UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-141

Friday, April 29, 2005

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 04-0718/AF.  U.S. v. Mark R. HUSCHAK.  CCA 35382.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is granted on the following issue specified by the Court:

 

WHETHER APPELLANT'S CONVICTION OF SPECIFICATION 2 OF CHARGE III (CONSENSUAL, HETEROSEXUAL, ORAL SODOMY) SHOULD BE SET ASIDE IN LIGHT OF LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).

 

     In view of United States v. Marcum, 60 M.J. 198 (C.A.A.F. 2004), the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

No. 05-0192/NA.  U.S. v. Manuel A. MATOSPACHECO.  CCA 200101562.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is granted on the following issues:

 

I.   WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED WHEN IT HELD THAT APPELLANT WAS NOT PREJUDICED BY HIS DEFENSE COUNSEL'S DEFICIENT PERFORMANCE WHERE HIS COUNSEL RECOMMENDED A PUNITIVE DISCHARGE AND STRUCTURED HIS CLOSING ARGUMENT TO AVOID FORFEITURES IGNORANT OF THE FACT THAT APPELLANT WOULD BE IN A NON-PAY STATUS DURING HIS CONFINEMENT BECAUSE HE WAS PAST HIS END OF ACTIVE OBLIGATED SERVICE.

 

II. WHETHER APPELLANT WAS DEPRIVED OF HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO TIMELY REVIEW WHEN IT TOOK 561 DAYS FOR THE CONVENING AUTHORITY'S ACTION.

 

     The decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is set aside.  The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy for resubmission to that court.  Issue I is remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Quick, 59 M.J. 383, 387 (C.A.A.F. 2004).  Issue II is remanded to address the delay encountered between the end of the trial and the convening authority’s action.  Thereafter, Article 67, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 867 (2000), will apply.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 04-0718/AF.  U.S. v. Mark R. HUSCHAK.  CCA 35382.  [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

No. 05-0015/AR.  U.S. v. Michael A. SHIFFLETT.  CCA 20000881.  Review granted on the following issue personally asserted by appellant:

 

WHETHER APPELLANT WAS PREJUDICED BY LENGTHY POST-TRIAL DELAY.

 

     No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 05-0117/MC.  U.S. v. Brandon T. RIBAUDO.  CCA 200301672.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER APPELLANT WAS DEPRIVED OF A SUBSTANTIVE LEGAL AND FACTUAL REVIEW OF HIS CASE WHEN HE DIED AFTER THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AFFIRMED HIS CONVICTION, BUT BEFORE THE TIME PERIOD FOR RECONSIDERATION HAD PASSED, IN VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION AND UNITED STATES v. RORIE, 58 M.J. 399 (C.A.A.F. 2003).

 

     Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

No. 05-0192/NA.  U.S. v. Manuel A. MATOSPACHECO.  CCA 200101562.  [See also APPEALS – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0443/AF.  U.S. v. Hans L. CORDOVA.  CCA S30400.

No. 05-0444/AF.  U.S. v. Benjamin J. HUBBLE.  CCA 35519.

No. 05-0445/AF.  U.S. v. Eric J LEONARD.  CCA 35444.

No. 05-0446/AF.  U.S. v. Thomas T. J. SCHAFF.  CCA 35385.

No. 05-0447/AF.  U.S. v. Bryan P. WALSWORTH.  CCA S30592.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-140

Thursday, April 28, 2005

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 05-0260/AF.  U.S. v. Charles M. LANE.  CCA S30339.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER A UNITED STATES SENATOR'S PARTICIPATION ON A PANEL OF THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS VIOLATES THE SEPARATION OF POWERS DOCTRINE.

 

     Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0441/AR.  U.S. v. David M. ROMAN.  CCA 20030834.

No. 05-0442/AR.  U.S. v. Travis A. BOISVERT.  CCA 20021012.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 05-8030/NA.  Jessie A. QUINTANILLA, Petitioner, v. Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks, and United States, Respondents.  CCA 9801632.  Petitioner's motion to attach, filed April 11, 2005, granted.

 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-139

Wednesday, April 27, 2005

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 01-0134/AR.  U.S. v. Robert J. WIESEN.  CCA 9801770.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is hereby granted and the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 01-0134/AR.  U.S. v. Robert J. WIESEN.  CCA 9801770.  [See also APPEAL – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 05-0276/AR.  U.S. v. Kenneth C. ANDREAS.  CCA 20040661.

No. 05-0302/AF.  U.S. v. James M. LONG.  CCA 35875.

No. 05-0316/AR.  U.S. v. Herrod J. BEASLEY, Jr.  CCA 20040584.

No. 05-0319/AR.  U.S. v. Savon L. BROWN.  CCA 20031271.

No. 05-0326/AF.  U.S. v. Jonathan P. MINCHEY.  CCA S30622.

