UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-184

Thursday, June 30, 2005

 

APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 05-0199/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher C. PLUMB.  CCA 20021410.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER APPELLANT RECEIVED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WHEN HIS DEFENSE COUNSEL FAILED TO: (1) ALLOW HIM THE OPPORTUNITY TO SUBMIT MATTERS WITH HIS CLEMENCY PETITION; AND (2) CONSULT WITH HIM REGARDING THE MATTERS THAT DEFENSE COUNSEL INTENDED TO SUBMIT IN THAT PETITION AND THE SPECIFIC RELIEF HE INTENDED TO REQUEST ON APPELLANT'S BEHALF.

 

     The decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is set aside.  The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for remand to that court to obtain an affidavit from the trial defense counsel responding to Appellant’s allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel.  In the course of conducting its new review under Article 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c) (2000), the Court of Criminal Appeals shall review the trial defense counsel’s affidavit and any other relevant matters.  See United States v. Ginn, 47 M.J. 236 (C.A.A.F. 1997).  Thereafter, Article 67, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 867 (2000), shall apply.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 05-0199/AR.  U.S. v. Christopher C. PLUMB.  CCA 20021410.  [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 05-0184/AR.  U.S. v. Nino M. NELSON.  CCA 20010630.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0583/NA.  U.S. v. Christopher M. GASHWARZA.  CCA 200500214.

No. 05-0584/MC.  U.S. v. Charles C. GARRETT.  CCA 200400568.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 05-8033/NA.  Darryl S. PHILLIPS, Petitioner, v. Commanding General, Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, CA, and United States, Respondents.  CCA 200400865.  On consideration of Petitioner’s request for stay and the petition for extraordinary relief, it is ordered that Petitioner’s request for a stay is hereby denied; and that said petition is hereby denied without prejudice.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 05-0157/NA.  U.S. v. Ivor G. LUKE.  CCA 200000481.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file brief granted, up to and including August 12, 2005; and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-183

Wednesday, June 29, 2005

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 05-0343/AF.  U.S. v. Darrell A. DANNELLEY.  CCA 35455.

No. 05-0358/AR.  U.S. v. Donnie H. JACKSON Jr.  CCA 20010762.

No. 05-0377/AR.  U.S. v. Earl B. COFFEY.  CCA 20040462.

No. 05-0409/AR.  U.S. v. Abram J. DUNN.  CCA 20031012.

No. 05-0410/AR.  U.S. v. Gregory H. GALLOWAY, II.  CCA 20030882.

No. 05-0414/AR.  U.S. v. Ernest S. ROLLINS, Jr.  CCA 20030730.

No. 05-0435/NA.  U.S. v. Billy J. AYERS.  CCA 200300166.

No. 05-0454/AR.  U.S. v. Anthony J. KRON.  CCA 20041123.

No. 05-0458/MC.  U.S. v. Jonathan J. KIM.  CCA 200400152.

No. 05-0470/AR.  U.S. v. Antonio O. MACIAS.  CCA 20040290.

No. 05-0474/AR.  U.S. v. Daniel L. PUNCHAK.  CCA 20030057.

No. 05-0480/AF.  U.S. v. Ellis D. HALL.  CCA 35569.

No. 05-0492/MC.  U.S. v. Mitchell A KOLBERG.  CCA 200401840.

No. 05-0502/AR.  U.S. v. Harold A. CORDERO, Jr.  CCA 20040287.

No. 05-0534/AR.  U.S. v. Travis E. SIRNIO.  CCA 20041329.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 05-0004/AR.  U.S. v. Kimberly E. DOBSON.  CCA 20000098.

Appellee's motion to exceed page length granted.

 

No. 05-0532/AR. U.S. v. Damien H. THOMAS.  CCA 20021201.

Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to July 28, 2005.

 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-182

Tuesday, June 28, 2005

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 04-0494/AF.  U.S. v. Stephen J. DODGE.  CCA 34870.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby granted and the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 04-0494/AF.  U.S. v. Stephen J. DODGE.  CCA 34870. [See also APPEALS-SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 05-0156/NA.  U.S. v. David E. CRAWFORD.  CCA 200100806.

