03-0141/AF.
No. 06-0035/AR.
No. 06-0262/AR.
WHETHER,
AS TO SPECIFICATION 2 OF THE CHARGE, THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN
FINDING THAT
APPELLANT UNLAWFULLY BATTERED A CHILD UNDER THE AGE OF 16 BY STRIKING
THE CHILD
ON THE BUTTOCKS WITH HIS HAND.
The
decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is
reversed as to
the words “hand and” in Specification 2 of the Charge, but is affirmed
in all
other respects. The finding of guilty as
to those two words is set aside and that portion of Specification 2 is
dismissed. [See also ORDERS GRANTING
PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]
No. 06-0285/AF.
Accordingly,
it is ordered that said petition is granted on the following issue:
WHETHER
THE
The
decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is
affirmed
as to the “approved findings, as modified” and reversed as to sentence. The record of trial is returned to the Judge
Advocate General of the Air Force for remand to the court of criminal
appeals. That court may either reassess
the sentence
or order a rehearing. Thereafter,
Article 67, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 867 (2000) shall
apply. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION
FOR REVIEW
this date.]
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 02-0048/AF.
No. 03-0141/AF.
No. 06-0035/AR.
No. 06-0262/AR.
No. 06-0285/AF.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No.
06-0069/NA.
No.
06-0126/NA.
No.
06-0268/AF.
No.
06-0277/AR.
No.
06-0420/AF.
No.
06-0485/AR.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
06-0563/AR.
No.
06-0564/AR.
No.
06-0565/AF.
No.
06-0566/AF.
No.
06-0567/AF.
No.
06-0568/AF.
No.
06-0569/AF.
No.
06-0570/AF.
No.
06-0571/AF.
No.
06-0572/AF.
No.
06-0573/AF.
No.
06-0574/AR.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No.
05-0551/MC.
No.
06-0365/AF.
No.
06-0455/AR.
1/
It is directed that
the
promulgating order be corrected to reflect a guilty plea and finding to
Charge
V.
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
06-140
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 04-0372/MC.
WHETHER
THE APPELLANT'S RIGHT TO TIMELY POST-TRIAL REVIEW HAS BEEN DENIED TO
HIM
BECAUSE, DUE TO THE
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
No. 06-0001/AR.
WHETHER APPELLANT
SHOULD BE GRANTED A NEW TRIAL BECAUSE MR.
[M], WHO TESTIFIED AS AN EXPERT WITNESS ON DNA, HAS BEEN FOUND TO HAVE
MADE
SEVERAL MISTAKES IN HIS HANDLING OF FORENSIC EVIDENCE AND HAS MADE
FALSE
ENTRIES IN REPORTS FROM THE CRIMINALISTICS LABORATORY OF THE ARMY CID
AT FT.
GORDON.
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
No. 06-0170/AR.
WHETHER THE
DILATORY POST-TRIAL PROCESSING OF APPELLANT'S
CASE VIOLATES HIS DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO TIMELY REVIEW OF HIS
COURT-MARTIAL.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No.
06-0300/AF.
No.
06-0349/AF.
No.
06-0400/AF.
No.
06-0401/AF.
No.
06-0402/AF.
No.
06-0405/AF.
No.
06-0407/AF.
No.
06-0463/AF.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
06-0555/AR.
No.
06-0556/NA.
No.
06-0557/AF.
No.
06-0558/AF.
No.
06-0559/AF.
No.
06-0560/AF.
No.
06-0561/AF.
No.
06-0562/AF.
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
Misc.
No. 06-8012/NA.
Hawan T. CAMPBELL, Petitioner, v. Navy-Marine Corps Court of
Criminal
Appeals, Respondent. CCA
200400093. On consideration of
the petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of
mandamus,
Petitioner’s motion to attach and motion for a stay of proceedings,
Petitioner’s motion to attach is granted; Petitioner’s motion for a
stay of
proceedings is denied; and the petition for extraordinary relief is
denied.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No.
05-0510/AF.
No.
06-0322/AR.
No.
06-0439/AF.
UNITED STATES
COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 06-139
APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
No. 05-0728/AR.
WHETHER APPELLANT
SHOULD STAND CONVICTED OF SEPARATE
OFFENSES OF WRONGFUL APPROPRIATION IN SPECIFICATIONS 1 AND 2 OF CHARGE
IV,
WHERE THE BOTH ITEMS WERE TAKEN AT THE SAME TIME AND PLACE.