No. 05-0345/AF.  U.S. v. Lonnie D. MCCOLLIGAN.  CCA S30648.

No. 05-0350/AR.  U.S. v. Eric J. EMOND.  CCA 20010615.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-138

Tuesday, April 26, 2005

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 05-0188/AR.  U.S. v. Daniel E. GAINES.  CCA 20020637.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0439/AR.  U.S. v. Edward H. JOST.  CCA 20030975.

No. 05-0440/AR.  U.S. v. Salvador E. GONZALEZ.  CCA 20020077.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 03-0646/AR.  U.S. v. Michael S. FARLEY.  CCA 20001079.

No. 04-0217/AF.  U.S. v. Richard ISRAEL, Jr.  CCA 34877.

No. 04-0348/AR.  U.S. v. Justin L. BROOKS.  CCA 20000901.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-137

Monday, April 25, 2005

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 05-0194/NA.  U.S. v. Christopher L. STARK.  CCA 200200327.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0436/AR.  U.S. v. Maurey L. WEBBER.  CCA 20010902.

No. 05-0437/AR.  U.S. v. Prince L. KNIGHT.  CCA 20020428.

No. 05-0438/NA.  U.S. v. Aaron W. CANTRELL.  CCA 200401293.



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-136

Friday, April 22, 2005

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 05-0284/AR.  U.S. v. Corey M. ZOLLO.  CCA 20010352.

No. 05-0286/AF.  U.S. v. Cody R. CROSS.  CCA 35236.

No. 05-0301/AR.  U.S. v. Jason T. GERGICH.  CCA 20030668.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0427/AR.  U.S. v. Anthony T. BRYANT.  CCA 20030283.

No. 05-0428/AF.  U.S. v. Emmitt W. SCHOOLCRAFT.  CCA 35332.

No. 05-0429/AF.  U.S. v. Tyrone OLIVER.  CCA 36119.

No. 05-0430/AF.  U.S. v. Robert F. WADE.  CCA 35458.

No. 05-0431/MC.  U.S. v. Dennis J. VANETTEN.  CCA 200300498.

No. 05-0432/MC.  U.S. v. Maurice L. HUGHES.  CCA 200300902.

No. 05-0433/NA.  U.S. v. Brian K. RICHARDSON.  CCA 200001149.

No. 05-0434/MC.  U.S. v. Anthony J. SALAZAR.  CCA 200401634.

No. 05-0435/NA.  U.S. v. Billy J. AYERS.  CCA 200300166.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-135

Thursday, April 21, 2005


PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0425/AR.  U.S. v. Rubin F. CHAPPELL.  CCA 20010695.

No. 05-0426/AR.  U.S. v. Wayne E. STANTON.  CCA 20011006.

 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-134

Wednesday, April 20, 2005

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 03-0394/AF.  U.S. v. Hector R. GONZALEZ Jr.  CCA 34691.  Review granted on the following issue assigned by appellate defense counsel:

 

I.   WHETHER BRADY v. MARYLAND, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), AND R.C.M. 701 REQUIRED THE GOVERNMENT TO DISCLOSE EVIDENCE REGARDING AN AUGUST 2000 BROOKS LAB ANALYTICAL FALSE POSITIVE URINALYSIS RESULT AND PREJUDICIALLY ERRED IN FAILING TO DO SO.

 

And the following issue specified by the Court:

 

II.  WHETHER THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED ON REMAND WHEN IT FOUND NO INEFFECIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL BECAUSE DEFENSE COUNSEL FAILED TO DISCOVER EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE REGARDING AN AUGUST 2000 BROOKS LAB ANALYTICAL FALSE POSITIVE URINALYSIS RESULT.

 

No. 05-0242/AR.  U.S. v. Sharvenckie R. LONNETTE.  CCA 20020349.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE CONVENING AUTHORITY IMPROPERLY APPROVED FORFEITURE OF ALL PAY AND ALLOWANCES WHERE APPELLANT HAD ALREADY COMPLETED HIS SENTENCE TO CONFINEMENT AT THE TIME THE CONVENING AUTHORITY TOOK ACTION.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 04-0651/NA.  U.S. v. Christopher A. BROWN.  CCA 200301824.

No. 04-0751/AF.  U.S. v. Michael D. BOUCHILLON.  CCA 34910.

No. 05-0064/AF.  U.S. v. William N. ROGERS.  CCA 35256.

No. 05-0167/AF.  U.S. v. Taisha T. BIVENS.  CCA 35570.

No. 05-0176/MC.  U.S. v. Luis R. HERNANDEZ.  CCA 200301475.

No. 05-0205/AR.  U.S. v. John W. CHANEY Jr.  CCA 20030465.

No. 05-0231/AR.  U.S. v. Damon K. HODGE.  CCA 20020524.

