450
E Street, Northwest
SCHEDULED HEARINGS
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
(Appellee)
(Appellant)
Counsel
for Appellant: Capt
Eugene Ham,
Counsel
for Appellee: Capt
Case
Summary: GCM
conviction of larceny, forgery and false
official statement. Granted
issue questions whether the military judge erred by
admitting into evidence, under Mil. R. Evid. 803
(6)
and 807, and over defense objection, the affidavit of Sergeant J. P.
who did
not appear at trial in contravention of the Mil. R. Evid. and Crawford v.
(Appellee) (Appellant)
Counsel for Appellant: LT Brian L. Mizer, JAGC, USN
Counsel for Appellee: Capt Roger E. Mattioli, USMC
Case Summary: SPCM conviction of disrespect toward, and disobedience of an NCO and violating a general order. Granted issue questions whether the military judge failed to adhere to the liberal grant mandate when he denied a defense challenge for cause against Chief Warrant Officer W, who served as acting legal officer to the convening authority in Appellant’s case.
NOTE: Counsel for each side will be allotted 15 minutes to present oral argument in this case.
Followed by:
(Appellee) (Appellant)
Counsel for Appellant: LT Richard H. McWilliams, JAGC, USNR
Counsel for Appellee: Capt Roger E. Mattioli, USMC
Case Summary: SPCM conviction of making a false official statement, larceny and obstruction of justice. Granted issues question: (I) whether Appellant is entitled to financial compensation or other relief under Article 58b (c) or otherwise as a result of the remission of the adjudged bad-conduct discharge by the convening authority, and if so, the duration and amount of such compensation or other relief; and (II) whether Appellant is entitled to financial compensation or other relief under Article 58b (c) or otherwise as a result of the decision of the Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals to approve a sentence that did not include a bad-conduct discharge, and if so: (1) the duration and amount of such compensation or other relief; and (2) whether such compensation or other relief was in addition to any compensation or other relief to which Appellant was entitled under the first granted issue.
NOTE: Counsel for each side will be allotted 15 minutes to present oral argument in this case.