No. 05-0207/AR.  U.S. v. Juan L. PONCEALONSO.  CCA 20020955.

No. 05-0217/NA.  U.S. v. Robert W. EGLI.  CCA 200300883.

No. 05-0344/AF.  U.S. v. Phillip K. DEGARMO.  CCA S30258.

No. 05-0392/NA.  U.S. v. Elliot F. BURKLUND.  CCA 200401486.

No. 05-0475/AF.  U.S. v. Kevin C. LYLE.  CCA S30565.

No. 05-0484/AF.  U.S. v. Kelvin E. BARNETT.  CCA 35892.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0581/AR.  U.S. v. Nativity M. RIOS.  CCA 20040697.

No. 05-0582/AR.  U.S. v. Daniel P. JUDGE.  CCA 20030952.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 03-0072/AF.  U.S. v. Joshua P. LOVETT.  CCA 33947.  Appellant's

motion to submit documents granted with respect to the documents in Appendix C, but denied with respect to the documents in Appendix A and Appendix B. 

 

No. 05-0366/MC.  U.S. v. Matthew M. PARRISH.  CCA 200401212. In light of United States v. Brunson, 59 M.J. 41 (C.A.A.F. 2003), Appellant’s motion to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review out of time is granted.

 

No. 05-0382/NA.  U.S. v. Edward TAMEZ,  CCA 200401361.  On consideration of Appellee’s motion to dismiss, Appellant’s answer, and Appellant’s response to this Court’s order to show cause, the Court orders counsel for the parties to submit briefs on the following issues:

 

 I.  IF A SERVICE MEMBER HAS EXECUTED A POWER OF ATTORNEY REGARDING APPELLATE RIGHTS:

 

A. WHAT EFFECT, IF ANY, SHOULD THIS COURT GIVE TO THE PROVISIONS IN A POWER OF ATTORNEY THAT PROVIDE FOR APPELLATE DEFENSE COUNSEL TO:

 

(1) ACCEPT SERVICE OF THE DECISION OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS FOR PURPOSES OF STARTING THE 60-DAY TIME PERIOD FOR FILING A PETITION FOR REVIEW UNDER ARTICLE 67(b), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 867(b) (2000)?

 

(2) DECIDE WHETHER TO FILE A PETITION FOR REVIEW OR TO WAIVE THE RIGHT TO PETITION THIS COURT FOR REVIEW UNDER ARTICLE 67(a)(3), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 867(a)(3) (2000)?

 

B. UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES, IF ANY, MAY APPELLATE COUNSEL APPOINTED UNDER ARTICLE 70, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 870 (2000)  DECIDE TO NOT PETITION THIS COURT FOR REVIEW UNDER ARTICLE 67, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 867 (2000) WITHOUT ATTEMPTING FIRST TO CONTACT APPELLANT?

 

II.  WHEN A SERVICE MEMBER HAS EXECUTED A POWER OF ATTORNEY REGARDING APPELLATE RIGHTS, AND APPELLATE DEFENSE COUNSEL IS UNABLE TO CONTACT APPELLANT, UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES, IF ANY, MAY COUNSEL DECIDE TO FOREGO FILING ANY PETITION, INCLUDING A “MERITS” PETITION?

 

III. WHAT ARE AN APPELLATE DEFENSE COUNSEL’S RESPONSIBILITIES TO APPELLANT ONCE COUNSEL HAS BEEN SERVED WITH THE DECISION OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

 

A. WHEN A POWER OF ATTORNEY REGARDING APPELLATE RIGHTS HAS BEEN EXECUTED BY APPELLANT?

 

B. WHEN THERE IS NO SUCH POWER OF ATTORNEY?

 

IV.  IF A PETITION IS FILED OUT OF TIME UNDER ARTICLE 67(b), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 867(b) (2000), IS APPELLANT REQUIRED TO SET FORTH THE SPECIFIC FACTS DEMONSTRATING GOOD CAUSE FOR A LATE FILING?