No. 05-0272/NA.  U.S. v. Felix GARCIA.  CCA 200401417.

No. 05-0314/MC.  U.S. v. Jimmy D. SUMMERS.  CCA 200401549.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0422/AR.  U.S. v. Nicole L. JORDAN.  CCA 20040944.

No. 05-0423/CG.  U.S. v. Christopher S. BUNGERT.  CCA 1203.

No. 05-0424/AR.  U.S. v. Kelly M. MEREDITH.  CCA 20021184.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 05-0307/AR.  U.S. v. Darlene M. McPHEE.  CCA 20020801.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including May 4, 2005; and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-133

Tuesday, April 19, 2005


PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW - OTHER SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 04-0082/AF.  U.S. v. Shane T. SEIDER.  CCA 35154.  Appellant's motion to withdraw petition for grant of review granted.

 

No. 05-0281/AF.  U.S. v. Ryan D. LOGAN.  CCA S30354.  Appellant’s motion to withdraw the petition for grant of review granted.

 

No. 05-0346/AF.  U.S. v. Dustin M. WILSON.  CCA 35461.  Appellant’s motion to withdraw the petition for grant of review granted.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0421/NA.  U.S. v. Aaron T. RUGGS.  CCA 200301267.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 04-0698/MC.  U.S. v. Javier A. MORENO.  CCA 200100715.  Appellant's motion to attach granted.

 

No. 04-0801/MC.  U.S. v. Jemima HARVEY.  CCA 200001040.  Appellant's motions for an enlargement of time out of time and for leave to file a brief out of time are granted.

 

No. 05-0103/MC.  U.S. v. Daniel W. STEPHENS.  CCA 200100754.  Appellant's motion for leave to file supplemental assignment of error granted.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-132

Monday, April 18, 2005

 
APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 05-0145/AF.  U.S. v. John W. HOLMES.  CCA 35411.  On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, said petition is granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE MATERIALLY PREJUDICED APPELLANT'S SUBSTANTIAL RIGHTS WHEN SHE INSTRUCTED THE COURT MEMBERS IN SENTENCING THAT MILITARY CONFINEMENT FACILITIES ARE CORRECTIVE RATHER THAN PUNITIVE.

 

     In view of the inconsistency between the military judge’s instruction that confinement is a form of authorized punishment, see Article 58(a), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 858(a) (2000), Rule for Courts-Martial 1003(b)(7), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2002 ed.), and her instruction that the military confinement facilities are corrective rather than punitive, we hold that the sentencing instruction was erroneous.  Accordingly, the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed as to findings but reversed as to sentence.  The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for remand to the Court of Criminal Appeals for reassessment of the sentence or remand for a sentence rehearing if the court concludes that it cannot appropriately reassess the sentence.  See United States v. Sales, 22 M.J. 305 (C.M.A. 1986).  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 05-0010/MC.  U.S. v. Amy L. HOLDERMAN.  CCA 200301880.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED WHEN IT CONCLUDED THAT APPELLANT'S UNREBUTTED CLAIM OF PREJUDICE FROM UNREASONABLE POST-TRIAL DELAY (LOSS OF AN EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY SUPPORTED BY A SWORN AFFIDAVIT) WAS "SPECULATIVE AT BEST" AND THEREFORE DENIED RELIEF.

 

No. 05-0145/AF.  U.S. v. John W. HOLMES.  CCA 35411.  [See also APPEALS –SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0408/AR.  U.S. v. Daniel J. DORAN.  CCA 20020109.

No. 05-0409/AR.  U.S. v. Abram J. DUNN.  CCA 20031012.

No. 05-0410/AR.  U.S. v. Gregory H. GALLOWAY, Jr.  CCA 20030882.

No. 05-0411/AR.  U.S. v. Fredrick L. JOHNSON.  CCA 20020978.

No. 05-0412/AR.  U.S. v. Derrick W. MOORE.  CCA 20021272.

No. 05-0413/AR.  U.S. v. Melanie L. PRATT.  CCA 20030145.

No. 05-0414/AR.  U.S. v. Ernest S. ROLLINS, Jr.  CCA 20030730.

No. 05-0415/AR.  U.S. v. Michael A. RUST.  CCA 20040346.

No. 05-0416/AF.  U.S. v. Ramon A. EDISON.  CCA 35313.

No. 05-0417/AF.  U.S. v. Patricia C. MADIGAN.  CCA 35087.

No. 05-0418/AF.  U.S. v. Bradley D. ROBERTS.  CCA S30264.

No. 05-0419/AF.  U.S. v. Brandon C. SPILLERS.  CCA 35457.

