UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-077

Friday, January 30, 2004

 
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 04-0268/AR.  U.S. v. Richard P. LEGG.  CCA 20030375.

No. 04-0269/MC.  U.S. v. Oscar MALDONADO.  CCA 200301351.

No. 04-0270/MC.  U.S. v. John A. SEAGRAVE.  CCA 200301214.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 04-0169/AF.  U.S. v. Gregory L. PARKER.  CCA 34430.  Appellant's motion to submit documents granted.



 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-076

Thursday, January 29, 2004


ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 03-0613/MC.  U.S. v. Jimmie L. GETER.  CCA 9901433.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

I.   WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION IN DENYING APPELLANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS PERSONAL E-MAIL MESSAGES THAT WERE DOWNLOADED FROM A GOVERNMENT SERVER AND HAD BEEN SENT TO ONE INTENDED RECIPIENT.

 

II.  WHETHER SPECIFICATION 1 OF CHARGE II FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE BECAUSE THE AGREEMENT OF TWO PERSONS IS NECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE SUBSTANTIVE CRIME OF DISTRIBUTION OF MARIJUANA AND THERE IS NO INGREDIENT IN THE CONSPIRACY TO DISTRIBUTE WHICH IS NOT PRESENT IN THE COMPLETED CRIME.

 

III. WHETHER THE LOWER COURT'S VERBATIM REPLICATION OF SUBSTANTIAL PORTIONS OF THE GOVERNMENT'S ANSWER BRIEF AS THAT COURT'S OPINION CONSTITUTES AN ABUSE OF DISCRETION, NEGATES ANY APPEARANCE OF JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY AND SUBSTANTIALLY UNDERMINES THE INTEGRITY OF THE OPINION.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 04-0041/AR.  U.S. v. Jesse R. CRISOSTO.  CCA 20020974.

No. 04-0059/MC.  U.S. v. Jacob A. GARCIA.  CCA 200101606.

No. 04-0099/MC.  U.S. v. Salvatore A. FALZONE.  CCA 200300701.

No. 04-0118/AF.  U.S. v. Shane A. CURRY.  CCA S30206.

No. 04-0138/AF.  U.S. v. Darnell E. THOMPSON.  CCA 35580.

No. 04-0154/AF.  U.S. v. Brandon T. ROGERS.  CCA S30288.

No. 04-0155/AF.  U.S. v. Renne RODRIGUEZ.  CCA S30225.

No. 04-0159/NA.  U.S. v. Nicholas K. IZZI.  CCA 200200674.

No. 04-0166/AR.  U.S. v. William F. WHITE II.  CCA 20021304.

No. 04-0167/AR.  U.S. v. Joseph G. BELL.  CCA 20030457.

No. 04-0171/CG.  U.S. v. Robbie L. RIGGS.  CCA 1186.

No. 04-0172/AR.  U.S. v. Spencer D. STEELE.  CCA 20030509.

No. 04-0181/AR.  U.S. v. George FLORES, Jr.  CCA 20030422.

No. 04-0186/AF.  U.S. v. Jason M. MAYNARD.  CCA S30388.

No. 04-0197/MC.  U.S. v. Jermaine T. HARRINGTON.  CCA 200301300.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 04-0218/MC.  U.S. v. Paul A. RICHARDSON.  CCA 200101917. Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to February 27, 2004.

 

No. 04-0230/AR.  U.S. v. Steven R. SMITH.  CCA 9102660.  Appellant's motion for enlargement of time to file a response granted up to and including February 13, 2004.


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-075

Tuesday, January 27, 2004

 
PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 04-0267/AR.  U.S. v. Michael P. RUGGIA.  CCA 20021067.

 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-074

Monday, January 26, 2004

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 04-0266/AR.  U.S. v. Rashan G. BROOKS.  CCA 20030254.

No. 04-6001/AF.  U.S. v. Matthew T. FENWRICK.  CCA 2003-06.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 04-0143/AR.  U.S. v. Kiyon H. HARVEY.  CCA 20030268.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including February 10, 2004; and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 04-0148/AR.  U.S. v. David L. DURDIN.  CCA 20030525.  Appellant's second motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including February 10, 2004; and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

 

No. 04-0212/AR.  U.S. v. Dennis S. MURPHY.  CCA 20010654.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to February 23, 2004.