 

A. IF APPELLANT WISHES TO MAKE A LATE FILING, AND SUCH FACTS INVOLVE ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATIONS, MAY COUNSEL DISCLOSE THOSE FACTS TO THE COURT WITHOUT VIOLATING THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE?

 

B. IF THERE APPEARS TO BE A COLORABLE CLAIM OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF APPELLATE DEFENSE COUNSEL, OR IF COUNSEL’S INTERESTS ARE OTHERWISE POTENTIALLY ADVERSE TO APPELLANT’S, SHOULD THE JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL APPOINT  ANOTHER APPELLATE DEFENSE COUNSEL TO REPRESENT  APPELLANT WITH RESPECT TO THE MATTER OF THE UNTIMELY FILING?

 

Appellant’s brief is due within 30 days of the date of this order;  Appellee’s brief is due within 30 days of the filing of Appellant’s brief.

The Chiefs of the Appellate Defense and Appellate Government Divisions of the United States Army, United States Air Force, and United States Coast Guard are invited to file amicus curiae briefs on the above issues under Rule 26 of the Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure.

 

No. 05-0509/AR.  U.S. v. Stefan E. HILL.  CCA 20030720.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to July 5, 2005.

 

No. 05-8034/NA.  U.S. v. Russell B. MULLINS.  CCA 200200988.  On consideration of the Petitioner’s pro se petition for Extraordinary Relief, it appears that additional information is needed to determine whether Petitioner is represented by appellate defense counsel and, if so, whether he seeks to sever that relationship or proceed pro se. Accordingly, it is ordered that the Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals inquire into whether Petitioner has appointed appellate defense counsel and, if not, whether Petitioner desires the appointment of appellate defense counsel.  If he so desires, the court should determine whether Petitioner either explicitly or implicitly dismissed each appellate defense counsel that was assigned to his case, and whether Petitioner has made an adequate showing that each counsel was unsuitable or inadequate such that a new counsel should be appointed pursuant to Article 70(c), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. 870(c)(2000).  See United States v. Bell, 11 C.M.A. 306, 29 C.M.R. 122 (1960).

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-181

Monday, June 27, 2005

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0571/AR.  U.S. v. Branden R. WALTON.  CCA 20040714.

No. 05-0572/AR.  U.S. v. Scott R. GROTHE.  CCA 20041330.

No. 05-0573/AR.  U.S. v. Keesha R. HABEEB.  CCA 20021190.

No. 05-0574/AR.  U.S. v. Dennis C. GLICK, Jr.  CCA 20040209.

No. 05-0575/AF.  U.S. v. Benjamin D. THOMPSON.  CCA 35274.

No. 05-0576/AF.  U.S. v. David S. CURRIE.  CCA 35436.

No. 05-0577/AF.  U.S. v. Scott W. SCHRAFF.  CCA S30504.

No. 05-0578/AF.  U.S. v. Nicholas R. INTRERY.  CCA 35554.

No. 05-0579/AF.  U.S. v. Kyle BREZNAK.  CCA S30396.

No. 05-0580/AF.  U.S. v. Louandre H. CARDENAS.  CCA S30333.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 05-8034/NA. Russell B. MULLINS, Petitioner, v. Judges of the Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, Respondents.  CCA 200200988.  Notice is hereby given that a petition for extraordinary relief was filed under Rule 27(a) on May 19, 2005, and placed on the docket this date.

 

Misc. No. 05-8035/AR.  Michael L. BAKER, Petitioner, v. United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, The Judge Advocate General of the Army, and the United States Army, Respondents.  CCA 9800743. Notice is hereby given that a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of prohibition and other appropriate relief was filed under Rule 27(a) on June 23, 2005, and placed on the docket this date.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-180

Friday, June 24, 2005

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0566/NA.  U.S. v. Juse C. BARROS.  CCA 200201603.

No. 05-0567/MC.  U.S. v. Joseph FELICIES.  CCA 9900206.

No. 05-0568/AF.  U.S. v. Troy A. HAGAR.  CCA S30566.

No. 05-0569/AF.  U.S. v. Philip L. PEREZ.  CCA 35616.

No. 05-0570/AF.  U.S. v. Shari C. LOVING.  CCA S30450.