Under the
circumstances of this case, where the
providence inquiry revealed that both items alleged in Specifications 1
and 2
of Charge IV were taken at the same time and place, there is only one
offense. See Manual for
Courts-Martial,
United States, pt. IV, para. 46.c.(1)(h)(ii)
(2005
ed.). Therefore, the Court affirms a
finding of guilty to a consolidated specification to wrongful
appropriation as
follows:
In that Private
(E2) Matthew Salter, U.S. Army, did
at or near Baghdad, Iraq, on or about 11 April 2003, wrongfully
appropriate a
pair of AN PVS-7B Night Vision Goggles, military property of a value of
about
$2,695, and an M-16 Bayonet, Tag # 288, military property of a value
less than
$500, military property of the United States, the property of the U.S.
Army.
Because the
underlying
misconduct has not changed, the Court is satisfied that Appellant
suffered no
prejudice as to his sentence.
The decision of
the United States Army Court of
Criminal Appeals as to Charge I and its specifications, Charge II and
its
specifications, Charge III and its specification, and Charge IV and its
specifications (as consolidated), and the sentence is affirmed.
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 05-0694/NA.
WHETHER APPELLANT
HAS BEEN DENIED HIS RIGHT TO
TIMELY POST-TRIAL REVIEW BY HAVING HIS CASE PENDING POST-TRIAL REVIEW
FOR 1967
DAYS, INCLUDING 543 DAYS IN PANEL WITH THE NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF
CRIMINAL
APPEALS.
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
No. 05-0721/AR.
WHETHER THE
DILATORY
POST-TRIAL PROCESSING OF THE INSTANT CASE WARRANTS RELIEF GIVEN THAT IT
TOOK
APPROXIMATELY 9 MONTHS (279 DAYS) FOR THE CONVENING AUTHORITY TO TAKE
ACTION ON
A 96-PAGE RECORD OF TRIAL.
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No. 06-0099/MC.
No. 06-0236/AR.
No. 06-0252/AR.
No. 06-0289/NA.
No. 06-0309/AR.
No. 06-0338/AR.
No. 06-0377/AR.
No. 06-0379/AR.
No. 06-0384/AR.
No. 06-0387/AR.
No. 06-0390/AR.
No. 06-0394/AR.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No. 06-0450/AR.
No. 06-0502/AF.
UNITED STATES
COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY JOURNAL
No. 06-138
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
No. 05-0647/NA.
I.
WHETHER
APPELLANT'S ARTICLE 133 CONVICTION CAN BE SUSTAINED EVEN THOUGH HE
PLEADED NOT
GUILTY AND THE SPECIFICATION ON WHICH HE WAS TRIED EXPRESSLY RESTED ON
A
STATUTE THAT THE SUPREME COURT HAS FOUND UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
II.
WHETHER APPELLANT IS ENTITLED TO SENTENCE RELIEF BECAUSE OF
UNJUSTIFIED
POST-TRIAL DELAY.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25 on Issue II only.
No. 05-0779/MC.
WHETHER THE
MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION
WHEN HE DENIED THE DEFENSE CHALLENGE FOR CAUSE AGAINST COLONEL [J], A
MEMBER
DETAILED TO THE COURT-MARTIAL PANEL, WHO DEMONSTRATED A DRACONIAN AND
INELASTIC
ATTITUDE TOWARD SENTENCING.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No. 06-0537/AR.
No. 06-0538/AR.
No. 06-0539/AR.
No. 06-0540/NA.
No. 06-0541/MC.
No. 06-0542/AF.
No. 06-0543/AF.
No. 06-0544/AF.
No. 06-0545/AF.
No. 06-0546/AF.
No. 06-0547/AF.
No. 06-0548/AF.
No. 06-0549/AF.
No. 06-0550/AF.
No. 06-0551/AF.
No. 06-0552/AF.
No. 06-0553/AF.
No. 06-0554/AF.
MANDATES ISSUED
No. 04-0442/AF.
No. 05-0157/NA.
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
06-137
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No.
06-0275/MC.
MANDATES ISSUED
No.
05-0004/AR.
No.
05-0271/NA.
UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
DAILY
JOURNAL
No.
06-136
HEARINGS
No.
03-0086/AR.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED
No.
06-0121/MC.
No.
06-0240/AR.
No.
06-0317/AR.
No.
06-0347/AR.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW - OTHER SUMMARY
DISPOSITIONS
No.
06-0408/NA.
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED
No.
06-0535/MC.
No.
06-0536/MC.
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS
No.
03-0086/AR.
No.
06-0069/NA.
No.
06-0427/AR.
No.
06-0434/AR.
No.
06-0435/AR.