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-073

Friday, January 23, 2004

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 04-0066/MC.  U.S. v. Wesley R. RUNIONS.  CCA 200102075.  Review granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE COMMITTED PLAIN ERROR BY ADMITTING RECORDS OF TWO PRIOR NONJUDICIAL PUNISHMENTS DURING PRESENTENCING WITHOUT EVIDENCE OF COMPLIANCE WITH UNITED STATES v. BOOKER.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 04-0003/AR.  U.S. v. Jason T. DOERFLINGER.  CCA 20020824.

No. 04-0006/AF.  U.S. v. Erick R. FABIAN.  CCA 34903.

No. 04-0008/AF.  U.S. v. David B. MOYER.  CCA 35103.

No. 04-0024/MC.  U.S. v. Michael D. OLSON.  CCA 200102063.

No. 04-0079/AF.  U.S. v. Jacob D. MCAFEE.  CCA S30097.

No. 04-0131/AR.  U.S. v. Farrah L. DOZIER.  CCA 20010629.

No. 04-0132/AR.  U.S. v. Troy S. QUALE.  CCA 20021118.

No. 04-0136/AR.  U.S. v. Jecixca CARVAJAL.  CCA 20020676.

No. 04-0141/AR.  U.S. v. Donald C. ELZY Jr.  CCA 20020700.

No. 04-0149/AR.  U.S. v. Kristy L. FARNSWORTH.  CCA 20010738.

No. 04-0151/AR.  U.S. v. Amanda L. SHELLBERG.  CCA 20021161.

No. 04-0152/AF.  U.S. v. Chadd C. COLLIER.  CCA S30358.

No. 04-0161/AR.  U.S. v. Tresa R. CAROLINA.  CCA 20020585.

No. 04-0164/AR.  U.S. v. Scottie B. ROBINSON.  CCA 20030171.

No. 04-0180/AR.  U.S. v. Orlando D. EDIE.  CCA 20030473.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 04-0257/AF.  U.S. v. Scott M. ELLERBROEK.  CCA S30318.

No. 04-0258/AF.  U.S. v. Chivonn N. ANDERSON.  CCA 35514.

No. 04-0259/AF.  U.S. v. Kiel G. RUSO.  CCA S30377.

No. 04-0260/AF.  U.S. v. Mason A. STAPLEY.  CCA 35097.

No. 04-0261/AF.  U.S. v. Michael C. BUTLER.  CCA 35472.

No. 04-0262/AF.  U.S. v. Anthony A. DEHOFF.  CCA S30186.

No. 04-0263/AF.  U.S. v. James D. MALONEY.  CCA S30150.

No. 04-0264/AR.  U.S. v. Michael B. HAYS.  CCA 20001100.

No. 04-0265/AR.  U.S. v. Kimberly D. LOUDEN.  CCA 20011108.

No. 04-5002/AF.  U.S. v. Mario L. CARTER.  CCA 35027.*/

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 04-8008/NA.  United States, Appellee, v. Rodrigo P. GONZALES, Appellant.  CCA 200302053.  Writ-appeal petition denied without prejudice to Appellant's right to raise the issue during the course of normal appellate review.

 

Misc. No. 04-8010/NA.  United States, Appellee, v. Jahmal R. CLARK, Appellant.  CCA 200300254.  Writ-appeal petition denied without prejudice to Appellant's right to raise the issue during the course of normal appellate review.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 04-8011/AR.  United States, Appellee, v. Armand ANDREOZZI, Appellant.  CCA 20030440.  Writ-appeal petition for review of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals decision on application for extraordinary relief was filed under Rule 27(b) on January 20, 2004, and placed on the docket this date.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 04-0198/AR.  U.S. v. Dawn M. YOUNGBLOOD.  CCA 20030012. Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review out of time granted to February 17, 2004.

 

No. 04-0208/AR.  U.S. v. Keith L. WILLIAMS, Jr.  CCA 20020327.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to February 23, 2004.

 

__________

 

*/  Cross-petition filed in same case.

 


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-072

Thursday, January 22, 2004

 

HEARINGS

 

No. 03-0151/MC.  U.S. v. Fernando GARCIA.  CCA 9901513.