 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-179

Thursday, June 23, 2005

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 05-8033/NA. Darryl S. PHILLIPS, Petitioner, v. Commanding General, Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, CA, and UNITED STATES, Respondents. CCA 200400865.  Notice is hereby given that a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of prohibition was filed under Rule 27(a) on June 21, 2005 and placed on the docket this date.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 04-0578/AR. U.S. v. Charles J. WOLFORD.  CCA 20001042.

Appellant's motion to extend time to file brief granted, up to and including June 30, 2005; absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 05-0433/NA. U.S. v. Brian K. RICHARDSON.  CCA 200001149.

Appellant's second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including July 15, 2005; absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-178

Wednesday, June 22, 2005

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 05-0243/MC.  U.S. v. Carlos F. CHAVECO.  CCA 200300209.

No. 05-0325/NA.  U.S. v. Matthew R. KING.  CCA 200400743.

No. 05-0465/AF.  U.S. v. Jessy J. SCHIMKE.  CCA 35910.

No. 05-0493/MC.  U.S. v. Marlon R. JOHNSON.  CCA 200101153.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0565/AR.  U.S. v. Rafael A. PEREZ.  CCA 9900680.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 04-0284/AF.  U.S. v. Allan P. JAMES.  CCA 34863.

No. 04-0382/AF.  U.S. v. Patrick A. MIZGALA.  CCA 34822.

 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-177

Tuesday, June 21, 2005

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 05-0077/AF.  U.S. v. Keith E. POPE.  CCA 34921.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

I.   WHETHER THE EVIDENCE WAS LEGALLY SUFFICIENT TO CONVICT APPELLANT OF SPECIFICATIONS 2, 3, AND 4 OF CHARGE I (VIOLATION OF A DIRECTIVE PROHIBITING SEXUAL HARASSMENT) BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.

 

II. WHETHER AIR EDUCATION AND TRAINING INSTRUCTION 36-2002, PARA. 1.1.2.2.5. (PROHIBITING INAPPROPRIATE CONDUCT AND UNPROFESSIONAL RELATIONSHIPS) BOTH FACIALLY AND AS APPLIED TO APPELLANT VIOLATES DUE PROCESS AND IS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY VOID FOR VAGUENESS.

 

III. WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED WHEN SHE ADMITTED, OVER DEFENSE OBJECTION, A PROSECUTION EXHIBIT OFFERED AS SENTENCING AGGRAVATION EVIDENCE THAT ARGUED AIR FORCE CORE VALUES AND ENDORSED "HARSH ADVERSE ACTION" FOR THOSE WHO COMMITTED APPELLANT'S OFFENSES.

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 05-0211/AR.  U.S. v. Cal M. JONES.  CCA 200001057.  On its own motion, the Court has reconsidered the denial of the petition for grant of review in the above-captioned case dated 17 June 2005.  On reconsideration thereof, it is ordered that the order denying the petition for grant of review is hereby vacated; and, that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE COMMITTED ERROR WHEN HE FAILED TO FIND THE SPECIFICATION OF CHARGE II (FALSE OFFICIAL STATEMENT) MULTIPLICIOUS WITH SPECIFICATIONS 1, 3 AND 5 OF CHARGE III (MAKING AND USING FALSE WRITINGS IN CONNECTION WITH A CLAIM).

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 05-0161/MC.  U.S. v. Leo CABABA.  CCA 9901417.

No. 05-0273/AR.  U.S. v. Robert P. GROW.  CCA 20020323.

No. 05-0413/AR.  U.S. v. Melanie L. PRATT.  CCA 20030145.

No. 05-0483/AR.  U.S. v. Lowthair Z. MOBLEY.  CCA 20040964.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-176

Monday, June 20, 2005

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 05-0136/AF.  U.S. v. Mark S. BRISBANE.  CCA 35384.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

I.   WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN FAILING TO SUPPRESS APPELLANT'S STATEMENTS TO THE FAMILY ADVOCACY PROVIDER WHERE THOSE STATEMENTS WERE MADE IN RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS POSED WITHOUT AN ARTICLE 31, UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE, RIGHTS ADVISEMENT.

