United
States v. Scott, 66 M.J. 1 (the
convening authority is presumed to know the difference between
clemency materials and evidence adduced at trial).
United
States v. Lee, 50 MJ 296 (even though appellant’s
offenses
predated the effective date of Article 58b, thus not being subject to
automatic
forfeiture, the convening authority still had the power to remit or
suspend any
or all of the adjudged forfeitures as a matter of clemency).