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 03-0515/NA.  U.S. v. Thomas J. SCHNABLE.  CCA 9900852.  Review granted on the following issue specified by the Court:

 

WHETHER THE LOWER COURT'S VERBATIM REPLICATION OF SUBSTANTIAL PORTIONS OF THE GOVERNMENT'S ANSWER BRIEF AS THAT COURT'S OPINION CONSTITUTES AN ABUSE OF DISCRETION, NEGATES ANY APPEARANCE OF JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY AND SUBSTANTIALLY UNDERMINES THE INTEGRITY OF THE OPINION.

 

MANDATES ISSUED

 

No. 02-0937/AR.  U.S. v. Wayne M. PARKER.  CCA 9600945.




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-071

Wednesday, January 21, 2004

 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 02-0100/AF.  U.S. v. Raymond B. HARRISON.  CCA 34172.  On consideration of Appellant’s motion for leave to file petition for reconsideration out of time and petition for reconsideration out of time and in light of this Court's decision in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450 (C.A.A.F. 2003), it is ordered that Appellant's motion for leave to file petition for reconsideration out of time and petition for reconsideration out of time are granted; that the order of the Court dated February 26, 2002, is hereby vacated; and that review is granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER THE STATUTORY LANGUAGE OF 18 U.S.C. 2252A IS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY OVERBROAD ON ITS FACE AND AS APPLIED TO APPELLANT.

 
That the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed and the findings of guilty and the sentence are set aside.  The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for further action consistent with this Court's decision in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450 (C.A.A.F. 2003).  A rehearing may be ordered.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION and INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS this date.]

 

CRAWFORD, Chief Judge (dissenting):  I dissent for the reasons set forth in Sections A and B of my separate opinion in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450, 455-457 (C.A.A.F. 2003) (Crawford, C.J., dissenting).

 

No. 02-0257/AF.  U.S. v. James E. STOOPS.  CCA 34491.  On consideration of Appellant's petition for reconsideration of the order denying review and in light of this Court's decision in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450 (C.A.A.F. 2003), it is ordered that Appellant's petition for reconsideration of the order denying review is granted; that the order of the Court dated April 12, 2002, is hereby vacated; and that review is granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER APPELLANT'S GUILTY PLEA MUST BE SET ASIDE BECAUSE HIS PLEA WAS EXPRESSLY CONTINGENT ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE DEFINITION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY CONTAINED IN 18 U.S.C. 2256(8) WOULD BE UPHELD.

 

That the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed and the finding of guilty and the sentence are set aside.  The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for further action consistent with this Court's decision in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450 (C.A.A.F. 2003).  A rehearing may be ordered.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION this date.]

 

CRAWFORD, Chief Judge (dissenting):  I dissent for the reasons set forth in Section B of my separate opinion in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450, 456 (C.A.A.F. 2003) (Crawford, C.J., dissenting).

 

No. 02-0304/AR.  U.S. v. Jason L. MATHEWS.  CCA 20000136.  On consideration of Appellant's petition for grant of review and in light of this Court’s decision in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450 (C.A.A.F. 2003), it is ordered that the petition is granted on the following issue:

 

WHETHER APPELLANT'S PLEA OF GUILTY TO POSSESSION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY UNDER THE CHILD PORNOGRAPHY PREVENTION ACT MAY STAND WHEN THE MILITARY JUDGE'S DEFINITION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY INCLUDED COMPUTER-GENERATED IMAGES, A DEFINITION THAT THE SUPREME COURT FOUND UNCONSTITUTIONAL.  ASHCROFT v. FREE SPEECH COALITION, 535 U.S. 234 (2002).

 

     That the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed and the finding of guilty and the sentence are set aside.  The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for further action consistent with this Court's decision in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450 (C.A.A.F. 2003).  A rehearing may be ordered.  [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

 

CRAWFORD, Chief Judge (dissenting):  I dissent for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450, 455 (C.A.A.F. 2003) (Crawford, C.J., dissenting).