 

II.  IF SO, WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN FAILING TO SUPPRESS ALL EVIDENCE DERIVED FROM APPELLANT'S STATEMENT TO THE FAMILY ADVOCACY PROVIDER BECAUSE AFOSI DID NOT GIVE APPELLANT A CLEANSING WARNING PRIOR TO ITS INTERROGATION OF APPELLANT.

 

III. DID THE PROSECUTION PRESENT LEGALLY SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE THAT APPELLANT'S POSSESSION OF VISUAL DEPICTIONS OF NUDE MINORS WAS SERVICE-DISCREDITING OR PREJUDICIAL TO GOOD ORDER AND DISCIPLINE?

 

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0561/AR.  U.S. v. Sean W. O’LEARY.  CCA 20030491.

No. 05-0562/AR.  U.S. v. Scott S. DAVIS.  CCA 20010469.

No. 05-0563/MC.  U.S. v. Kevin L. SIMON.  CCA 200500094.

No. 05-0564/NA.  U.S. v. Byron HEARST.  CCA 200201816.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 05-0406/NA.  U.S. v. Kenneth G. HOBSON.  CCA 200101836.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including July 8, 2005; and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 05-0426/AR.  U.S. v. Wayne E. STANTON.  CCA 20011006.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted, up to and including June 30, 2005; and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 05-0440/AR.  U.S. v. Salvador E. GONZALEZ.  CCA 20020077.  Appellant's motion out of time to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to July 15, 2005; and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-175

Friday, June 17, 2005

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 04-0560/AR.  U.S. v. Enrique FLORES-RIVERA, Jr.  CCA 20010505.

No. 05-0187/AR.  U.S. v. Herelin FUENTES, Jr.  CCA 20021123.

No. 05-0196/AR.  U.S. v. Roland E. BROWN, Jr.  CCA 20030418.

No. 05-0211/AR.  U.S. v. Cal M. JONES.  CCA 200001057.

No. 05-0370/AF.  U.S. v. Sean P. YANCY.  CCA S30516.

No. 05-0385/AR.  U.S. v. Donald COLEMAN.  CCA 20030173.

No. 05-0399/AR.  U.S. v. David L. ANDERSON.  CCA 20040255.

No. 05-0401/AR.  U.S. v. Hugh A. BREWSTER.  CCA 20031191.

No. 05-0425/AR.  U.S. v. Rubin F. CHAPPELL.  CCA 20010695.

No. 05-0432/MC.  U.S. v. Maurice L. HUGHES.  CCA 200300902.

No. 05-0438/NA.  U.S. v. Aaron W. CANTRELL.  CCA 200401293.

No. 05-0442/AR.  U.S. v. Travis A. BOISVERT.  CCA 20021012.

No. 05-0448/AR.  U.S. v. Kim P. PAYNE.  CCA 20040756.

No. 05-0494/AR.  U.S. v. Jhoel E. QUIROZ-VASQUEZ.  CCA 20040854.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0553/MC.  U.S. v. Craig S. MEWBORN.  CCA 200400689.

No. 05-0554/AF.  U.S. v. Nicole ANTHONY.  CCA S30690.

No. 05-0555/AF.  U.S. v. Jesse J. CALDWELL.  CCA 35463.

No. 05-0556/AF.  U.S. v. David K. CRAVEN.  CCA 34974.

No. 05-0557/AF.  U.S. v. Justin V. GILLESPIE.  CCA S30408.

No. 05-0558/AF.  U.S. v. Robert M. MCCOLLUM.  CCA 35632.

No. 05-0559/AF.  U.S. v. Jonathan H. ROGERS.  CCA 35028.

No. 05-0560/AR.  U.S. v. Charles E. PATTON, Jr.  CCA 20031004.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 05-8032/NA.  Jesse C. SCOTT, Petitioner, v. United States, Respondent.  CCA 200300976.  Notice is hereby given that a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of habeas corpus was filed under Rule 27(a), together with Petitioner’s motion to file the same out of time on May 10, 2005, and placed on the docket this date.