No. 05-0420/MC.  U.S. v. Michael J. ADAMS.  CCA 200200722.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 05-131

Friday, April 15, 2005

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 03-0072/AF.  U.S. v. Joshua P. LOVETT.  CCA 33947.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

I.   WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY INSTRUCTING THE PANEL THAT THE MAXIMUM SENTENCE WAS LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE WHEN THAT PUNISHMENT WAS NOT AN AUTHORIZED SENTENCE AS ITS IMPLEMENTATION HAD NOT YET BEEN ORDERED BY THE PRESIDENT, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, WHERE INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE WAS PRESENTED AT TRIAL TO PROVE THAT ANY ALLEGED ACTS OF RAPE HAD OCCURRED AFTER 19 NOVEMBER 1997.

 

II. WHETHER APPELLANT WAS SUBJECTED TO CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT WHILE IN POST-TRIAL CONFINEMENT.

 

No. 04-0604/NA.  U.S. v. Tyrone J. FORNEY.  CCA 200001573.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

I.   WHETHER APPELLANT WAS DEPRIVED OF HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO TIMELY REVIEW WHEN OVER FORTY-THREE MONTHS PASSED BETWEEN THE DATE OF SENTENCE AND COMPLETION OF REVIEW PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 66, UCMJ.

 

II. WHETHER APPELLANT'S RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL AND APPELLATE REVIEW WERE DEPRIVED BECAUSE OF THE REASONS SET FORTH IN [APPELLANT'S LETTER OF 8 AUG 04] SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO UNITED STATES v. GROSTEFON.

 

No. 04-0797/AR.  U.S. v. David P. CHRISTIAN.  CCA 20011021.  Review granted on the following issue raised by appellate defense counsel:

 

I.   BECAUSE LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE WAS NOT AN AUTHORIZED PUNISHMENT UNDER THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE FOR FORCIBLE SODOMY OF A CHILD UNDER TWELVE YEARS OF AGE, WHETHER APPELLANT'S PRETRIAL AGREEMENT IS A NULLITY AND IT, AND THE FINDINGS AND SENTENCE WHICH WERE BASED UPON IT, SHOULD BE SET ASIDE AS APPELLANT ENTERED INTO THE AGREEMENT WITH A MATERIAL MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE MAXIMUM IMPOSABLE SENTENCE.

 

     And the following issue personally asserted by Appellant:

 

II. WHETHER APPELLANT RECEIVED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WHEN HIS TRIAL DEFENSE COUNSEL FAILED TO REQUEST CREDIT FOR APPELLANT'S ILLEGAL PRETRIAL RESTRAINT AND PRETRIAL CONFINEMENT AND THEN ADVISED APPELLANT TO AFFIRMATIVELY WAIVE THESE ISSUES.

 

No. 05-0058/NA.  U.S. v. Peter T. COSBY.  CCA 9901704.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE GOVERNMENT VIOLATED APPELLANT'S DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO A TIMELY APPEAL BY STRUCTURING THE APPELLATE REVIEW ACTIVITY IN SUCH A WAY THAT HIS CASE WAS NOT DECIDED UNTIL NEARLY FOUR YEARS AFTER HIS CONTESTED TRIAL.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 05-0150/AR.  U.S. v. Robert W. GERACI, Jr.  CCA 20010051.

No. 05-0283/AF.  U.S. v. Robert D. KLINE.  CCA 35868.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 05-0405/NA.  U.S. v. Brian DEARING.  CCA 200100291.

No. 05-0406/NA.  U.S. v. Kenneth G. HOBSON.  CCA 200101836.

No. 05-0407/AF.  U.S. v. Joshua B. HILYARD.  CCA 35241.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 05-8023/AR.  United States, Appellee, v. Gary L. MARSHALL, Appellant.  CCA 20050165.  Writ-appeal petition denied without prejudice to Appellant’s right to raise the issue asserted in the petition during the course of normal appellate review if he is convicted.

 

Misc. No. 05-8029/AR.  Anthony R. LUCERO, Petitioner, v. United States, Respondent.  CCA 20020869.  Notice is hereby given that a petition for extraordinary relief was filed under Rule 27(a) on March 8, 2005, and placed on the docket this date.  On consideration thereof, the petition for extraordinary relief is hereby remanded to the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals to determine whether Appellant is seeking to sever the attorney-client relationship.  See United States v. Goodwin, 60 M.J. 428 (C.A.A.F. 2004)(summary disposition); United States v. Young, 60 M.J. 428 (C.A.A.F. 2004)(summary disposition).  [See also MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET – FILINGS this date.]

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 05-8029/AR.  Anthony R. LUCERO, Petitioner, v. United States, Respondent.  CCA 20020869.  [See also MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET – SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

Misc. No. 05-8030/AR.  Jessie A. QUINTANILLA, Petitioner, v. Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks, and United States, Respondents.  CCA 9801632.  Notice is hereby given that a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of prohibition was filed under Rule 27(a) on March 15, 2005, and placed on the docket this date.  Respondents shall file an answer to said petition on or before April 25, 2005.  A reply