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 02-0304/AR.  U.S. v. Jason L. MATHEWS.  CCA 20000136.  [See also APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

No. 03-0620/AR.  U.S. v. William T. LUNDY.  CCA 2000069.  Review granted on the following issue raised by appellate defense counsel:

 

I.   WHETHER THE ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS, HAVING FOUND THAT THE CONVENING AUTHORITY DID NOT OR COULD NOT WAIVE FORFEITURES AT THE E-6 RATE AS PROVIDED IN THE PRETRIAL AGREEMENT, ERRED WHEN IT HELD THAT BECAUSE HIS FAMILY RECEIVED PAYMENTS UNDER THE TRANSITIONAL COMPENSATION PROGRAM, 10 U.S.C. 1059, HIS PLEAS WERE NOT IMPROVIDENT.

 

And the following issue specified by the Court:

 

II.  WHETHER TRIAL DEFENSE COUNSEL PROVIDED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL BY FAILING TO ADVISE APPELLANT OF THE LEGAL CONSTRAINTS ON THE POWER OF THE CONVENING AUTHORITY TO WAIVE FORFEITURES AT THE E-6 RATE AS PROVIDED IN THE PRETRIAL AGREEMENT.

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION

 

No. 02-0100/AF.  U.S. v. Raymond B. HARRISON.  CCA 34172.  [See also APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS and INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS this date.]

 

No. 02-0257/AF.  U.S. v. James E. STOOPS.  CCA 34491.  [See also APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS this date.]

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

 

No. 04-0089/NA.  U.S. v. Mark S. SARASUA.  CCA 200100723.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 04-0255/NA.  U.S. v. Russell E. HARRIS.  CCA 99-1587.

No. 04-0256/MC.  U.S. v. Juan D. PASTOR.  CCA 200200142.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 02-0100/AF.  U.S. v. Raymond B. HARRISON.  CCA 34172.  [See also APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS and ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION this date.]

 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-070

Tuesday, January 20, 2004


 

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

No. 02-0617/AR.  U.S. v. Martin C. DUNCAN.  CCA 20010182.  On consideration of the issue granted review by this Court on December 31, 2002, and in light of this Court's decision in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450 (C.A.A.F. 2003), it is ordered that the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed and the findings of guilty and the sentence are set aside.  The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for further action consistent with this Court's decision in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450 (C.A.A.F. 2003).  A rehearing may be ordered.

 

CRAWFORD, Chief Judge (dissenting):  I dissent for the reasons set forth in Sections A and B of my separate opinion in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450, 455-457 (C.A.A.F. 2003) (Crawford, C.J., dissenting).

 

No. 03-0071/AF.  U.S. v. Joseph W. LEE.  CCA S29894.  On consideration of the issue granted review by this Court on January 24, 2003, and in light of this Court's decision in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450 (C.A.A.F. 2003), it is ordered that the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed and the finding of guilty and the sentence are set aside.  The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for further action consistent with this Court's decision in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450 (C.A.A.F. 2003).  A rehearing may be ordered.

 

CRAWFORD, Chief Judge (dissenting):  I dissent for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v. Thompson, 57 M.J. 319 (C.A.A.F. 2002) (Crawford, C.J., dissenting), and Section A of my separate opinion in United States v. O'Connor, 58 M.J. 450, 455 (C.A.A.F. 2003) (Crawford, C.J., dissenting).

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 03-0389/NA.  U.S. v. Alvin N. CUENTO.  CCA 200100281.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

I.   WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY FAILING TO ORDER A DUBAY HEARING TO ASSIST IT IN DETERMINING WHETHER THE PETITION FOR A NEW TRIAL SHOULD BE GRANTED AND A NEW TRIAL ORDERED WHERE THE TRIAL WAS A SWEARING CONTEST BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND THE COMPLAINING WITNESS RECANTED HER ALLEGATIONS ON FOUR OCCASIONS AFTER APPELLANT WAS TRIED.

   

II.  WHETHER APPELLANT'S CONFESSION WAS INVOLUNTARY WHEN THE GOVERNMENT OBTAINED THE CONFESSION AFTER INFORMING APPELLANT THAT HE WOULD NOT BE REUNITED WITH HIS CHILDREN UNLESS HE ADMITTED THAT HE HAD SEXUALLY MOLESTED HIS DAUGHTER, AND WHERE APPELLANT CONFESSED WITHIN DAYS OF A GOVERNMENT IMPOSED DEADLINE FOR ADMITTING HIS GUILT AFTER MAINTAINING HIS INNOCENCE FOR EIGHTEEN MONTHS.

