MILITARY JUSTICE PERSONNEL: Defense Function: Individual Military Counsel                    


2000

United States v. Spriggs, 52 MJ 235 (case contains detailed discussion of the right to individual military counsel, including:  the source of the right; standards and limitations applicable to requests for individual military counsel; assessing claimed prior attorney-client relationships and the limitations on severing such relationships; and burdens applicable to requests for individual military counsel and motions for individual military counsel).

(in support of motion for individual military counsel, accused failed to establish an attorney-client relationship that would be protected under the “good cause” limitations on severance where:  (1) the record did not demonstrate that attorney agreed to enter an attorney-client relationship with accused; (2) accused’s responses to the military judge revealed that accused understood that there was no agreement to enter into an attorney-client relationship; and, (3) the record did not reveal that the attorney engaged in any substantive activity for accused beyond discussing some of the pending charges and the possibility of representation).

(if a civilian attorney happens to be a reservist, that person’s availability as individual military counsel must be determined on the basis of activities undertaken in his or her military status, not on the basis of attorney-client relationships developed in civilian practice).

(record contained ample basis for denying individual military counsel request under the good-cause standard where:  (1) the judge advocate was routinely separated from active duty; (2) the attorney did not agree to represent the accused in his civilian capacity or in his capacity as a reservist; (3) a 15-day involuntary call to active duty would have been inadequate time for the attorney to investigate, prepare, and try a general court-martial; (4) the accused failed to show that an attorney-client relationship was established in the context of the attorney’s military assignment; and, (5) the accused failed to show that the attorney accomplished substantial trial preparation while in his military assignment).

(absent government misconduct, the routine separation of a judge advocate from active duty normally terminates any attorney-client relationship established on the basis of the attorney’s military status, except when:  (1) the attorney agrees to represent the client in his or her civilian capacity; or (2) the attorney enters the reserves and is ordered to represent the client to the extent permitted by applicable law based upon a determination by the appropriate official of reasonable availability).



Home Page |  Opinions & Digest  |  Daily Journal  |  Scheduled Hearings  |  Search Site