 

III. WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION WHEN IT REFUSED TO CONDUCT A PLAIN ERROR ANALYSIS AND FOUND THAT ANY POTENTIAL ERROR WAS HARMLESS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT WHERE THE GOVERNMENT VIOLATED APPELLANT'S SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO CONSULT WITH COUNSEL BY ELICITING TESTIMONY THAT APPELLANT RECANTED HIS ADMISSION ONLY AFTER CONSULTING WITH AN ATTORNEY AND BY ARGUING TO THE MEMBERS THAT APPELLANT'S RECANTATION WAS FALSE BECAUSE IT WAS MOTIVATED BY APPELLANT'S CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY.

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 04-0254/CG.  U.S. v. David D. RENDON.  CCA 1168.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

 

Misc. No. 04-8003/NA.  United States, Appellee, v. Justin M. LEWIS, Appellant.  CCA 200200089.  Writ-appeal petition denied without prejudice to Appellant's right to raise the issue during the course of normal appellate review.

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 04-0206/AR.  U.S. v. Anthony R. RUDD, Sr.  CCA 20000886.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to February 20, 2004.

 


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 04-069

Friday, January 16, 2004

 

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

 

No. 03-0246/AR.  U.S. v. Bobby D. SEAY II.  CCA 9900779.  Review granted on the following issues:

 

I.   WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION IN NOT SUPPRESSING APPELLANT'S PRETRIAL STATEMENTS TO ARMY INVESTIGATORS.

 

II.  IF APPELLANT'S PRETRIAL STATEMENTS SHOULD HAVE BEEN SUPPRESSED (ISSUE I), WHETHER THE REMAINING EVIDENCE IS LEGALLY SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT FINDINGS OF GUILTY TO ALL CHARGES AND SPECIFICATIONS.

 

III. WHETHER PORTIONS OF APPELLANT'S STATEMENTS TO ARMY INVESTIGATORS WERE UNCORROBORATED, AND, IF SO, WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRONEOUSLY PERMITTED THE PANEL MEMBERS TO CONSIDER THE PERTINENT PORTIONS OF APPELLANT'S STATEMENTS REGARDING THE CHARGE OF LARCENY.

 

IV.  WHETHER THE EVIDENCE IS LEGALLY SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT A FINDING OF GUILTY TO THE CHARGE THAT APPELLANT STOLE PFC [C]'S WALLET.

 

V.   WHETHER THE EVIDENCE IS LEGALLY SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT A FINDING TO THE CHARGE THAT APPELLANT KIDNAPPED PFC [C].

 

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 01-0738/AF.  U.S. v. Amanda L. GILBREATH.  CCA 34091.*/

No. 04-0238/AF.  U.S. v. John C. HARRIS.  CCA 34918.  [See

        also PETITIONS FOR NEW TRIAL - FILINGS this date.]

No. 04-0253/AR.  U.S. v. William R. RICKARD.  CCA 20030368.

 

PETITIONS FOR NEW TRIAL - FILINGS

 

No. 04-0238/AF.  U.S. v. John C. HARRIS.  CCA 34918.  [See also PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED this date.]

__________

 

*/  Second petition filed in this case.



 

 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY JOURNAL

No. 068

Thursday, January 15, 2004


PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

 

No. 04-0252/AR.  U.S. v. Michael E. BODKINS.  CCA 20010107.

 

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

 

Misc. No. 04-8010/NA.  United States, Appellee, v. Jahmal R. CLARK, Appellant.  CCA 200300254.  Writ-appeal petition for review of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals decision on application for extraordinary relief was filed under Rule 27(b).

 

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

 

No. 04-0185/AF.  U.S. v. Trevor L. NELSON.  CCA 35083.  Motion filed by Major Andrea M. Gormel for leave to withdraw as counsel for Appellant granted.

 

No. 04-0191/AR.  U.S. v. Mark G. SARAZINE.  CCA 20020321.  Appellant's motion to extend time to file supplement to petition for grant of review granted to January 28, 2004.


 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES